PDA

View Full Version : How many planets are there in the solar system?


kcchief19
08-16-2006, 08:53 AM
No, it's not the latest question from jbmagic ...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060816/ap_on_he_me/new_planets

The International Astronomical Union is meeting this week and allegedly will finally address the status of Pluto and other celestial bodies.

The hubbub before the conference was that Pluto and its moon Charon (which is less of a moon and more of a binary asteroid system given their size and that the two rotate in unison so that the same face of each body is always facing the other) would be reclassified into a new category along with some of the other larger asteroids and celestial objects in the asteroid belt and Kuiper belt.

Now comes this proposal that the media is jumping on that would not only maintain Pluto as a planet but promote Charon, Ceres and Xena to planets as well. Ceres is believed to be the largest object in the asteroid belt, and Xena is a planetoid object in the Kuiper belt beyond Pluto. Ceres was originally classified a planet in the 1800s when it was discovered, then quickly demoted when astronomers came to their senses and realized that it was much smaller and erratic than the other planets.

I could live with Pluto remaining a planet status to maintain the status quo, but to simply say that because we call Pluto a planet that everything the same size or larger than Pluto is a planet just compounds a bad mistake.

I really hope this proposal gets changed.

rkmsuf
08-16-2006, 08:56 AM
Cue jokes about the 7th planet...

gottimd
08-16-2006, 09:02 AM
What did Neptune say to Saturn?

Give me a ring sometime!


Oh you cued up the 7th planet jokes....

QuikSand
08-16-2006, 09:05 AM
I don't claim much knowledge abou such matters, but I got the sense that the IAU group mostly went in with an approach to define planet in such a way to include Pluto, at basically any cost.

What I heard this morning on NPR was that their proposed definition hinged on shape -- that an opbect with sufficient internal gravity to develop a round shape shoudl be classified as a planet, and anything oddly shaped would not be. Passes my common sense test, I guess, but I can't help but feel like there might be a more sensible definition that might involve distance or orbit duration or somesuch that might have been rejected on the sole grounds that it left Pluto out.

MikeVic
08-16-2006, 09:09 AM
If a mass in space is possible to land on, has significant properties, and rotates around the sun... that's what a planet is to me. I don't know much about such things, like QuikSand said above, but how can an asteroid belt have planets in it? Am I being narrow-minded?

Lorena
08-16-2006, 09:16 AM
How do you know that Saturn was married more than once?

She has lots of rings.

randal7
08-16-2006, 10:13 AM
What do the starship Enterprise and toilet paper have in common?



Both go past Uranus and pick off Klingons.

GoldenEagle
08-16-2006, 10:32 AM
The title of this thread if jbmagic started it:

"How many Planets in solar System?"

ice4277
08-16-2006, 10:35 AM
What better more or less Planets?

Crim
08-16-2006, 11:27 AM
If planet Pluto? Or not?

Bee
08-16-2006, 11:29 AM
Why everyone hate planet?

sabotai
08-16-2006, 12:27 PM
If a mass in space is possible to land on, has significant properties, and rotates around the sun... that's what a planet is to me. I don't know much about such things, like QuikSand said above, but how can an asteroid belt have planets in it? Am I being narrow-minded?
That definiation would exclude the 4 biggest planets in our solar system, btw.

sabotai
08-16-2006, 12:36 PM
Passes my common sense test, I guess, but I can't help but feel like there might be a more sensible definition that might involve distance or orbit duration or somesuch that might have been rejected on the sole grounds that it left Pluto out.

I was thinking somewhere along the lines of mass and the shape of the orbit. All planets have an elliptical orbit, but for laymen's purposes, you could say they are circular (they aren't so elliptical that you wouldn't be far from correct if you drew their orbit as a perfect circle) . But that would leave out Pluto which has a far more elliptical orbit than the other planets.

Not only that, but, again no planet orbits one the same "plane" as another planet, but again, you wouldn't be far from correct if you put them all on the same plane. Pluto's "plane" is very different from the rest.

I agree with you that they were trying the best they could to include Pluto as a planet, but try to exclude the other KBOs from the definition.

sabotai
08-16-2006, 12:50 PM
dola,

Here's Phil Plait's take on it: http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/

This comment from his blog sums up my feelings on this whole debate: This is all incredibly silly.

MikeVic
08-16-2006, 12:53 PM
That definiation would exclude the 4 biggest planets in our solar system, btw.

Sorry, I didn't mean that we have the technology to do it. I just meant that in terms of size. If there's something out there the size of a golf ball that isn't being pulled into whatever it's circling around, that's still not a planet to me. :)

sabotai
08-16-2006, 01:05 PM
Sorry, I didn't mean that we have the technology to do it. I just meant that in terms of size. If there's something out there the size of a golf ball that isn't being pulled into whatever it's circling around, that's still not a planet to me. :)
Yeah, I know what you mean. It's not every day I get to show off my geeky astronomy knowledge. :D

And it's not a question of technology, gas giants do not have a surface that you can "land on" at all. They have a liquid core, because of the immense pressure inside, but as you go down, it very, VERY gradually goes from gas to liquid. IOW, there's no point where it suddenly goes from atmosphere to land or ocean like on our planet or other rocky masses.



Hello, my name is sabotai and I am an astronomy geek.

kcchief19
08-16-2006, 01:12 PM
I don't claim much knowledge abou such matters, but I got the sense that the IAU group mostly went in with an approach to define planet in such a way to include Pluto, at basically any cost.
If that is the rationale and objective of the IAU, I am very disappointed.

The problem is that if lower the standard of what is a planet to include Pluto and you let in Ceres, Xena and Charon based on spherical shape and size, then we're going to end up with an ass load of planets one day because we're likely going to find larger Kuiper belt objects. We may even find the occassional comet or asteroid that fits that definition.

One report has characterized the IAU definition as essentially any spherical object that orbits the sun. The Pluto/Charon binary "planet" orbits the sun in a similar fashion that the moon and the Earth orbit the sun. The moon is larger than either Pluto or Charon. Does that make the moon a planet?

As I said before, I'm not opposed to a definition that makes an exception for Pluto -- although because "public sentiment" wanting Pluto to remain a planet is not a good enough reason for me. But it seems that if you're going to define what planet is, size, shape and orbiting the sun is simply not enough. Orbital plane and circumference should be factors as well. To be honest, however, I'm not sure I can develop a definition of a planet that would exclude Ceres as a planet unless you establish a minimum size requirement -- or you specificy that an object must be shperical, not "almost" spherical -- then you can throw Ceres, Pluto/Charon and Zena in the trash.

kcchief19
08-16-2006, 01:23 PM
Hello, my name is sabotai and I am an astronomy geek.
Do you have a group meeting or a newsletter? :)

sabotai
08-16-2006, 01:31 PM
Do you have a group meeting or a newsletter? :)

I'm in the math club, uh, the latin, and the physics club... physics club.

Well, in physics we... we talk about physics, properties of physics.

kcchief19
08-16-2006, 01:33 PM
dola,

Here's Phil Plait's take on it: http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/

This comment from his blog sums up my feelings on this whole debate: This is all incredibly silly.
Ah, crap. Everything he says largely goes double for me. I hate this whole Planet, Dwarf Planet, "Pluton" nonsense.

I do think we can have a classical definition of what a contemporary planet is without going nuts. I quibble with him on being able to come up with a exception for every rule you could come up with. I think we can limit the definition in a way without creating chaos; but I think establishing multiple classes of planets is much more chaotic.

rkmsuf
08-16-2006, 01:33 PM
I'm in the math club, uh, the latin, and the physics club... physics club.

Well, in physics we... we talk about physics, properties of physics.

Did your cousin Kendall ever start eating really weird foods?

kcchief19
08-16-2006, 01:35 PM
I'm in the math club, uh, the latin, and the physics club... physics club.

Well, in physics we... we talk about physics, properties of physics.
I'm sorry, you lost me at physics. However, I will admit to being a mathlete until junior high when the math got too boring. I was a Literature Bowl and -- dear god -- Economics Bowl -- participant, however. I'm glad our Economics Bowl team wasn't very good.

Fidatelo
08-16-2006, 01:37 PM
All this astronomy talk has me thinking, which I don't do often, especially about stuff like astronomy. So I am eager to ask some really basic astronomy questions that will leave all the hardcore people here giggling at my foolishness (and probably most non-astronomy buffs as well).

If a planet orbits the sun, and moons orbit planets, can anything orbit moons? And if a moon has moons, is it a planet? And can we say with certainty that the galaxy itself is not orbiting something else?

rkmsuf
08-16-2006, 01:38 PM
All this astronomy talk has me thinking, which I don't do often, especially about stuff like astronomy. So I am eager to ask some really basic astronomy questions that will leave all the hardcore people here giggling at my foolishness (and probably most non-astronomy buffs as well).

If a planet orbits the sun, and moons orbit planets, can anything orbit moons? And if a moon has moons, is it a planet? And can we say with certainty that the galaxy itself is not orbiting something else?

didn't they cover all this on Star Trek at some point?

MJ4H
08-16-2006, 01:42 PM
Yes, no, no.

and no.

Fidatelo
08-16-2006, 01:43 PM
didn't they cover all this on Star Trek at some point?

Guys who know nothing about astronomy also tend to know nothing about Star Trek.

sabotai
08-16-2006, 01:51 PM
If a planet orbits the sun, and moons orbit planets, can anything orbit moons?
*giggles at Fidatelo's foolishness*

Theoretically, of course. But I would think, generally, the gravity of the planet would orverride the gravity of the moon and either pull to object away from the moon and cause it to orbit around/crash into the planet, or cause it to be ejected away from both of them.

After thinking about it for a minute, I could see it. But as with the relationship of moon to planet to sun, the moon would have to be pretty far away from the planet, and the moon's moon would have to be pretty close to the moon for it to retain the body. Given the distance required, it might be possible for some of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn that are really far away from their planet to pick up some very small, minor body. But it would have to be exactly the right set of circumstances for it to happen.

And if a moon has moons, is it a planet?
No. Even though there is this large debate over what a planet is, that it has to be orbiting the sun is a pretty consistant parameter.

And can we say with certainty that the galaxy itself is not orbiting something else?
OUR galaxy? No, it's not orbiting anything. We'd be able to observe that pretty easily, given what the size of something would have to be in order to have our galaxy orbiting it.

But, our galaxy does have several much smaller galaxies orbiting it. I think, anyway. I know there are several minor galaxies close to ours. I'll have to double check on if they are actually orbiting our galaxy or not. EDIT: Yes, our galaxy does have several "dwarf galaxies" orbiting it.

Fidatelo
08-16-2006, 02:09 PM
Thanks Sabotai, that was very informative!

clintl
08-16-2006, 08:29 PM
One report has characterized the IAU definition as essentially any spherical object that orbits the sun. The Pluto/Charon binary "planet" orbits the sun in a similar fashion that the moon and the Earth orbit the sun. The moon is larger than either Pluto or Charon. Does that make the moon a planet?



According to IAU's definition, if point around which the two bodies orbits is inside one of the bodies, the other is not a planet. Thus, the moon fails that test. They are considering Pluto and Charon a double planet because they orbit around a point outside either of them.

kingfc22
08-16-2006, 09:17 PM
Why everyone hate planet?

gold

Ksyrup
08-24-2006, 08:45 AM
http://members.aol.com/vltdisney/angelpluto.gif

Godspeed!

BrianD
08-24-2006, 08:52 AM
I'm in the math club, uh, the latin, and the physics club... physics club.

Well, in physics we... we talk about physics, properties of physics.

So it's sort of social. Demented and sad, but social.

Butter
08-24-2006, 08:54 AM
Too bad, I was looking forward to the new age of 13 planets.

Ksyrup
08-24-2006, 08:57 AM
I hope they get to replacing the solar system placemats that are in circulation. I don't want my kids staring at dated information!

rkmsuf
08-24-2006, 09:02 AM
Pluto is getting screwed!

Ksyrup
08-24-2006, 09:03 AM
Pluto is getting screwed!

Sorry, I didn't have a picture of that, so I went with the one above.

Celeval
08-24-2006, 09:11 AM
The Hubble telescope captured an interesting image of Pluto just moments before it was removed from planetary status:


http://www.dutch-starwars.com/database/planeten/pics/alderaan_1.jpg

WSUCougar
08-24-2006, 09:29 AM
I never realized that Pluto was smaller than our moon. What a punk ass "planet." I've seen women's butts bigger than our moon.

rkmsuf
08-24-2006, 09:31 AM
I never realized that Pluto was smaller than our moon. What a punk ass "planet." I've seen women's butts bigger than our moon.

Her butt was like Pluto...small and firm.



I have the poetry spilling out of me.

BrianD
08-24-2006, 09:37 AM
I guess the answer to this question is 8.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20060824/sc_space/breakingnewsplutodemotednolongeraplanet

Capping years of intense debate, astronomers resolved today to demote Pluto in a wholesale redefinition of planethood that is a victory of scientific reasoning over historic and cultural influences.
ADVERTISEMENT

Pluto is no longer a planet.

Ksyrup
08-24-2006, 09:39 AM
This is going to seriously hamper Pluto's bid for the 2016 Olympics.

WSUCougar
08-24-2006, 09:40 AM
A spontaneous anti-Earthling riot has just broken out on Pluto!!! Ice cubes are being thrown at ice carvings made to look like Earth!

Ksyrup
08-24-2006, 09:43 AM
OK, your challenge is to come up with a replacement mnemonic device for remembering the planets, to replace:

My Very Educated Mother Just Showed Us Nine Planets

...leaving off the last P, of course.

Go!

QuikSand
08-24-2006, 09:44 AM
Easy, just abridge the most common variant, I think...

Mary's
Violet
Eyes
Make
John
Stay
Up
Nights

QuikSand
08-24-2006, 09:45 AM
This is going to seriously hamper Pluto's bid for the 2016 Olympics.

They have a stronger shot at landing the Miss Universe contest, I'd think.

Ksyrup
08-24-2006, 09:46 AM
Easy, just abridge the most common variant, I think...

Mary's
Violet
Eyes
Make
John
Stay
Up
Nights

Never heard that one. ANd I was hoping for something a little more comical.

WSUCougar
08-24-2006, 09:46 AM
Or...

Mary's
Vagina
Easily
Makes
John
Stay
Up
Nights

cthomer5000
08-24-2006, 09:49 AM
This should be submitted as a case for Pluto. A song from one of my favorite now-broken up bands, the 2 Skinnee J's.

http://www.somethingwithanh.com/mp3/2skinneejs_pluto.mp3

Pluto

With depravity,
I break lots of gravity
Blast past the atmosphere
to the last frontier
I go boldly through space and time
The sky's the limit,
but they're limiting the sky
I break orbit by habit,
I ignite satellites and leave rings round the planets
A flying ace like that beagle,
nevertheless this alien remains illegal
Cause their discovery dont cover me
the immigrants been left in the cold
to grow old
and disintegrate
Discriminate
against the distant and disclaimers,
Cause small minds can't see past Uranus
When I shun their race
cause that's just a phase
and my odyssey runs in 2001 ways
And I can see clearly now like Hubble
shoved off the shuttle,
here's my rebuttal
It's a planet.

Who do you represent?
I represent the smallest planet
A tourney in this journey
versus those who tried to ban it.
If you don't agree
go see interplanet Janet Cause
the sun is star like
Pluto
is planet.
So lend me all ears
and let me state my case,
about all the types of satellites we must embrace
Cause like parents'
great-grandparents,
this planet was an immigrant,
to deport its an offense.
It's an upstanding member of the solar system
Abide the laws of Earth and make it a victim.
Of Proposition
107,
When Pluto spawns a moon it will apply to the heavens.
A dandy like Judas of a chariot
If you demote this boat
remote to a goat
It's like taking ETs custody from Elliot,
support yours
clearly put cause,
simply put

Pluto is a planet. Pluto!
Pluto is a planet. Pluto!
(Do it for the children, if not for yourself)
Pluto is a planet. Pluto!
(Do it for the children, if not for yourself)
Pluto is a planet.

rkmsuf
08-24-2006, 09:52 AM
Somewhere this year a heated debate will take place in science class with an ill informed teacher resulting in an unjust detention.

BrianD
08-24-2006, 09:56 AM
Somewhere this year a heated debate will take place in science class with an ill imformed teacher resulting in an unjust detention.

And Hollywood will make a movie of it starring Dakota Fanning.

WSUCougar
08-24-2006, 09:59 AM
...and J-Lo's butt starring as Pluto.

rkmsuf
08-24-2006, 10:00 AM
"What did you say"

"I said Pluto is not a planet."

"You just bought yourself another Saturday."

WSUCougar
08-24-2006, 10:01 AM
Can you describe the ruckus?

BrianD
08-24-2006, 10:05 AM
"What did you say"

"I said Pluto is not a planet."

"You just bought yourself another Saturday."

"How many is that?"

kcchief19
08-24-2006, 10:18 AM
I'll sleep better now. This is the right decision. One astronomer summed up my thoughts this morning in an interview when he said they tried to tailor a definition that would include Pluto without letting any other celestial bodies, but there was just no way to rationalize making Pluto a planet without declaring other objects planets as well -- and that number 12 being bantered about would probably have been 13 by the end of the year and could very easily end up in the hundreds or thousands once we better explore the Kuiper belt.

I'm not crazy about the concept of a dwarf planet, but compared to the alternative ...

WSUCougar
08-24-2006, 10:23 AM
I'm not crazy about the concept of a dwarf planet, but compared to the alternative ...
Shouldn't that be a "little person" planet?

Kodos
08-24-2006, 10:37 AM
Let me reassert that Rigel IV is indeed a planet. And I shall kick the ass of anyone who says that it is not so.

Vegas Vic
08-24-2006, 10:41 AM
Shouldn't that be a "little person" planet?

"Mass challenged planet" would be the politically correct term.

Vegas Vic
08-24-2006, 10:44 AM
Let me reassert that Rigel IV is indeed a planet. And I shall kick the ass of anyone who says that it is not so.

I think you're right. (http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Rigel_IV)

MalcPow
08-24-2006, 10:53 AM
I'm waiting for Pluto's tell-all book before I rush to judgment. Word on an underground astronomer's board I frequent is that two and possibly three other "planets" are using mass-enhancing radionuclides to bolster marginal measurements.

And check out Jupiter, you telling me that's from hot dogs and beer? Flaxseed my ass!

st.cronin
08-24-2006, 11:01 AM
...and J-Lo's butt starring as Pluto.

Who will be portraying Uranus?

cuervo72
08-24-2006, 11:07 AM
This should be submitted as a case for Pluto. A song from one of my favorite now-broken up bands, the 2 Skinnee J's.

Maybe they can reunite for a Pluto benefit tour.

Mustang
08-24-2006, 11:16 AM
Pluto is the new Moops in trivial pursuit.


"How many planets in the solar system?"

"8"

"I'm sorry the card says 9"

rkmsuf
08-24-2006, 11:20 AM
Pluto is the new Moops in trivial pursuit.


"How many planets in the solar system?"

"8"

"I'm sorry the card says 9"



LOL

kcchief19
08-24-2006, 11:33 AM
Who will be portraying Uranus?
Screw Uranus.

King of New York
08-24-2006, 12:39 PM
Can anyone else hear Pluto screaming right now?


"NNOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!"

Vegas Vic
08-24-2006, 12:42 PM
I'm sure this does wonders for NASA's morale. As of today, instead of going to the 9th planet, we're spending $650 million on the New Horizons probe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Horizons) as it speeds toward one of the thousands of big rocks in the Kuiper Belt.

rkmsuf
08-24-2006, 12:44 PM
I'm sure this does wonders for NASA's morale. As of today, instead of going to the 9th planet, we're spending $650 million on the New Horizons probe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Horizons) as it speeds toward one of the thousands of big rocks in the Kuiper Belt.


Where the Plutonians are sure to blast it right out of the sky when it's in range.

rkmsuf
08-24-2006, 12:52 PM
I wonder if we'll see a major jump in the price of plutonium now.

Ksyrup
08-24-2006, 01:21 PM
Screw Uranus.

The bright side of this news is that Uranus jokes remain unaffected by today's decision.

Mustang
08-24-2006, 01:47 PM
"That's No Planet.. That's a Rock"

http://torch.cs.dal.ca/~olson/starwars.jpg

st.cronin
08-24-2006, 01:49 PM
The bright side of this news is that Uranus jokes remain unaffected by today's decision.

I heard something about astronomers wanting to change the name of Uranus, to stop the jokes. Supposedly they were going to change it to Urectum.

sorry

MikeVic
08-24-2006, 02:05 PM
I heard something about astronomers wanting to change the name of Uranus, to stop the jokes. Supposedly they were going to change it to Urectum.

sorry

Futurama!

cthomer5000
08-24-2006, 02:08 PM
Futurama, baby.

st.cronin
08-24-2006, 02:13 PM
you gots it

sabotai
08-24-2006, 02:19 PM
I think the bigger question is how is this going to effect the science of Astrology?

QuikSand
08-24-2006, 02:22 PM
Funny you should mention that...

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5697880

WSUCougar
08-24-2006, 02:27 PM
If somebody traveled back in time, and told Walt Disney that Pluto would no longer be a planet in 2006, what do you think the cartoon dog's name would be?

rkmsuf
08-24-2006, 02:33 PM
If somebody traveled back in time, and told Walt Disney that Pluto would no longer be a planet in 2006, what do you think the cartoon dog's name would be?

Horshack?

Ksyrup
08-24-2006, 02:38 PM
Who says we have to accept this determination?

http://images.cafepress.com/product/71612518v4_240x240_F.jpg

WSUCougar
08-24-2006, 02:39 PM
I think we should dispatch Andy Dick to Pluto on a mission of reconciliation.

st.cronin
08-24-2006, 02:47 PM
If somebody traveled back in time, and told Walt Disney that Pluto would no longer be a planet in 2006, what do you think the cartoon dog's name would be?

Rigel IV?

Bad-example
08-24-2006, 03:03 PM
If somebody traveled back in time, and told Walt Disney that Pluto would no longer be a planet in 2006, what do you think the cartoon dog's name would be?

Omicron Persei Eight

MikeVic
08-24-2006, 03:08 PM
If somebody traveled back in time, and told Walt Disney that Pluto would no longer be a planet in 2006, what do you think the cartoon dog's name would be?

Nintendoo 64?

sabotai
08-24-2006, 03:18 PM
If somebody traveled back in time, and told Walt Disney that Pluto would no longer be a planet in 2006, what do you think the cartoon dog's name would be?

2003 VB12 ?

cuervo72
08-24-2006, 03:21 PM
If somebody traveled back in time, and told Walt Disney that Pluto would no longer be a planet in 2006, what do you think the cartoon dog's name would be?

Elm Farm Ollie.

Bee
08-24-2006, 04:11 PM
I think we should go ahead and grandfather Pluto in as a planet.

sterlingice
08-24-2006, 09:06 PM
Omicron Persei Eight

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/96/Lrrr.jpg

Lrrr approves!

SI

Warhammer
08-24-2006, 09:28 PM
Sometimes size does matter.

Young Drachma
08-24-2006, 10:04 PM
Astronauts have known forever that Pluto wasn't really a planet and the argument that we ought to keep it one to prevent having to redo schoolbooks seems absurd.

cartman
10-06-2014, 02:47 PM
Pluto is back, baby.

Yes? No? Harvard astronomers kick up storm by claiming Pluto is indeed a planet : SCIENCE : Tech Times (http://www.techtimes.com/articles/17093/20141003/yes-no-harvard-astronomers-kick-up-storm-by-claiming-pluto-is-indeed-a-planet.htm)

Kodos
10-06-2014, 02:48 PM
Pluto: The Cleveland Browns of the solar system.

Blackadar
10-06-2014, 04:01 PM
Pluto is back, baby.

Yes? No? Harvard astronomers kick up storm by claiming Pluto is indeed a planet : SCIENCE : Tech Times (http://www.techtimes.com/articles/17093/20141003/yes-no-harvard-astronomers-kick-up-storm-by-claiming-pluto-is-indeed-a-planet.htm)

Nah. Pluto is too small. If it's a planet, then first Eris has to be a planet and MakeMake, Sedna and others aren't too far behind.

Chief Rum
10-07-2014, 01:55 AM
.

JPhillips
10-07-2014, 06:35 AM
Don't call it a comeback
I been here for years

cartman
01-07-2015, 02:17 PM
This article goes way past our solar system, and based off to the Kepler findings, tries to extrapolate how many habitable planets there might be in our Milky Way galaxy.

How many habitable planets are in our galaxy? — Starts With A Bang! — Medium (https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/how-many-habitable-planets-are-in-our-galaxy-5bcf6db80c7f)

Mizzou B-ball fan
02-07-2015, 12:26 PM
So cool!

Luminary DailyNASA Spacecraft ‘Wakes Up’ Near Pluto, 2.9 Billion Miles From Earth - Luminary Daily (http://luminarydaily.com/nasa-spacecraft-wakes-near-pluto-2-9-billion-miles-earth/)

cartman
07-14-2015, 02:19 PM
http://www.fofc-bbcf.com/pluto.jpg

Chief Rum
07-14-2015, 02:33 PM
Pluto memes are awesome.

Edward64
10-14-2017, 10:30 PM
Poor Pluto ... but would be an exciting find.

NASA Suspects a Ninth Planet Could be in Our Solar System's Outer Edges (https://www.outerplaces.com/science/item/16896-nasa-ninth-planet-solar-system)
Starting last year, it's been suggested by some astronomers that a large, undiscovered planet could be orbiting at the far end of our solar system, subtly throwing off other planets' orbits without otherwise being detected.

And before we get into a completely different conversation: no, this is not Pluto, which is no longer a planet. This hypothetical ninth planet is thought to be much, much bigger than any dwarf planet, and would be several times the size of Earth based on the calculations which point to its existence.

Earlier this month, NASA finally lent some credibility to this idea in a press release explaining how explaining how a ninth planet is currently the best explanation for several odd phenomena in the solar system. These phenomena range from odd behavior among far out objects, to several planets' orbital planes being non-level with the sun's equator (suggesting an object further out in space might be pulling at them).

NobodyHere
10-14-2017, 10:33 PM
Planet Nine From Outer Space!