King of New York
03-20-2006, 02:36 PM
Hi lawyers,
I have a question about hold-harmless and indemnification clauses.
I signed a contract with someone (in this case, a book publisher), and the contract states that I have agreed to hold the producer harmless and indemnify it against all damages, suits, judgments, and so on, if and when the publisher violates the contract. The publisher now wants to violate the contract by publishing the book in a format other than the one stipulated in the contract.
Does that mean that the publisher can do anything that it wants, and I cannot sue no matter what? And if that is what it means, then in what sense is this a "contract," with both parties undertaking mutual obligations? How ironclad are these indemnification clauses?
I have a question about hold-harmless and indemnification clauses.
I signed a contract with someone (in this case, a book publisher), and the contract states that I have agreed to hold the producer harmless and indemnify it against all damages, suits, judgments, and so on, if and when the publisher violates the contract. The publisher now wants to violate the contract by publishing the book in a format other than the one stipulated in the contract.
Does that mean that the publisher can do anything that it wants, and I cannot sue no matter what? And if that is what it means, then in what sense is this a "contract," with both parties undertaking mutual obligations? How ironclad are these indemnification clauses?