PDA

View Full Version : Sharpe out


Fritz
07-08-2003, 03:10 PM
There is an artilce on ESPN about the network picking up Michael Irvin. What it does not mention is that this he is taking Sterling Sharpe's slot.


--------
ESPN thinks Sharpe isn't sterling anymore

Sterling Sharpe has been cut.

ESPN has declined to renew its contract with the former Green Bay Packers receiver, who had served as a National Football League studio analyst on "Sunday NFL Countdown" and "Monday Night Countdown" since his 1995 retirement.

The network announced earlier this week that it had hired Michael Irvin as a studio analyst. According to an ESPN news release, Irvin "will join veteran host Chris Berman, Tom Jackson and Steve Young on the main set of 'Sunday NFL Countdown.' "

The release, which said Irvin would join "Monday Night Countdown" starting July 28, makes no reference to Sharpe's dismissal.

Sharpe could not be reached for comment. The telephone listed for his business office in Columbia, S.C., has been disconnected.

A reporter's call to the office of Mark Shapiro, ESPN's executive vice president for programming and production, was directed to the ESPN communications department.

Keri Potts, a spokeswoman for ESPN, said Thursday that Irvin was replacing Sharpe on "Countdown."

"He did a great job for us," Potts said, referring to Sharpe. "We think he has a great future. It's just that we are very excited about Michael."

Last season, "Sunday NFL Countdown" included Bill Parcells, who departed to coach the Dallas Cowboys. He was "Countdown's" best analyst.

The departure of Sharpe and the addition of Irving mark more changes for the show, which has undergone other changes in set and format the last few years.

"Michael brings fresh perspective to an already informed, veteran cast," Bob Rauscher, ESPN's senior coordinating producer, said in a prepared statement.

Irvin's contract with "Best Damn Sports Show Period" was up and he was looking for another venue, and the opportunity for "Countdown" came along.

Said Shapiro in the release, referring to Irvin, "He brings solid credentials: closeness to the game, an engaging personality and television experience."

As an analyst, Sharpe was a high-volume talker, which is to say he could shout for impressively long periods of time. When his turn came, he could give you wall-to-wall words, but those words didn't always contain impressive insight, unvarnished opinion and a willingness to take shots at players and coaches.

Sharpe always sounded better than what was delivered.

Last year, one of the changes to the show involved building in a more free-flowing discussion between the participants, more improvisational give and take, and Sharpe did not seem to flourish in that setting. At times, he seemed to be miffed by some disagreements.

Sharpe can be uncooperative, and that might not be viewed as a positive quality in a company that wants its talent to be made available across a variety of media: TV, radio, Internet and a magazine.

At one point, ABC's "Monday Night Football" was interested in talking to Sharpe about an analyst's role on that broadcast, a role eventually given to Dennis Miller, but Sharpe didn't return phone calls to executives about the matter.

All or some or none of that might have been in Shapiro's mind when he let Sharpe go.

In any case, Shapiro and Rauscher made the judgment that "Countdown" would be better off with Irvin and without Sharpe.

Sharpe could re-emerge with a role on one of the other networks with NFL inventory. Fox's and CBS' main studio shows are set, however, leaving HBO or the fledgling NFL Netw

http://www.jsonline.com/packer/news/jul03/152612.asp

damnMikeBrown
07-08-2003, 03:13 PM
I'd seen that a few days ago. While I was never married to any pre-game shows, there are ones I won't watch. The unwatchables are the shows that have either Michael Irvin or Deon Sanders as commentators.

This decision is absolutely ridiculous. It'd be one thing if it was the mouthier of the Sharpe brothers, but I actually enjoyed Sterling. I took note of him, and remembered him as being one of the x-jocks that I not only could tolerate, but somewhat enjoyed watching.

I guess that Bristol will be putting out job apps for more hookers & drug dealers with Mike in town. Man, I hate that guy.

Hammer755
07-08-2003, 03:13 PM
Out with the bad...

in with the much much worse.

Fritz
07-08-2003, 03:18 PM
I liked the chemisty on the ESPN set before last season. Sharpe's joking around seemed to loosen the place up.

Kodos
07-08-2003, 03:20 PM
This is definitely a downgrade.

JeeberD
07-08-2003, 03:24 PM
I agree. I always enjoyed watching Sterling and Berman interact.

Even this Cowboys fan doesn't want to see Irvin on ESPN...

Craptacular
07-08-2003, 03:26 PM
Maybe Sterling can come out of retirement and play WR for the Pack again. I wonder how that neck is feeling?

Craptacular
07-08-2003, 03:26 PM
Oh yeah, Michael Irvin's a lemonass.

scooper
07-08-2003, 03:29 PM
Originally posted by Craptacular
Oh yeah, Michael Irvin's a lemonass.

Lemonass. That's one I haven't heard. When life gives you lemons.....

Subby
07-08-2003, 03:36 PM
Originally posted by Hammer755
Out with the bad...

in with the much much worse. I couldn't agree more.

At least it is still better than CBS...

ISiddiqui
07-08-2003, 03:44 PM
Can't have two WRs on one analyst team, eh? ;)

Maybe Sharpe wanted more money or something?

QuikSand
07-08-2003, 03:59 PM
Hammer... pardon the obvious pun...hit it on the head, as far as I'm concerned.

tucker342
07-08-2003, 04:21 PM
Terrible move, I thought that last years group was great... now they're bringing in a crack head Cowboys player, big mistake...

markprior22
07-08-2003, 04:24 PM
I thought Sharpe did ok. I am a Cowboys fan and hate to see Irvin on this show. That's almost as big of a hypocrisy as Marion Barry (sp).

Kodos
07-08-2003, 04:26 PM
I don't want it to turn into the Best Damn Pregame Show Period.

Ksyrup
07-08-2003, 04:30 PM
Originally posted by Kodos
I don't want it to turn into the Best Damn Pregame Show Period.

Ain't that the truth.

Sharpe had gotten to be where he was acceptable because he had turned himself into a caricature, but not an annoying one (IMO). He used his arrogance as part of his persona, and I thought it worked well or, at least, was harmless.

Michael Irvin is awful. He's one step above Deion, as far as I'm concerned. I wonder if, when he makes a prediction that comes to fruition, he'll stand up and pound his chest in the same moronic way he used to do as a player.

Passacaglia
07-08-2003, 04:30 PM
Yeah, seriously, these shows are usually so bad as it is. Mostly if I'm ever watching them, it's just in anticipation of REAL football to come. It wouldn't be so bad if they weren't SOO fluffy, and ESPN was the least fluffy. But wait, NFL Primetime (the show I usually watch to get my fantasy football results) is just Berman and Jackson, right? So that might not be so bad.

Swaggs
07-08-2003, 05:20 PM
I enjoyed Sterling. He had enthusiasm for the game and was very well spoken, but was not obnoxious about it.

Irvin should be in prison.

TroyF
07-08-2003, 07:34 PM
Hammer,

You win the prize for best post in this thread.

Unbelievable. They put him on NFL Edge, I'll throw myself off a cliff.

TroyF

B & B
07-08-2003, 11:36 PM
Agree with Swaggs, this is not a good move.

Irwin's lack of professionalism now has a greater audience.

thesloppy
07-09-2003, 12:15 AM
Free haircuts for everyone!!!

Now, where did I put my special stabbin' scissors?

Draft Dodger
07-09-2003, 12:29 AM
I just read this thread.

never in a million years could I see E$PN doing this.

JeeberD
07-09-2003, 12:29 AM
I just hope that he gets to wear his fur coats on set... :rolleyes:

Hammer755
07-09-2003, 08:35 AM
Originally posted by B & B
Irwin's lack of professionalism now has a greater audience.

No kidding, that guy's nuts.

http://www.pak1508.org/images/stevecroc.jpg

B & B
07-09-2003, 11:08 AM
Nice pickup on the typo. LOL

KWhit
07-09-2003, 11:42 AM
Sharpe was better than Berman (okay, that's not saying much). I actually liked him.

Bad move by ESPN.

cuervo72
07-09-2003, 11:58 AM
Were there personality issues between him and the other hosts? I can't imagine Irvin being good at all.

Samdari
07-09-2003, 12:55 PM
I can't believe that someone thinks Michael Irvin would improve any broadcast. He is simply the worst broadcaster I have ever heard not named Dickerson.

I just stopped watching NFL pregame altogether. The other shows are horrible as well.

Leonidas
07-09-2003, 02:53 PM
Now if they could only get Jerry Glanville...

Taur
07-09-2003, 10:58 PM
Any chance of a Fox/ESPN trade? It seems lately that ESPN is using FSN as a mior league system.

I would love to see Sharpe on TBDSSP. Irvin is in the class of Mohr, remember Mohr Sports? I would bet the farm that ESPN will "Send Irvin on Assignment" before the season ends.

CBS may also want to give Sharpe a look as their pre-game show took a hedder with their youth movement last year.

And, what is up with the many exits from TBDSSP.

Kodos
07-10-2003, 12:13 AM
I wish ESPN would trade Irvin for Marino.

Fritz
07-10-2003, 05:39 AM
Originally posted by Kodos
I wish ESPN would trade Irvin for Marino.

Poor Dan, stuck with CBS crew. Well, Jim Nance is okay.

Kodos
07-10-2003, 12:25 PM
Yeah, I like Jim Nance. But Boomer and Deion are unbearable. As much as I love Marino, I hardly ever watch that show. It's always ESPN for me for the pregame show.