PDA

View Full Version : Nipplegate is a federal case


Butter
02-05-2004, 02:55 PM
Tenn. Woman Files Suit over Super Bowl
Associated Press

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. - Terri Carlin wants to make Janet Jackson's bare breast into a federal case.

Carlin filed a proposed class action lawsuit in U.S. District Court Wednesday against Jackson, singer Justin Timberlake, broadcasters MTV and CBS and their parent company, Viacom.

Carlin alleges that she and others who watched the halftime show during Sunday's Super Bowl were injured by the performers' lewd actions when Timberlake ripped off part of Jackson's costume, exposing her breast.

In the lawsuit, Carlin charges that the exposure and "sexually explicit conduct" by other performers during the show injured viewers.

"As a direct and proximate result of the broadcast of the acts, (Carlin) and millions of others saw the acts and were caused to suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury," the lawsuit says.

But Carlin, who works in a bank, doesn't specify the type of injury allegedly suffered.

"All of the defendants knew that the Super Bowl, the pre-eminent sports event in the United States, would be watched by millions of families and children," says the lawsuit filed by Knoxville attorney Wayne A. Ritchie II. "Nevertheless, (they) included in the halftime show sexually explicit acts solely designed to garner publicity and, ultimately, to increase profits for themselves."

The lawsuit charges that the broadcast companies and the two singers violated an "implied" contract with viewers not to subject them to lewd actions.

"Families have an expectation that they can trust companies and individuals such as the defendants not to expose families to sexually explicit conduct during broadcasts of prime time events such as the Super Bowl," the lawsuit says.

Jackson has apologized for the incident, saying a red lace garment was supposed to remain over her breast when an outer garment was ripped away. She denied that the NFL, CBS, or MTV, which produced the halftime show for CBS, knew of her plans, and those entities all have condemned the performance.

The lawsuit says the broadcasters should have had a "sufficient broadcast delay" to censor the acts, even if they didn't know what Jackson and Timberlake planned to do on stage.

Carlin's lawsuit seeks billions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages.

The Afoci
02-05-2004, 02:56 PM
I am going to sue her for stupidity.

rkmsuf
02-05-2004, 02:58 PM
Anytime you can sue for punitive damages you are giving me I'm all for it...

JonInMiddleGA
02-05-2004, 02:58 PM
The lawsuit says the broadcasters should have had a "sufficient broadcast delay" to censor the acts, even if they didn't know what Jackson and Timberlake planned to do on stage.
Although I don't see this proposed suit going very far at all, it's spot-on in at least one detail.

Noop
02-05-2004, 03:00 PM
Please excuse my french but this is the reason(one of many) why America is going down the drain. I fucking hate stupid muthafucker who jusy want to sue for a quick buck cause they are to fat and lazy to work for a damn living. Fuck her!!!

yabanci
02-05-2004, 03:02 PM
I wonder if she'll sue herself after looking at her own breasts in the mirror.

sabotai
02-05-2004, 03:03 PM
I've said before that CBS should have done a time-delay...but to sue over it is retarded!

Carlin's lawsuit seeks billions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages.
Ah, now we know the real reason for sueing...

GrantDawg
02-05-2004, 03:05 PM
I've said before that CBS should have done a time-delay...but to sue over it is retarded!


Ah, now we know the real reason for sueing...
Was there ever a doubt?

Noop
02-05-2004, 03:06 PM
I have a question for the lawyers out there... could I be sued for breaking a girl's heart? Lets say she gains weight and blames my breaking her heart as the reason. That I cause emotional damage and all that other stuff.... Is that possible?

Coffee Warlord
02-05-2004, 03:08 PM
You can answer this yourself. Do you have lots of money? If yes, then the answer to your question is yes.

Chubby
02-05-2004, 03:08 PM
I've said before that CBS should have done a time-delay...but to sue over it is retarded!


Ah, now we know the real reason for sueing...


nooooooooooooooooo, she's suing cause it's the right thing to do :rolleyes:

Honolulu_Blue
02-05-2004, 03:09 PM
Outrage? Anger? Embrassment? Serious Injury?

I'll show Terri outrage.

Unbelievable.

cuervo72
02-05-2004, 03:12 PM
Somewhat ironic that the plaintiff's name is Carlin.

Honolulu_Blue
02-05-2004, 03:13 PM
Also, for the record. There. was. no. nipple. She was wearing some bizzaro Aztec pastie thing or something. We didn't see nipple. Just the bared breast around the nipple. Pretty much what you can see on any billboard, TV show, magazine rack, etc.

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 03:14 PM
I'm going to sue her because I have to read about her stupid lawsuit... its not my fault I'm too lazy to not look at article instead of just clicking away. Reading that has caused me great emotional distress as I lose faith in the country.

yabanci
02-05-2004, 03:14 PM
Obviously poor Mrs. Carlin hasn't heard of Rule 11.

The Afoci
02-05-2004, 03:19 PM
Also, for the record. There. was. no. nipple. She was wearing some bizzaro Aztec pastie thing or something. We didn't see nipple. Just the bared breast around the nipple. Pretty much what you can see on any billboard, TV show, magazine rack, etc.

There was nipple. The star was attached a bar that went directly through the nipple.

Castlerock
02-05-2004, 03:22 PM
Also, for the record. There. was. no. nipple. She was wearing some bizzaro Aztec pastie thing or something. We didn't see nipple. Just the bared breast around the nipple. Pretty much what you can see on any billboard, TV show, magazine rack, etc.

No nipple? [Warning: non-work-safe-nipple-link below]
hxxp://www.............com/jjt.jpg

This lawsuit is a stupid political stunt.

gstelmack
02-05-2004, 03:23 PM
Pretty much what you can see on any billboard, TV show, magazine rack, etc.
But most of those don't show a guy assaulting the woman right before the exposure. All those defending this act seem to blow off the entire performance except for this one second where the breast is shown.

The lawsuit is still stupid, though. This is an FCC/legal issue, not a civil one.

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 03:26 PM
No nipple? [Warning: non-work-safe-nipple-link below]
hxxp://www.drudgereport.com/jjt.jpg

This lawsuit is a stupid political stunt.
Yes, because thats the shot we all saw on live TVhttp://dynamic2.gamespy.com/%7Efof/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif

sabotai
02-05-2004, 03:26 PM
Was there ever a doubt?
No.

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 03:29 PM
But most of those don't show a guy assaulting the woman right before the exposure. All those defending this act seem to blow off the entire performance except for this one second where the breast is shown.

The lawsuit is still stupid, though. This is an FCC/legal issue, not a civil one.
Assault is generally considered an unwanted advance or something done to cause some kind of injury... nothing I saw says this was unwanted, unplanned or inteded to cause injury.

gstelmack
02-05-2004, 03:41 PM
Assault is generally considered an unwanted advance or something done to cause some kind of injury... nothing I saw says this was unwanted, unplanned or inteded to cause injury.
No, but it was intended to look unplanned. Note the look Janet is giving Justin in the pictures on CNN. Note that he reaches over and yanks on the costume. This was a simulated assault.

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 03:43 PM
If you're worried about seeing simulated assaults, don't watch TV at any time, because its always on... except maybe Barney.

Chubby
02-05-2004, 03:44 PM
No, but it was intended to look unplanned. Note the look Janet is giving Justin in the pictures on CNN. Note that he reaches over and yanks on the costume. This was a simulated assault.

a simulated assault? you're really reaching now.

gstelmack
02-05-2004, 03:45 PM
If you're worried about seeing simulated assaults, don't watch TV at any time, because its always on... except maybe Barney.
If I'm tuning in to a crime drama or something similar, then I expect it (and not until after 10). If I'm watching a Super Bowl halftime show, I don't. There's a time and a place for everything.

My point is that this particular halftime show went far beyond just showing a breast. But all the defenders focus on that one bit, telling the rest of us we're overreacting when they are ignoring the rest of the show.

gstelmack
02-05-2004, 03:47 PM
a simulated assault? you're really reaching now.
Are you saying that reaching over and yanking on an unsuspecting woman's shirt over her chest is not a violent act?

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 03:47 PM
And you ignore every other show on before 10 PM that has shown many different acts of "simulated assault."

gstelmack
02-05-2004, 03:50 PM
And you ignore every other show on before 10 PM that has shown many different acts of "simulated assault."
How many of those shows are advertised as family entertainment?

sabotai
02-05-2004, 03:51 PM
Here we go again....

panerd
02-05-2004, 03:53 PM
Could I please have the 30 seconds of my life back that I spent reading Gstelmak's posts?

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 03:54 PM
How many of those shows are advertised as family entertainment? How many of every other... I'd say almost all of them are "family" shows... and speaking of simulated assault, did you watch the Super Bowl? Thats not even "simulated" assault.

The Afoci
02-05-2004, 03:54 PM
How many of those shows are advertised as family entertainment?

Lion King has murder in it. Last I check Disney did mainly family entertainment.

gstelmack
02-05-2004, 03:54 PM
Here we go again....
Not for long ... my build's done so I have to test my code now :D

Chubby
02-05-2004, 03:54 PM
How many of those shows are advertised as family entertainment?

Don't watch transformers, GI Joe, DBZ or any of a host of other shows that are family entertainment yet include "simulated assault". Don't flip on my channel with movies on <gasp> SIMULATED MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 03:55 PM
Lion King has murder in it. Last I check Disney did mainly family entertainment. They also have nudity :)

edit: not the Lion King, but watch the Avengers (I think, something about flying rodents.)

Chubby
02-05-2004, 03:56 PM
They also have nudity :)

edit: not the Lion King, but watch the Avengers (I think, something about flying rodents.)

The mouse one? The pulled those.
Lion King spells out sex in the clouds!

The Afoci
02-05-2004, 03:57 PM
I believe it was actually SFX or something like that. The initials of one of the animators or something...

Chubby
02-05-2004, 03:59 PM
I believe it was actually SFX or something like that. The initials of one of the animators or something...

no way man, it says SEX. and it chants "paul is dead"...

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 04:01 PM
Aladdin has a penis in it.

Easy Mac
02-05-2004, 04:01 PM
dola,

Yeah thats right TheLionKing, we're talking shit about you.

wig
02-05-2004, 04:04 PM
I'm still pissed you beat me in the WigBowl, gstelmack.

:(

Noop
02-05-2004, 04:06 PM
You can answer this yourself. Do you have lots of money? If yes, then the answer to your question is yes.
I guess she has a legit lawsuit against me....hmmm I so in her direction. *Spits*

sterlingice
02-05-2004, 04:12 PM
Somewhat ironic that the plaintiff's name is Carlin.
That was my first thought, too. :)

SI

Fonzie
02-05-2004, 04:19 PM
If you're worried about seeing simulated assaults, don't watch TV at any time, because its always on... except maybe Barney.

Who, ironically, is the one TV character most in need of an assault.