PDA

View Full Version : who needs seat belts?


cthomer5000
01-10-2005, 12:50 PM
<CENTER>http://snopes.com/autos/accident/seatbelt.asp</CENTER><CENTER> </CENTER><CENTER>Home (http://snopes.com/snopes.asp) --> Automobiles (http://snopes.com/autos/autos.asp) --> Traffic Accidents (http://snopes.com/autos/accident/accident.asp#seatbelt) --> Seat Belts</CENTER>


<CENTER>Seat Belts</CENTER>


Claim: Anti-seat belt law advocate is killed in automobile accident.

<NOINDEX>Status: True.

Origins: Despite the vital role automobile seat belts have played in saving thousands and thousands of lives over the last several decades, there is still a group http://snopes.com/autos/graphics/seatbelt.gif of drivers and passengers who are determined not to wear them, for any number of reasons: because they find them too uncomfortable or confining, because they don't believe in their efficacy, because they've heard that wearing seat belts might actually cost (http://snopes.com/autos/techno/seatbelt.asp) them their lives in certain types of accidents, or because they resent as an unwarranted intrusion of government into private life the plethora of laws now requiring motorists to buckle up.

In this vein, we note with a sense of both sadness and irony a couple of articles recently called to our attention. The first is a <NOBR>17 September</NOBR> 2004 editorial (http://www.dailynebraskan.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/09/17/414a5a030e91d?in_archive=1) published in the Daily Nebraskan and entitled "Individual Rights Buckle Under Seat Belt Laws," by Derek Kieper, a 21-year-old senior at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, in which the writer inveighed against mandatory seat belt laws, opining that "Uncle Sam is not here to regulate every facet of life no matter the consequences," and that "Democrats and Republicans alike should stand together to stop these laws that are incongruous with the ideals of both parties." In the midst of his editorial he noted: As laws become increasingly strict for seat belts, fewer people will respond positively by buckling up in response to the laws. There seems to be a die-hard group of non-wearers out there who simply do not wish to buckle up no matter what the government does. I belong to this group.
Evidently his words were far more prescient than any of us might have wanted, as an article (http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2005/01/04/local/doc41db350078259784029686.txt) in the <NOBR>4 January</NOBR> 2005 Lincoln Journal Star reported that Mr. Kieper not only died in a car crash, but the tragic mishap that claimed his life was the very type of accident in which seat belts have proved so effective in saving <NOBR>lives — preventing</NOBR> passengers from being ejected from vehicles: Derek Kieper was a smart, funny, intense young man who relished a good debate and would do anything for his friends.

Kieper, a 21-year-old senior at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, died early Tuesday morning when the Ford Explorer he was a passenger in travelled off an icy section of <NOBR>Interstate 80</NOBR> and rolled several times in a ditch. Kieper, who was riding in the back seat of the Explorer, was ejected from the vehicle.

Two others in the vehicle, including the driver, Luke Havermann of Ogallala, and the front-seat passenger, Nick Uphoff of Randolph Air Force Base in Texas, sustained non-life threatening injuries. Havermann and Uphoff, both 21, were being treated at BryanLGH Medical Center West.

Derek, who was thrown from the vehicle, was not wearing a seat belt, [Capt. Joe Lefler of the Lancaster County Sheriff's Office] said. He said Havermann and Uphoff were wearing seat belts at the time.
Last updated: 9 January 2005

Franklinnoble
01-10-2005, 12:56 PM
All we need now is a story about an animal rights activist that gets eaten by a grizzly bear or something...

Kodos
01-10-2005, 12:57 PM
It's like RAAAAAIIIINN...

Franklinnoble
01-10-2005, 01:00 PM
Awesome.

http://www.spokesmanreview.com/news-story.asp?date=082702&ID=s1206589

KWhit
01-10-2005, 01:24 PM
Thinning the herd.

Kodos
01-10-2005, 01:29 PM
Thinning The Herd (http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/member.php?u=1884)? :confused:

BigJohn&TheLions
01-10-2005, 04:24 PM
Wouldn't the hat trick be a gun rights activist being shot?

sterlingice
01-10-2005, 05:24 PM
I was thinking maybe something about the guy who invented the life preserver being strangled by the rope on one and drowning.

SI

Raiders Army
01-10-2005, 06:12 PM
What about a gay rights activist getting gang raped by a bunch of guys?

BigJohn&TheLions
01-10-2005, 06:21 PM
I thought that was what they called an Inexpensive Date.

Cringer
01-10-2005, 06:57 PM
There has to be a story about an anti-Iraqi war activist killed by Iraqi's somewhere right? I think that would be the 3rd part of this

kcchief19
01-10-2005, 07:25 PM
Nice to see people stretching analogies to make this little bit of cruel irony fit their political agendas, but you would really need to have a rapist activist gang raped or an anti-war activist killed by Saddam Hussein to have those analogies be comparable.

KWhit
01-10-2005, 07:31 PM
Or have Ryan come onto the board and ban SkyDog.

2 weeks in the box for you!

cuervo72
01-10-2005, 08:03 PM
There was the girl who was flying to South Africa for some humanitarian effort who was beaten to death getting off the plane (or something along these lines).

Raiders Army
01-11-2005, 09:40 AM
Nice to see people stretching analogies to make this little bit of cruel irony fit their political agendas, but you would really need to have a rapist activist gang raped or an anti-war activist killed by Saddam Hussein to have those analogies be comparable.
Okay...#1, I do not have a political agenda against gays.

#2, How is a gay activist getting gang raped by a bunch of gays any different from a animal rights activist getting mauled by a grizzly?

Jeez...lighten up. The Chiefs beat the Raiders, so you should be happy. ;)