DeToxRox
03-16-2008, 04:27 PM
Every sport has stats that are so overblown and over analyzed that certain guys make a living because one stat line makes them seem like a guy who contributes then generally that isn't the case, but if it is, it's overblown. So what are stats you guys feel, in any sport, are generally used as gospel when judging a guy that mean nothing? I'll start with .
NHL - +/-
Plus/Minus is used a lot by analysts or beat writers and used as a big determining factor in how a guys playing. While it does show certain trends, I find it laughable how it can carry so much weight. If a guy's +/- is a + 30, then yeah, he's doing something right, and if it's -20, then year, hes probably not doing his job, but all that in between area can help inflate/deflate someones game based on how good the team they play on is. It's always something that bothered me.
MLB - Batting Average + Saves
Alex Sanchez and Juan Pierre each hit over .300. Need I say more? The guys got hits every so often but never walked, never drove in runs but they did steal some bases (but they were ineffective) yet .300 is some twisted benchmark in baseball. Batting average to me doesn't mean anything and those exampls provided prove it.
Saves are a way for a one inning pitcher to make huge money. There are only several elite closers who are worht the money the save has created. Further proof is Joe Borowski and Todd Jones had 40 + saves and are nothing more then average MLB pitchers who make more then more talented guys who are stuck working 7th and 8th innings.
NBA - Assists
The simple fact the assist rules don't apply to everyone equally should be enough for this to not mean anything. Creating shots for others doesn't always mean a great feed, it can be setting as simple as setting a screen. If assists weren't so highly valued Steve Nash wouldn't have two undeserved MVP's in his possession.
So what do you guys feel are overrated stats?
NHL - +/-
Plus/Minus is used a lot by analysts or beat writers and used as a big determining factor in how a guys playing. While it does show certain trends, I find it laughable how it can carry so much weight. If a guy's +/- is a + 30, then yeah, he's doing something right, and if it's -20, then year, hes probably not doing his job, but all that in between area can help inflate/deflate someones game based on how good the team they play on is. It's always something that bothered me.
MLB - Batting Average + Saves
Alex Sanchez and Juan Pierre each hit over .300. Need I say more? The guys got hits every so often but never walked, never drove in runs but they did steal some bases (but they were ineffective) yet .300 is some twisted benchmark in baseball. Batting average to me doesn't mean anything and those exampls provided prove it.
Saves are a way for a one inning pitcher to make huge money. There are only several elite closers who are worht the money the save has created. Further proof is Joe Borowski and Todd Jones had 40 + saves and are nothing more then average MLB pitchers who make more then more talented guys who are stuck working 7th and 8th innings.
NBA - Assists
The simple fact the assist rules don't apply to everyone equally should be enough for this to not mean anything. Creating shots for others doesn't always mean a great feed, it can be setting as simple as setting a screen. If assists weren't so highly valued Steve Nash wouldn't have two undeserved MVP's in his possession.
So what do you guys feel are overrated stats?