albionmoonlight
07-26-2006, 03:03 PM
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:wGkuWsx7G8YJ:www.madduxsports.com/college-football-lines.php+college+football+lines+betting&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1
Some early lines are out for the first college football games of the season. And there are, as you would expect, some very large lines in mismatch games: Kentucky-Louisville, La. Tech-Nebraska, UAB-Oklahoma, and my favorite North Texas-Texas (40 point line).
I know that the guys who make point spreads do it in a way to try to get the betting equal on each game. And I know that they are very good at setting initial lines, and tend to be really good at breaking down matchups.
And this makes sense to me when you are saying things like UGA is a field goal better than LSU at home. Or Miami is 10 points better than Florida this season.
But how can anyone really say that Texas is 40 points better than North Texas? Isn't it totally random at that point? Texas may be able to beat North Texas by 60 if they tried to run up the score. Or they may win by "only" 21 if they decide to work out some kinks in the offense and give the backups major playing time. It seems like the margin of victory in a game like that becomes a function of random factors, most of which are just not knowable until they play the game.
So, my question/observation--how do they decide to set a line in an obvious mismatch? 25 points? 30 points? 40 points? It all seems like the same thing to me, when you get down to it.
Some early lines are out for the first college football games of the season. And there are, as you would expect, some very large lines in mismatch games: Kentucky-Louisville, La. Tech-Nebraska, UAB-Oklahoma, and my favorite North Texas-Texas (40 point line).
I know that the guys who make point spreads do it in a way to try to get the betting equal on each game. And I know that they are very good at setting initial lines, and tend to be really good at breaking down matchups.
And this makes sense to me when you are saying things like UGA is a field goal better than LSU at home. Or Miami is 10 points better than Florida this season.
But how can anyone really say that Texas is 40 points better than North Texas? Isn't it totally random at that point? Texas may be able to beat North Texas by 60 if they tried to run up the score. Or they may win by "only" 21 if they decide to work out some kinks in the offense and give the backups major playing time. It seems like the margin of victory in a game like that becomes a function of random factors, most of which are just not knowable until they play the game.
So, my question/observation--how do they decide to set a line in an obvious mismatch? 25 points? 30 points? 40 points? It all seems like the same thing to me, when you get down to it.