View Full Version : Confederations Cup Final- USA v. Brazil (LET'S WORK!!!)
Karlifornia
06-28-2009, 10:34 AM
Come on, boys. Win the one that counts. Set it up as the perfect run up to the last qualifiers for the WC.
LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOO USA!
This is the only time I get jingoistic.....fuck everyone else...let's get some GOOAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLS!
Bust out your vuvuzelas, ladies and gentlemen. Get your beers, get your scotch, get your rum, get your fried chicken, get your watermelon, get your plantains, get your quiche, get your hamburgers, get your Shepherd's Pie, get your nachos, get your corn tortilla tacos, get your friends, your kids, your wife, paint your face, and get ready to KICK SOME BRAZILIAN ASS!!!
Coffee Warlord
06-28-2009, 10:37 AM
GOOOOOOOAAAALL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL.
GOOOOOAAAAAAAL.
I'm just thrilled I get to watch this one.
Flasch186
06-28-2009, 10:51 AM
espn360 baby
Butter
06-28-2009, 10:56 AM
I have to go to some cookout today. I'm taping it though, but I just know some douche at the cookout is going to ruin it for me before I get to watch it.
MikeVic
06-28-2009, 11:07 AM
Looking at the results of the 3rd place game, I want to go back and not read the results but instead watch the game. Seems like it would've been pretty exciting.
Big Fo
06-28-2009, 11:19 AM
The last twenty minutes of regular time were great.
It's going to take a hell of a performance but it would be pretty awesome if the US could pull off the upset today. I wish the semifinal ref had some sense and hadn't sent Bradley off, he'll definitely be missed out there today.
Eaglesfan27
06-28-2009, 11:27 AM
Starts at 2 Eastern, right?
MikeVic
06-28-2009, 11:31 AM
The last twenty minutes of regular time were great.
It's going to take a hell of a performance but it would be pretty awesome if the US could pull off the upset today. I wish the semifinal ref had some sense and hadn't sent Bradley off, he'll definitely be missed out there today.
I thought in the other thread someone said even with a yellow, Bradley would miss today's game (too many yellows)?
Brazil is my favourite soccer nation, so I'll be cheering for them today. :cool:
Big Fo
06-28-2009, 11:44 AM
I thought in the other thread someone said even with a yellow, Bradley would miss today's game (too many yellows)?
Brazil is my favourite soccer nation, so I'll be cheering for them today. :cool:
Yellow cards were erased for the final iirc.
It's the Confederations Cup, you should be rooting for CONCACAF.
path12
06-28-2009, 01:43 PM
WOO!
Scoobz0202
06-28-2009, 01:43 PM
GOOOOOOAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 01:43 PM
GOOAALLLLLLLL!!!!!!
Eaglesfan27
06-28-2009, 01:43 PM
Wow, USA is up!
Radii
06-28-2009, 01:44 PM
holy crap gooooooooal!!!!!!! GO USA
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 01:44 PM
Sweet, first time Brazil has trailed in the tournament.
Flasch186
06-28-2009, 01:44 PM
omg!
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 01:44 PM
The pace of this game is going to pick up significantly now. I was expecting a slow ball control game, but not now with a goal being scored.
MrBug708
06-28-2009, 01:45 PM
Why are they calling that a great finish? Dempsey missed it with his foot and it bounced off his knee...lol
MikeVic
06-28-2009, 01:46 PM
Wow! Was not expecting the U.S. to lead at any moment!
Dr. Sak
06-28-2009, 01:46 PM
That buzzing is driving me insane.
path12
06-28-2009, 01:47 PM
Two decent chances on those corners.
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 01:48 PM
That buzzing is driving me insane.
+1
Just when I thought there could be nothing more annoying than the Tampa cow bells (though they are still a very close second).
MikeVic
06-28-2009, 01:49 PM
I think the buzzing is funny lol. Bzzz bzzz bzzz bzzzz, must be nuts for the players.
edit: I find it funny as a viewer, but as a player, it would definitely annoy the hell out of me... maybe eventually it'll annoy me as a viewer too.
Eaglesfan27
06-28-2009, 01:51 PM
+1
Just when I thought there could be nothing more annoying than the Tampa cow bells (though they are still a very close second).
+2. It's the most annoying sound I've ever heard while watching a sporting event.
MikeVic
06-28-2009, 01:52 PM
It sounds like a race track to me.
bulletsponge
06-28-2009, 01:54 PM
Why are they calling that a great finish? Dempsey missed it with his foot and it bounced off his knee...lol
cause it went in
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 01:57 PM
US needs to start possessing the ball. Yikes...
MikeVic
06-28-2009, 01:58 PM
Nice save by Howard.
Dr. Sak
06-28-2009, 02:00 PM
WOW!
Scoobz0202
06-28-2009, 02:00 PM
OMG OMG OMG GOALLLLLLLLL
path12
06-28-2009, 02:00 PM
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLL!!!
MikeVic
06-28-2009, 02:00 PM
Wow wowowowo!!! Nice goal!
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 02:00 PM
GOALLLLLLL!!!!!
Eaglesfan27
06-28-2009, 02:00 PM
WOW! What a pass, what a goal!
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 02:00 PM
Ok nevermind.
I'll take the counter attack :)
larrymcg421
06-28-2009, 02:01 PM
Wow!
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 02:01 PM
GGGGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Radii
06-28-2009, 02:01 PM
unbelievable! What a perfect counter attack, GOGOGO!!!!
Flasch186
06-28-2009, 02:01 PM
OMG!!!!!
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 02:02 PM
This is freakin' awesome. Donovan's just great. GO USA!!!
Warhammer
06-28-2009, 02:02 PM
Why can't I find this anywhere?!?!?!?
Axxon
06-28-2009, 02:03 PM
That was an awesome goal.
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 02:03 PM
Why can't I find this anywhere?!?!?!?
You don't get ESPN?
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 02:03 PM
Why can't I find this anywhere?!?!?!?
ESPN
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 02:04 PM
Okay. Can we record the last 120 minutes of soccer and show it to the team over and over again before the WC starts.
bulletsponge
06-28-2009, 02:04 PM
great passing there on the 2nd goal
larrymcg421
06-28-2009, 02:04 PM
Watching the replay, it seems that Brazil was very lazy getting back. The 3rd guy following barely jogged down there and then stopped to watch the play.
Warhammer
06-28-2009, 02:05 PM
Nevermind, stupid listings have it wrong..
Flasch186
06-28-2009, 02:05 PM
online ESPN360
Dr. Sak
06-28-2009, 02:07 PM
What a save!
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 02:07 PM
VERY nice save!!!
Eaglesfan27
06-28-2009, 02:08 PM
Howard has been unbelievable so far.
Dr. Sak
06-28-2009, 02:09 PM
Howard has been unbelievable so far.
Very Jim Craig esk
path12
06-28-2009, 02:11 PM
God it's nervewracking just watching Brazil set plays up.
mauchow
06-28-2009, 02:14 PM
That could have been another breakaway goal but he missed the lane for a perfect pass that would have been a surefire goal.
larrymcg421
06-28-2009, 02:15 PM
Even with the 2-0 lead, I'm not that comfortable because Brazil is spending so much time in our box.
Axxon
06-28-2009, 02:16 PM
I have faith in Tim Howard. He's on his game today.
bulletsponge
06-28-2009, 02:21 PM
i bet Bigsoccer has crashed
Tigercat
06-28-2009, 02:22 PM
Even with the 2-0 lead, I'm not that comfortable because Brazil is spending so much time in our box.
They are in even better shape than they were against Spain, IMO. (Talking about gameplay, not even the fact that we are up 2 instead of 1.) I know Spain played like crap before the half, but that's the point. We have seen a better first half Brazil than we saw out of Spain, and still we are up 2-0. We are taking a good punch and we are also counterattacking better than we did against Spain.
SirFozzie
06-28-2009, 02:23 PM
*sings a old song the Metro fans taught him (it wasn't Red Bull at the time)
He's got Tourette's. He Guards the US nets.. he's timmy howard.. Timmy Howard!
Young Drachma
06-28-2009, 02:35 PM
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K6Di8QT98Zk&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K6Di8QT98Zk&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
path12
06-28-2009, 02:36 PM
That didn't take long.
class move by Fabiano there
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 02:36 PM
That isn't how they needed to start the half.
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 02:40 PM
That hurt. Come on USA!!!!
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 02:48 PM
Howard comes up huge again.
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 02:50 PM
I don't know how they hang on to this. Brazil is relentless.
Eaglesfan27
06-28-2009, 02:50 PM
I think we were lucky there. Still, a great effort by Howard.
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 02:51 PM
Ummmm that looked like it might have been in...
Axxon
06-28-2009, 02:51 PM
We got lucky on that no goal call.
SirFozzie
06-28-2009, 02:51 PM
whew.
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 02:51 PM
Hmm...looks in to me. I'll take it though.
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 02:51 PM
yea looked like a goal, still hard to tell though.
larrymcg421
06-28-2009, 02:51 PM
Do they not have a camera right on the line? That's the angle we need.
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 02:51 PM
I think they got a fortunate call there.
mauchow
06-28-2009, 02:51 PM
Okay, stop sucking now USA...or I should say stop being so good Brazil.
I really hope US scores at least one more time at least nullify what should have been a goal by Brazil.
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 02:53 PM
That was a goal. Hopefully Brazil gets bitter about the non-call and stops trying. ;)
Seriously, though, USA needs to get a second wind here. Recapture the heart they showed in the first half and don't go into a prevent defense.
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 02:54 PM
I must say though, our Defense inbox is top notch.
mauchow
06-28-2009, 02:54 PM
You know Brazil is going to score again.
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 02:54 PM
This is not looking good based on how they are playing. They played well in the first half but look like they are playing afraid to lose instead of trying to win.
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 02:55 PM
Now were on the attack!
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 02:58 PM
Soccer is so much more enjoyable when the likes of Italy, Mexico, Portugal, all other diving/lying down on the ground like they've been shot countries are not involved.
Scoobz0202
06-28-2009, 02:59 PM
We need to get some fresh legs in there...
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:00 PM
OMFG Howard what a save!
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:00 PM
Howard is playing great. Keep it up!
larrymcg421
06-28-2009, 03:00 PM
Wow, that was a shitty pass and then some lazy defense that almost cost us there.
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 03:01 PM
OMFG Howard what a save!
+1
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 03:01 PM
Some subs would be nice. They are getting crushed right now.
SirFozzie
06-28-2009, 03:01 PM
No Subs yet, Bob?
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:02 PM
Damn it. That was a nice effort.
Scoobz0202
06-28-2009, 03:02 PM
Some subs would be nice. They are getting crushed right now.
We need fresh legs... badddddd
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:03 PM
tie game
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:03 PM
FUCK
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 03:03 PM
They weren't even playing defense.
mauchow
06-28-2009, 03:03 PM
You knew it was going to happen.
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 03:03 PM
damn
Eaglesfan27
06-28-2009, 03:04 PM
:(
Young Drachma
06-28-2009, 03:04 PM
Aw shucks.
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:04 PM
Oh... Now you sub...heh
Scoobz0202
06-28-2009, 03:04 PM
OOHHHH NNOOWWW HE SUBS!!
jesus
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 03:04 PM
Crap, saw that coming the way that developed. They are scrambling too much.
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 03:04 PM
I'm actually glad this happened. Removes the monster in the room. Now maybe it frees the US from the prevent defense, and gets them attacking again.
SirFozzie
06-28-2009, 03:05 PM
Damnit
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 03:05 PM
They're just lucky to still have a shot to send it to a shootout.
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 03:05 PM
Not syaing, mind, that I wanted Brazil to score, but if you assume they were going to score, glad it finally happened, so the squad can move forward.
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 03:06 PM
US hasn't done anything since the 30th minute.
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 03:07 PM
Not syaing, mind, that I wanted Brazil to score, but if you assume they were going to score, glad it finally happened, so the squad can move forward.
The US seemed to be playing like they were asuming Brazil was going to tie it.
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:08 PM
that was kind of close
larrymcg421
06-28-2009, 03:08 PM
That was a great kick by Donovan.
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:09 PM
US hasn't done anything since the 30th minute.
Yep. They look dead out there.
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:11 PM
Damn that was scary.
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 03:12 PM
That Kletzkin guy complete more passes to Brazil than the US.
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:13 PM
Geez.. this is nuts
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:13 PM
yep...
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:13 PM
NO
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 03:13 PM
Shit.
kingfc22
06-28-2009, 03:13 PM
F***
mauchow
06-28-2009, 03:13 PM
Howard.........Of all shots to block.
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 03:14 PM
Well, good effort in the first half at least. Rather embarassing 2nd half.
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 03:14 PM
Dammit
Young Drachma
06-28-2009, 03:14 PM
well that settles that.
MrBug708
06-28-2009, 03:14 PM
:(
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:14 PM
:(:(:(
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:14 PM
Agreed, Embarrassing 2nd half.
mauchow
06-28-2009, 03:16 PM
Brazil is loads better.. obviously we knew that from the get go, but it just continues to show without a doubt who the better players are.
Doubtful the US can score in the next 7(roughly) minutes.
Flasch186
06-28-2009, 03:16 PM
well crap
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 03:17 PM
I can't believe how extremely different those halves were.
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:17 PM
good as chance as any that was...
mauchow
06-28-2009, 03:17 PM
Huge oppurtunity there. Missed by a few feet.
JetsIn06
06-28-2009, 03:17 PM
That was our shot right there.
Scoobz0202
06-28-2009, 03:18 PM
Is it wrong of me to blame this on Bob or is that just the emotion speaking?
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:19 PM
Is it wrong of me to blame this on Bob or is that just the emotion speaking?
I'm not sure he's really to blame. I guess it depends how you look at it.
EagleFan
06-28-2009, 03:20 PM
They say, no shame in losing this way but I disagree. If you just look at a 3-2 loss you would think no shame but I see shame in this loss with such a poorly played second half. If they played a solid 90 minutes and lost 3-2 that is one thing but to get mauled like this in the second half is quite shameful.
Young Drachma
06-28-2009, 03:21 PM
Is it wrong of me to blame this on Bob or is that just the emotion speaking?
That's what I was thinking. I mean, they call them managers for a reason. I dunno.
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:23 PM
Good Match, Nice try USA.... better luck next time.
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 03:23 PM
I don't know how you can blame Bradley. Even after the subs they were getting their ass kicked. Although I don't know what the gameplan was in the 2nd half. Up 2-0 and play soft defense?
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:23 PM
Fuck, what I really meant to say Is this shit pisses me off, why the fuck did I even think we had a chance. ARGH
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 03:24 PM
That's what I was thinking. I mean, they call them managers for a reason. I dunno.
If you blame Bob for the second half, you have to give him credit for the first half and for the tournament run as well.
Personally, I want to know what the bleep Klezthan (sp?) was doing.
Scoobz0202
06-28-2009, 03:24 PM
yea, but the subs he put on had no right being on the pitch, imo.
Where's Adu and Torres?
He did nothing to help the attack.
MIJB#19
06-28-2009, 03:25 PM
Don't sell your team short, people. It's not an every day situation for any team to take a 2-0 lead over Brazil in a tournament final. Team USA survived the three-way tie and ended Spain's world record tying unbeaten streak. Results haven't been all that bad.
rowech
06-28-2009, 03:27 PM
I don't know how you can blame Bradley. Even after the subs they were getting their ass kicked. Although I don't know what the gameplan was in the 2nd half. Up 2-0 and play soft defense?
The subs he made offered no pick-up to the team. Wasn't there someone on the bench that could have brought some energy? The two subs he made did little to nothing. Not to mention taking off our best scoring threat.
I will never understand why coaches take off top strikers in one goal games.
k0ruptr
06-28-2009, 03:27 PM
Don't sell your team short, people. It's not an every day situation for any team to take a 2-0 lead over Brazil in a tournament final. Team USA survived the three-way tie and ended Spain's world record tying unbeaten streak. Results haven't been all that bad.
this is true, and while I agree, I know they could of played a better 2nd half. thats what makes it rough.
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 03:29 PM
The subs he made offered no pick-up to the team. Wasn't there someone on the bench that could have brought some energy? The two subs he made did little to nothing. Not to mention taking off our best scoring threat.
I will never understand why coaches take off top strikers in one goal games.
Easy to blame the coach. The team didn't show up in the 2nd half. Can't blame 2 subs for that.
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 03:30 PM
yea, but the subs he put on had no right being on the pitch, imo.
Where's Adu and Torres?
He did nothing to help the attack.
But do the subs make the difference here? I thought it was systemic decisions and attitude--taking a defensive approach--along with Brazil's functional excellence that led to this loss.
The lack of presence of Adu and Torres or other offensively-inclined players is a long standing criticism of Bradley. Reminds me of the Angels, fans complaining (me one of them) that we keep throwing in an Izturis in there in the lineup when we have Brandon Wood ripping it up in AAA. Pro-Wood fans (most of Angel nation) wonder WTF Scioscia won't bring him up and play him. And then other fans basically say "In Scioscia we trust". Frustrating for those of us who want Wood up.
Same with Bradley and guys like Adu and Torres. He just doesn't seem to play them enough. Even more annoying with Bradley, though, is that, unlike Scioscia, he doesn't have the track record to deserve people looking away.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 03:33 PM
*sighs* boooo on Bob Bradley. His fault they decided to bunker up in the second half and abandon what was working so well in the first half.
Definitely a game of two halves. Still, a 2-0 win over the #1 team in the world and a 2-0 half against Brazil are nothing to scoff at, neither is 2nd place. Still, you can say that they should have won this one.
Scoobz0202
06-28-2009, 03:34 PM
It's almost like Bradley isn't prepared for the big matches.
I can't say it would have been any different with Adu or Torres out there, because that is why we were gassed in the second half, because we have no depth.
But it's just so frustrating to be sitting here and see Brazil making subs while Bradley stands there with his thumb up his ass. It was obvious we needed some fresh legs, and it was obvious this defensive play was imploding on us. So he brings in shit defensive players, and Casey coming on in the end almost made me want to throw up.
I give him props, we beat Spain. Brilliant game. But it's one of those things where I think with a different coach we would have beat both Spain and Brazil and won our first FIFA cup.
RPI-Fan
06-28-2009, 03:35 PM
Don't sell your team short, people. It's not an every day situation for any team to take a 2-0 lead over Brazil in a tournament final. Team USA survived the three-way tie and ended Spain's world record tying unbeaten streak. Results haven't been all that bad.
We don't need your condescending back-handed compliments. We didn't go the South Africa to "take the lead on Brazil" or have results that "weren't all that bad". We showed up with one goal - win the tournament - and did not reach that goal. While there are certainly positives we can reflect on, we did not reach our goal and that is a disappointment no matter what. Maybe in Netherlands second-best is what you strive for, but not for us.
Crapshoot
06-28-2009, 03:37 PM
We don't need your condescending back-handed compliments. We didn't go the South Africa to "worry Brazil" or "give them a close game". We showed up with one goal - win the tournament - and did not reach that goal. While there are certainly positives we can reflect on, we did not reach our goal and that is a disappointment no matter what. Maybe in Netherlands second-best is good enough, but not for us.
You're being an ass of epic proportions here. The US is not one of the 10 best teams in the world, and they did a damn good job to get where they did; there's no shame in losing 3-2 to the best team in the world (or second best, between them and Spain). MIJB was offering a compliment for a team that made a good effort, and your "TEAM AMERICAN FUCK YA FOREIGNERS" bit doesn't help.
Crapshoot
06-28-2009, 03:38 PM
But do the subs make the difference here? I thought it was systemic decisions and attitude--taking a defensive approach--along with Brazil's functional excellence that led to this loss.
The lack of presence of Adu and Torres or other offensively-inclined players is a long standing criticism of Bradley. Reminds me of the Angels, fans complaining (me one of them) that we keep throwing in an Izturis in there in the lineup when we have Brandon Wood ripping it up in AAA. Pro-Wood fans (most of Angel nation) wonder WTF Scioscia won't bring him up and play him. And then other fans basically say "In Scioscia we trust". Frustrating for those of us who want Wood up.
Same with Bradley and guys like Adu and Torres. He just doesn't seem to play them enough. Even more annoying with Bradley, though, is that, unlike Scioscia, he doesn't have the track record to deserve people looking away.
Actually a good analogy with Wood, except Scioscia is considered a good manager. My impression from most US fans is that Bradley isn't that popular. :D
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 03:38 PM
Don't sell your team short, people. It's not an every day situation for any team to take a 2-0 lead over Brazil in a tournament final. Team USA survived the three-way tie and ended Spain's world record tying unbeaten streak. Results haven't been all that bad.
eh - but it was Bradley's decision to bunker-up in the second half and abandon what worked so well in the first half and try to withstand 45mins of brazil-pressure.
Cringer
06-28-2009, 03:39 PM
The subs he made offered no pick-up to the team. Wasn't there someone on the bench that could have brought some energy? The two subs he made did little to nothing. Not to mention taking off our best scoring threat.
I will never understand why coaches take off top strikers in one goal games.
I agree the subs sucked. Once again Sacha Kljestan comes on and turns over the ball almost every time he touches it. The problem with the rest overall is just a lack of depth on the team. Casey wasn't going to do much, but at least he was an attacking player I guess, though too late. Bornstein coming in was fine, no problem there. No Ching at the tournament, Bradley with the red card in the last game.....there just were not a lot of options for Bob Bradley in the end, since we all know Adu and Torres would not come on for some reason, and Torres (though I really like him) isn't some great attacking threat anyways.
Overall though, great run after a horrible start to the tournament and some bad WCQ games before that. I will actually say I am happy to see Bradley stick with something that worked for the most part with the 4-4-2 and the starting lineup.
Hopefully some guys on the Gold Cup roster step up and give the USA some options for the WC next year to add depth. We need more guys to go to with confidence. We may not get a sub like Brazil with Alves, but we need something better then we have now.
Well done USMNT.
edit: And about taking out Altidore. Moving Dempsey up worked the last couple games when taking Altidore out, I won't come down too hard on Bradley for that. Don't take this whole post wrong, I still want Bradley gone. ;)
larrymcg421
06-28-2009, 03:39 PM
I don't know. I didn't think we played particularly well in the first half. We just converted the few opportunities we got and Brazil missed all of theirs. The odds just did us in in the 2nd half.
rowech
06-28-2009, 03:40 PM
It's almost like Bradley isn't prepared for the big matches.
I can't say it would have been any different with Adu or Torres out there, because that is why we were gassed in the second half, because we have no depth.
But it's just so frustrating to be sitting here and see Brazil making subs while Bradley stands there with his thumb up his ass. It was obvious we needed some fresh legs, and it was obvious this defensive play was imploding on us. So he brings in shit defensive players, and Casey coming on in the end almost made me want to throw up.
I give him props, we beat Spain. Brilliant game. But it's one of those things where I think with a different coach we would have beat both Spain and Brazil and won our first FIFA cup.
It's funny you say that...I really think Bradley was like, "Holy crap...we're up 2-0. What do I do now? I wasn't prepared for this at all."
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 03:40 PM
We don't need your condescending back-handed compliments. We didn't go the South Africa to "take the lead on Brazil" or have results that "weren't all that bad". We showed up with one goal - win the tournament - and did not reach that goal. While there are certainly positives we can reflect on, we did not reach our goal and that is a disappointment no matter what. Maybe in Netherlands second-best is what you strive for, but not for us.
Damn, dude, not only was that phenomenally assholish of you, but you managed to also come off as the evil, arrogant American, too. Kudos for nailing so many goals in one punch.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 03:42 PM
We don't need your condescending back-handed compliments. We didn't go the South Africa to "take the lead on Brazil" or have results that "weren't all that bad". We showed up with one goal - win the tournament - and did not reach that goal. While there are certainly positives we can reflect on, we did not reach our goal and that is a disappointment no matter what. Maybe in Netherlands second-best is what you strive for, but not for us.
:eek:
dude...i think you're sorta...overreacting to MJIB's comments
rowech
06-28-2009, 03:43 PM
I really didn't expect to win that game but it sucks to be up 2-0, playing fairly well, and then just tanking a whole half.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 03:43 PM
Damn, dude, not only was that phenomenally assholish of you, but you managed to also come off as the evil, arrogant American, too. Kudos for nailing so many goals in one punch.
haha...seriously my thought too.
MJIB - don't be offended by the one asshole-ish comment that i can only hope was driven by frustration.
Arles
06-28-2009, 03:50 PM
Subs always kill us against good teams and Kljestan and Beasley (who thankfully didn't play) have no business on this team. They are terrible, play terrible every time they get on the pitch and constantly kill possession. Bradley also played the "deer in headlights" strategy for the final 45 minutes, so we were behind the 8-ball.
All that said, Landon Donovan was absolutely brilliant in this tournament, Dempsey and Altidore have given the US legit scoring threats and the back 4 were superb. We just need to find one more midfielder who can create and this team is on its way. I hope Adu gets some time coming up as he is exactly the player we need.
As much as I have been frustrated with Bradley, atleast he stopped this insane 4-5-1 "we will out possession Italy/Spain/Brazil" craziness and went back to a solid defense with two strikers leveraging a counter attack (the only way the US can win against decent teams). So, that lesson should help long term. Although, one wonders why it took him so long to learn it.
Oilers9911
06-28-2009, 03:56 PM
We don't need your condescending back-handed compliments. We didn't go the South Africa to "take the lead on Brazil" or have results that "weren't all that bad". We showed up with one goal - win the tournament - and did not reach that goal. While there are certainly positives we can reflect on, we did not reach our goal and that is a disappointment no matter what. Maybe in Netherlands second-best is what you strive for, but not for us.
Considering you were 1-2 in the round robin you should be thanking your lucky stars that they finished second in the tournament.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 03:56 PM
I really didn't expect to win that game but it sucks to be up 2-0, playing fairly well, and then just tanking a whole half.
+1 yeah - absolutely
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 03:57 PM
We don't need your condescending back-handed compliments. We didn't go the South Africa to "take the lead on Brazil" or have results that "weren't all that bad". We showed up with one goal - win the tournament - and did not reach that goal. While there are certainly positives we can reflect on, we did not reach our goal and that is a disappointment no matter what. Maybe in Netherlands second-best is what you strive for, but not for us.
Oh please. No one gave the team a shot and even the biggest US Soccer fans would have admitted that a trip out of the opening round would have been a victory. They beat the top ranked team in the world and had Brazil on the ropes. They built some good buzz going into the World Cup and gathered some valuable experience playing in South Africa and in front of those horns.
Karlifornia
06-28-2009, 04:05 PM
sonovabitch. Went to the Britannia Arms to watch it. Great first half...and well, yeah. Still have some strides to make, but it was a good effort.
Crapshoot
06-28-2009, 04:13 PM
sonovabitch. Went to the Britannia Arms to watch it. Great first half...and well, yeah. Still have some strides to make, but it was a good effort.
Good bar. I didn't think you lived down in the South Bay?
MIJB#19
06-28-2009, 04:32 PM
We don't need your condescending back-handed compliments. We didn't go the South Africa to "take the lead on Brazil" or have results that "weren't all that bad". We showed up with one goal - win the tournament - and did not reach that goal. While there are certainly positives we can reflect on, we did not reach our goal and that is a disappointment no matter what. Maybe in Netherlands second-best is what you strive for, but not for us.After how the past week went, with two "maybe we can win this thing afterall" moments, no doubt I expect Team USA and the fans to be very disappointed. I've seen too many tournaments in the past 15 years where my homeland choked one way or another in the most uncharming ways, after cruising through the early stages.
At the same time I know there's a lose-lose situation here. Had I gone against my sentiments and pointed out that your team choked one of the biggest games in their careers, you'd still grab your pitchfork and vent your frustration of disappointment towards me. Well, sir, vent away. As a note in advance, I'll also be here next summer, in case the USA doesn't win the World Cup (providing they do qualify, of course).
Karlifornia
06-28-2009, 04:34 PM
Good bar. I didn't think you lived down in the South Bay?
yeah, I live in downtown SJ. Are you up on the penninsula?
bhlloy
06-28-2009, 04:39 PM
Maybe in Netherlands second-best is what you strive for, but not for us.
Wow... classy.
edit - take out the threadjack
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 04:40 PM
i disagree - MJIB is welcome to discuss futbol with us anytime.
Crapshoot
06-28-2009, 04:44 PM
yeah, I live in downtown SJ. Are you up on the penninsula?
Yeah, mv. was switching back and forth with the giants game.
JonInMiddleGA
06-28-2009, 04:49 PM
And in the absence of a coaching change or significant roster changes, this team reverts to their early C-Cup form and finishes 3rd (or possibly last) in WC pool play (assuming they get there at all). Remember, you heard it here first.
RPI-Fan
06-28-2009, 04:54 PM
:eek:
dude...i think you're sorta...overreacting to MJIB's comments
He constantly denigrates the U.S. team in threads, always in this same snarky backhanded way. It's like a script. It's a shame none of you see the trend, but I do and I stand by my comments.
RPI-Fan
06-28-2009, 04:56 PM
You're being an ass of epic proportions here. The US is not one of the 10 best teams in the world, and they did a damn good job to get where they did; there's no shame in losing 3-2 to the best team in the world (or second best, between them and Spain). MIJB was offering a compliment for a team that made a good effort, and your "TEAM AMERICAN FUCK YA FOREIGNERS" bit doesn't help.
Get over yourself. Thanks for throwing in that we're not one of the 10 best teams. Where did I say that we were? On any given today we have the chance to be the best team on the field - when we are not it's a disappointment. That's the attitude that got us to the finals, and it's what will get us back while Europeans and South Americans are busy making sly backhanded disses on our team.
cubboyroy1826
06-28-2009, 04:56 PM
Okay question for those of you who watch more of the US games. I think they said Altidore is like 19 and watching him today he looked like a dear in headlights. I did not think he went after the ball and his effort looked weak. Was this because of the Brazil defense, was it just a bad day or is he not quite ready for this big of a game?
rowech
06-28-2009, 05:01 PM
Okay question for those of you who watch more of the US games. I think they said Altidore is like 19 and watching him today he looked like a dear in headlights. I did not think he went after the ball and his effort looked weak. Was this because of the Brazil defense, was it just a bad day or is he not quite ready for this big of a game?
To me, he plays like a 19 year old sometimes. There are times he doens't work as hard as I think he should. in addition, when he's into the game, he's fantastic...not, he's not. Nevertheless, I think he's our 2nd best threat on the field. Just having him makes defenses adjusts. Once he was subbed for, Brazil's defense had no pressure anymore. (not that they had a lot that half)
Crapshoot
06-28-2009, 05:03 PM
He constantly denigrates the U.S. team in threads, always in this same snarky backhanded way. It's like a script. It's a shame none of you see the trend, but I do and I stand by my comments.
No, you're the asshole who always falls into this idea that this is the GREATEST TEAM EVAH at times, and everyone else is blind for not seeing it. Look around- you're the one who is a homer of epic proportions.
Crapshoot
06-28-2009, 05:04 PM
To me, he plays like a 19 year old sometimes. There are times he doens't work as hard as I think he should. in addition, when he's into the game, he's fantastic...not, he's not. Nevertheless, I think he's our 2nd best threat on the field. Just having him makes defenses adjusts. Once he was subbed for, Brazil's defense had no pressure anymore. (not that they had a lot that half)
The talent level is great - IMO, that first goal against Spain showed how good he can be. I dunno if sitting on the bench at Villareal is the way to do it, but that's another story.
At the risk of pissing off RPI-fan, i must say USA has done a hell of a good job in this tournament, specially in the second half of it, beating a good Egypt team by a huge goal difference, beating Spain totally deserving it, and putting Brazil against the ropes.
USA defensive system was mainly based on physical condition and tactical order/concentration and it worked really well for them, you just need to look at the bodies of some USA players vs the Euro or Brazilian ones. I guess Bradley knew that he doesn't have a lot of technical players to choose from, and i'm sure he would prefer a beautiful Brazilian style of playing, but he must adapt his tactics to the players he has, and he did it well imho. I'm still impressed about how well did USA team keep the 4-4-2 formation vs Spain the whole game, not loosing the composure even once and never showing any tiredness signal.
About today's game, it was really hard to resist those two goals difference, but maybe Bradley decided to bunk too early. Of course it worked vs Spain in the second half, so probably he thought it could work this time too. Also vs teams like Brazil, even if you don't want to play defensively, they can easily force you to do it, so maybe it was not that he decided to play that way in the second half, but that they were forced to do it.
That is the problem of playing too defensive vs good teams. Sometimes you can stop them as they did vs Spain, but most of the times, when you allow the other team to keep possession and shoot again and again, a simple lucky deflection, or a single loss of concentration from one player, can lead to the defeating goal.
The good thing for USA is probably that from now they won't be as afraid of playing historical teams, and it will be huge confidence boost for the future. In fact i think that one of the keys of the good games vs Spain and Brazil was the confidence boost after the win vs Egypt. USA players started to think about themselves about a winning team that can do way better than expected even vs the top national teams.
Hope this also will make more American kids to play soccer, with your population and the huge importance of sports in your culture and education, if soccer becomes popular enough i have no doubt USA will be a top 5 country.
MIJB#19
06-28-2009, 05:23 PM
He constantly denigrates the U.S. team in threads, always in this same snarky backhanded way. It's like a script. It's a shame none of you see the trend, but I do and I stand by my comments.That's bullshit, you and I both know that you're the backstabber between the two of us. It's really disturbing that you always seem to want me to come off like that. Tied with that other guy that shares your type of trolling, I'd say you're the biggest prejudged asshole at the board. Either live with the fact that I'll root for the USA when my own country isn't involved, or stop reading and replying my posts overhere.
/end rant
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 05:25 PM
Hope this also will make more American kids to play soccer, with your population and the huge importance of sports in your culture and education, if soccer becomes popular enough i have no doubt USA will be a top 5 country.
They were talking about this on a national radio show yesterday, and it was an interesting (if disappointing for soccer fans) discussion of the sport in the U.S.
Fact is, Icy, a ton of kids play soccer in the U.S. I don't have the numbers, but my guess is it is the most popular kids' sport in the country, when it comes to leagues and what not. Little league might give the AYSO a run for its money, but that's probably about it. And the kids generally love it.
The problem is, around late junior high/early high school (that's 13-15 or so), these kids end up having to make a decision, stick with soccer or gravitate to one of the other sports, which they also have probably been playing and are good at. And kids invariably pick the other sports, baseball, basketball, and most predominantly, football, because "that's where the money is". If you want the "sports dream" in America, those are the sports you go to. Soccer just isn't perceived that way.
Also, it's a prestige thing that young, too. If you can be a great athlete on the football or the baseball team, that's a lot "cooler" than being a star on the soccer team.
Completely agree on the potential, as most anyone will acknowledge. In most of the world, soccer is #1 and the best athletes in most countries go to soccer. But in the US, there are 3-4 major draws before soccer is considered.
Coffee Warlord
06-28-2009, 05:26 PM
Bradley apparently selected "Pleased" during his half time talk. For shame.
JonInMiddleGA
06-28-2009, 05:31 PM
Fact is, Icy, a ton of kids play soccer in the U.S. I don't have the numbers, but my guess is it is the most popular kids' sport in the country, when it comes to leagues and what not. Little league might give the AYSO a run for its money, but that's probably about it.
Last figures I could find were for 2006 (or earlier for some sports, including 2002 for U.S. Soccer), had soccer second only to baseball 2.2 million to 1.7 million. That's with soccer on the rise of course & baseball participation down 1% per year since peaking in 1996.
Also, it's a prestige thing that young, too. If you can be a great athlete on the football or the baseball team, that's a lot "cooler" than being a star on the soccer team.
Or everywhere I've been (all in Georgia but I mean rural or suburban) it's football then maybe basketball and then everything else that really doesn't matter except in extremely narrow circles.
Logan
06-28-2009, 05:33 PM
Help me out here with something guys, as I know next to nothing about soccer.
That entire second half, Howard would take each goalkick and drill it downfield, only to have Brazil easily win every ball, establish control and bring it upfield. I really don't think there was a single one that the US controlled. Why not just pass it short to one of our guys to attempt to carry it into Brazil territory? We NEVER had the ball the second half and it seemed like this was a major reason why.
Thanks.
Last figures I could find were for 2006 (or earlier for some sports, including 2002 for U.S. Soccer), had soccer second only to baseball 2.2 million to 1.7 million. That's with soccer on the rise of course & baseball participation down 1% per year since peaking in 1996.
Or everywhere I've been (all in Georgia but I mean rural or suburban) it's football then maybe basketball and then everything else that really doesn't matter except in extremely narrow circles.
Spot on for everywhere I've been, too, FWIW. Football >>>>>>> Basketball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else about the same.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 05:37 PM
Bradley apparently selected "Pleased" during his half time talk. For shame.
haha nice
BishopMVP
06-28-2009, 05:37 PM
The subs he made offered no pick-up to the team. Wasn't there someone on the bench that could have brought some energy? The two subs he made did little to nothing. Not to mention taking off our best scoring threat.
I will never understand why coaches take off top strikers in one goal games.It wasn't even a 1-goal game, it had just been tied up. It's like Bradley decided to sub Bornstein and Kljestan in for Altidore and Feilhaber to protect the 1-goal lead, then once Brazil scored to tie it he didn't know how to react and change his plans.yea, but the subs he put on had no right being on the pitch, imo.
Where's Adu and Torres?
He did nothing to help the attack.Conor Casey in the 88th minute wasn't enough? Ugh.The good thing for USA is probably that from now they won't be as afraid of playing historical teams, and it will be huge confidence boost for the future. In fact i think that one of the keys of the good games vs Spain and Brazil was the confidence boost after the win vs Egypt. USA players started to think about themselves about a winning team that can do way better than expected even vs the top national teams.The US beat Brazil in 1998, beat Portugal and made it to the quarters (and a terrible no handball away from E.T. with Germany) in 2002. For the past 15 years the US has had athletes technically proficient enough to be able to counterattack and get a result if they convert chances/have epic goalie performances.The talent level is great - IMO, that first goal against Spain showed how good he can be. I dunno if sitting on the bench at Villareal is the way to do it, but that's another story.Hey, he wasn't on the bench at Villareal! He was on the bench for a Segunda division club. Seriously though, he should be going out on loan and getting some quality PT this season.Okay question for those of you who watch more of the US games. I think they said Altidore is like 19 and watching him today he looked like a deer in headlights. I did not think he went after the ball and his effort looked weak. Was this because of the Brazil defense, was it just a bad day or is he not quite ready for this big of a game?He does play like he's 19 at times, but he still drew 2 yellow cards today, and drew 1 plus scored a beatiful goal against Spain. Part of the problem watching him is that he gets used as a target/holding striker, which isn't his forte, against decent teams. He has size, speed and can run at defenders, but his touch isn't that great at holding long balls and waiting for our midfielders to catch up. You can tell how much he improved when we started playing a 2nd striker next to him, and you can see how much he frustrates defenses. IMO, it's completely inexcusable that he gets pulled in a tie game and then replaced 15 minutes later by Conor Casey. If we had Davies or even Brian Ching on the bench sure, but I'll take Altidore at 50% over Conor Casey any day of the week.
JonInMiddleGA
06-28-2009, 05:42 PM
Spot on for everywhere I've been, too, FWIW. Football >>>>>>> Basketball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else about the same.
Which is to say virtually irrelevant to non-existent (in terms of interest).
You get the occasional pocket of baseball hotbed still (such as the success of programs like the ones in East Cobb/Marietta, GA) but there's literally more people watching football practice (or even spring practice) than attend most other HS sporting events.
BishopMVP
06-28-2009, 05:42 PM
The problem is, around late junior high/early high school (that's 13-15 or so), these kids end up having to make a decision, stick with soccer or gravitate to one of the other sports, which they also have probably been playing and are good at. And kids invariably pick the other sports, baseball, basketball, and most predominantly, football, because "that's where the money is". If you want the "sports dream" in America, those are the sports you go to. Soccer just isn't perceived that way.Actually the real problem is that around 13-15 tons of kids in other countries are joining professional teams and being developed while our culture places so much emphasis on education that parents want their kids to be good enough to get a college scholarship. That's starting to change with a number of youngsters going overseas, but it's not just the other sports - it's the difference in socially acceptable training and education.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 05:43 PM
yeah - what others have said.
kudos to MLS (and honestly given where they started and how things have gone i'm not sure what else they coudl have done) for staying afloat and viable and successful for so long, but until soccer either becomes a big-money sport in this country, OR you establish the USA as a pipeline to major European clubs so that kids have a realistic chance of moving over there and succeeding, you won't see it become a "major" choice
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 05:51 PM
Last figures I could find were for 2006 (or earlier for some sports, including 2002 for U.S. Soccer), had soccer second only to baseball 2.2 million to 1.7 million. That's with soccer on the rise of course & baseball participation down 1% per year since peaking in 1996.
Or everywhere I've been (all in Georgia but I mean rural or suburban) it's football then maybe basketball and then everything else that really doesn't matter except in extremely narrow circles.
Yeah, I would tend to agree, Jon, especially my impression of how it works in Georgia. Out here in the West, the "baseball hotbeds" are much larger and more prevalent, and it's a realistic third choice in the suburbs, easily outgaining basketball in the suburbs, IMO. Basketball is competitive even with football in the urban areas among the taller kids (of course), but by and large it's football, football, football, since most kids aren't 6'4-+.
Chief Rum
06-28-2009, 05:52 PM
yeah - what others have said.
kudos to MLS (and honestly given where they started and how things have gone i'm not sure what else they coudl have done) for staying afloat and viable and successful for so long, but until soccer either becomes a big-money sport in this country, OR you establish the USA as a pipeline to major European clubs so that kids have a realistic chance of moving over there and succeeding, you won't see it become a "major" choice
Speaking of which, going to see Galaxy-Houston tonight.
And in that vein...Cringer blows. :D
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 06:04 PM
Our best athletes are not playing soccer. That's the problem. Sure some good ones get through. But for the most part, if you're an elite athlete, you are playing basketball or football. There isn't much that we can do to change that either. Unless soccer reaches that level, we will never reach the levels of Brazil or Spain.
I believe that if our best athletes played soccer from the start, we'd have won multiple World Cups by now.
Crapshoot
06-28-2009, 06:14 PM
Spot on for everywhere I've been, too, FWIW. Football >>>>>>> Basketball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else about the same.
To be fair, both you and JIMGA are in the South; football (I believe anecdotally) totally trumps baseball there, and especially college/high school football. I'd bet it would be different in say, New England.
lynchjm24
06-28-2009, 06:21 PM
And in the absence of a coaching change or significant roster changes, this team reverts to their early C-Cup form and finishes 3rd (or possibly last) in WC pool play (assuming they get there at all). Remember, you heard it here first.
Is there anyone who really thinks differently?
cubboyroy1826
06-28-2009, 06:27 PM
Okay let's talk a little more about the pipeline getting US players to the Euro leagues. Are US players not getting the opportunities because they are not good enough, there is no real scouting system in place, or there is a bias against US players. For the players that have made the transition to the Euro leagues has there been a problem transitioning because our game differs from the Euro game?
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 07:06 PM
Okay let's talk a little more about the pipeline getting US players to the Euro leagues. Are US players not getting the opportunities because they are not good enough, there is no real scouting system in place, or there is a bias against US players. For the players that have made the transition to the Euro leagues has there been a problem transitioning because our game differs from the Euro game?
i would honestly say it's because our game differs from the Euro game. Only our best players have the technical ability (read: ability to control the ball in close quarters, vision to move into space effectively and play the ball into space, etc) to play in Europe right now, because our player development (in youth leagues and such) doesn't emphasize those qualities. That is changing more on the youth levels, but it'll take time to trickle-up
To be fair, both you and JIMGA are in the South; football (I believe anecdotally) totally trumps baseball there, and especially college/high school football. I'd bet it would be different in say, New England.
Agreed.
And in the absence of a coaching change or significant roster changes, this team reverts to their early C-Cup form and finishes 3rd (or possibly last) in WC pool play (assuming they get there at all). Remember, you heard it here first.
For the record, "first" is off by about 15,000 in this particular prediction's case.
GoldenEagle
06-28-2009, 07:30 PM
It was a frustrating game for the American soccer fan, but I am glad the game got people interested in my sport. It really is a great game, but it can sometimes break your heart.
Anyway, here is an article I wrote for my blog: Bradley's Poor Decision Making Cost US (http://socceracademics.com/2009/06/28/bradleys-poor-decision-making-costs-us/)
The US really could not afford to sit back and let Brazil take the game to them. Brazil is too good for that. But when you put pressure on them, you can beat them.
JonInMiddleGA
06-28-2009, 07:31 PM
Yeah, I would tend to agree, Jon, especially my impression of how it works in Georgia. Out here in the West, the "baseball hotbeds" are much larger and more prevalent, and it's a realistic third choice in the suburbs, easily outgaining basketball in the suburbs, IMO. Basketball is competitive even with football in the urban areas among the taller kids (of course), but by and large it's football, football, football, since most kids aren't 6'4-+.
Found an interesting 2007 report from the CIF.
http://www.cifstate.org/about/participation/partsurvey07.pdf
For boys, there's 107,916 playing football, followed by 49,911 track & field, 44,700 for soccer, 44,722 for basketball, and 42,835 for baseball.
For girls, soccer has 40,895 to pass track & field's 38,817, volleyball has 36, 499,basketball had 34,991, and softball had 31,306.
Of course raw numbers says nothing about the prestige of the various sports but I thought it was interesting to find those numbers.
edit to add: Still haven't found a northeast state specific figure, much less one for a region, but here's an interesting link (http://www.nfhs.org/custom/participation_figures/default.aspx). It's the National Federation of High School Associations database for participation in nearly every HS sport imaginable, boys & girls, by year, nationally. You can sort by sport for all the years or by year for all the sports.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 07:33 PM
The US really could not afford to sit back and let Brazil take the game to them. Brazil is too good for that. But when you put pressure on them, you can beat them.
It kills me that they seemed to recognize that in the first half, but fucking forgot it at halftime
Marc Vaughan
06-28-2009, 07:46 PM
It kills me that they seemed to recognize that in the first half, but fucking forgot it at halftime
I don't think they "forgot it" - it takes a LOT out of you to track players and pressure them continually during a match, simple as that.
I'd expect that they tired and gave up that little bit of time and space which Brazil needed to make the difference.
To be honest the result is still something to be proud of from a USA perspective, heck I'd be dead chuffed if England managed a 2-3 loss against Brazil most days ;)
We don't need your condescending back-handed compliments. We didn't go the South Africa to "take the lead on Brazil" or have results that "weren't all that bad". We showed up with one goal - win the tournament - and did not reach that goal. While there are certainly positives we can reflect on, we did not reach our goal and that is a disappointment no matter what. Maybe in Netherlands second-best is what you strive for, but not for us.
Everyone who enters a tournament should want to win it - but they should also imho be realistic about their achievements.
Don't nail your coach to the flag post because you didn't win it - appreciate the fact that realistically speaking your team far out-performed reasonable expectations, given time he might take them even further.
kcchief19
06-28-2009, 07:51 PM
The lack of presence of Adu and Torres or other offensively-inclined players is a long standing criticism of Bradley. Reminds me of the Angels, fans complaining (me one of them) that we keep throwing in an Izturis in there in the lineup when we have Brandon Wood ripping it up in AAA. Pro-Wood fans (most of Angel nation) wonder WTF Scioscia won't bring him up and play him. And then other fans basically say "In Scioscia we trust". Frustrating for those of us who want Wood up.
Same with Bradley and guys like Adu and Torres. He just doesn't seem to play them enough. Even more annoying with Bradley, though, is that, unlike Scioscia, he doesn't have the track record to deserve people looking away.
Are we talking about the same Brandon Wood with a .198 career MLB average That would seem to support the crowd that says trust the guy making the decision, he knows the game and the player better than the guys in the stands.
I've followed USA soccer at arms length for most of my life. I don't like soccer. I'd like to see the USA do well and cheer for the USA as an American.
But the USA soccer base is just about the worst fan base of any sport I've ever seen. Fans are patting the team on the back for making one of its greatest tournament runs ever while trashing the coach for his decisions. So ... the expectation is that the team isn't better than Brazil and when the team loses, fire the coach. That attitude makes George Steinbrenner seem absolutely calm and rational.
USA soccer fans remind me a lot of my local Royals fan base. They know the Royals don't have a team to compete then they win a few games and they expect them to win it all. As soon as they start to lose, its the manager's fault because he sucks or it's the GM for signing too many vets or not enough, playing too many rookies or not enough.
What I've seen USA soccer do is what any team that doesn't win often does: change coaches, players, management, etc. But this isn't the NFL where parity is king or MLB where you an buy a title. You can't change a country's performance in a sport on a dime. Spain is competitive with the US in basketball but it's taken decades of improvement. There's no magical fix that will make Team USA a winner. Burning down the house and restarting without plan will continue to keep American soccer in neutral.
But RPI touches on what I think is our fundamental flaw in soccer. USA soccer fans are generally satisfied with an atta-boy. Look at Brazil and other winners in soccer -- losses hurt and hurt bad. When we got embarrassed in basketball in 1988, when unleashed the pros and punished the world. If Brazil had lost today, there would be nationwide mourning. We lost and ... we don't really care. If that's your mindset, you're not going to win.
It's not a jingo-istic American thing -- it's about being a winner. The USA didn't expect to win and Brazil did. When that's the case, the results are usually predictable.
ISiddiqui
06-28-2009, 07:56 PM
I don't think they "forgot it" - it takes a LOT out of you to track players and pressure them continually during a match, simple as that.
Bingo. You tend to see a lot of matches where the underdog has a shot, has a shot, has a shot... but then the better team goes wild and scores a couple goals and takes the game. Reason being because constant pressure of the opposing, more talented, squad, while exceedingly effective is also incredibly hard to keep up for 90 minutes.
Marc Vaughan
06-28-2009, 08:03 PM
The problem is, around late junior high/early high school (that's 13-15 or so), these kids end up having to make a decision, stick with soccer or gravitate to one of the other sports, which they also have probably been playing and are good at. And kids invariably pick the other sports, baseball, basketball, and most predominantly, football, because "that's where the money is". If you want the "sports dream" in America, those are the sports you go to. Soccer just isn't perceived that way.
I can see from a 'money' perspective (locally in America) soccer isn't that popular - however for older people at least in my area of Florida it seems more popular as a sport to play than more 'traditional' American sports*.
I play in a very active soccer league (3v3 or 4v4 for adults) with probably around 80-100 odd active players at my age (and around 300 players at youth age).
Its great fun and the skill level varies from fairly low (there are a lot of people who've never played soccer before in the rec leagues) to very talented (some of the better players in the competitive divisions are incredibly skillful - particularly some of the people who've played at college level).
I think more and more people are attracted to soccer because in its essence its a very simple sport and requires next to no equipment to play a match, indeed I play pick up matches here on a sunday in one of the local parks where we still do the whole 'jumpers for goalposts' type of thing :D
*I say more popular than traditional American sports simply because I have yet to see an American Football or Baseball league advertised for adults in the area, I have seen adult basketball leagues advertised and that is what I'd probably consider the 'most popular' to play sport around this area.
I find this interesting as I'd always thought American Football and Baseball were the 'classic' American sports and as such expected to see more of them played when I moved over here.
JonInMiddleGA
06-28-2009, 08:03 PM
So ... the expectation is that the team isn't better than Brazil and when the team loses, fire the coach. ...
Unless you don't believe that the team will ever win with said coach, in which case it would seem to make pretty good sense (assuming the object is actually to win eventually).
larrymcg421
06-28-2009, 08:04 PM
I don't think a coach is immune from criticism just because the team overperforms. The team can surpass expectations for reasons other than the coach, and it is possible for the coach to prevent them from taking full advantage of that.
A case in point is the Orlando Magic this year. Van Gundy certainly did some good things in helping them get where they ended up, but there's no doubt that his terrible decisions cost the Magic at least 4 or 5 playoff games, and definitely cost them THE key game of the Finals. So eventhough the Magic got further than anyone expected, Van Gundy still deserves every bit of criticism for his horrible decision making.
I don't know enough about soccer to judge the tactics that Bradley employed, but just because the US squeaked in to the semis based on lucky circumstances and pulled off a big upset doesn't validate all of his decisions.
ISiddiqui
06-28-2009, 08:06 PM
Unless you don't believe that the team will ever win with said coach, in which case it would seem to make pretty good sense (assuming the object is actually to win eventually).
Though one of the problems may be that the coach that some of the fanbase seems to want doesn't seem to exist (or at least doesn't seem to want the US job or would ask for a wheelbarrow-load of money).
JonInMiddleGA
06-28-2009, 08:07 PM
I play in a very active soccer league (3v3 or 4v4 for adults) with probably around 80-100 odd active players at my age (and around 300 players at youth age). ... *I say more popular than traditional American sports simply because I have yet to see an American Football or Baseball league advertised for adults in the area, I have seen adult basketball leagues advertised and that is what I'd probably consider the 'most popular' to play sport around this area. I find this interesting as I'd always thought American Football and Baseball were the 'classic' American sports and as such expected to see more of them played when I moved over here.
Bet you'd have no problem finding a great deal more than 100 or so adult male softball players though.
The physical demands of baseball tend to put an end to most competitive play by adulthood except for real extreme diehards, and they gravitate to softball. Sometimes ultra-competitive, more often beer league caliber and a good bit that are in between. Full blown full contact football for adults pretty much ceases to exist outside of a relative few semi-pro teams & leagues, there's a little bit of organized flag football out there afaik but the injury risk plus the high cost tend to end pads & helmet play for most folks.
BishopMVP
06-28-2009, 08:11 PM
Okay let's talk a little more about the pipeline getting US players to the Euro leagues. Are US players not getting the opportunities because they are not good enough, there is no real scouting system in place, or there is a bias against US players. For the players that have made the transition to the Euro leagues has there been a problem transitioning because our game differs from the Euro game?For under-18's, they aren't allowed to sign a professional contract unless they have a European passport (my neighbor plays for Birmingham City because his dad is English and he has a passport there.) Even for players over 18, a Euro passport is almost required in many countries since they only have a limited number of spots for foreigners.
Scouting and the different style of play also do contribute. The top players get seen internationally, or at showcase youth tournaments, but if you're going for a squad player why would a European team bother coming across the ocean to scout in America than going to a nearby country? Also it takes almost any player time to adjust to a new league, but there's such little track record of players going from MLS to Europe, or vice versa that it's hard to know how a player will translate. (That can also work against foreigners coming into MLS - there have been many, many busts and players that couldn't handle the physicality/athleticism of MLS.) Mexican teams play a more continental style, and the Superliga matches almost always end up being intense because of the clash of styles. What's called a foul in Mexico, or Spain, or what's a red card internationally, isn't in MLS, and players that think they've been fouled with no call start hacking and bitching.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 08:13 PM
I don't think they "forgot it" - it takes a LOT out of you to track players and pressure them continually during a match, simple as that.
I'd expect that they tired and gave up that little bit of time and space which Brazil needed to make the difference.
To be honest the result is still something to be proud of from a USA perspective, heck I'd be dead chuffed if England managed a 2-3 loss against Brazil most days ;)
good points. i guess i just would have wished that Bradley would have substituted accordingly (bring on fresh legs that might have helped), but there again i guess the lack of depth hurt.
BishopMVP
06-28-2009, 08:15 PM
Though one of the problems may be that the coach that some of the fanbase seems to want doesn't seem to exist (or at least doesn't seem to want the US job or would ask for a wheelbarrow-load of money).Jurgen Klinsmann turned down the job not over money but over US Soccer refusing to give him control of the Youth Development Teams. The politics and good ole boy network is very much alive and well.
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 08:16 PM
Bingo. You tend to see a lot of matches where the underdog has a shot, has a shot, has a shot... but then the better team goes wild and scores a couple goals and takes the game. Reason being because constant pressure of the opposing, more talented, squad, while exceedingly effective is also incredibly hard to keep up for 90 minutes.
yeah. but i think they could have done better..seemed like they just had nothing in the second half, which, as a fan, is disappointing.
JonInMiddleGA
06-28-2009, 08:20 PM
Though one of the problems may be that the coach that some of the fanbase seems to want doesn't seem to exist (or at least doesn't seem to want the US job or would ask for a wheelbarrow-load of money).
Fair point, but a different point IMO.
They could be still right that the current guy isn't "the guy" but in denial that he doesn't exist/isn't obtainable under acceptable terms.
ISiddiqui
06-28-2009, 08:30 PM
Jurgen Klinsmann turned down the job not over money but over US Soccer refusing to give him control of the Youth Development Teams. The politics and good ole boy network is very much alive and well.
I'm not sure blaming US Soccer for not giving Klinsmann the keys to the entire house is all that fair. NFL experiments should show us that GM-Coach deals don't always tend to work that well... for obvious reasons.
Marc Vaughan
06-28-2009, 08:31 PM
I don't think a coach is immune from criticism just because the team overperforms. The team can surpass expectations for reasons other than the coach, and it is possible for the coach to prevent them from taking full advantage of that.
Agreed.
I don't know enough about soccer to judge the tactics that Bradley employed, but just because the US squeaked in to the semis based on lucky circumstances and pulled off a big upset doesn't validate all of his decisions.
I think the tactics that Bradley employed 'made' the luck which gave USA the opportunity to make it to the final and then pushed Brazil as far as they did.
Without trying to be mean, most people will agree that both the Brazilian and Spanish teams are technically and physically head and shoulders above the USA team - both contain what are considered to be World Class players playing at the peak of their games and performing consistently within the best soccer leagues in the world.
The USA team by contrast has some very competant players but few players who could be considered on a level with their opposing players.
From what I could see the tactics that the USA coach employed were intended to emphasise superior work-rate, cohesion and tactical organisation to nullify the differential in skill between the teams.
This very nearly came off and imho is a sign of a very good coach, one who should be praised rather than criticised.
The team USA reminded me of most were the Greek side who won't the European Championships a while back - that side also was lacking in stand out 'World Class' players but made up for it through work rate and organisation.
Marc Vaughan
06-28-2009, 08:35 PM
Jurgen Klinsmann turned down the job not over money but over US Soccer refusing to give him control of the Youth Development Teams. The politics and good ole boy network is very much alive and well..
To be honest I don't know what the level of coaching is like at university levels etc. here because I haven't attended - BUT I have been hugely impressed with the skill level of older teenagers I've played against here, heck the technical control of most of them surpasses most similar aged English players (the problem is more however imho that they know the 'control' and especially the 'cool' tricks but lack positional intelligence defensively - that being said the little buggers can still run me into the ground without any hassle after which positionally I've got my hands on my knee's gasping and it doesn't disadvantage them at all ;) ).
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 08:40 PM
To be honest I don't know what the level of coaching is like at university levels etc. here because I haven't attended - BUT I have been hugely impressed with the skill level of older teenagers I've played against here, heck the technical control of most of them surpasses most similar aged English players (the problem is more however imho that they know the 'control' and especially the 'cool' tricks but lack positional intelligence defensively - that being said the little buggers can still run me into the ground without any hassle after which positionally I've got my hands on my knee's gasping and it doesn't disadvantage them at all ;) ).
how'd my name get attached to that quote?
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 08:42 PM
lack positional intelligence defensively - that's a nice bit of analysis MV - thanks for that. I guess I was under the wrong impression as far as lacking the close-control bit.
but i still contend as far as "seeing the larger game" that I was correct and we're talking about the same thing -- defensive positional intelligence, the ability to move into space and play the ball into space and make your teammates better is what most US players are lacking (on a "world class" level)
Cringer
06-28-2009, 09:02 PM
Speaking of which, going to see Galaxy-Houston tonight.
And in that vein...Cringer blows. :D
Game time - 3 points Dynamo. :rant:
Marc Vaughan
06-28-2009, 09:36 PM
how'd my name get attached to that quote?
Dunno - copy and paste error on my behalf most likely, apologies.
RainMaker
06-28-2009, 09:43 PM
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but does the loss of Bradley today from the lineup have an effect on the outcome? Do they hang on with him out there?
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 09:49 PM
Dunno - copy and paste error on my behalf most likely, apologies.
no worries - just found it curious. like you put my name on his quote but the point you responded to was mine
:D
DaddyTorgo
06-28-2009, 09:50 PM
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but does the loss of Bradley today from the lineup have an effect on the outcome? Do they hang on with him out there?
maybe. it might have given them some more midfield depth. but idk because then he would have likely started and we'd have been missing benny F
Cringer
06-28-2009, 10:06 PM
maybe. it might have given them some more midfield depth. but idk because then he would have likely started and we'd have been missing benny F
Either way, it would have given a better option later in the game then Sacha. Since Beasley has been benched, Sach is my new target of venom. ;)
Big Fo
06-28-2009, 11:17 PM
Is there anyone who really thinks differently?
I'd say the US has an even chance of making it out of the group. Assuming a draw that is not particularly harsh or favorable, their World Cup group should be easier than their Confederations Cup group.
Chief Rum
06-29-2009, 01:04 AM
Are we talking about the same Brandon Wood with a .198 career MLB average That would seem to support the crowd that says trust the guy making the decision, he knows the game and the player better than the guys in the stands.
Not saying those people supporting Scioscia's moves are wrong. There's certainly logic to support that he knows what he's doing. But when every single year your team suffers from offensive issues, and in particular, power issues, and your statistically least productive players are playing at the same position as your best offensive prospect who is tearing it up in AAA, it's a little hard to just swallow that and go with it.
As for the numbers, really? You're going to toss out what Wood's done in 192 at bats in sporadic time, mostly September or spot injury call ups, over three seasons to make a vast generalization on him? Come on, not everyone is a star in the bigs from the first moment they step on a major league field.
Karlifornia
06-29-2009, 01:38 AM
Whoever is slagging on MIJB needs to take a time out and reevaluate. MIJB has been nothing but supportive of USA Football. Yeah, he gives a neutral take on things. He's not a USA!!USA!! Moronic patriot. He's a supportive outsider from a country that has a richer football tradition than we could even dream of having.
He's on our side, but he's not blind to the truth. MIJB, I always have, and always will continue to appreciate your contributions. Don't let buttheads deter you, please.
Karlifornia
06-29-2009, 01:46 AM
btw, that second goal from our side was one of the most beautiful plays I have ever witnessed in any sport. If I had been more sober while watching it, the hairs on the back of my neck would have not only stood, but leapt from my skin.
That counter-attack and goal was a prime example of why people call it "The Beautiful Game". I could watch the replay forever.
Crapshoot
06-29-2009, 02:03 AM
btw, that second goal from our side was one of the most beautiful plays I have ever witnessed in any sport. If I had been more sober while watching it, the hairs on the back of my neck would have not only stood, but leapt from my skin.
That counter-attack and goal was a prime example of why people call it "The Beautiful Game". I could watch the replay forever.
Yeah, its one of those times you realize that Donovan is a genuine skill player - and the US doesn't have many of those to waste. Yeah he's frustrating as hell, but the talent is still there.
Karlifornia
06-29-2009, 02:32 AM
Yeah, its one of those times you realize that Donovan is a genuine skill player - and the US doesn't have many of those to waste. Yeah he's frustrating as hell, but the talent is still there.
Word. Flawed he may be, but he's pretty much the best we got, and we should appreciate him.
DaddyTorgo
06-29-2009, 07:31 AM
YouTube - Landon Donovan goal vs Brazil - Confederations Cup Final (USA v Brazil) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr5zAvXNyFQ)
(for some reason my video-embedding fu has left the building)
GoldenEagle
06-29-2009, 09:33 AM
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but does the loss of Bradley today from the lineup have an effect on the outcome? Do they hang on with him out there?
Many feel he is the best player for the US, so yes I would say it had an affect. Maybe Bob would have went to his bench sooner if Feilhaber would have been available.
I think one of the announcers said that Brazil had played everyone on its roster, except for its two backup goalkeepers. They were more fresh down the stretch, and that is probably why. Many of the US players would probably not be considered match fit coming into this tournament. (Spector, Bocanegra, Altidore, etc.)
I also agree that MIJB did nothing wrong. I use to think he was Eurosnot, but that was probably the more immature GE that though that.
GoldenEagle
06-29-2009, 09:34 AM
Word. Flawed he may be, but he's pretty much the best we got, and we should appreciate him.
Donovan would tear it up in LaLiga, where he would be given time and space on the ball. He really needs to get out of MLS.
DaddyTorgo
06-29-2009, 09:36 AM
Donovan would tear it up in LaLiga, where he would be given time and space on the ball. He really needs to get out of MLS.
Totally.
BishopMVP
06-29-2009, 05:05 PM
I think the tactics that Bradley employed 'made' the luck which gave USA the opportunity to make it to the final and then pushed Brazil as far as they did.
From what I could see the tactics that the USA coach employed were intended to emphasise superior work-rate, cohesion and tactical organisation to nullify the differential in skill between the teams.
This very nearly came off and imho is a sign of a very good coach, one who should be praised rather than criticised.The problem is those are the same tactics that have been employed by the US by any decent coach for the past 20 years. I fail to see how Bob Bradley finally coming around to and continuing what worked previously makes him a very good coach. He's not Guus Hiddink with Russia reinventing the wheel and making players do things on the pitch fans never thought possible.Many feel he is the best player for the US, so yes I would say it had an affect. Maybe Bob would have went to his bench sooner if Feilhaber would have been available.But where would he have played? Doubtful Bradley Sr. would have pulled his son or Clark if we were tied or nursing a lead, so most likely Feilhaber comes on for Altidore, bumping Dempsey up to forward. And taking Altidore off at 2-2 for a less talented offensive player was the bigger problem than whether Feilhaber, Kljestan, Bornstein or Beasley was the sub (even as bad as Kljestan and Beasley played).To be honest I don't know what the level of coaching is like at university levels etc. here because I haven't attended - BUT I have been hugely impressed with the skill level of older teenagers I've played against here, heck the technical control of most of them surpasses most similar aged English players (the problem is more however imho that they know the 'control' and especially the 'cool' tricks but lack positional intelligence defensively - that being said the little buggers can still run me into the ground without any hassle after which positionally I've got my hands on my knee's gasping and it doesn't disadvantage them at all ;) ).It's not so much the coaching ability as it is the NCAA's limiting of practice time/games and the rules - you can sub any player anytime in the half, and they can re-enter in the 2nd. This leads to college teams ending up emphasizing speed and high pressure defense everywhere instead of positioning and possession football that conserves energy. (There are some exceptions - the ACC and Wake Forest in particular have enough quality to play tactical soccer.)
Take Charlie Davies as an example. He graduated HS from this area a year after me and I have many friends that played with/against him either ISL or club teams. There were a number that had technical ability in the same range, but Davies was also a fantastic athlete (All American wrestler). That meant he would get put at forward, served long balls and get the attention (another example for US fans is Sheanon Williams, who was the 2nd best player on the Bolts to a kid who lost 5 games in 3 years combined between HS and Club and just quit college soccer because he played possession CM/AM and his team is all long ball). Even in college at BC it was much the same thing for 3 years. Then he left to go to Sweden, where he's quite possibly the best athlete in the league, but he has poor finishing so it takes him until the last game of his 1st season to score his 1st goal. Then this past season he did very well and is being looked at by clubs in France, Holland, Germany. But he did that at a later age than comparative European players (he just turned 23). If you removed the 3 years he effectively spent stagnating at BC, he'd be 20 and a very bright prospect. Instead he's looked at as a finished project by many teams solely due to age, even though he's still developing, and won't get nearly the attention of a player like Theo Walcott or Jozy Altidore.
Meanwhile of the other players who were as good or better technically, they played D3 ball, or a couple D1, and now all but 1 or 2 have gotten college degrees and are working in higher paying jobs than anything MLS will pay, and playing the weekend mens leagues. Now, some players have come through college and turned into good players (Dempsey, Davies, Marcus Tracy, Vedad Ibisevic from TSG Hoffenheim, Shalrie Joseph, GK's it doesn't affect much) but those guys all were late bloomers because of the 3-4 years of limited development. Of course while it hampers our production of world-class players (and more and more young players like Altidore, Bradley and Adu are going pro instead of college) the flip side of the coin is that many of our "failed" football players are getting an education and are able to find a good job after college, while in most other countries the ones that don't make it professionally are usually left with less than a high school education. You can see why parents in this country like the current system.
lynchjm24
06-29-2009, 07:16 PM
I'd say the US has an even chance of making it out of the group. Assuming a draw that is not particularly harsh or favorable, their World Cup group should be easier than their Confederations Cup group.
I enjoy your wide eyed optimism Big Fo and I saw the ESPN.com poll put most people in your camp, but I can't see it as anything other then delusional.
Crapshoot
06-29-2009, 08:07 PM
Donovan would tear it up in LaLiga, where he would be given time and space on the ball. He really needs to get out of MLS.
I dunno - Germany's a pretty high-scoring league (though admittedly more Premier League like than Spain), and he certainly wasn't a big hit there. I think Donovan's running away from Germany twice probably scars him in European eyes; I do think he has the talent to play at that level (not a Real Madrid / Barca of course, but still).
BishopMVP
06-29-2009, 09:30 PM
I dunno - Germany's a pretty high-scoring league (though admittedly more Premier League like than Spain), and he certainly wasn't a big hit there. I think Donovan's running away from Germany twice probably scars him in European eyes; I do think he has the talent to play at that level (not a Real Madrid / Barca of course, but still).I think Landon Donovan's a little bitch, but it's not fair to say he ran away from Germany this time. He had a 2 month loan deal with Bayern Munich and they neglected to buy him. I don't know if he'll leave LA with his wife's commitments, and his insistence on going to a high-profile club instead of just going to a smaller team in La Liga or Germany that didn't have Toni, Klose and Podolski ahead of him is annoying though.
Big Fo
06-29-2009, 11:18 PM
I enjoy your wide eyed optimism Big Fo and I saw the ESPN.com poll put most people in your camp, but I can't see it as anything other then delusional.
Well it's hardly delusional considering they've made it out of the group stage two of the last four times. Maybe they will, maybe they won't but they'll have a decent chance.
Qualifiers could change, most confederations are still in progress, but here is what the draw could look like as of today (it's unlikely the US would be in pot 1 even with a Gold Cup victory):
(stats from www.football-rankings.info (http://www.football-rankings.info/2009/06/2010-wc-seeding-formula-based-on.html))
Pot 1: Argentina, Brazil, England, France, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Spain
Pot 2: Croatia, Czech Republic, Greece, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey
Pot 3: Australia, Honduras, Iran, Japan, Korea Republic, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, USA
Pot 4: Cameroon, Chile, Cote d'Ivoire, Egypt, Ghana, Nigeria, Paraguay, Uruguay
Obviously, a Spain/Netherlands/USA/Cote d'Ivoire group would likely see us coming home early. Even assuming we won't luck out and get South Africa's group, something like Germany/Greece/USA/Nigeria would be something the US would have a good chance of qualifying from.
lynchjm24
06-30-2009, 05:51 PM
Well it's hardly delusional considering they've made it out of the group stage two of the last four times. Maybe they will, maybe they won't but they'll have a decent chance.
Those teams were better then this team. I rewatched much of the Championship game. Howard kept that from being 5 or 6 to 2. Haven't seen it many places but he was brilliant for much of that game.
Teams that are going to go to the World Cup and play well aren't blowing 2-0 halftime leads like that. Even at 2-0 Brazil knew they were coming back, they dominated that game, it was just the rare occasion the US converted their few chances and it made the score much closer then the game.
RainMaker
06-30-2009, 06:18 PM
Those teams were better then this team. I rewatched much of the Championship game. Howard kept that from being 5 or 6 to 2. Haven't seen it many places but he was brilliant for much of that game.
Teams that are going to go to the World Cup and play well aren't blowing 2-0 halftime leads like that. Even at 2-0 Brazil knew they were coming back, they dominated that game, it was just the rare occasion the US converted their few chances and it made the score much closer then the game.
It should have been 4-2 regardless as the refs missed a Brazil goal.
MrBug708
06-30-2009, 07:57 PM
I think Landon Donovan's a little bitch, but it's not fair to say he ran away from Germany this time. He had a 2 month loan deal with Bayern Munich and they neglected to buy him. I don't know if he'll leave LA with his wife's commitments, and his insistence on going to a high-profile club instead of just going to a smaller team in La Liga or Germany that didn't have Toni, Klose and Podolski ahead of him is annoying though.
Based on the book coming out, Donovan isn't coming back to an MLS team after what happened with Beckham
MrBug708
06-30-2009, 07:58 PM
It should have been 4-2 regardless as the refs missed a Brazil goal.
Nope. That goal could have rallied the troops for the US and we win 5-3 :)
BishopMVP
06-30-2009, 10:12 PM
Based on the book coming out, Donovan isn't coming back to an MLS team after what happened with BeckhamBased off the SI excerpt, Donovan comes off like such a little spoiled brat it's unbelievable. He feels disrespected because they ask him to give up the captain's armband when Beckham is coming in? He thinks Beckham is a terrible teammate and leader because he wasn't buying the whole team meals every week? Donovan sent his complaints to Beckham by text message? It's the same reason why he despises Freddy Adu. He's so insecure he needs to be acknowledged as the best player on the team and hates any other players that play with confidence or "an ego". And while he may be the most accomplished US field player in modern history, we're not going to win a world cup if he's the best player on the team.
And if Donovan was the leader/captain he thinks he is in his mind and actually cared about team success, he wouldn't be publicly airing it out with his team's most important player for the 2nd half of the season.
ISiddiqui
06-30-2009, 10:16 PM
Wait... you came away with Donovan coming off like a spoiled brat?! Donovan?!
Wow.
If anything, I came away with far more respect for LD than I've had in the past.
MrBug708
06-30-2009, 11:53 PM
Based off the SI excerpt, Donovan comes off like such a little spoiled brat it's unbelievable. He feels disrespected because they ask him to give up the captain's armband when Beckham is coming in? He thinks Beckham is a terrible teammate and leader because he wasn't buying the whole team meals every week? Donovan sent his complaints to Beckham by text message? It's the same reason why he despises Freddy Adu. He's so insecure he needs to be acknowledged as the best player on the team and hates any other players that play with confidence or "an ego". And while he may be the most accomplished US field player in modern history, we're not going to win a world cup if he's the best player on the team.
And if Donovan was the leader/captain he thinks he is in his mind and actually cared about team success, he wouldn't be publicly airing it out with his team's most important player for the 2nd half of the season.
What?
Chief Rum
07-01-2009, 12:59 AM
Wow, that article is an eye opener. And as a Galaxy fan, it makes a lot of things about the team the past couple seasons--failing in spite of their talent--make a ton of sense.
I'm in the camp with Issidiqui, BTW, have no idea how it's Donovan that comes off looking bad there. I'm not sure it's a good idea for Becks to come back to LA with what's in this article.
BishopMVP
07-01-2009, 01:28 AM
Wait... you came away with Donovan coming off like a spoiled brat?! Donovan?!Fine, Beckham is the spoiled brat and Donovan is the petulant, insecure little girl. Beckham sounds like he turned into Vince Carter trying to sulk his way to a different team about mid-2008, but I don't see how you gain respect for Donovan and/or think he comes off looking good here.Donovan recalled two exchanges that had taken place just the week before. On successive days he had met with Yallop and Galaxy president and general manager Alexi Lalas, and each had told him that "people above me" -- meaning Tim Leiweke, CEO of AEG, which owned the Galaxy -- thought Beckham should be the team captain. Both men tried to sugarcoat the blow. "I don't really look at who has the armband," Yallop told Donovan. "You're a leader to me, a great player. It would just be great if you could have a relationship with David and you pass it on to him." Lalas, for his part, issued Donovan a challenge: "Let him be the captain; you be the star."
...
Donovan's first thought about his bosses' request? That's pretty s-----. He didn't have a problem with someone else being captain, least of all a player with Beckham's credentials, but he did have an acute sense of being disrespected.
...
Of course, nobody -- including Donovan -- would tell the media the real story behind the change.Well, unless we consider an SI soccer journalist part of the media.Nearly everyone at the table was thinking, Is Beckham going to pick up the check? But nobody said anything. Beckham, meanwhile, had never been in this situation before. The players on his other teams had all been millionaires, and Real Madrid paid for all team meals anyway. The Galaxy provided only a $45 per diem on the road. What would Beckham do? What should he do? Donovan eyed the bill from his seat. He had paid for teammates' dinners in the past, and (Donovan) had made his position clear even before Beckham's arrival. "He'd better be picking up meals too," Donovan had told teammates, "or else I'll call him out on it."
But defender Chris Klein, one of Donovan's best friends on the team, had a different viewpoint. "If you're out to dinner with the guys and you pick up a check here or there, then fine," Klein said. "But if you start to feel like you're being used, these aren't your friends anymore. These are leeches. You can look at it two ways: Here's this guy that's making a lot of money, and maybe he should pick up the tab. But the other side of it is, maybe he's trying so hard to be one of the guys, if he's paying for everything then he's not one of the guys anymore."
Beckham didn't pick up the check. He put in enough to cover his share and passed it along. That would be standard operating procedure at meals throughout the season. "None of us care," said Kelly Gray, one of Beckham's frequent dining companions. "It's just nice to go out to dinner."
Donovan didn't call Beckham out at Morton's after all, but he could never get over Beckham's alligator arms when the bill arrived.Donovan talking tough about calling someone out (over a petty grievance his teammates don't have a problem with) and then not backing it up. This comes up again later.After months of reflection Donovan felt that he had worried too much about Beckham's arrival, wasted too much time and energy wondering whether they and their wives would have a close relationship. It was like the bad parts of high schoolMost of all, Donovan was upset that Beckham had not supported him in front of the team when Gullit had confronted him at halftime of the May 25 game against Kansas City. Donovan had not played deep enough in midfield in the first half, according to Gullit, who angrily challenged him in the locker room. "If I'm the captain and he goes after our best player that way, I would have said, 'Hold on a second, that's not right, this guy is doing everything he can,' " Donovan said. But Beckham had sat stone silent.I was shy, self-conscious and never a captain in any sport I played and I had no problem standing up to any coach or teammate I ever had. If Donovan is a captain and a leader, why does he need other people to fight his battles?"I really like David as a person, and I respect him as a man," Chris Klein said, "but it's a different type of leadership that has to go on with all this. Sometimes it's the rah-rah American sports leader that needs to be like, 'All right, guys, come on!' and have a team meeting. It's difficult for a foreign player to do that because [he doesn't] know what the college kid had to go through, [he doesn't] know what it's like to make $12,000 a year."A) clearly Beckham was used to a different culture and atmosphere where players took care of their own business.
B) any athlete, let alone a professional, who needs a rah-rah team meeting when they're losing is a joke.Beckham, meanwhile, had grown increasingly frustrated over not seeing enough of the ball on the right side, so much so that he had been drifting all over the field. Beckham wasn't hiding -- he wanted to do something -- but the net effect was negative.By mid-July, Donovan felt he needed to say something to Beckham about it, but it was a sign of their increasingly distant relationship that he did so by text message. I know you're frustrated and I know you're trying, Donovan wrote, but we need you farther up the field where you're more dangerous. You're the best player out there and you need the ball, but it doesn't help us achieve anything if you're doing other people's jobs.
Beckham's reply was short: We just need guys to be better on the field and do a better job. Donovan tried to follow up with Beckham in the locker room the next day -- "You understand what I'm saying?" he asked -- but Beckham clearly didn't want to talk about it.In addition to being accustomed to a more professional atmosphere, clearly Beckham was also used to better players. And not just that MLS players were worse than EPL/La Liga players - keep in mind that that Galaxy team had possibly the worst starting goalie/defenders/d-middies in MLS history. Quite simply they weren't doing their jobs and getting the ball up which is why Beckham (and Donovan) was tracking back and collecting it so much. Surround Kobe or LeBron or DWade or Crosby with rookies and fringe players and see how he responds. Any great, competitive player is naturally going to try and take over the game and do too much when his teammates suck. And those teammates blew. Should Beckham have called a team meeting and said that 22 of the 28 players on the roster were abysmal and could be replaced by mens league players? (It's partially Beckham's fault because between his and Donovan's contracts the Galaxy had no money under the salary cap to spend on quality, but I don't think he would have pulled this crap if he was in an organization/on a team like Houston or New England.)
Agreed that from this point on Beckham begins to look bad, but I completely understand where the frustration is coming from, and it's also only telling one side of the story.Donovan had wanted the Beckham Experiment to work, and there was no reason in his mind that it still couldn't be successful in 2009. But not if Beckham continued acting the way he had during the last half of 2008. "When David first came, I believed he was committed to what he was doing," Donovan said. "He cared. He wanted to do well. He wanted the team and the league to do well.Except we have you saying the exact opposite 2 paragraphs away.From the start Donovan's primary concern with Beckham had been, What is he really here for? The money? A vacation? Would he care about beating Real Salt Lake when he'd played for Real Madrid?Donovan didn't know what would come next, but he did know that things would have to change if he and Beckham were teammates in 2009. "Let's say he does stay here three more years," Donovan said. "I'm not going to spend the next three years of my life doing it this way. This is f------ miserable. I don't want to have soccer be this way."
What could he do? "That's my issue too," he said. "I've got to confront it somehow. If that's the way he's going to be, fine, then hold him accountable. Bench him. Just say, 'We're not going to play you, we don't think you're committed.' "Jesus - if you are the captain, if you are this leader, confront him. Confront management. Don't repress your feelings and give hatchet job interviews.By the time Beckham returned, Donovan planned on finally confronting the Englishman over his commitment to the Galaxy.Better late than never, if it actually happens. And I suppose this backdoor crybaby act in the media assures it will. Of course, I don't see how turning this into a soap opera will do anything to help LA Galaxy in 2009 (i.e. the rest of Beckham's, and possibly Donovan's, career with them) instead of making them ever more the traveling freak show/circus.
vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.