Klinglerware
01-11-2005, 09:44 AM
Hopefully this will signal the start of the NCAA putting its money where its mouth is.
I hope we'll start to see the ideal where the "student" part of "student-athlete" is taken seriously again. With these new policies, boosters and athletic departments of "Bigtime U." can no longer hope to reach the post-season on the backs of mercenaries who don't belong at their school academically.
Incidentally, does anybody know which of the BCS schools would have been in danger of losing scholarships or getting banned from their bowl outright (i.e., via long consective years of poor academic performance) if this was implemented for last season?
hxxp://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=1964069
I hope we'll start to see the ideal where the "student" part of "student-athlete" is taken seriously again. With these new policies, boosters and athletic departments of "Bigtime U." can no longer hope to reach the post-season on the backs of mercenaries who don't belong at their school academically.
Incidentally, does anybody know which of the BCS schools would have been in danger of losing scholarships or getting banned from their bowl outright (i.e., via long consective years of poor academic performance) if this was implemented for last season?
hxxp://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=1964069