PDA

View Full Version : Cheating Pays


DaddyTorgo
03-25-2005, 08:32 PM
hxxp://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/25/divorce.settlement.ap/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/25/divorce.settlement.ap/index.html)

-discuss

LionsFan10
03-25-2005, 08:37 PM
I believe it was Pharrell who said "cheat on your man ma, that's how you get ahead"

Drop it like it's hot.

finkenst
03-25-2005, 08:39 PM
maybe he should've had an inkling because of this:

The couple met in 1978 when Howard Sosin was an assistant professor at Columbia University. At the time, she was married to another man and working in retail.

Noop
03-25-2005, 09:58 PM
This is why I say all women are money grubbers. Its like he cheater and I am damn sure she didnt help him make his money but yet she is entitled to something. That is some bullshit I wouldnt have give her shit. She broke the trust of marriage but gets money some of these judges need to stop making men into punks. SHEESH!!!!!!!!

DaddyTorgo
03-25-2005, 11:58 PM
This is why I say all women are money grubbers. Its like he cheater and I am damn sure she didnt help him make his money but yet she is entitled to something. That is some bullshit I wouldnt have give her shit. She broke the trust of marriage but gets money some of these judges need to stop making men into punks. SHEESH!!!!!!!!
word up brutha! Noop speaks the gospel truth boyz!

Ragone
03-26-2005, 12:13 AM
Welcome Back Torg :)

SunDevil
03-26-2005, 12:25 AM
Pre Nup

Ragone
03-26-2005, 01:10 AM
Child Support and the divorce courts are inherantly slanted to favor women.. whether or not its fair or not is debatable.. but my friend pays 800 bucks a month FOR ONE KID.. and the woman(i use the term loosely) uses that money to support her fashion/party habit.. that poor kid barely has any clothes.. etc

Noop
03-26-2005, 08:26 AM
Child Support and the divorce courts are inherantly slanted to favor women.. whether or not its fair or not is debatable.. but my friend pays 800 bucks a month FOR ONE KID.. and the woman(i use the term loosely) uses that money to support her fashion/party habit.. that poor kid barely has any clothes.. etc
If it is slanted then why don't they balance it? Some women are evil fucking creatures. I will never marry a woman without a pre-nup and even then I am not sure it will hold up in court. The way some of these judges are.....Oh and woman can not drive.

Tekneek
03-26-2005, 09:05 AM
That is outrageous. The judge even admits that her actions caused the termination of the marriage. Unreal. If you've got a hookup with that much money, with that many millions that he has spent specifically on you (via the gifts, jewelry, brokerage accounts, etc), you should get nothing if you then go dick around with other men on the side.

This just proves that adultery is not really illegal. If adultery were considered so bad, she would not have had a penny more than the husband wanted to give her.

EDIT:

The couple met in 1978 when Howard Sosin was an assistant professor at Columbia University. At the time, she was married to another man and working in retail.

He gets what he had coming. Sounds like she dumped some other man to run off with him, so he shouldn't be too surprised that she ran around on him. It looks like she has never really taken marriage vows seriously her entire life. She must have been pretty hot.

stevew
03-26-2005, 09:09 AM
Child Support and the divorce courts are inherantly slanted to favor women.. whether or not its fair or not is debatable.. but my friend pays 800 bucks a month FOR ONE KID.. and the woman(i use the term loosely) uses that money to support her fashion/party habit.. that poor kid barely has any clothes.. etc


Yeah, i have friends in similar situations(though they dont pay *that* much. I just cant believe that they dont require even a rudimentary summary of where the woman spends the "child support," after all, its for the kid. I guess it goes to show to not have a kid without being married.

stevew
03-26-2005, 09:11 AM
maybe he should've had an inkling because of this:

The couple met in 1978 when Howard Sosin was an assistant professor at Columbia University. At the time, she was married to another man and working in retail.


Yeah, bingo. That jumped out at me as well.

JeeberD
03-28-2005, 08:06 AM
Pre Nup

Pre Noop?

Blackadar
03-28-2005, 08:31 AM
While I'm not advocating her infidelity, lost in this is that they hooked up for 27 years and she got 27% of the estate. He got to keep a helluva lot more than she did:

Howard Sosin's wealth was estimated at $168 million. Among the assets he gets to keep are $89 million in bank accounts, 10 of the couple's 18 cars, $960,000 worth of private club memberships and $22 million in fine

stkelly52
03-28-2005, 09:47 AM
Pre Nup
A prenup would be worthless in this case. When they were married back in 1978 he was not a millionaire, he worked as a professor at a college. Nine years after that he founded AIG. Basically the vast majority of his $168 million came since then. Even with a prenup she would have been entiled to half of the assests. Her adultry cost her $44 million. I think that it is fair.

Lathum
03-28-2005, 09:54 AM
the question I have to ask is if HE had cheated on HER how much more would she be getting?

Raiders Army
03-28-2005, 09:57 AM
I guess the moral of the story is to get a prenup even if you think you're going to be rich someday. ;)

bosshogg23
03-28-2005, 10:00 AM
What do ya need 3 desert homes for?

Noop
03-28-2005, 03:37 PM
Pre Noop?
Ah right... don't get mad because I am free and your tied down.