PDA

View Full Version : Should this guy have been forced to resign?


oliegirl
01-05-2006, 11:07 AM
Branding leads to resignation
Roswell football assistant leaves

By BILL SANDERS, PAUL KAPLAN
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/05/06

Seventeen football players at Roswell High School branded themselves in a show of solidarity this past season, and an assistant coach who attended the rituals has resigned amid a county investigation, school officials confirmed.

Mario Hansbrough, the defensive coordinator for the north Fulton school, made a weekly routine of taking players off campus, behind the school, on Thursday nights and overseeing as they branded red-hot paper clips that left an inch-long scar on the chest of defensive players who were set to start that Friday, according to athletics department officials, including head coach Tim McFarlin.

McFarlin said the players had seen a branded fraternity Greek letter omega on Hansbrough's shoulder, and decided to do something similar as a show of defensive solidarity.

He said Hansbrough talked the kids into using small paper clips instead of something more drastic.

"I'm disappointed he was there," McFarlin said. "He used poor judgment, but I know his heart and I know he didn't do one thing to hurt kids. He was doing this because the kids were intent on doing something anyway. We all make poor decisions at some point in life. If it was up to me, I'd retain him, but I know the liability issues here."

An anonymous caller told the Fulton County school superintendent's office of the brandings, school officials said. The matter was turned over to the Fulton County athletics office, and Hansbrough resigned during the investigation.

When contacted Wednesday, Hansbrough declined to comment, as did the parents of several players.

McFarlin said the kids who participated saw it as sort of a badge of honor. He said he didn't know about it until the investigation surfaced in mid-December.

Hansbrough is respected by the players on the team and has been a role model for them, several parents said. He's also highly regarded as a history teacher, they said.

"This does not portray his character or leadership at all — he's worked tirelessly for the boys," said Richard Niedzwiecki, vice president of the football booster club, whose son plays on the team but did not participate in the branding. "All the parents that I discussed it with are very supportive of the coach."

McFarlin said he too had spoken with several parents who were supportive of Hansbrough. "Mario has a real talent for this profession and for teaching and I'd recommend him in a heartbeat," McFarlin said.

Stephen Ehret, whose son was a reserve defensive lineman who did not participate in the branding, said Hansbrough was a tough disciplinarian, and Ehret meant it as a compliment. "He'd go after kids when other teachers were more timid and didn't discipline them," he said.

Ehret said he didn't agree with the ritual, but added: "I see things kids put on their bodies that are a lot more objectionable than that, like tattoos."

Niedzwiecki said it was his understanding that the branding was not presented to the players as a requirement for starting or for getting playing time. The Hornets won the Region 6-AAAAA championship this past season, and made it to the second round of the state playoffs.

Roswell athletics director Mike Power said he'd been out of the state on family matters for 28 of the last 30 days and didn't know all the details, but confirmed the investigation and Hansbrough's resignation.

"I do know that he'd been wanting to coach elsewhere anyway," Power said.

Hansbrough was a top candidate for the head coaching job at North Cobb High School before this happened, McFarlin said. He has been coaching at Roswell High for 8 years, and has a wife and small child.



After reading this article, I was very sad to see that a "highly regarded" teacher and well liked coach was (presumably) asked/forced to resign over an incident where he appears to have his players best interest at heart. Now, I do not condone the fact that they engaged in the branding to begin with, but it seems that the coach was there to make sure nothing bad happened that would cause "complications" (disease, etc...) and in fact convinced the team members to make the brands smaller, which to me would be a good thing. He has a wife and small child, who will undoubtedly be affected by this, not only financially, but socially. Additionally, his aspirations of coaching elsewhere are probably down the drain - basically his entire future has been altered becaue of his good intentions.

So, should he have been asked/forced to resign? Did he really have good intentions, or is he just someone who made a really bad decision and should have known better - basically letting the kids do what they wanted and turning a blind eye to the dangers.

thetrilogy
01-05-2006, 11:29 AM
I think the Notre Dame defense should've performed this ritual before the Fiesta Bowl.

JonInMiddleGA
01-05-2006, 11:34 AM
made a really bad decision and should have known better

That about sums it up, and the "should have known better" part is why I believe he pretty much had to go. How this played out is akin to a teacher finding out the students were planning a Golden Grain booze bash & convincing them to use Miller Lite instead, because there was less risk of alcohol poisoning. That's not the appropriate response to the situation & would warrant dismissal, just as this does.

Frankly, I'll be surprised if this incident doesn't wind up in criminal or civil court. There's a case to be made that, because of his role as an authority figure, his involvement creates a good bit of liability.

kcchief19
01-05-2006, 11:48 AM
I'm going tiwth the bad decision and should have known better. Convincing kids to do something less dangerous than they were planning isn't exactly teaching -- teaching is leading them to learn not to do something like that in the first place.

Was it that serious? Maybe not, but I think most people wouldn't want their teachers do something like this -- they would want them to put a stop to it. And by actively participating he opened up his school to tremendous liability.
He has a wife and small child, who will undoubtedly be affected by this, not only financially, but socially. Additionally, his aspirations of coaching elsewhere are probably down the drain - basically his entire future has been altered becaue of his good intentions. I think about this all the time when I see a story like this. It is very sad when you see someone's life altered by a bad decision. But a lot of people have jobs where they have to realize that the decisions they make outside the office can impact their futures. This sounds like one of those cases.

As a I said above, the only thing I quibble with is his good intentions. Maybe it was a good intention, but it certainly wasn't the "best" intention.

Desnudo
01-05-2006, 11:58 AM
The actual incidents sound relatively harmless compared to a lot of other things that go on at high school, but I don't think it sets a good example to have an authority figure behave like that. Especially since he clearly could have told them not to do it and they would have had to obey since it's pretty hard to hide a brand. The "they would have done it anyway" argument doesn't hold water here.

KWhit
01-05-2006, 12:14 PM
Resign?

Nope, he should have been fired outright.

oliegirl
01-05-2006, 12:19 PM
I agree that he made a bad decision, but what bothers me is that the article makes it sound like this guy was a great employee/teacher/coach up until this incident. Does one bad decision negate all the good he has done?

When the Tookie Williams issue was being discussed, people advocated leniency based on the fact that since his incarceration he had been doing good by writing childrens books which were said to have helped to stop gang violence and prevent children from joining gangs. This was a man who murdered 4 children but this fact convinced some people that he shouldn't be put to death. However, this is a man who has served the community as a teacher for years and was seen by all as a good teacher/coach/influence on the kids. However one bad decision has quite possibly, ruined his life. Maybe that term is a bit dramatic, but I can't think of another word to convey my idea.

Shouldn't we be as lenient, if not more so, with someone like Mr. Hansbrough? Shouldn't we give him the benefit of the doubt and provide him with another chance to learn from his mistake and continue to do good work with kids?

ISiddiqui
01-05-2006, 12:20 PM
The actual incidents sound relatively harmless compared to a lot of other things that go on at high school, but I don't think it sets a good example to have an authority figure behave like that. Especially since he clearly could have told them not to do it and they would have had to obey since it's pretty hard to hide a brand. The "they would have done it anyway" argument doesn't hold water here.
Yeah, I agree. Having an authority figure there lends credence to the ritual. And it could be seen as an endorsement of the ritual. I know they said it wasn't required, but if you here the asst coach presides over it, are you going to say no?

ISiddiqui
01-05-2006, 12:22 PM
I agree that he made a bad decision, but what bothers me is that the article makes it sound like this guy was a great employee/teacher/coach up until this incident. Does one bad decision negate all the good he has done?

When the Tookie Williams issue was being discussed, people advocated leniency based on the fact that since his incarceration he had been doing good by writing childrens books which were said to have helped to stop gang violence and prevent children from joining gangs. This was a man who murdered 4 children but this fact convinced some people that he shouldn't be put to death. However, this is a man who has served the community as a teacher for years and was seen by all as a good teacher/coach/influence on the kids. However one bad decision has quite possibly, ruined his life. Maybe that term is a bit dramatic, but I can't think of another word to convey my idea.

Shouldn't we be as lenient, if not more so, with someone like Mr. Hansbrough? Shouldn't we give him the benefit of the doubt and provide him with another chance to learn from his mistake and continue to do good work with kids?
And I advocated the DP for Tookie Williams. And I do think that one bad thing should lead to the coach's being shown the door. Anything less and you almost say that it's ok to continue what the kids are doing. The fact that he was a teacher with a good record makes the lesson even stonger.

Tekneek
01-05-2006, 12:29 PM
I agree that he made a bad decision, but what bothers me is that the article makes it sound like this guy was a great employee/teacher/coach up until this incident. Does one bad decision negate all the good he has done?

No, it doesn't undo any previous good. It does, however, indicate he has poor judgment and therefore needs to move on.

JonInMiddleGA
01-05-2006, 12:42 PM
... people advocated leniency

Not anybody with good judgement IMO.


... this fact convinced some people that he shouldn't be put to death.


Luckily, none of those convinced were the ones making the decision.