PDA

View Full Version : What positions do you draft well, and with what positions do you struggle?


Ben E Lou
07-08-2007, 06:20 AM
I've been tracking my draftees for the last 16 SP drafts, and looking back, I can see trends on how well I evaluate certain positions. I'm wondering if I'm just good or bad at certain positions, or if there are certain positions that are more difficult. (Oh, and fyi, it's intentional that I'm trading up very rarely. I figure I'm not going to learn anything by drafting an obvious stud in the top 10 every third or fourth year. I'd rather learn by seeing if I can find stars or near-starts at the end of the first round.) So, here's how I've done:

QB
Because the position is so important, I've tended to draft more players (especially in rounds 4-7) that I doubted would pan out, but just wanted to at least look at in training camp. So, in 16 seasons, I've drafted 11 QBs, the earliest at 3(32), and the latest at 7(32). I've managed to land four players in that time who turned out to be rated in the 45ish or above range.

RB
Before looking at my data, I'll say that this is probably my worst position.

{Looks at data}

OK. I picked 9 RBs, ranging from 1(31) to 7(30). My best pick was a 2(3) guy who was 33/53 at the draft, and turned out 58/58. Other than that, though, pretty much every other pick has been a flop. Only one other RB pick was ever my starter.

FB
Not exactly a position that I spend draft picks on often. Only two picked, both were good picks. Grabbed a guy at 4(27) in 2011 who was 20/32--->51/51, and spent the 1(28) pick in 2020 on a 60/79--->86/86 guy. Both were very useful starters.

TE
3 picks in 16 drafts, only one starter: a guy at 3(30) who was 32/47-->63/63, and who has been a stud on the field.

WR
Again, without looking, I'd say that WR and DE are the positions that I absolutely nail.

{Looks at WR data.}

Takin' candy from a baby lately, boyz. It looks like I've got the hang of this position. From 2007-2009, I drafted 4 WRs in the 6th and 7th rounds (my team started out strong at WR so I didn't feel the need to spend a good pick on any early), none of whom panned out. Then, from 2010-2020, 8 of the 10 WRs I drafted turned out to be starter-caliber, ranging from a guy I traded up to draft at 1(6) who was 27/57-->81/81 and arguably the best WR in league history, to a 5(30) pick who was 17/41-->51/51 and had three seasons averaging over 10 yards per target. I've picked two WRs in the last two years, and both are creeping upward to what looks to be starter level as well. Six picks have been made in rounds 1 or 2.

OL
Pretty good success here:

No centers drafted earlier than 4(31), but four out of the five picked became starter quality (including a 7(24) guy for whom I ignored the scout's Very Overrated), and the other one was a Mr. Irrelevant who became a solid long-time backup and eventual mentor. I think he was on the team for 12 years.
Gotten better with guards as the career has progressed. Only first-round guard was a 1(30) who became an 86/86 superstar who has 57 pancakes over the last five seasons. Overall, five of nine guards picked became starter-quality. Four of the five guards picked in rounds 1-3 became starter-quality.
Two of the three early-round tackles panned out. I feel good about the third one I picked, but he was one of those random busts. Also managed to grab an eventual 73/73 RT with the 5(30) pick in 2014.DEFENSIVE ENDS
As I said earlier, my impression here is that I've really nailed these, like WRs.

The data bears out that impression. I've picked 6 DEs in the first three rounds, none earlier than 1(30). Four of those six became solid starters or better. The later rounds have been very good to me for DEs. I've gotten four DEs who ended up rated 59 or better at 7(26), 4(32), 4(32) (again), and 6(29). Overall 8 of 13 DEs drafted have become starter quality.

DEFENSIVE TACKLES

For a two-starter position, I'm surprised to see how few of these I've taken. Only seven have been drafted. All three first round picks (26, 30, 30) have turned out to be rated 62 or better. So far, nothing to get excited about yet in the later rounds, although I currently have a 3rd year guy who is 19/30-->27/43 who was taken in the fourth.

LINEBACKERS
Impression: I suck at drafting these guys.

Actually, the data tells me that I may not that bad at them, but that I don't draft them high enough. Only two ILBs have been picked, at 6(25) and 7(30). The 7(30) guy turned into a 52/52 starter. Only one of the seven OLBs I've taken was a first-day pick: a 2(29) guy taken in the most recent draft who was 25/62-->26/61 in training camp, so I'm thinking he'll pan out. No other OLB was taken higher than 4(27). Two of the remaining six became marginal starters, but when I'm not taking them any higher than this, I guess I really don't know if I'm any good at drafting them. ;)

CORNERBACKS
Surprisingly, I've yet to take a corner higher than 2(25). That 2(25) guy is still creeping, so the jury is still out. I've gotten starters at 2(31) and 3(24). The 3(24) guy in particular has been a good find. He grabbed seven INTs in his first year as a starter.

SAFETIES
Only four safeties have been picked in all this time. Grabbed a "Very Overrated" 15/44 guy at 2(32) last season, and he's up to 32/52, so that looks like pick to be proud of. None of the other three were taken early, nor did they pan out into anything useful, although there's one who is still creeping.


So, overall:

POSITIONS I DRAFT VERY WELL: WR, DE, OL
POSITIONS I STRUGGLE WITH: RB

Are RBs more difficult to draft, or am I just missing something in my evaluation with them?

JMO
07-08-2007, 07:04 AM
I dont have data to back this up but generally I draft alot of D linemen and get alot of hits there. I'm also quite good with safeties.

My worst spot is RB and LBs. I do spend alot of picks on LBs and have alot of busts for some reason. With RBs I've given up as I can't draft a good one in SP.

In MP I got lucky with a good RB at 2.1 but he is a converted FB so I'm not sure if it counts.

Nugget699
07-08-2007, 07:39 AM
I tend to nail my Safeties and CB picks while usually being way out with my DEs, Ts and Gs.

gstelmack
07-08-2007, 10:05 AM
None and All, respectively.

Noop
07-08-2007, 10:34 AM
Hmm I seem to do very well with QB's but terrible with LB's...

wade moore
07-08-2007, 10:46 AM
I wish I tracked data like SD so that I could be less anectodal about this, but...

I feel like when I'm drafting that if I'm picking DE, SS or RB that I have a high level of confidance about what that guy will be. That I can pick a guy anywhere in the draft and get a contributor.

But when I'm drafting OL (more specifically OT) and CB that more often than not in a couple of years I end up with a piece of garbage.

I'll try to pull together more concrete info, but that's my gut feeling.

Vinatieri for Prez
07-08-2007, 10:57 AM
I rarely draft QB/FB/TE/P-K, so I really don't have enough evidence on that.

Taking out high #1s since those normally aren't too difficult to hit on. Here is my anectodal evidence.

RB- ok
WR- very good
O-Line- very good
DE- ok
DT- good
LB- subpar from where I have drafted
CB- ok
S- good

ddrrbb
07-08-2007, 12:03 PM
One thing that I kind of noticed is that each position rating is based on a different number of categories. So, Olineman are only rated in 5 categories, D-line is 6. Most other positions are rated in many more categories, and unless there are high bars in most categories, each player drafted in later rounds has some glaring deficiencies in a few categories (including the dreaded ZERO). With OL/DL, if all of his bars are pretty high, and my scout (with "excellent" for young talent) tells me he's underrrated, I'll draft him.

That being said, I draft OL well. You can tell before they are drafted roughly how good they will project to be (not that they will necessarily pan out). I draft a lot of centers and Otackles and move them to positions with similar XP. They can play part-time behind my high price starters and a few can replace them in a few years at half the price.

Good young Oline is also good trade bait. I've traded a good lineman that I developed and a draft pick for Roy Williams (the WR, 82/82 with 3 yrs. left on contract).
I don't ever bother drafting FB, TE, K, P. Great ones can be picked up for very little in free agency.

QBs can kiss my a$$. The top 1 or 2 in the draft seem to be studs and I just don't have 5 seasons to see if a 2nd or 3rd tier QB will pan out. Example: Houston---No David Carr for me (x-factor made him 34/34 in this sim. I've also seen 45/45, 40/40). He has 2 backups 19/57 and 23/54. I split time with them for 3 seasons at 29/54 and 27/49 at the end (no big deal, they are s l o w l y progressing). I get a high draft pick, trade up to pick 2 from 4, and get a QB who is 50/80 after camp. SO....trade everything possible and get a good QB early in your career. It will make all your work at other positions pay off. BTW, I'm a Bears fan, so I am biased towards getting a stud QB as I've never had one. :(

Also, save before training camp. I've had picks that are complete busts after camp (say 34/45), but when I run it again...voila (38/68). I wish it didn't vary so much as a player is either good or bad and one training camp should not make or break you.

JetsIn06
07-08-2007, 06:11 PM
I'm with others as I wish I had taken better notes and recorded things more often. My computer is being worked on now, so I don't have my game to look at. I will post again once I can look at it, but my gut feeling is this:

QB - I've had decent success here. Right now my QB was drafted in the 4th round, I think. I've had him for about 4 years maybe. He is in the 40's and we have won two superbowls. I did trade up once to get the best QB I have ever seen in the game, who ended up being rated a 94/94 after two seasons. But, when his contract ran out, he wanted 44 million a year, so I traded him for first-rounders for the three following seasons and second-rounders in the next two seasons. The deal worked out well in my favor.

RB - This is where I have struggled. I've never, ever, in this game, had a consistent running game. I've gone from first in YPC to last in YPC with the same backfield, same O-line from year-to-year. I notice that there is a huge dropoff at this position. There may be two good RB's each draft class, and then the next ones are below average. I've never gotten any of the great ones, but my runing backs who have put up good numbers were mostly mid-round pick, but again, they were very inconsistent year to year.

FB - I actually draft these more often than many of you, mostly because I want a really good run-blocker for my offensive system. I've had good success mostly because I don't mind spending a 2nd rounder on one if I need to, and you can usually find the best one each year still on the board in the 2nd.

TE - Here's another spot where I've never had great success, but I think that's because there are usually some great TE's in free agency, and they don't cost much. So basically, I'll sign one in F/A and then the ones I draft never get enough playing time to develop fully. I've had a few work out though.

OL - I've done well drafting C's and G's, but haven't done well drafting T's.

WR - I've had a few great success stories here. I've had two of the best WR's in the league at a given time who weren't even first rounders, and I've also got an UDFA now who's turned out to be a great starting WR.

K/P - I also don't mind spending a mid-rounder on a K or P. If I need one, or I have an aging one that's starting to use more cap space than I want, I don't mind spending a 4th rounder on a K or P.

NT - Running the 3-4, so I've spent less picks on this position than I would have otherwise, but I've had two excellent NT's who spent their whole career on my team. I've had good success drafting backups, who have also spent most of their career on my team.

DE - This is my favorite position to draft, and I've traded up many times to get a stud, but as of now, I have a guy who didn't get drafted about 5 seasons ago now starting. He turned into a 50/50 guy and is starting opposite a 95/95.

LB - I've had limited success here, but I've also had a few huge busts. I've had first rounders who never made it to a starting job, and a few mid-rounders who rack up 8+ sacks a year. One in particular is a 25/25 who puts up 7 sacks a year who I drafted in the 5th round.

CB - This is another spot that I will trade up for in a heartbeat. But when I don't trade up, I seem to always end up with a lot of crappy players. So this is a bad position for me I guess.

S - Safeties always seem to last a little longer in the draft, so I've had a few great player's chosen here in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round.

Fonzie
07-08-2007, 07:57 PM
None and All, respectively.

+1

Sgran
07-09-2007, 07:20 PM
Defense - good
Offense - bad

ddrrbb
07-10-2007, 03:36 PM
I do like that after every draft, there are 4 or 5 undrafted guys that have good potential and high volatility (not P or K). Like WRs and TEs with 18/53 or some project type T or Gs that project high, or a DB that could be a nickel CB in a few seasons. I generally pick a lot of these guys up especially since they are usually way better than my 7th rd. pick, and are a cheap investment for a few seasons. I'm sure every 1 out of 7 or 8 of these guys may reach their potential or even breakout, and that's worth a few 100K to find them.

The last draft I picked up TE 25/51, SE 21/50, FL 22/51 undrafted.

db

George
07-10-2007, 03:54 PM
I seem to have done okay with RBs and LBs, though I'm not exactly sure why. I've had trouble with CBs and d-linemen, but again, I'm not sure why.

path12
07-11-2007, 05:03 PM
I think I've had the best success with LB's and WR's. DE's and OL's have not been nearly as good for me.

Izulde
07-12-2007, 04:38 AM
My best success based on what I can remember from my various aborted dynasties has been with WR, but I could be wrong on that.

My latest Dolphins historical dynasty will probably give me a better idea of how I do at the various positions, but thus far in that one and from what I can remember of previous ones, WR seems to be one I hit pretty well most of the time.

I'll update this as I get further into the historical dynasty. :)

stevew
07-12-2007, 05:41 AM
I tend to find quite a few good guards in later rounds. It may just be because I tend to focus on the O-line with quite a few 2nd day picks. It seems like a lot of the other positions, CB, RB, WR, DE, and QB especially, that you better grab one in the first round if you want a starter, top 10-15 most likely to get a really good one.

aston217
09-30-2013, 02:28 PM
This is a fun thread.

I've done quite well with RBs, TEs, WR, OL, and DB. LBs I can't seem to get the hang of, at all. Can't quite tell if this is talent related, but I think it's just that I can't figure them out for the life of me.

Sef0r
09-30-2013, 03:15 PM
A lot of my roster building initially has been to copy what Ben did. Draft very high BPR par WRs and TEs, switch to a 3-4 and have scrubs in most places except WLB so all my cash can go to lock up renegotiated contracts for my WRs.

I moved away from focusing on defense because offense wins games. Recently things have changed and my drafting of players has improved to the point that I can generally get good contributors outside of the 1st round.

Overall:
QB - Good. I've been fortunate to get some high performing (with the right supporting cast of course) QBs late, but the best ones have been the 1st round picks.

RB - Very good. I know what I look for a want in a RB and in almost all my leagues I can get a RB later than 3rd round that is a starter with 4+ ypc avg.

FB - Meh. I tend to take stud FBs in the 1st to try and convert them to TE and fail.

TE - Meh. My inability to utilise the TE hurts any good TEs I might get.

WR - I tend to hit these all the time, but then again I'm going after these guys with 1st round picks and almost always try to trade up to get them.

C/G/T - Very good. Another position where I know what bars are important and I can plug in starters from rounds 4 onward. I do have some high picks but I have rarely spent a 1st round pick on the Oline. I hope the new game changes that and makes this position as important as it is in the real game.

P/K - Very good. I have great punters, but 50/50 on kickers

DE/DT - meh. In the 3-4 I tend to focus on the high RUN stuffers so generally just work with 6th/7th rounders and FAs in their 40s.

ILB/OLB - very good. When I have focused on getting the right ILB I generally get good ones, 70% of the time I can get a good pass rushing WLB, but do have to spend a 1st round pick on them.

CB/S - Very good. Another position that I can draft and just seem to get the right guys, this ranges from all draft positions in the draft. I generally do not spend a 1st round pic here but if there is no obvious WR then I take the stud in the DB position - like the S I just took in CCFL here (http://www.younglifenorthdekalb.com/ccfl/draft/show_player.php?player_id=85)

Sebmono
09-30-2013, 04:33 PM
RB and CB - just atrocious, for some reason I just cannot figure out these positions.

QB - when not picking in top 10, just ok. Some serviceable starters but no studs. Although I do remember one time where I spent a 7th rounder on a guy as a backup and he ended up taking the job from my anointed starter after 3 years on the bench and ended up posting Romo-esque numbers. Still my favorite FOF story ever.
WR - bad at finding studs for some reason, but good 50 - 55 guys are consistent for me.
TE/FB - only ever use picks here if in top 20, usually find it easier just to sign good veteran blockers or undrafted guys
O-line - fantastic, I seem to always have two or three future studs waiting in the wings that I grabbed in the 2nd through 6th rounds all across the line and I never have anyone less than a 55 starting.
DT - oddly terrible when picking in the 1st but average to good when taken in 3rd through 5th rounds
DE - very good
LB - very good, especially in the first three rounds
S - good

Prinzar
09-30-2013, 04:42 PM
I think that I am the opposite of Ben. I draft linebackers very well in the 3rd-7th. Most of my teams are stacked at all the linebacker positions

RB I have found to be hit & miss. Most of the time I draft them in the 1st because my gameplan is very run heavy. The mid round guys pan out as decent starters, but never studs. The late round guys are usually special teams players

My problem position is QB. I know what to look for, but they never seem to become useful

Julio Riddols
09-30-2013, 06:23 PM
Damn, when this thread was posted the game was just a baby. Things have changed a lot in the world of FOF and drafting since then. Now I would be willing to bet that most of us can land studs just about anywhere in a SP draft with decent depth.

BighouseBrock
10-02-2013, 02:47 AM
best: rb/qb i've done very well at both over the years

worst. WR by far...several attempts many high rounds, i've read all the threads i can find and i still stink at it. so i play without'em now :) (thats not really working out so well incase your wondering! )