View Full Version : On topic -- What's the biggest "decade"?
Passacaglia
06-02-2004, 11:10 AM
Just an attempt to provoke some discussion.
Let's say you're looking to sign a player for your FOF franchise. There are 11 players, one for each rating that ends in 0 (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100).
Where, is the biggest difference between two "adjacent" players?
Suicane75
06-02-2004, 11:15 AM
ummm, what? I may still be hung over from Memorial day but A) I'm not sure what you're asking and B) 1-9 don't end in 0
Huckleberry
06-02-2004, 11:18 AM
He's asking what the biggest ability jump is for each level of 10 in the FOF ratings.
I'll go with 30-40 and 60-70.
albionmoonlight
06-02-2004, 11:25 AM
50-60 or 60-70 would be my picks
wbatl1
06-02-2004, 11:26 AM
60-70
A 60 guy is a fine player, but a 70 is a star
Suicane75
06-02-2004, 11:28 AM
70-80 A 70 guy is real good, an 89 player is a friggin stud.
Did I do this right?
sabotai
06-02-2004, 02:45 PM
I think I go with 60-70, with 70-80 being second.
Huckleberry
06-02-2004, 02:49 PM
So who's going to setup a player file with 1 team full of players rated 0, one 10, one 20, etc., through 100? Then we would need to sim games between adjacent squads repeatedly until we felt confident that our average final score was stable.
I volunteer someone else.
TroyF
06-02-2004, 03:08 PM
and I second that nomination.
Someone else it is.
Can't wait for some poor guy to use that for a screen name now.
Maple Leafs
06-02-2004, 03:35 PM
So who's going to setup a player file with 1 team full of players rated 0...Go to the Team Select screen and click "Arizona"...
Huckleberry
06-02-2004, 03:54 PM
Welcome back, Troy.
vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.