PDA

View Full Version : In case you missed it...(Jose Guillen)


Chief Rum
09-27-2004, 03:49 AM
...the Angels have suspended Jose Guillen without pay for the rest of the season and, should they make it, the postseason as well. Pretty shocking, really. Guillen has been the Angels' second best run producer, with .294-27-104 numbers, behind only Vladimir Guerrero.

Here's what happened (and at a game I attended, although I somehow missed the brewhaha from my rightfield terrace seat). In Saturday's game, Guillen was lifted for a pinchrunner in the eighth inning and did not react favorably to it. The overt stuff is that Guillen reacted visibly poorly to the move, threw his batting helmet in Mike Scioscia's general direction (or his end of the dugout), and then made a show of walking to the other (far) end of the dugout before coming in. What happens after that is mere conjecture.

The lockerroom was closed for a while after Saturday's game, but it's hard to tell if Guillen is being suspended for additional actions in there, just his actions on the field, or the weight of his actions across the season.

I have heard rumors that he may have taken a swing at either Darin Erstad or Scioscia in that clubhouse meeting, but I think that's likely BS. After all, he actually was taking batting practice with the team the next day, and every comment the organization has made in the wake of the decision have been based around his actions on the field Saturday and his history of temperamental outbursts. Also, players seemed to have been caught unawares at his suspension as well. Finally, supposedly, whatever happened really bothered Scioscia (he told the media he couldn't sleep over it Saturday night), but he seemed ready to let ti slide until GM Bill Stoneman and owner Artie Moreno themselves stepped in and made the decision. A lot of that is just rumor, though, as well.

I think if an actual fight occurred in the clubhouse, Guillen would have been suspended rather quickly, and it wouldn't have taken a day for the Angels to do something about it. My guess is there was some arguing in the clubhouse, and it may have gotten vicious, but that was it.

On the field, as if the overt actions weren't bad enough, Guillen also is rumored to have dropped the F-bomb on Scioscia, at least according to some who watched local video takes of the incident (I never saw them), and he obviously may have done it loud enough to be heard by the fans around the dugout (and visibly, too, while coming in from the field).

And then there's all the things he has done this season, including getting into a stare down with David Riske in June, his near outburst with an umpire following Vlad's beaning last Monday, and his complaining to the media last May that the pitchers weren't protecting the hitters after he and Vlad got hit by pitches in games at Toronto (ironically, John Lackey got thrown out for pitching too close inside against the Jays in the very game in question, and was suspended for five games).

Guillen has played with six teams in six years, and has a reputation of being a clubhouse cancer a la Raul Mondesi. He had his problems with the A's last year, too, and with the Reds before them. Most of the season, his oubtbursts were just dismissed as coming from an emotional, passionate player and that he was well liked in the clubhouse.

I don't know what to say about all this. I guess I'll go to a quick bullet form.

1. Real ballsy move for the team to do this just before the final week of a long and bitter pennant race.

2. Guillen has been absolutely critical to this team's success this year, often carrying this team through injuries and bad offensive slumps, and coming up with a number of key hits. He also has dazzled with his arm in leftfield, throwing out a ton of runners at home plate with some terrific throws.

3. Despite his importance to the team, I have to agree with the Angels' move based on what I know of his history and his actions on Saturday. I don't know if it warrants the rest of the regular season and postseason, though (unless there really was something to those clubhouse rumors).

4. Guillen's actions were all about "me", and the team has made a big deal about the Angels being a true team (a theme they rode to the 2002 WS champ), so while the strength of the punishment is a little surprising, their decision is not.

5. He is being suspended without pay, which means we're likely to see a something from the good ole Player's Union on this one.

6. He's in the first year of a $6 M, 2-year deal. What does this mean for next year?

These are all questions swirling around this team even as they are trying to get into the postseason (one game back of the A's, one game up on the Rangers, with seven games left--all against the A's and Rangers).

Obviously, this all means a lot more to me and fellow Angels fans then to anyone else, but I thought I would ask for comments from the baseball peanut gallery here anyway.

CR

Vince
09-27-2004, 04:41 AM
I'm amazed at the move. Kudos to the Angels for putting team chemistry before on-the-field stuff (read: winning) -- but I think it's a foolish move. Like you say, he's one of the best players on the team. And as bad as it is for the on-the-field stuff, it can't be good from a clubhouse morale perspective either. I truly don't know what to make of it...from a personal perspective, good for them for putting him in his place, because he messed up. But from a baseball perspective, it's just plain stupid.

Danny
09-27-2004, 05:46 AM
If they felt Guillen was going to be a problem then it was a good move. Guillen has also played like crap in September, so it may not even hurt them offensively.

oykib
09-27-2004, 07:15 AM
Unless he was a danger to his teammates, winning comes first. Chemistry is an after-the-fact thing. If chemistry really meant something, the Bronx Zoo wouldn't have been able to produce back-to-back championships.

There you had a team where the best player and the team captain hated each other. The best player hated the manager even more. The most consistent player bagged on everybody and wasn't afraid to do so when reporters were around. The leadoff hitter only played when he felt like it. And on and on...

It's all about having talented players who want to win. As the saying goes momentum is today's starting pitcher. I don't believe in any of that bullshit.

mgadfly
09-27-2004, 09:03 AM
5. He is being suspended without pay, which means we're likely to see a something from the good ole Player's Union on this one.



I'm sure we will. If the union doesn't do something on his behalf they open themselves to a failure of the duty of fair representation law suit. So instead of having this out in front of an arbitrator (regardless of what they might think of Guillen and whether they hope he prevails) for relatively little cost and inconvenience, they'd have to have it out in front of federal judge where both the union and MLB would be named as codefendants.

clintl
09-27-2004, 09:25 AM
As Joe Morgan said last night, there has to be more to it than what happened in the game on Saturday. Players get fined for outbursts like that, not suspended. Something had to have happened in the clubhouse for the Angels to go as far as they did. And if nothing happened in the clubhouse, then I don't see where the Angels have any justification for a suspension. Players get angry all the time for getting taken out of the game. It's something managers should expect and know how to deal with.

dawgfan
09-27-2004, 05:32 PM
It's a real gutsy move - it says to the world that sportsmanship and team unity are more important to the Angels than winning. It's an admirable position, but I wonder if all the Angels are on board with it.

Sharpieman
09-27-2004, 05:33 PM
Good, go A's.

MrBug708
09-27-2004, 05:40 PM
I'd be surprised if Guillen was an Angel next year

Sharpieman
09-27-2004, 05:45 PM
I'd be surprised if Guillen was an Angel next year
In other news Bug, I'll be rooting for your UCLA bruins when they play those stuck up brats from USC later this year. Go Bruins...I guess.

MJ4H
09-27-2004, 06:02 PM
my team is on the floor

stevew
09-27-2004, 06:06 PM
Roid Rage? His power numbers exploded from almost nothing.

MrBug708
09-27-2004, 08:02 PM
Except he's been a jerk supposedly his whole life

MrBug708
09-27-2004, 08:03 PM
In other news Bug, I'll be rooting for your UCLA bruins when they play those stuck up brats from USC later this year. Go Bruins...I guess.

Which team are you a fan of? The Coaches Stepping Stone UC school or the Farm boys?

Chief Rum
09-28-2004, 09:22 PM
Update for those of you who care and haven't been following along...

1. On Monday, the union filed a grievance to overturn the suspension and an arbitrator will hear Guillen's case in Oakland on Friday. If he rules in Guillen's favor, though, it will almost certainly be just on the pay issue--I don't think the arbitrator has the power to force the Angels to play Guillen.

2. It seems clear now that there was definitely a verbal disagreement between Guillen and Scioscia int he clubhouse following, and that that is another part of this whole thing. No reports of fisticuffs or that Erstad was involved, though, so that appears to be BS (as expected).

3. Other incidents I forgot about that have been mentioned. Guillen was sat for a game in July when he didn't show for a pre-game Photo Fan Day promo (everyone else on the team did), and he took offense to that. His complaining about it led to a team meeting after the game. He also questioned the need for a player's meeting called by Ersty (the widely acknowledged team leader and captain) in recent weeks. He also grumbled aloud at one point in the past couple months about the stadium posting out of town scores (sheesh, what a weird thing to bitch about).

4. Interesting quote from Stoneman: "There was some stuff that was seen publicly, and some stuff that wasn't." Apparently several incidents/disagreements managed to be contained within the clubhouse, and we're only seeing what has been public.

5. At one point in the season, Scioscia was heard to mutter: "I wish Jose would just keep his mouth shut and play."

6. Some players have said they were surprised at the severity of the punishment, but none will say it's inappropriate. Several have said in the past couple days that Guillen would be missed, and excused his behavior because of his emotion and passion, but no one seems to think what the team did was wrong. Nor is there universal admiration of Guillen from the players, which includes Jarrod Washburn acknowledging he felt the punishment was worth it alone for what he saw in the clubhouse after Saturday's game (he didn't see the incidents ont he field because he was icing his arm), and John Lackey refusing to comment when asked if Guillen was a good teammate.

7. Guillen has apparently expressed remorse to Scioscia for the way things went down on Saturday, but has not apologized for anything (and I don't get the feeling it would matter even if he did). Scioscia continues to say he would elcome Guillen back next season, but everyone and their mother figures Guillen is gone this offseason.

8. The Angels have won two since the incident (and three in a row overall), and short of a huge breakdown late in the current game, they seem likely to pad those numbers today (8-2 in the top of the eighth against Texas).

CR

MrBug708
09-28-2004, 09:40 PM
Hmmm...I just saw that Sebastian had posted in this thread but when I clicked, nothing....

stevew
09-28-2004, 09:42 PM
yeah, he is ghostbanned.