QuikSand
04-23-2003, 03:11 PM
At the moment, afterhustling players for most of last season, my Cheapshots have calmed down and now only are carrying 18 players. My intent was to fish around and pick up some appropriate B-teamers, but I now openly wonder whether that makes the most sense.
I understand the inherent benefit of using B-teamers in the area you are training, to build up their value for either sale or use. My club has been training playmaking, and so having a rotation of middle infielders (or guys playing elsewhere who can rotate to MI for cup matches) is important. Got it.
But does it truly make sense to field a whole second team for off-matches? I'd be out some significant capital if I now go and pick up another eight players - maybe $150,000-200,000 if I'm frugal. And I'd be paying those salaries every week - another $5,000 a week at the least, I expect - probably more.
And so the point of this is - to avoid injuries to my starters, of course. But if I get an injury, can't I just go and plug that hole as needed - go buy a guy for $50,000 or so, use him for a few weeks, and then sell him away after my starter is healed? I more or less break even on that transfer (assuming I make a wise purchase), get what Ineed for my club, and come out fine. My current squad is not so star-dependant that losing any one player would be cataclysmic (were that not the case, perhaps I'd reconsider this thinking) and so I'm not that worried abotu the performance drop from my current guy to a replacement off the transfer wire.
Any thoughts on this? I'v heard that nearly everyone carries 22 players, sometimes many more. Right now, I'm thinking that my curretn squad size-- 11 starters, plus only a handful of young replacements and one or two jacks-of-all-trades -- might be the way to go.
I haven't given this much deep thought... I may well be missing something fundamental. Would welcome corrections, if appropriate.
I understand the inherent benefit of using B-teamers in the area you are training, to build up their value for either sale or use. My club has been training playmaking, and so having a rotation of middle infielders (or guys playing elsewhere who can rotate to MI for cup matches) is important. Got it.
But does it truly make sense to field a whole second team for off-matches? I'd be out some significant capital if I now go and pick up another eight players - maybe $150,000-200,000 if I'm frugal. And I'd be paying those salaries every week - another $5,000 a week at the least, I expect - probably more.
And so the point of this is - to avoid injuries to my starters, of course. But if I get an injury, can't I just go and plug that hole as needed - go buy a guy for $50,000 or so, use him for a few weeks, and then sell him away after my starter is healed? I more or less break even on that transfer (assuming I make a wise purchase), get what Ineed for my club, and come out fine. My current squad is not so star-dependant that losing any one player would be cataclysmic (were that not the case, perhaps I'd reconsider this thinking) and so I'm not that worried abotu the performance drop from my current guy to a replacement off the transfer wire.
Any thoughts on this? I'v heard that nearly everyone carries 22 players, sometimes many more. Right now, I'm thinking that my curretn squad size-- 11 starters, plus only a handful of young replacements and one or two jacks-of-all-trades -- might be the way to go.
I haven't given this much deep thought... I may well be missing something fundamental. Would welcome corrections, if appropriate.