JonInMiddleGA
10-25-2005, 12:33 AM
Okay, I'm not impartial on the subject at hand, so I'd like some outside input.
The team described below is a high school team, about medium sized for their competition, in a small region (which accounts for the quirks of how many winning/losing teams they play each year)
My question is: Is it be fair to describe them as a "posterchild for mediocrity"?
2005 YTD:
6-3 overall
teams they've beaten are 19-36
teams they've lost to are 21-6
6-0 vs teams with a losing record, 0-3 vs teams with a winning record
2004
3-8 overall
teams they beat were 6-27-1
teams they lost to were 67-31-1
Lost 1st round playoffs 42-13
3-2 vs teams with a losing record, 0-6 vs teams with a winning record
2003
6-5 overall
teams they beat were 17-51-1
teams they lost to were 32-26-1
Lost 1st round playoffs 42-16
5-1 vs teams with a losing record, 1-4 vs teams with a winning record
2002
10-3 overall
teams they beat were 31-82
teams they lost to were 20-17
10-1 vs teams with a losing record, 0-2 vs teams with a winning record
2-1 in playoffs (won 2x vs sub-500 teams, then lost 56-13)
2001
4-5 overall
teams they beat were 8-28
teams they lost to were 28-28
Lost 1st round playoffs 41-6
3-2 vs teams with a losing record, 1-3 vs teams with a winning record
5 years total
29-24 overall
2-18 vs teams with a winning record
27-6 vs teams with a losing record
Post-season avg vs team w/winning record is a 45-12 loss
You make the call -- "Average"? Or "Mediocre"?
The team described below is a high school team, about medium sized for their competition, in a small region (which accounts for the quirks of how many winning/losing teams they play each year)
My question is: Is it be fair to describe them as a "posterchild for mediocrity"?
2005 YTD:
6-3 overall
teams they've beaten are 19-36
teams they've lost to are 21-6
6-0 vs teams with a losing record, 0-3 vs teams with a winning record
2004
3-8 overall
teams they beat were 6-27-1
teams they lost to were 67-31-1
Lost 1st round playoffs 42-13
3-2 vs teams with a losing record, 0-6 vs teams with a winning record
2003
6-5 overall
teams they beat were 17-51-1
teams they lost to were 32-26-1
Lost 1st round playoffs 42-16
5-1 vs teams with a losing record, 1-4 vs teams with a winning record
2002
10-3 overall
teams they beat were 31-82
teams they lost to were 20-17
10-1 vs teams with a losing record, 0-2 vs teams with a winning record
2-1 in playoffs (won 2x vs sub-500 teams, then lost 56-13)
2001
4-5 overall
teams they beat were 8-28
teams they lost to were 28-28
Lost 1st round playoffs 41-6
3-2 vs teams with a losing record, 1-3 vs teams with a winning record
5 years total
29-24 overall
2-18 vs teams with a winning record
27-6 vs teams with a losing record
Post-season avg vs team w/winning record is a 45-12 loss
You make the call -- "Average"? Or "Mediocre"?