View Full Version : life really isn't fair is it
rufusjonz
09-16-2004, 03:01 PM
Buh-bye. I don't think you've "contributed" anything but semi-nude pictures since you got here.
oliegirl
09-16-2004, 03:02 PM
I'd hit it
(not really, but I wanted to beat all the guys to saying it!!!) :)
rkmsuf
09-16-2004, 03:02 PM
Heard that yesterday. They were busting on the guy.
mckerney
09-16-2004, 03:02 PM
If she's dating someone else what hope does that give us :confused:
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 03:02 PM
I love her work in the soft-core porn industry...
sachmo71
09-16-2004, 03:02 PM
I wish you looked like the one on the right Rufus. Then it could be me and Mrs. Jonz.
rufusjonz
09-16-2004, 03:02 PM
yeah she's from the beer commercial wrestling a girl in the water
rufusjonz
09-16-2004, 03:03 PM
wtf man that wasnt even close to risque
rkmsuf
09-16-2004, 03:04 PM
yeah she's from the beer commercial wrestling a girl in the water
nice edit Freud.
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 03:04 PM
yeah she's from the beer commercial wrestling a guy
No, she wrestled the chick in the commercial. She's done quite a few Skin-imax type flicks, though... :)
Chubby
09-16-2004, 03:04 PM
wow, evidentally wearing a dress now equals semi-nude...
I fail to see what was wrong with that pic.
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 03:05 PM
Agreed. Kinda harsh on this one, SD...
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 03:06 PM
wtf man that wasnt even close to risqueWhen all it seems I've ever seen you post are pictures of chicks, you get very little latitude.
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 03:06 PM
Agreed. Kinda harsh on this one, SD...I know it is, but I've warned him multiple times that this isn't a friggin' fraternity house.
sachmo71
09-16-2004, 03:06 PM
Skydog. Dictator. Sometimes.
albionmoonlight
09-16-2004, 03:07 PM
I got to see it before you deleted it, SkyDog. It offended my sense of moral values. I beleive that you were grossly neglegent in not protecting me by acting quicker.
Expect my lawsuit for 8.3 billion dollars in emotional damages to be filed shortly.
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 03:07 PM
I missed it!!!! I've never seen a woman before..I wannna seeeeeeeeeeeee!@!!!!
rkmsuf
09-16-2004, 03:08 PM
The title of this thread is becoming quite prophetic.
Raven Hawk
09-16-2004, 03:08 PM
I know it is, but I've warned him multiple times that this isn't a friggin' fraternity house.
So I learned the secret handshake for nothing?
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 03:09 PM
So I learned the secret handshake for nothing?:p
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 03:10 PM
I know it is, but I've warned him multiple times that this isn't a friggin' fraternity house.
We are gonna TP your office later tonight!!!
So I learned the secret handshake for nothing?
That wasn't Ben's hand.
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 03:10 PM
I fell the worst for Sach. What's he gonna do without his lover around?
Chubby
09-16-2004, 03:10 PM
quick, someone else with more posts find the same picture and post it since there was nothing wrong with the pic and evidentally the whole reason it was removed was because it wasn't one of someone's "buddies"
rkmsuf
09-16-2004, 03:11 PM
and it begins
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 03:13 PM
**pulls up a seat and gets some popcorn**
sachmo71
09-16-2004, 03:14 PM
me and rufusjonz?
RUFUSJONZ!!!! YOU SHALL BE AVENGED!!
samifan24
09-16-2004, 03:15 PM
It's like we're part of a crowd after the cops came and broke something up. This could get interesting...
rkmsuf
09-16-2004, 03:15 PM
I place the blame for all of this on Kitana Baker. Men are stupid and weak.
rkmsuf
09-16-2004, 03:16 PM
It's like we're part of a crowd after the cops came and broke something up. This could get interesting...
Maybe we'll get some looting in.
I have to leave in 5 minutes. Can you guys pause the board until I get back?
Thanks
Raven Hawk
09-16-2004, 03:16 PM
I blame Jon Kitna
MikeVic
09-16-2004, 03:18 PM
Nothing better happen until I get home this evening!
MikeVic
09-16-2004, 03:19 PM
I blame Jon Kitna
I second that.
Sun Tzu
09-16-2004, 03:22 PM
I missed something...something big. What happened?
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 03:28 PM
I wonder if it would be safe to post an hxxp-ed link to the pic for the latecomers?
Chubby
09-16-2004, 03:29 PM
I wonder if it would be safe to post an hxxp-ed link to the pic for the latecomers?
You can, I think you have enough posts to make it ok :D
rkmsuf
09-16-2004, 03:30 PM
I wonder if it would be safe to post an hxxp-ed link to the pic for the latecomers?
Don't mess with the bull young man, you'll get the horns.
Desnudo
09-16-2004, 03:31 PM
Or you could post a link to a site with a link to the deleted link.
albionmoonlight
09-16-2004, 03:33 PM
Or you could put the picture in the strategy forum. No one would think to look for it there.
DaddyTorgo
09-16-2004, 03:39 PM
Or you could put the picture in the strategy forum. No one would think to look for it there.
lol. ssssh albion, you'll give away the biggest secret of the strategy forum. We only post pics there b/c SD never goes!!
samifan24
09-16-2004, 03:57 PM
I wonder if it would be safe to post an hxxp-ed link to the pic for the latecomers?
Why would you want to do that?
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 03:59 PM
So that they would know what's going on. It's not like he posted anything all that bad...
Chubby
09-16-2004, 04:07 PM
And he was banned for posting that picture? LOLOL
ice4277
09-16-2004, 04:07 PM
Censorship-walking the fine line ;)
Sticker this
Censor this
Ban this
We've got something to say!
Release this
Condemn this
Damn this
We'll be heard anyway!
Middle finger is the flag that I wave when I'm silenced!
You, sir, do not have enough posts to do anything but toe the company line around here ;)
Sun Tzu
09-16-2004, 04:08 PM
Ok, well at least tell me who was banned.
ice4277
09-16-2004, 04:08 PM
And he was banned for posting that picture? LOLOL
dola
Actually, he wasn't banned after the picture was taken off, so methinks something else may have happened.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 04:09 PM
Ok, well at least tell me who was banned.
rufus was, he who started this thread and posted a pic of a chick wearing a dress standing next to her boyfriend.
ice - that means nothing, skydog has admitted he's lazy and prob just didn't get around to it.
Keep in mind, he's "banned" not "in the penalty box".
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 04:09 PM
No, that pic got him banned. SD just took the pic down before banning him.
FYI, he's been in the Penalty Box before for posting much racier pics...
Sun Tzu
09-16-2004, 04:11 PM
Thanks Chubby.
ice4277
09-16-2004, 04:11 PM
ice - that means nothing, skydog has admitted he's lazy and prob just didn't get around to it.
Keep in mind, he's "banned" not "in the penalty box".
true, my bad--sorry to contribute more baseless idle gossip ;)
korme
09-16-2004, 04:12 PM
The title of this thread is becoming quite prophetic.
lol.. i feel bad, i dont think rufus has ever done anything deeming teh banstick
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 04:13 PM
Dammit, I miss Shorty's quips. Fuckin' college taking him away from FOFC... :mad:
korme
09-16-2004, 04:16 PM
i know, my posts per day since sep3 is like, .5 maybe
[Ed's Note: 3.92]
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 04:18 PM
lol.. i feel bad, i dont think rufus has ever done anything deeming teh banstickIn case you're wondering, my opinion hasn't changed.
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showpost.php?p=306873&postcount=273
sachmo71
09-16-2004, 04:20 PM
Bodyblow!
Chubby
09-16-2004, 04:20 PM
Obviously not deaf ears if you're responding to him.
WSUCougar
09-16-2004, 04:27 PM
Mommmmmm! Chubby's teasing the bulldog again.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 04:30 PM
Mommmmmm! Chubby's teasing the bulldog again.
I just don't see the point in trying to publicly embarass shorty by posting that link. I mean, "ooooh he sure showed shorty his place" :rolleyes:
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 04:32 PM
I just don't see the point in trying to publicly embarass shorty by posting that link. I mean, "ooooh he sure showed shorty his place" :rolleyes:
I totaly agree with you, it was uncalled for.
Now when he does it to you................
korme
09-16-2004, 04:33 PM
skydog, i didn't fucking say anything about you, i just, gathering from what has been said in this thread and what i have seen from rj, don't think the ban was necessary. penalty box, sure, ban? that's a tad harsh. whatever.
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 04:36 PM
I just don't see the point in trying to publicly embarass shorty by posting that link. I mean, "ooooh he sure showed shorty his place" :rolleyes:I wasn't trying to publicly embarrass him, or "show him his place." As I said back then (http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showpost.php?p=306887&postcount=279), "I really think that since I completely discount his opinions, it isn't fair to him to let him keep posting, thinking that he might actually affect some sort of change."<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 04:38 PM
I wasn't trying to publicly embarrass him, or "show him his place." As I said back then (http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showpost.php?p=306887&postcount=279), "I really think that since I completely discount his opinions, it isn't fair to him to let him keep posting, thinking that he might actually affect some sort of change."<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
I highly doubt he thought he was gonna get ruffus reinstated. Come on.
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 04:42 PM
I highly doubt he thought he was gonna get ruffus reinstated. Come on.Agreed. I'd imagine that he's doing so in the hopes that he might affect change going forward.
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 04:45 PM
Agreed. I'd imagine that he's doing so in the hopes that he might affect change going forward.
Or maybe he was just lamenting the fact that rufus is gone and it maybe it bums him out a little. That was just meanness on your part, for no real reason.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 04:45 PM
I wasn't trying to publicly embarrass him, or "show him his place." As I said back then (http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showpost.php?p=306887&postcount=279), "I really think that since I completely discount his opinions, it isn't fair to him to let him keep posting, thinking that he might actually affect some sort of change."<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
So how many times do you have to tell him that? Once? Twice? Every time he says something you don't like? I'm pretty sure he knows and doesn't care what your opinion is on the matter. Just because he might not hold sway with you doesn't mean he shouldn't voice his opinion in a non-combative manner.
korme
09-16-2004, 04:45 PM
or i was just commenting, because honeslty i know you don't give a fuck and will keep running the ship the way it is currently being sailed. yer not big on change and i'm not going to assist in adjusting your stance. but, jsut like every other fucking person in this thread, i'm going to give my opinion. not for you, but perhaps maybe just for myself and everyone else of this community.
thankyou. preach on.
sovereignstar
09-16-2004, 04:49 PM
http://www.digitalend.com/pics/malcom-x.jpg
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 04:50 PM
Or maybe he was just lamenting the fact that rufus is gone and it maybe it bums him out a little. That was just meanness on your part, for no real reason.I can honestly say that there was no meanness or animosity intended with the post. I was under the impression that he had possibly forgotten, or just didn't get it. Apparently, based upon his most recent response, he does get it. Therefore, I won't feel the need to remind him again.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 04:53 PM
http://www.digitalend.com/pics/malcom-x.jpg
you better photoshop this to put more clothes on him to make sure it passes, I mean, you're post count isn't THAT high ;)
Franklinnoble
09-16-2004, 04:56 PM
I missed it.. someone PM me a link to the photo.
sachmo71
09-16-2004, 04:57 PM
Moderating must SUCK!
Chubby
09-16-2004, 04:57 PM
I missed it.. someone PM me a link to the photo.
it's not even worth it, it was the asian chick from the fountain wrestling beer commercials on the stern set with her boyfriend. she had a dress on and showed nothing.
sachmo71
09-16-2004, 04:58 PM
it's not even worth it, it was the asian chick from the fountain wrestling beer commercials on the stern set with her boyfriend. she had a dress on and showed nothing.
I could see the outer curve of her breasts.
JeeberD
09-16-2004, 05:01 PM
I missed it.. someone PM me a link to the photo.
You've been hooked up...
sabotai
09-16-2004, 05:01 PM
I could see the outer curve of her breasts.
And we'll have none of that around these parts!
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 05:03 PM
I can honestly say that there was no meanness or animosity intended with the post. I was under the impression that he had possibly forgotten, or just didn't get it. Apparently, based upon his most recent response, he does get it. Therefore, I won't feel the need to remind him again.
Ya know that, i know you're the mod, and i'm probably gonna get banned for this, but bullshit. You took an inocuous post by Shorty and decided to slam him like a big fuckin bully.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 05:06 PM
Ya know that, i know you're the mod, and i'm probably gonna get banned for this, but bullshit. You took an inocuous post by Shorty and decided to slam him like a big fuckin bully.
/agree
sometimes I wonder whether he actually believes 1/2 the stuff he says or whether he thinks we buy half the stuff he says...
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 05:16 PM
Wow, these guys are really impressive. Apparently they can *READ MY MIND*. :rolleyes:
You both need to know that I do not appreciate one single bit being called a liar, particularly with no evidence. You cannot see inside of me. You cannot judge my motivations. I told you exactly why I said what I said, and that's the 100% truth. I have nothing if I don't have my integrity, which I value above all other character traits. An unfounded assault on someone's integrity, in my opinion, is the most viscious kind of verbal assault there is. Poor form, gentlemen. Very poor form.
Franklinnoble
09-16-2004, 05:17 PM
You've been hooked up...
Thanks, Jeebs.
That's pretty weak S.D. You would have been better slapping him for something a little more ban-worthy. Like this. (http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/%7Efof/forums/showpost.php?p=583016&postcount=42)
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 05:18 PM
All the evidence I need is in your post. You acted like a total asshole, as I said, for no real reason except to slam Shorty. Thats poor form.
Sun Tzu
09-16-2004, 05:19 PM
http://www.monkeyview.net/id/308/craptastic/P1010019.jpg
sovereignstar
09-16-2004, 05:21 PM
Wow, these guys are really impressive. Apparently they can *READ MY MIND*. :rolleyes:
You both need to know that I do not appreciate one single bit being called a liar, particularly with no evidence. You cannot see inside of me. You cannot judge my motivations. I told you exactly why I said what I said, and that's the 100% truth. I have nothing if I don't have my integrity, which I value above all other character traits. An unfounded assault on someone's integrity, in my opinion, is the most viscious kind of verbal assault there is. Poor form, gentlemen. Very poor form.
puh-leez
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/%7Efof/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif
gottimd
09-16-2004, 05:22 PM
Can't we all just get along?
SD, not judging you, but that Pic wasn't revealing at all. You can see basically the same picture in the local newspaper ad. I was looking at his other posts and I don't see anything that bad. But hey, you're the Mod, I guess its your call.
In the immortal words of socrates, " I drank what?"
Can we get a reinstatement Poll post?
Chubby
09-16-2004, 05:23 PM
Wow, these guys are really impressive. Apparently they can *READ MY MIND*. :rolleyes:
You both need to know that I do not appreciate one single bit being called a liar, particularly with no evidence. You cannot see inside of me. You cannot judge my motivations. I told you exactly why I said what I said, and that's the 100% truth. I have nothing if I don't have my integrity, which I value above all other character traits. An unfounded assault on someone's integrity, in my opinion, is the most viscious kind of verbal assault there is. Poor form, gentlemen. Very poor form.
Poor Form - banning someone for posting a fully clothed pic than trying to say it was "semi-nude".
Poor Form - taking an uncalled for shot at a poster simply because he was disagreeing with you.
You have no integrity to me and I'm assuming the same is true for others. I really think that since I completely discount your opinions, it isn't fair to you to let you keep posting, thinking that you might actually affect some sort of change in my opinion.
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 05:23 PM
for no real reason except to slam ShortyNot at all. As I said several months ago: "For example, when I send Jim an e-mail about an issue with an FOF game, I do so in the expectation that the e-mail has the potential to affect change. If it didn't, I wouldn't waste my time doing so, and I'd appreciate it if he would tell me that--as in with the TCY "Vision" issues. While I didn't agree with him, I appreciated him valuing our time enough to let us know that certain things were not going to change." I really don't see how that is interpreted as "slamming him" or "acting like an asshole."
ice4277
09-16-2004, 05:24 PM
This thread has all the fun of the political threads with none of the politics.
Franklinnoble
09-16-2004, 05:28 PM
This thread has all the fun of the political threads with none of the politics.
And all the fun of a naughty photos thread with none of the pictures.
I got nothing.
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 05:29 PM
Not at all. As I said several months ago: "For example, when I send Jim an e-mail about an issue with an FOF game, I do so in the expectation that the e-mail has the potential to affect change. If it didn't, I wouldn't waste my time doing so, and I'd appreciate it if he would tell me that--as in with the TCY "Vision" issues. While I didn't agree with him, I appreciated him valuing our time enough to let us know that certain things were not going to change." I really don't see how that is interpreted as "slamming him" or "acting like an asshole."
So in other words, any post any of us make is completely invalidated because it won't affect change? What in the blue hell are you talking about? Why don't you close the thread about what Jim new game will be, I'm sure it has no impact on his decision (since it's probably already been made).
Your post was very mean spirited and instead of just saying "yeah, I guess it was, i'm sorry." You act like it wasn't, which anyone with 2 eyes can clearly see it was.
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 05:37 PM
So in other words, any post any of us make is completely invalidated because it won't affect change?No, not at all. That was specifically applied to the Shorty situation, for reasons that I outlined back in December when I originally posted it.
Why don't you close the thread about what Jim new game will be, I'm sure it has no impact on his decision (since it's probably already been made)....because that thread has nothing to do with impacting a decision, just having a little fun, because I'm genuinely curious what people think. Note that it says what do you *think* it will be, not what do you *want* it to be. There's no indication anywhere in that thread that I am trying to sway him to release a particular game. (And yes, I sure hope that decision has been made. I'm ready for another Solecismic masterpiece! I'd hate to find out that it is so early in the development cycle that the next release hasn't been decided yet.)
Your post was very mean spirited and instead of just saying "yeah, I guess it was, i'm sorry." You act like it wasn't, which anyone with 2 eyes can clearly see it was.You clearly don't know what I was thinking when I posted it. I absolutely was not doing it for mean-spirited reasons. There's only one person in the online world who has ever gotten under my skin enough to drive me to mean-spiritedness, and Shorty is not that person.
So wait a minute, here. SkyDog is a moderator here? I thought he was just some mouthy dude with cool underwear. My bad.
;)
Franklinnoble
09-16-2004, 05:52 PM
So wait a minute, here. SkyDog is a moderator here? I thought he was just some mouthy dude with cool underwear. My bad.
;)
Some things never get old...
http://www.irregardless-productions.com/bigmanphoto.jpeg
that's what i'm talkin bout
Chubby
09-16-2004, 05:53 PM
too much nudity! BANNINATED!!!
Easy Mac
09-16-2004, 05:55 PM
no, no, male nudity is ok, this is a board for men you know.
Crapshoot
09-16-2004, 05:59 PM
Some things never get old...
http://www.irregardless-productions.com/bigmanphoto.jpeg
and amusingly enough. that has more nudity than the first pic... :D
Chubby
09-16-2004, 06:00 PM
and amusingly enough. that has more nudity than the first pic... :D how true.
Samdari
09-16-2004, 06:05 PM
Skydog. Dictator. Sometimes.
Wrong.
He is, by definition, ALWAYS a dictator.
Its just sometimes that he makes decisions that are seen as arbitrary and/or capricious by the majority who witnessed them.
Masked
09-16-2004, 06:06 PM
Poor Form - banning someone for posting a fully clothed pic than trying to say it was "semi-nude".
To get back to the more important issue of pics of hot women - it really doesn't matter what the picture is. The host (where the link to the picture points) is more important in determining if FOFC gets banned in some workplaces. It can be a picture of kitten and a puppy, but if it is hosted by xxx-troutinrectum-xxx.com, its going to get FOFC blocked. Although, lately it has become a policy that no pics of hot women (i guess the britney spears thread is safe esp) can be linked even if hosted by CNN (as with the beach volleyball pics) because someone always trys to come up with a better pic linked to a less work-friendly site.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 06:07 PM
To get back to the more important issue of pics of hot women - it really doesn't matter what the picture is. The host (where the link to the picture points) is more important in determining if FOFC gets banned in some workplaces. It can be a picture of kitten and a puppy, but if it is hosted by xxx-troutinrectum-xxx.com, its going to get FOFC blocked. Although, lately it has become a policy that no such pics can be linked even if hosted by CNN (as with the beach volleyball pics) because someone always trys to come up with a better pic linked to a less work-friendly site.
Get back to me when the other pics that have been posted today result in bannings. As was already said, the patriotic undies pic has more nudity in it.
Easy Mac
09-16-2004, 06:08 PM
this thread is asenine
Philliesfan980
09-16-2004, 06:08 PM
My main issue with Skydog is he seems to try and be cocky and funny with his power (Not the same cocky and funny when you're trying to get girls mind you). All of this (and the previous message contained in the link of discussion) could have been handled in a PM to Shorty. His message, whether intentional or not, serves as only to embarass Shorty. And since perception is reality, its overwhelmingly obvious to us here that Skydog was attempting flex his muscles when he posted the message (both of them).
Writing is just as powerful, if not more powerful, than the spoken word. You can't just write something and then say "oh no, it wasn't meant to sound like that". Stuff like that will get you crucified in the "Real world". You gotta be careful what you write. I've let my emotions get the best of me while writing messages sometimes, and I'm wrong for it.
Masked
09-16-2004, 06:14 PM
Get back to me when the other pics that have been posted today result in bannings. As was already said, the patriotic undies pic has more nudity in it.
I was trying to avoid express my opinion on the banning and ensuing banter.
But as I said, the content of the pic really isn't the biggest problem, the host of the pic is. (I have no idea who hosted the picture rufus posted).
hhiipp
09-16-2004, 06:15 PM
To get back to the more important issue of pics of hot women - it really doesn't matter what the picture is. The host (where the link to the picture points) is more important in determining if FOFC gets banned in some workplaces. It can be a picture of kitten and a puppy, but if it is hosted by xxx-troutinrectum-xxx.com, its going to get FOFC blocked. Although, lately it has become a policy that no pics of hot women (i guess the britney spears thread is safe esp) can be linked even if hosted by CNN (as with the beach volleyball pics) because someone always trys to come up with a better pic linked to a less work-friendly site.
No offense here but possibly if you're at work and surfing these posts with the 'naughty' pictures that are 'bad' sites and it could be harmful to your job, perhaps you shouldn't be surfing the web at work.
sovereignstar
09-16-2004, 06:17 PM
somebody cue the "the board would be dead if no one posted from work" line
Masked
09-16-2004, 06:19 PM
No offense here but possibly if you're at work and surfing these posts with the 'naughty' pictures that are 'bad' sites and it could be harmful to your job, perhaps you shouldn't be surfing the web at work.
FOFC got banned by some employers because of links to questionable sites. It doesn't matter if you opened those threads or not. Sites get blocked if the have questionable content for a workplace or link to sites with such content.
Now if someone post a thread with the title "Nice ass" and someone opens it at work and it contains close up of a beach volleyball player hosted by espn then it's their own fault if they get caught with the pic on their screen.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 06:23 PM
FOFC got banned by some employers because of links to questionable sites. It doesn't matter if you opened those threads or not. Sites get blocked if the have questionable content for a workplace or link to sites with such content.
Now if someone post a thread with the title "Nice ass" and someone opens it at work and it contains close up of a beach volleyball player hosted by espn then it's their own fault if they get caught with the pic on their screen.
So what you're saying is that the issue should really be where the pics are linked to and not the content? Which is definately NOT what Skydog banned him for...
Masked
09-16-2004, 06:34 PM
So what you're saying is that the issue should really be where the pics are linked to and not the content?
yes, at least in terms of what the policy on links was originally trying to accomplish.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 06:37 PM
yes, at least in terms of what the policy on links was originally trying to accomplish.
Glad to see you agree that the banning was totallyunjustified then!
GoldenEagle
09-16-2004, 06:38 PM
I think the issue here is a domino effect. Id one guy got away with posting pictures, other clowns would come in and do it. I do not come to FOFC to look at pictures of naked women. I can other places for that. To be honest, the guy was getting on my nerves posting all these pictures. I said to myself, when is he going to get banned? I guess today was the day.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 06:42 PM
I think the issue here is a domino effect. Id one guy got away with posting pictures, other clowns would come in and do it. I do not come to FOFC to look at pictures of naked women. I can other places for that. To be honest, the guy was getting on my nerves posting all these pictures. I said to myself, when is he going to get banned? I guess today was the day.
Did you see the pic? She was fully clothed standing next to her boyfriend.
duckman
09-16-2004, 06:43 PM
Did you see the pic? She was fully clothed standing next to her boyfriend.
Does it really matter since he had been warned to lay off with the piture postings? He was given an inch and he took a mile.
McSweeny
09-16-2004, 06:43 PM
I think the issue here is a domino effect. Id one guy got away with posting pictures, other clowns would come in and do it. I do not come to FOFC to look at pictures of naked women. I can other places for that. To be honest, the guy was getting on my nerves posting all these pictures. I said to myself, when is he going to get banned? I guess today was the day.
yeah that sounds about right
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 06:44 PM
I think the issue here is a domino effect. Id one guy got away with posting pictures, other clowns would come in and do it. I do not come to FOFC to look at pictures of naked women. I can other places for that. To be honest, the guy was getting on my nerves posting all these pictures. I said to myself, when is he going to get banned? I guess today was the day.Bingo. It didn't really have that much to do with that individual picture...just a pattern. I guess I could have just banned him early in the morning for "nothing" (or so the complainers would have said), but I decided to just go ahead and do it with that post. It had gotten to the point that it was a certainty that he was going to get banned, so there was no real reason to wait around any longer. The banning was probably a little overdue, if anything, but that is the case with most of the disciplinary actions that I end up taking.
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 06:44 PM
Did you see the pic? She was fully clothed standing next to her boyfriend.
At some point it becomes redundant. If SD had asked him to stop it with the pictures, I don't think it would of mattered if he posted a pic of C3PO. This much I agree with SD on.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 06:48 PM
At some point it becomes redundant. If SD had asked him to stop it with the pictures, I don't think it would of mattered if he posted a pic of C3PO. This much I agree with SD on.
then why say the pic was "semi-nude" when it was nowhere close? The intent was to make people believe that he had posted a naughty pic and got banned for it when that wasn't the case.
If it's now supposedly a matter of "posting too many pics" then again, get back to me when anyone else that posts pics all the time gets time in the box much less banned.
Suicane75
09-16-2004, 06:50 PM
Ya know that friend that doesn't know when to shut up, and as much as you admire his spunk and sticktoitwithness, when the time comes that he mouths off to the wrong guy and is about to get his ass kicked ya sorta just gotta step aside and let him get his ass kicked........ya know that guy?
Ben E Lou
09-16-2004, 06:57 PM
then why say the pic was "semi-nude" when it was nowhere close? The intent was to make people believe that he had posted a naughty pic and got banned for it when that wasn't the case.
If it's now supposedly a matter of "posting too many pics" then again, get back to me when anyone else that posts pics all the time gets time in the box much less banned.I didn't say *that* pic was semi-nude, now did I? I've deleted threads that he's started, suspended him, and he an I have talked via IM, and I think e-mail as well. Technically "anything but" in my edit was an exaggeration, but this point should be easily understood: Other than wignifty, I've *never* seen someone whose ratio of (posts-that-needed-to-be-examined-and-maybe-edited) / (total posts) was as high as this guy's. ;)
Ya know that friend that doesn't know when to shut up, and as much as you admire his spunk and sticktoitwithness, when the time comes that he mouths off to the wrong guy and is about to get his ass kicked ya sorta just gotta step aside and let him get his ass kicked........ya know that guy?
yes.
WSUCougar
09-16-2004, 08:08 PM
All those in favor of various people sticking a big stinky sock in it, say "Aye."
oliegirl
09-16-2004, 08:13 PM
Aye!!!
cuervo72
09-16-2004, 08:15 PM
it's not even worth it, it was the asian chick from the fountain wrestling beer commercials on the stern set with her boyfriend. she had a dress on and showed nothing.
Uh, I never realized Kitana Baker is Asian.
Oh, and there are plenty of nudes of her out there. Not like they're hard to find.
cuervo72
09-16-2004, 08:17 PM
somebody cue the "the board would be dead if no one posted from work" line
The board is on life support as it is, at least as I've come to know it.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 08:25 PM
Uh, I never realized Kitana Baker is Asian.
Oh, and there are plenty of nudes of her out there. Not like they're hard to find.
and? that has nothing to do with it, the fact is that is that the pic was her fully clothed in the stern studio standing next to her boyfriend and rufus was lamenting about if that tool could get her then there's hope for everyone.
cuervo72
09-16-2004, 08:27 PM
The fact is that rufus had been warned, and just as easily could have posted an hxxp link to the pic along with the comment to get his point across.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 08:31 PM
The fact is that rufus had been warned, and just as easily could have posted an hxxp link to the pic along with the comment to get his point across.
as could the other people that like to post pics constantly yet we see far worse pics on a regular basis with nothing done.
GrantDawg
09-16-2004, 08:36 PM
The fact is that rufus had been warned, and just as easily could have posted an hxxp link to the pic along with the comment to get his point across.
And what most people are missing, he posted semi-nude girls pics ealier today that RyanS got rid of. This is a constant from him. Isn't there other places to get porn than here? Do you really NEED to post this stuff here? Or isn't this just another form of trolling, trying the push the limits of the board like a 3 year-old?
GoldenEagle
09-16-2004, 08:42 PM
I vaugley remember seeing Kitana Baker in a porn once. I could be wrong though.
Chubby
09-16-2004, 08:55 PM
And what most people are missing, he posted semi-nude girls pics ealier today that RyanS got rid of. This is a constant from him. Isn't there other places to get porn than here? Do you really NEED to post this stuff here? Or isn't this just another form of trolling, trying the push the limits of the board like a 3 year-old?
well I missed that, I also couldn't find anything bad on his 1st page of recent posts.
EagleFan
09-16-2004, 09:04 PM
Not at all. As I said several months ago: "For example, when I send Jim an e-mail about an issue with an FOF game, I do so in the expectation that the e-mail has the potential to affect change. If it didn't, I wouldn't waste my time doing so, and I'd appreciate it if he would tell me that--as in with the TCY "Vision" issues. While I didn't agree with him, I appreciated him valuing our time enough to let us know that certain things were not going to change." I really don't see how that is interpreted as "slamming him" or "acting like an asshole."
I usually stay out of this stuff and just grab some popcorn and watch. I do have to say that I think there is a difference here (not sure how much that matters). Would you want Jim to come here and post links to him telling you that your opinion is of no value to him publicly so all can see when you make a suggestion?
Sorry, not looking to start something but just wanted to post my 2 cents. I would think that a PM might be the best approach for letting Shorty know. After all, that is something that is between him and you, not the entire forum.
Draft Dodger
09-16-2004, 09:14 PM
I think the issue here is a domino effect. Id one guy got away with posting pictures, other clowns would come in and do it. I do not come to FOFC to look at pictures of naked women. I can other places for that. To be honest, the guy was getting on my nerves posting all these pictures. I said to myself, when is he going to get banned? I guess today was the day.
pls pst link pls
(hxxp)
Draft Dodger
09-16-2004, 09:18 PM
my take:
the banning was fine (he's had it coming for a while)
the hxxp thing is still pretty moronic, but I'm not getting into it again.
the uninstigated cheapshot at Shorty was complete bullshit
GoldenEagle
09-16-2004, 09:57 PM
hxxp://google.com
Enter any dirty word you can think of with SafeSearch off. :)
duckman
09-16-2004, 09:58 PM
Enter any dirty word you can thing of with SafeSearch off. :)
You don't say? ;)
GoldenEagle
09-16-2004, 10:01 PM
You don't say? ;)
What's this you speak of? :)
sovereignstar
09-16-2004, 10:02 PM
hxxp://google.com
Enter any dirty word you can think of with SafeSearch off. :)
http://images.google.com/images?q=marmalade&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wi
duckman
09-16-2004, 10:04 PM
What's this you speak of? :)
Oh nothing. :D
Go Rochester!
GoldenEagle
09-16-2004, 10:10 PM
hxxp://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=Marmel&btnG=Search
GrantDawg
09-16-2004, 10:29 PM
well I missed that, I also couldn't find anything bad on his 1st page of recent posts.
That is because they are deleted. He would show them for a while, then remove them to not get caught. He also started thread constantly, have about 20 or so replies, and then delete the thread. PEOPLE LOST POSTS!!!
WSUCougar
09-17-2004, 08:42 AM
the uninstigated cheapshot at Shorty was complete bullshit
Uninstigated as long as you ignore the fact that Shorty posts a similar jab or critique of virtually every single penalty box or suspension that occurs. Let's not get too carried away with the outcries and gnashing of teeth. He brings it on himself. And he's a big boy now, he can take it.
rkmsuf
09-17-2004, 08:48 AM
Uh, I never realized Kitana Baker is Asian.
Oh, and there are plenty of nudes of her out there. Not like they're hard to find.
Asian?
rkmsuf
09-17-2004, 08:51 AM
At some point it becomes redundant. If SD had asked him to stop it with the pictures, I don't think it would of mattered if he posted a pic of C3PO. This much I agree with SD on.
Something like this perhaps?
http://img74.exs.cx/img74/9819/c-3p0.jpg
Samdari
09-17-2004, 08:53 AM
Shorty ... he's a big boy now,.
When did that happen?
gottimd
09-17-2004, 08:54 AM
UH OH! He isn't wearing any pants in the picture.
JeeberD
09-17-2004, 10:33 AM
But as I said, the content of the pic really isn't the biggest problem, the host of the pic is. (I have no idea who hosted the picture rufus posted).
It was/is hosted at HowardStern.com. Probably not the best place to post a picture from (I probably would have hxxp-ed it if I had been the one to post it), but it's most certainly not a porn site...
JeeberD
09-17-2004, 10:34 AM
Dola-
And what most people are missing, he posted semi-nude girls pics ealier today that RyanS got rid of.
Didn't sov post those?
GrantDawg
09-17-2004, 11:17 AM
Dola-
Didn't sov post those?
Not alone. I can still see deleted threads, and there are a couple from Ruf.
wade moore
09-17-2004, 11:23 AM
No offense here but possibly if you're at work and surfing these posts with the 'naughty' pictures that are 'bad' sites and it could be harmful to your job, perhaps you shouldn't be surfing the web at work.
How did this go completely ignored?
It is completely legitimate for me to surf the web at work, particularly when on break. This is appropriate by my work place policy.
However, it is not appropriate to look at pictures of semi-nude women or even bikini-clad women is a little shaky...
So.. your comment is assinine... many workplaces allow surfing, but not of 'naughty' pictures from 'bad' sites...
hhiipp
09-17-2004, 11:31 AM
'naughty' pictures from 'bad' sites...
The site was howardstern.com and the picture wasn't even showing skin. That's why I gave them the ' ' treatment. Even still if you expect this kind of behavior from Rufus why did you even bother to click?
Ben E Lou
09-17-2004, 11:36 AM
The site was howardstern.com and the picture wasn't even showing skin. That's why I gave them the ' ' treatment. Even still if you expect this kind of behavior from Rufus why did you even bother to click?I've explained this OVER and OVER and OVER and OVER again, and people still don't seem to get it, and someone else even explained it in this thread: IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER OR NOT YOU CLICK ON THE LINK, OR EVEN THE THREAD IN QUESTION. IF A QUESTIONABLE SITE IS LINKED FROM FROM FOFC, MANY WORK 'NET SNOOPING SOFTWARE PACKAGES TREAT FOFC ITSELF AS A QUESTIONABLE SITE!!! Yes, so even if someone is just checking in for 10 minutes here on lunch break, they might end up getting accused of using those 10 minutes looking for porn.
korme
09-17-2004, 11:52 AM
Bingo. It didn't really have that much to do with that individual picture...just a pattern. I guess I could have just banned him early in the morning for "nothing" (or so the complainers would have said), but I decided to just go ahead and do it with that post. It had gotten to the point that it was a certainty that he was going to get banned, so there was no real reason to wait around any longer. The banning was probably a little overdue, if anything, but that is the case with most of the disciplinary actions that I end up taking.
why didn't you just penalty box him? it is my understanding that only trolls got banned.
why didn't you just penalty box him? it is my understanding that only trolls got banned.
I'd guess because he has been put in the penalty box before and was warned not to continue. But he decided to press the issue and test the limits. Mess with Bull and you might get the horns. :D
korme
09-17-2004, 11:57 AM
Uninstigated as long as you ignore the fact that Shorty posts a similar jab or critique of virtually every single penalty box or suspension that occurs. Let's not get too carried away with the outcries and gnashing of teeth. He brings it on himself. And he's a big boy now, he can take it.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hhiipp
09-17-2004, 12:40 PM
I've explained this OVER and OVER and OVER and OVER again, and people still don't seem to get it, and someone else even explained it in this thread: IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER OR NOT YOU CLICK ON THE LINK, OR EVEN THE THREAD IN QUESTION. IF A QUESTIONABLE SITE IS LINKED FROM FROM FOFC, MANY WORK 'NET SNOOPING SOFTWARE PACKAGES TREAT FOFC ITSELF AS A QUESTIONABLE SITE!!! Yes, so even if someone is just checking in for 10 minutes here on lunch break, they might end up getting accused of using those 10 minutes looking for porn.
Nice that you were so calm, cool, and collected when you replied.
Apparently since I haven't been around since 2000 and don't read every single post I must have missed you or anyone else stating this before. I would prefer if everything was hxxp'd, but that's just me.
Ben E Lou
09-17-2004, 12:53 PM
Nice that you were so calm, cool, and collected when you replied.
Apparently since I haven't been around since 2000 and don't read every single post I must have missed you or anyone else stating this before. I would prefer if everything was hxxp'd, but that's just me.I didn't notice that you were fairly new here or I wouldn't have gotten quite so upset. I don't pay attention to the dates. However, the point still remains that it was already explained in this very thread. Further, the point still remains that I have stickied the thread about it at least once since you've been around. Consider the first point, along with the fact that I've explained it multiple times in various threads, and stickied a thread specifically about it multiple times, and you might understand why my patience is thin with regard to this issue.
WSUCougar
09-17-2004, 01:13 PM
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
My bad. I guess you're not as big a boy as I thought. :redface:
rkmsuf
09-17-2004, 01:16 PM
He's a college man now:
http://archiv.tiscali.cz/ente/images/3/1/3/8/313804.jpg
Senator
09-17-2004, 01:25 PM
Crud, and I have a hilarious nsfw link to share. (language in song) but I guess I will just send it to my buddies instead.
RendeR
09-17-2004, 01:27 PM
Purely opinionated post:
SD banned someone for ignoring his warnings and repeating the offense, it doesn't matter how risque the pics were, thats not the point. He was warned, he blew off the mod, he got banned, Rufus' fault, entirely.
SD takes enough flack from every tom dick and shorty on this board on a daily basis, quite honestly I'm amazed that he's had the patience he's shown thus far and not thrash the lot of you who continuously berate him for his decisions. He's the mod, he has the power, get over it and leave the man alone.
Shorty, I love you like a brother, but you can in fact be an annoying assmunch, you do rail against da'Man, every time someone get the hand slap.
SD while I understand your reasoning about the shorty thing, it could have been handled in a less belligerant way, no matter how you intended it, it came across quite snippish. It happens to everyone, we can all only hope to be more careful in what we post.
Chubby....wow...you're still an unrelenting ass. You latch on to a point like a starving rottweiler and you shake that thing at everyone till you're blue in the face....thankfully we can't see that, early on it was stated that the content of the photo wasn't relevent, but did you catch on to that? No, it seems the clue train left you at the station once again.
I've been away for awhile, checking in now and then because life only gives me a bit of time these days to hang here. I miss this place, but holy shit people. get your collective heads out of your asses and leave SD alone. he has enough to deal with trying to keep this place accessible to everyone from everywhere when people like rufus blatantly ignore him and do things which could damage that ability.
For fucks sake get a grip.
HornedFrog Purple
09-17-2004, 01:31 PM
I think it was because SkyDog doesn't like Howard. He listens to Neal Boortz. An Aggie. Enough said. See you in a week! :D
Subby
09-17-2004, 01:32 PM
Chubby....wow...you're still an unrelenting ass. You latch on to a point like a starving rottweiler and you shake that thing at everyone till you're blue in the face....thankfully we can't see that, early on it was stated that the content of the photo wasn't relevent, but did you catch on to that? No, it seems the clue train left you at the station once again.
Has there been a more crystal-clear, dead-on post on an Internet message board? Ever?
I think not.
Eaglesfan27
09-17-2004, 01:35 PM
I thought the whole post was dead-on.
Has there been a more crystal-clear, dead-on post on an Internet message board? Ever?
I think not.
Are you and Chubby twins?
WSUCougar
09-17-2004, 01:43 PM
I thought the whole post was dead-on.
Aye.
Subby
09-17-2004, 01:47 PM
Are you and Chubby twins?It depends. Does Chubby go 4'6" - 337 lbs. and have a tragic genetic disorder known to laypersons as dinosaur labia?
VPI97
09-17-2004, 01:49 PM
It depends. Does Chubby go 4'6" - 337 lbs. and have a tragic genetic disorder known to laypersons as dinosaur labia?I think so.
Buzzbee
09-17-2004, 01:53 PM
I thought the whole post was dead-on.
What he said.
Well, actually, what Ren said.
Subby
09-17-2004, 01:53 PM
I think so.Then we are both conjoined, siamese and fully versed in the special language of twins.
It depends. Does Chubby go 4'6" - 337 lbs. and have a tragic genetic disorder known to laypersons as dinosaur labia?
Can we call you the ubby twins?
Suicane75
09-17-2004, 01:53 PM
It depends. Does Chubby go 4'6" - 337 lbs. and have a tragic genetic disorder known to laypersons as dinosaur labia?
pics pls, kthnx......................clothed pls, kthnx...........hxxp pls, kthnx.
Buzzbee
09-17-2004, 01:56 PM
It depends. Does Chubby go 4'6" - 337 lbs. and have a tragic genetic disorder known to laypersons as dinosaur labia?
I think what Chubby has is Gyno Sore labia.
WSUCougar
09-17-2004, 02:14 PM
Can we call you the ubby twins?
They're actually triplets. Keep an eye out for Rubby.
VPI97
09-17-2004, 02:17 PM
They're actually triplets. Keep an eye out for Rubby.
Subby, Rubby, Chubby?
Sounds like gay porn.
WSUCougar
09-17-2004, 02:18 PM
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Subby
09-17-2004, 03:21 PM
You guys are thinking of our bizarro twins, Stubby and Nubby. Those guys are gay pornstars. We are heterosexual maneaters.
Ksyrup
09-17-2004, 03:47 PM
We are homosexual maneaters.
http://picserver.student.utwente.nl/view_image.php/A0V135J9N834/picserver.jpeg
Julio Riddols
09-17-2004, 03:51 PM
This thread would make a fantastic british sitcom.
Chubby got owned by Render....
Franklinnoble
09-17-2004, 04:44 PM
http://uploads.edsroom.com/pwned.jpg
Franklinnoble
09-17-2004, 04:45 PM
http://figz.com/%7Edeters/photos/icons/00Stuff-own3d.jpg
Franklinnoble
09-17-2004, 04:45 PM
http://figz.com/%7Edeters/photos//00Stuff/owned-boob.jpg
Buddy Grant
09-17-2004, 04:57 PM
I totally agree with the decisions (and actions) made by all parties in this post, it's about time we learn how to butter our own muffins, without being coddled by the man.
NoMyths
09-17-2004, 05:30 PM
I totally agree with the decisions (and actions) made by all parties in this post, it's about time we learn how to butter our own muffins, without being coddled by the man.We get it already, you don't like unbuttered muffins. :rolleyes:
VPI97
09-17-2004, 06:16 PM
http://www.fof-ihof.com/upload/VPI97/snownedkitty.jpg
Pumpy Tudors
09-18-2004, 07:59 PM
http://www.twyst.org/~pumpy/images/skeletor_owned.gif
Raiders Army
09-18-2004, 08:30 PM
This sucks...somebody repost the pic please or do something. It took me about 10 posts to understand what's going on.
Buh-bye. I don't think you've "contributed" anything but semi-nude pictures since you got here.
I was confused as to what life not being fair and the above quote had to do with each other. Maybe if the original pic was posted or hxxp'ed it would make sense to us latecomers.
Pumpy Tudors
09-18-2004, 09:59 PM
I was confused as to what life not being fair and the above quote had to do with each other. Maybe if the original pic was posted or hxxp'ed it would make sense to us latecomers.
I didn't see the original picture either, but just do a Google Image Search for Kitana Baker, and you'll find something, I'm sure.
Raiders Army
09-19-2004, 06:10 AM
Ah, thanks. Glad I looked it up at home, since some nudie pictures came up on the google pic search. :)
vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.