View Full Version : Shaolin Landfills HT Dynasty
BillyNYC
05-08-2003, 04:25 AM
At GoldenEagle's recommendation, I guess I'll add to the wealth of dynasties here. No clue how much I'll keep up with it, but figure I'll give it a go. Some of my team's issues are going to be quite different from most, so might be a good read (or be totally irrelevant and boring). I leave that to you.
Never done anything like this, so bare with me (any advice/feedback welcome....)
The basics
Shaolin Landfills (8076)
Country: USA
Region: New York City
Arena: The Swamp (60,250)
Series: Major League
Supporter club size: 2899
Current standings
Team Played Goals Points
1. Red Star Belgrade 5 14 - 3 11
2. Drunk&Disorderly 5 13 - 4 11
3. Slashers FC 5 14 - 12 9
4. Kansas City Wizards 5 11 - 8 8
5. Indy Racing Athleti 5 12 - 10 6
6. Shaolin Landfills 5 7 - 9 5
7. Minute Men 5 4 - 15 4
8. AYSA Express 5 2 - 16 1
BillyNYC
05-08-2003, 04:33 AM
The Players
Keepers
Steffen Riedel
1 405 000 US$, 21 years, solid form
Has inadequate experience and inadequate leadership abilities
Keeper: outstanding
Ola Vintermar
469 000 US$, 25 years, excellent form
Has weak experience and inadequate leadership abilities
Keeper: solid
Defenders/Wingbacks
Krita Mae Noi
2 038 000 US$, 28 years, solid form
Has outstanding experience and inadequate leadership abilities
Stamina: excellent Keeper: wretched
Playmaking: solid Passing: wretched
Winger: solid Defending: brilliant
Scoring: weak Set Pieces: weak
Stefan Wennling
4 665 000 US$, 23 years, inadequate form
Has weak experience and poor leadership abilities [Quick]
Stamina: solid Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: wretched Passing: wretched
Winger: poor Defending: titanic
Scoring: wretched Set Pieces: weak
Kenneth Flodgren
168 000 US$, 24 years, excellent form
Has weak experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: weak Passing: weak
Winger: wretched Defending: excellent
Scoring: wretched Set Pieces: weak
Wings
Bo Hägersjö
1 344 000 US$, 20 years, solid form
Has poor experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: formidable Passing: passable
Winger: outstanding Defending: wretched
Scoring: wretched Set Pieces: disastrous
Mats Fermblad
14 000 US$, 36 years, passable form
Has formidable experience and solid leadership abilities
Stamina: solid Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: inadequate Passing: passable
Winger: passable Defending: wretched
Scoring: weak Set Pieces: disastrous
Inner midfielders (and trainees)
Lave Kyhlen
4 531 000 US$, 23 years, wretched form
Has passable experience and inadequate leadership abilities [Unpredictable]
Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: extra-terrestrial Passing: weak
Winger: poor Defending: wretched
Scoring: poor Set Pieces: poor
Anders Lundgren
3 657 000 US$, 22 years, excellent form
Has poor experience and wretched leadership abilities
Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: world class Passing: wretched
Winger: poor Defending: poor
Scoring: poor Set Pieces: wretched
John Larsson
3 050 000 US$, 20 years, excellent form
Has poor experience and wretched leadership abilities [Technical]
Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: world class Passing: poor
Winger: inadequate Defending: weak
Scoring: inadequate Set Pieces: poor
Olaf Methi
725 000 US$, 19 years, inadequate form
Has disastrous experience and inadequate leadership abilities [Unpredictable]
Stamina: solid Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: outstanding Passing: poor
Winger: poor Defending: weak
Scoring: inadequate Set Pieces: poor
Milton Taylor
1 707 000 US$, 20 years, passable form
Has weak experience and poor leadership abilities [Technical]
Stamina: passable Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: brilliant Passing: inadequate
Winger: inadequate Defending: wretched
Scoring: passable Set Pieces: poor
Strikers
Mats Thorbrant
2 607 000 US$, 22 years, weak form
Has weak experience and passable leadership abilities [Technical]
Stamina: weak Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: inadequate Passing: weak
Winger: inadequate Defending: weak
Scoring: supernatural Set Pieces: poor
Lars Törnen
1 259 000 US$, 24 years, poor form
Has poor experience and passable leadership abilities [Head]
Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: weak Passing: weak
Winger: poor Defending: inadequate
Scoring: magnificent Set Pieces: poor
Olli Gooch
335 000 US$, 25 years, passable form
Has poor experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina: solid Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: poor Passing: passable
Winger: weak Defending: weak
Scoring: formidable Set Pieces: passable
BillyNYC
05-08-2003, 04:45 AM
Last Cup Match
0-3 win at !Vengeance Is Mine!. VIM put up an outstanding midfield in their previous cup match, while my trainees PIC'ing only got solid. Therefore, I needed to improve my midfield for the match.
Playing it normal was NOT an option. I needed to PIC to keep up with my ML opponents spiritwise. Furthermore, altering training was not preferable either. But I had some leeway here. In the last 2 weeks, my 3 inners were my 2 trainees along with my TOP midfielder Lave Kyhlen(extra-terrestrial, but in wretched form. Bad enough that he doesn't start for me on Sundays). However, I didn't HAVE to play Kyhlen in midfield.
So what I opted to do was to play Kyhlen as a WINGER towards center (since I needed to play him SOMEWHERE, so his form *might* improve) and used my current #1 midfielder Lundgren in his place. This improved my midfield by 2-2.5* alone, which I figured was sufficient to get my midfield close to outstanding.
And so it was. My midfield, while still PIC'ing hit brilliant. My opponent matched that, but my D and strikers were MUCH better, so was a comfortable win.
!Vengeance is Mine!
Player rating and Team formation
Midfield: brilliant
Right Side Defence: solid
Central Defence: solid
Left Side Defence: inadequate
Right Side Attack: excellent
Central Attack: excellent
Left Side Attack: solid
Shaolin Landfills
Player rating and Team formation
Midfield: brilliant
Right Side Defence: outstanding
Central Defence: brilliant
Left Side Defence: magnificent
Right Side Attack: inadequate
Central Attack: formidable
Left Side Attack: outstanding
NEXT Cup match
Next week, we face a IV team named Darkhorse. They have a MUCH worse midfield than VIM, but a better attack. Today, their ratings:
Darkhorse
Player rating and Team formation
Midfield: excellent
Right Side Defence: passable
Central Defence: passable
Left Side Defence: inadequate
Right Side Attack: formidable
Central Attack: solid
Left Side Attack: excellent
If I play the same lineup as today, I should be able to PIC and advance, barring some really bad luck. Hoping some Major League opponents start to lose, so they can't PIC anymore, so my spirit would be higher, which helps me in future matches.
BillyNYC
05-08-2003, 05:07 AM
Short term concerns
1. Lave Kyhven: my superstar midfielder, who went up to extra-terrestrial in playmaking 2 weeks back. His form has plunged to wretched, meaning he's not even good enough to start for me. He gets about 3-3.5* in current form, as compared to probably around 7* in passable/solid form.
I want to sell him. I can't really train him much past where he's at without his wages KILLING me (they're already close to $50,000/week) and I have good enough midfielders to not need him. This can be shown by last week where he hasn't even played in the starting lineup, and my team's put up a utopian (one level below divine) midfield.
He's listed for $9M, which is comparable to the few Swedes of similar ratings, but his form will likely scare off any buyers. So he's an albatross around my neck until his form goes up. I can't sell him (unless I want to for considerably less than he SHOULD go for). I can't start him. I can't do anything with him. He'll likely play as a wing towards middle in Cup matches until his form goes up enough for him to start on Sundays.
2. Other form. My top 3 strikers have weak/poor/passable form, respectively. My attack sucks (compared to ML standards...) as a result. I will NOT train general, and hope it'll improve.
3. Survival: Am in 6th, 1 pt up on 7th. This is VERY uncomfortable, especially with my next 4 matches being against RSB and KC. If I beat Minute Men last week, would've been a very safe 7 pts up on 7th. But due to being upset (despite winning midfield by 6 levels), my very survival in ML is at stake.
Medium and longer term concerns
1. Training: my trainees are getting older, and I'll need to replace them with younger guys soon. Do I buy 17/solids (who will take longer to train to a startable level) or spend possibly more to buy 19/outstandings or similar? I don't know
2. Looking out for #3: I consider KC and Slashers to still be the top 2 teams in the US. My medium term goal is to be #3. D&D's success is not a concern, because it APPEARS he's training general to get amazing form. The same appears to be true of RSB. Neither has any good under-20 players, and both have high form, which leads to my assumption. As such, I don't consider either to be a long-term competitor.
Possible competitors longer term (behind KC and Slashers) are: Minute Men (and their American midfield, which is impressive), KOTA (and their defense...), Cyclones (and his attack...), and Indy Racing (also training attack I think). I continue to follow the progress of these 4 teams, as I view them as my main competitors in the future.
3. Rule changes: experience will matter more and so will passing perhaps. I sold off 2 of my national team players in the offseason, so my team is very young (which is good), but inexperienced (potentially bad). My wingback Krita Mae Noi has outstanding experience, and is the Thai national team's best defender. So that will improve. But he's 28, and needs to be replaced in a season or two. No other starters have about passable experience. My next batch of midfield trainees might likely be from smaller countries, so they get experience on U-20 teams...
DukeRulesMAB
05-08-2003, 07:09 AM
This is really cool; thanks!
Pretty much all of the dynasties on here right now are of the same type: Div IV/V teams that have been picked up in the last 3 seasons. In fact, most of them are Div V teams that are still trying to get their feet under them (like me :) ).
This is a completely different and unique perspective. Seeing the Cup as being necessary solely for the ability to PIC (as opposed to most of us who desperately need the cash), players of high talent, etc. Though the outlook is not unlike what many of us face: praying our form gets better. :)
Anyway, this is cool. Thanks!
PilotMan
05-08-2003, 07:40 AM
I have to add that no matter how often you update it, it will be very interesting as we have no idea how an upper level team is run. Also, it is a great tie in, and makes the ML closer, and more interesting. Keep it up.
Havok
05-08-2003, 10:37 AM
I agree, this will help alot of people, Me espically :)
Its good for us newbie's to see what its like in higher Divisons. Now if only we can get TP and Apoc to do Dynasty reports :)
GoldenEagle
05-08-2003, 12:41 PM
Great read so far Billy. Thanks for putting this together for us.
Blade6119
05-08-2003, 01:26 PM
just look at those stats on his players.....his back-ups would be a dream for me..one day...one day!!
oh...and if you want to post about the cup match you faced me and how i put up such a great showing...please feel free to embelish it a little!!
BillyNYC
05-08-2003, 01:35 PM
Thanks for the positive responses...
It looks like there's much interest in the "ML mindset" versus a IV/V team. So figured I'd go into some detail about how I treat certain aspects of HT, as far as my team.
The Cup
I do not remember for sure, but I think my team has played 1 HOME cup match in my team's 6+ year history. Nowadays as an ML team, the earliest it's even POSSIBLE to have a home cup match is the quarterfinals (since ML teams are seeded 1-8. So if all advance, we'd play each other in QFs), and it's more likely that a home match wouldn't be until semifinals. So, looking for a home sellout in the Cup isn't an issue.
Bluntly, neither's the money. I have a guy on the transfer list for 9M, and most anyone I'm buying or selling will cost $2M or more. While road cup teams still get 1/3 of the pot, it's minor. For example, yesterday's sell-out at VIM had an impressive 55,000 fans. It gave me about $100,000. I thought "that's not bad. That'll help a little" and nothing more.
So what's the Cup good for? Training, for one thing. My trainees get added experience in the Cup.
Team spirit for another. I, like almost all ML and II teams, PIC every Cup match for the first however many rounds. My spirit is currently as "Paradise on Earth", which is the max. But it's likely that everyone in ML has spirit around there, since we ALL PIC Cup matches. This is what leads to upsets. But it's a risk we have to take.
Also, if I think I can WIN the Cup, I'd go hard for it. In the last 2 seasons, have been upset early enough that this was never an issue. If I was to advance to the "Round of 16" or so, I'd take the Cup seriously. The Cup itself as secondary to the league.
Speaking of upsets, the other motivation is to avoid being upset by a much lower division team. Let me explain. If you're a fan of a top 10 college football or basketball team, and they get upset on the road and the opponents' fans dance on the court or tear down the goalposts, you'd find it annoying. You'd probably think "hrmph. Enjoy it while it lasts. I won't forget this.". And that's how it is for ML and II teams. When we get upset in the Cup, there's much rejoicing by lower level teams, many of whom say "wow, you beat an ML team! See, they're really not that good! Go you!" This gets annoying in a very similar way to being a Florida fan and watching Ole Miss tear down the goalposts. While Florida might say (and be right...) "it was a down year and a bad game", I might think (and be right...) "I used my trainees and PIC'ed. Can't you see my midfield in my league match was like 8-10 levels higher? Do you REALLY think you're as good as me?
(Sorry if that sounds arrogant. That's just my mindset...)
Money
Similarly, a higher level team's view of money will be much different. Getting 10k from mother club money is a drop in the bucket. So's selling a youth pull for 30k or something like that. As mentioned above, Cup money is similar. Other than my 3rd D, my whole lineup is outstanding and above (as far as primary rating. Like defense for a defender; scoring for a forward, etc). So to buy a brilliant+ guy, it'll cost several million. And while it's possible to sell an outstanding for 2.5M and buy a brilliant for 3M (thus meaning I'd spend "only" 750k), in most cases I try to improve by more than this, so cost to buy a guy are 2M+ usually.
But home league matches ARE important, as the main constant revenue stream. And I get annoyed when it rains and attendance is down compared to "what it should be". This could cost me 100k, which hurts a little. Also, trying to get the most for a player increases in importance, as prices are so high.
Training
Training is the ONE thing that many newer teams don't do "properly", and the MOST important thing to being successful in HT. When I ask someone what they're training, and I find out "I'm training defense. I have 3 of them. And my 28 year old doesn't seem to improve and it's been 10 weeks!", I shake my head.
While I KNOW money is more an issue for smaller teams, I see NO reason for a team to not train around the maximum amount possible (ie. if you're training playmaking, you can play 3 inner mids on Sunday and 3 on Weds, so 6 guys get max training. Same with strikers. Etc.). If you have hardly any money, you can still scoop up a 17 year old inadequate for quite cheap. If you're training only 3 midfielders, you can add 3 more for fairly cheap, and train them up and earn a sizable profit.
This leads into another point.
Friendlies/friendly cups
I don't take part in friendly Cups anymore. My 2nd season, I played in the American Cup, and got to the semifinals. In the last 2 rounds, I used many of my starters because I became competitive and wanted to win. This cost a few of my players some valuable training as a result. And winning a friendly cup is good for bragging rights, but useless to the team otherwise.
Other reasons for not taking part in a friendly cup is the "tear down the goalpost" aspect described above. I play my B team, get beat, and people celebrate. It's annoying :) . Also, the OPPOSITE reason. I don't like being the bully. I know my trainees/backups are better than many team's starters. Since a friendly cup isn't important to me, and I KNOW it IS important to some people, I don't want to take part and ruin the fun for anyone.
As such, you'll never see me in the FOFC Cup. Friendlies are purely for training (and using scrubs in other positions, so my starters don't risk injury), and I don't want to have the possibility of "wanting to win" a friendly cup as a result.
Very interesting so far, keep it up!
DataKing
05-08-2003, 02:58 PM
An interesting read. Most of it makes perfect sense when you think about it, but I hadn't considered the "tearing down the goalposts" aspect that you mentioned.
Don't mind the green. It's just envy. :)
Eilim
05-08-2003, 03:42 PM
Nice, thanks for the "ML Perspective", Billy. I fully understand your "Friendly Cup" attitude. While I don't deal with the "tear down the goalpost" syndrome.. I pretty much go through the same thing as far as dealing with my own competiveness and keeping it in check for the long term good of my team. I even go as far as to only schedule international friendlies for the exp boost (a strat that may even pay off given the possible upcoming changes. :) ) as I've forced myself into the mindset of "Build a long term competitive team".
Oh well, you've been added to my bookmark list and can consider yourself having one more devout fan following your club.. That is till I join you up in the ML in 10 or 12 seasons. ;)
-Eilim
NAIWF
05-08-2003, 04:09 PM
While I don't tend to enjoy following the crowd, I will say this has been an excellent read thus far and hope to see it continue. Thanks, good luck in the ML this year, and keep up the good work.
sterlingice
05-08-2003, 06:40 PM
Originally posted by BillyNYC
Short term concerns
1. Lave Kyhven: my superstar midfielder, who went up to extra-terrestrial in playmaking 2 weeks back. His form has plunged to wretched, meaning he's not even good enough to start for me. He gets about 3-3.5* in current form, as compared to probably around 7* in passable/solid form.
I want to sell him. I can't really train him much past where he's at without his wages KILLING me (they're already close to $50,000/week) and I have good enough midfielders to not need him. This can be shown by last week where he hasn't even played in the starting lineup, and my team's put up a utopian (one level below divine) midfield.
Oh to have problems like this ;)
"My world class middie has low form"
SI
AKnightofNi
05-09-2003, 10:05 AM
My inadequate middie is in poor form, too. I feel your pain. :)
robbgmaier
05-09-2003, 11:43 AM
(shakes head sadly)
I'm afraid you can expect a lot more of this, uh, lack of sympathy, for your troubles Billy, but hey, the smack talk can flow both ways :)
BillyNYC
05-09-2003, 01:05 PM
robb: yes, I expect that, and am fine with it :) The whole point of this dynasty thing is to show my team's situation/issues/evolution, and I KNOW reading "my extra-terrestrial mid is in bad form" leads to many rolling eyes. That said, it IS a big problem right now. To revisit my Florida example, they lose 4-5 games and go to a 2nd tier bowl and to THEM that's a lousy lousy season. But how many teams nationwide would LOVE to have a season like that?
Point is, standards and expectations increase I suppose. And when I will whine (at some point) about "I only got a titanic midfield this week", it's not being facetious, but rather a real concern.
That being said...
Training update; May 8
Well, Kyhven, the ET (16) midfielder did NOT improve in form. He actually went DOWN some, since his value dropped. Still wretched, but a low wretched. Grrrr.
And he has company. My 2nd striker, Lars Tornen (magnificent; (12)) dropped to wretched also. He won't play Sunday.
But not everything's bad in Shaolinland. My 20 year old trainee mid Milton Taylor moved up a level to magnificent (12). His form also moved to solid.
Other notable form increases: my top keeper Riedel to excellent(!), my 4th mid Methi to solid, my star defender Wennling to passable.
Other notable form decreases: my 3rd D Flodgren to solid
Next match
At first place Red Star Belgrade (RSB). Last season, my Landfills swept RSB...but both matches could've gone either way. RSB has to be favored here, but I think the match will be tight. My midfield should be even, or slightly better (even on road). This is helped out by his usual 3rd mid being suspended.
In scouting out RSB, in recent weeks they've played both wings towards center. This means their attack has been focused in the center. I USUALLY play a "balanced back 3", with one wingback defensive and one offensive (so, on the lineup screen, it looks like: defensive-extra inner midfielder-normal-offensive). However, I might change this around. Not certain yet.
My attack's still lousy due to bad form. The most important guy to my attack is my star wing, who's in solid form. My attack on his side will be stronger than the other 2 spots. Need to decide what to do otherwise.
It should be a very tight match...hopefully an injury-free one.
sterlingice
05-09-2003, 03:06 PM
robbgmaier: And, of course, he knows we're all just madly jealous of his team anyways. That kind of solace goes a long way ;)
BillyNYC: That said- it's really handy to have vets like you, TP6, and apoc along with our share of vets here to learn from. It gives lots of different perspectives and places for us relative newbies to learn from.
SI
AKnightofNi
05-09-2003, 04:31 PM
Hey, BillyNYC, as a less- than-2-week noob, I was wondering if the time to improve to, for example, magnificent by training is the same as to go from inad-passable. IOW, do you expect players to pop after the same amount of weeks of training as I would?
BillyNYC
05-09-2003, 05:01 PM
AKnightofNi: training's dependent on age (general rule of thumb is takes 1 week longer per level for every year older), your coach (ie. "a solid coach" trains players faster than "a passable coach", etc), and number of assistants (more assistants helps training; it's arguable about how long).
I'm thinking your question is "does a 20 year old magnif. mid train at the same speed as a 20 year old passable mid?" If everything else is equal (coach, assts), the answer is yes.
Coffee Warlord
05-09-2003, 05:03 PM
Technically speaking, the answer to that is yes. The split between levels is identical.
Realistically, no, because your players age over the seasons, and those older players take longer to train. (We're talking about long term, multiple season training here.)
AKnightofNi
05-09-2003, 10:58 PM
I understand. Thanks Billy and Coffee.
BillyNYC
05-10-2003, 04:18 PM
Woke up from a nice mid-afternoon nap to find under "My team"
YOUR TEAM
FK Sturm raises for Lave Kyhlen
I know what this meant. Clicking the message, I made sure:
FK Sturm offered 90 000 000 kr for Lave Kyhlen and thereby took the lead in the bidding.
Deadline is 2003-05-12 kl. 19.11
That's $9 Million, which is what I was asking for Lave for the last 2 weeks or so. There's no exactly comparable guys on Swedish list, but 9M looks about right. The most similar guy on the list is 25 years (mine's 23) and has no bids at 8M.
So, I get the albatross off my back, and will get at least 8.1M for him (taking out the 10% agent fee stuff).
This will put me at about $10M, which I plan on using to buy an extra-terrestrial+ forward perhaps. In meantime, I *might* buy a magnif. or so striker for tomorrow's match (and sell him shortly thereafter). Not sure yet. Am waiting until after the weekly updates to look around, so that I don't have only 5 logins for the week (ie. if I bought a guy before the update, I'd be way over -500k in debt, so would have 5 logins for the week despite having 8.1M coming in)
Other possibility is to sell off my outstanding keeper and use the proceeds to buy a titanic+ uberkeeper (probably would be the best keeper in ML; possibly in all of US). But my defense is already very good, while my attack is not. So buying a striker will be more useful.
I'm really happy that I didn't cave, which I could've done. I could've just said "enough" and listed him for 7M (or for 0, and he's get bid up to 6-7M or so). But no, I was patient and relisted him 3-4 times, and finally got a 9M bid, even still in wretched form.
By the same token, I won't rush into a buy. I want someone for tomorrow if I can, but if not, it's no rush. I play KC the next 2 weeks, which I consider likely losses. I won't overbid on a guy in desperation. HT is a marathon, not a sprint. Despite my bad league position, I think I'll be fine.
And this is why I don't fear teams that train general. I bought this guy for like 250k and 6 seasons later, sold for 9M. They buy a guy for 3M and 6 seasons later sell him for...maybe 3M. Longterm any team that trains in an area will be better off than one which trains general.
I'll sprint when I need to; but it's still a marathon right now.
RPI-Fan
05-10-2003, 04:39 PM
What's that stuff about 5 logins?
sterlingice
05-10-2003, 05:27 PM
Decisions, decisions... "hmm... the titanic-uber striker or my outstanding keeper, extra terrestrial striker" ;)
As for the 5 logins rule:
"There´s nothing to keep you from spending money even if your balance is zero. You have a cheque account credit for 500 000 US$ at the bank, but you´re going to have to pay some heavy interest on this borrowed money. If you run up debts amounting to 500 000 US$ you´ll be declared bankrupt and may be forced to leave the Hattrick series system! However, long before you reach the limit your interest costs will have become insurmountable, so stay clear of that limit!"
Basically, once you go $500K in debt, you have only 5 logins before you lose your team.
SI
NevStar
05-11-2003, 10:32 PM
Thought you weren't allowed to bid any higher than what would put you at ($200k)?
BillyNYC
05-11-2003, 10:39 PM
If you have certain money coming in, you can bid more (ie. If I have 100k, and am selling a guy for 500k and already have a bid, I'd be allowed to bid until 750k I believe. So if I bought the guy before the sale, I'd have -650k for a little while.
Also, I *think* you're allowed to go under -200k as far as hiring new coaches.
BillyNYC
05-12-2003, 06:08 PM
So, now it's official:
Date Type Players To/From Price Value then
5/12/2003 Sold Lave Kyhlen to FK Sturm 9 000 000 US$ (4 424 000 US$)
9M, which is what I wanted. This sets up 2 new things for me. Looking at my transfer history:
Total Purchases 69 085 762 US$
Total Sales 76 170 362 US$
Difference 7 084 600 US$
I found that kinda cool. Almost daytraderesque (and admittedly, I did semi-daytrade during season 2; but that would account for maybe 100-200k max...)
Also on the economy page:
Economy
Cash funds: 1 631 352 US$ (9 651 917) US$
Don't think I've ever had that much. Kinda wanted to be up to 10, but oh well :)
Lave was on my team since the end of my season 1 (I bought him same day as the 1st season ended). This is my 7th now, so he's been here for around 2 years (real-time). Maybe it's the lack of "personality" of players, but I didn't feel terribly bad about it. It's not AT ALL like experiences with Championship Manager where you interact and go through things with your player and feel like you actually impact them.
Maybe that's what i find to be the biggest weakness/flaw to HT. It's just not very immersive. You can browse the lists all you want, but there's not alot to truly do at any time. And when you look for guys, you're just looking at a few bits of numbers (age, rating in the main area, price. That's about it for the most part). It begins to feel "routine", which CM never did to me (and no, I haven't bought the newish CM yet). I guess that's why I enjoy CM more than HT. Other than the community atmosphere (which is quite a plus, admittedly), HT's quite simplistic and gets tedious at times. Wish there was more strategy to it.
Back on topic, that being said, I have about 10M to spend. Will scour for a striker. And a trainee midfielder to replace him in the rotation.
Havok
05-12-2003, 08:34 PM
do me a Favor and buy my passable/passable 19 year old Forward for like 250k. I coulds sure use the money, bidding ends tommarrow at 22:57 ;)
Airhog
05-13-2003, 01:25 AM
I would like to thank you for this dynasty. It provides new insight into how you should try to play. I will admit that at times I dont see the big picture around me. But I think now that I understand that you will not move from division 5 to the ML in a few years unless you get unbelieveably lucky.
BillyNYC
05-14-2003, 05:38 PM
Youth pull sold for 97k. Not bad at all. He was 19, passable D, passable PM, passable scoring. Too bad such a combination is essentially useless in HT (or at least one of the skills won't be used I mean).
Last week's league match
RSB 1-1 Shaolin
A tie at the first place Major League team (and thus the current top US team I guess) should be a great result. But it was frustrating anyway. My midfield was *6* levels better (AGAIN! Same levels too. Me utopian; opponent world class), defense slightly worse, attack about even. A match I could've won, but nearly lost.
Let's analyze it a bit. Already talked about midfield. But let's do defense vs. attack:
RSB attack:
Right Side Attack: excellent
Central Attack: brilliant
Left Side Attack: excellent
My defense:
Right Side Defence: brilliant
Central Defence: titanic
Left Side Defence: magnificent
As expected, RSB was stronger in the middle. Thus my 2 central D strategy worked...and yet it didn't. Their one goal was in the middle. So I made the right choice and it didn't work anyway. Oh well.
My attack:
Right Side Attack: inadequate
Central Attack: formidable
Left Side Attack: magnificent
RSB defense:
Right Side Defence: magical
Central Defence: utopian
Left Side Defence: mythical
Due to a suspension of their usual 3rd mid, they played 4-4-2 instead of 3-5-2. This was a bit of a surprise and their D ratings are a result of this. My attack is lousy, other than my one star winger. I consider myself lucky to score at all. However RSB was also lucky to score. A 0-0 result would've made more sense, or 1-1 with event goals. But oh well.
My top midfielder Larsson got stretched off. Out 4 weeks. Eek. Good timing though, since next 2 league matches are versus KC...and matches I consider probable losses. Hopefully Larsson will be back for RSB in 3 weeks (likely; his injury's already dropped to 3 weeks). The loss of training's annoying. He was on pace to turn titanic late next season.
This week's league match
Home to KC. My top midfielder hurt. All-time record against KC is 0-8. I expect that to move to 0-9. My midfield dominance in recent weeks won't happen against KC, especially with my top mid hurt. My D's ok. My attack blows.
Still looking to buy a striker. Hopefully will this week, since I move to Chicago next week. Thus, won't be online for a few days at least.
Tonight's Cup match shouldn't be difficult...but you never know. Still, I'm using mostly starters, other than midfield trainees. And yes, I am still PIC'ing in the Cup. I don't think I will be able to next week...if I get by today
BillyNYC
05-15-2003, 01:52 PM
The one area I don't REALLY need help in is D, with my great match ratings there. However, my 3rd D is "only" excellent (which is considerably lower than everything else), so if I saw a good deal, I didn't mind upgrading there. Furthermore I had NO backup D's (my 4th D is inadequate...), so wouldn't have minded making the excellent guy a backup.
Also, with my nearly 10M, I haven't seen anything thrilling on the titanic+ striker front, so a bit less hesitant to pull the trigger.
Trigger pulled.
My new defender, which cost me $3,249,000:
Magnus Nyhling (693243)
25 years, excellent form, healthy
A nasty fellow who is balanced and honest.
Has weak experience and wretched leadership abilities.
Nationality: Sverige
Assessed value: 2 511 000 US$
Wage: 15 936 US$/week including 20% Bonus
Owner: Shaolin Landfills
Warnings: 1
Stamina: excellent Goaltending: disastrous
Playmaking: weak Passing: solid
Winger: passable Defending: magnificent
Scoring: wretched Set Pieces: inadequate
Yes he's nasty, but surprisingly, I didn't get any spirit hit from buying him. Wonder if my coach's solid leadership is part of why.
Yes he's 25, which is older than I'd like, but he's obviously young enough for this not to be a big issue right now.
Other side considerations are that with the passable wing, he can play wingback or central D. Also, his solid passing was an attraction, based on the vague HT reference to passing becoming more important for D's. Am hopeful that this will make him even more useful.
Furthermore, this gives me the option of playing a 4-4-2 against KC, if I want to go D-heavy and try to survive.
I think I got a bargain. The guy's Swedish, but was on a Norwegian team. I think this might've made him less "visible", since it's rarer that one can find brilliant+ guys outside Sweden. From the looks of it, 20-22 year old magnif D's with NO side skills are going for around 3.5M+. I paid less, for a guy a little older (but by no means OLD), but with wing and passing abilities. Also, the exc. stamina means no "get tired" event goals.
The current excellent form's a nice bonus. In his last match 2 weeks back, he got 5.5* in central D. My exc. guy was pulling about 3*. So this is a SIZABLE upgrade.
Current main player ratings by position (ie. if a defender, then it's defense rating; if striker, then scoring rating) with the new guy plugged in
Keeper: outstanding-solid
Defender: titanic-MAGNIFICENT-brilliant-excellent
Winger: outstanding-passable (no real 2nd wing...)
Midfield: world class-world class-magnificent-outstanding (with one of the world class's hurt for 3 weeks)
Striker: supernatural-magnificent-formidable
So other than 2nd wing, assuming decent form, my whole lineup is outstanding+. Of course, my strikers have crap form, and I might use some (all?) of my remaining $6.5M or so to buy another striker.
sterlingice
05-15-2003, 03:02 PM
Why not get a second winger to plug that hole?
Now, I don't really know about guys up at the level you're looking at, but for most of us who shop in the ** to *** per game, range, wingers are about the cheapest position to fill. I got my solid winger/passable pm/solid stamina one for well under $100K. You can find ones with good secondary skills for less than $200K if you want an offensive or defensive winger. That's a lot of bang for your buck.
SI
Airhog
05-15-2003, 09:15 PM
I would imagine that a great winger is really expensive, remember they have 4 different skills that they draw from. so that is going to drive the price up alot.
BillyNYC
05-16-2003, 07:58 AM
Even at the ML level, a 2nd wing is more a luxury than a necessity. Some teams operate with only 1 wing (with the 2nd spot being a midfielder placed at wing towards middle); some have 0 even. See Red Star Belgrade's recent matches....he's top of ML with no wings really. As long as the center attack is great, a wing attack isn't NEEDED (although it's a nice plus). Plus wing towards middle helps the all-important midfield rating
In my own case, I have one SUPER wing, who I train in playmaking (he plays inner midfield on in Cup/friendlies):
Bo Hägersjö
1 320 000 US$, 20 years, passable form
Has poor experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: formidable Passing: passable
Winger: outstanding Defending: wretched
Scoring: wretched Set Pieces: disastrous
I've been wanting to get a super "pure wing" (ie. world class+ in wing; doesn't need playmaking), so I can have a super side attack. But they're not readily available. So few people train wings (since there's no real NEED as explained above).
Another consideration with a super "pure wing" is that I might "stack" that wing. Imagine if I had a world class wing on the side, and ALSO had Hagersjo as an inner midfield TOWARDS WING. Add to that, I have a wingback with solid wing, who I play offensive. My attack rating on that side would be insane....which is what I'd want (also, since so few teams have great wings, it's a strategy that would be very unique...). Also, could put my other wing towards middle to help make up for lost possession. I have no clue how well this works, but the idea of overloading a wing is something I find very interesting.
That's a medium-term possibility. If I see a great wing out there, I'd be interested. But really, there aren't any right now that strike my fancy.
Blade6119
05-16-2003, 09:11 AM
Originally posted by BillyNYC
My attack:
Right Side Attack: inadequate
Central Attack: formidable
Left Side Attack: magnificent
Wow...i beat a ML team in something...god bless my passable right side attack!!;)
DukeRulesMAB
05-16-2003, 09:18 AM
That totally makes sense...nearly no one trains wingers, so better than excellent on the wing must about the rarest thing in the entire game. Better at that point to just get a great inner with some wing rating and play him toward the middle.
Interesting how that works, as "good" wingers on the level most of us are at are a dime a dozen.
Originally posted by sterlingice
I got my solid winger/passable pm/solid stamina one for well under $100K.
SI
That SI is called a steal. I have been looking the market this last couple of days for an offensive winger (solid winger/passable passing) and there aren't any in yhe $100K price range...
RonnieDobbs
05-16-2003, 11:59 AM
I agree with Alf. I've been looking for that winger SI got for that same price for at least 3 weeks with no luck. It always gets expensive once you get to solid winger or solid PM.
Billy- this dynasty is awesome, and gives me a much needed perspective on my own actions down in V.47.
sterlingice
05-17-2003, 03:07 PM
You know, this almost makes me want to train wings. I would if both wings and wingbacks trained normally but, geez: it's wingers (wingbacks) so you just can't justify only fully training 4 guys a week.
SI
BillyNYC
05-17-2003, 03:51 PM
My strategy with the transfer list is like that of an NFL GM: I have needs and want to fill them, but if I can't, then I'll take the best available player and work around it.
So it is that somehow I have bought my 2nd defender in the last few days, even though D was already fairly strong. No cheap strikers, no wings that interested me.
In this case, being "around the international HT community" paid off. While on #hattrickint (on undernet IRC), found out there was a scandal in Romania, where the top team was locked, then unlocked and fined a large amount. This made the owner cranky and he quit and listed most of his team (it also angered the Romanian HT community, as they felt he was treated very unfairly, but that's not important here...).
So I knew that he listed his players, and since he was the top team in Romania, close to 50* or whatever, I checked. At the time the players expired, I was awake (7 AM eastern US time; I sleep weird hours. I was NOT up just to buy a player...although I did that once or twice in earlier seasons).
With 20 mins to go, the player had a bid of $5M, by an AMERICAN daytrader (a team I wasn't aware of; but he's a massive daytrader, and obviously most IV teams in US don't have 5M to splash around). Shortly thereafter, the bid went to 5.1, by Inter Stihm (owned by DrDDD, the Swedish national team coach!). I upped it to 5.2 and went to sleep (10 mins before he expired). No bidding wars for me. Inter would up my bid and I wouldn't get him. If I SOMEHOW did, would be a deal.
Woke up and my bid survived. The following is now mine:
Mikael Pettersson
3 988 000 US$, 23 years, inadequate form
Has inadequate experience and weak leadership abilities
Stamina: solid Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: weak Passing: weak
Winger: passable Defending: supernatural
Scoring: weak Set Pieces: weak
For 5.2, that's a good price. Supernatural D's are going for close to 6 nowadays. In fact, the SAME PLAYER was sold TO the romanian team for 5.6 six weeks ago. Prices haven't deflated particularly, so to get a guy for 400k LESS than was paid six weeks back makes me happy.
So now, my D is:
titanic, SUPERNATURAL, magnificent, brilliant, excellent.
I might play 4-4-2 for the next bit, until I decide which one I'd want to sell. In mean time, this guy will help my D even more. I won't beat KC tomorrow probably, but he's going to have a hard time scoring more than 1-2 on me.
robbgmaier
05-18-2003, 12:17 AM
anymore info on the "scandal"?
BillyNYC
05-18-2003, 02:18 AM
Not really. His press announcement is in Romanian and English. The English says:
"Last access for manager Dobrin from this amazing game! It is an alarm semnal against those GM with unlimited power. Thank you."
I take that to mean he quit based on what he viewed as excessive actions by GMs against him. I don't know all the facts (presumably only the GMs do; and they have a policy of not discussing matters), and I can't read the Romanian conf., since I don't speak Romanian.
Am unaware of the details, as I've said, but GMs make mistakes too. They're human.
BillyNYC
06-03-2003, 12:08 AM
FYI, haven't abandoned this or anything. Moved to Chicago 2 weeks back and have been getting everything settled. Should have DSL by the weekend and then can fully explain ummm...way too many losses. Ugh...
BillyNYC
06-08-2003, 10:51 PM
Will make a few more posts to catch up and explain my strategy in past matches (in the 3 weeks since I moved and have been away), but will comment on today first.
This was a match that in no way, shape, or form should I have won. Was 4 pts out of 6th place, with a US Cup quarterfinal at apoc coming up. I decided that I was going to PIC. The reason was 2 pronged:
1. Gets spirit high for apoc
2. Gets spirit high for a banged up Slashers team next week; I figure Minute Men would beat me today and my only chance would've been to catch IndyRacing (which I thought was possible, since I play him the last match of the season; and was only 4 pts behind).
So I PIC'ed AND rested 2 of my stars who had 2 yellow cards (wanted a full team for Weds. with no suspensions). So Wennling (the titanic D in exc. form, who churned out 7.5* as a D wingback last week) and Hagersjo (the outstanding wing) rested.
Played a strange 3-5-2, with one wing towards center and the other DEFENSIVE (the D wing is my usual wingback; brilliant D rating). Nonsymmetic defense, with 2 center D's and 1 D wingback (on the other side from the D wing). Hoped for a lucky draw...expected to lose by 3-4 goals.
Won 0-1. To my absolute shock. Yet, the strategy as I drew it up didn't work perfect, as my 2nd midfielder got a red card, so will miss Cup match. Eek. But now I'm 1 pt behind BOTH Minute Men and IndyRacing. I have a pulse.
Allow me to post something bizarre about my 2 matches with MM. My home match (which I lost 1-2), I thought I was absolutely ROBBED...won midfield by 6 levels, and better elsewhere and lost. Today was the exact opposite...lost midfield by 6 levels, won 0-1.
Here's a look at how my match report ratings compared to MM's in the first match:
Midfield: +6 (ie. my midfield rating was 6 higher than his)
Right D: +4
Center D: +2
Left D: +1
Right attack: +3
Center attack: -5
Left attack: -7
Possession for me: 60% and 58%
Score: Shaolin 1, Minute Men 2
And now today:
Midfield: -6
Right D: even
Center D: -4
Left D: +1
Right attack: -2
Center attack: -5
Left attack: -7
Possession for MM: 58% and 69%
Score: Minute Men 0, Shaolin 1
There's no explanation for either match really...which is a bit disturbing in a way.
BillyNYC
06-08-2003, 11:05 PM
Team Played Goals Points
1. Kansas City Wizards 10 24 - 13 21
2. Drunk&Disorderly 10 28 - 12 19
3. Slashers FC 10 34 - 19 19
4. Red Star Belgrade 10 23 - 11 19
5. Indy Racing Athleti 10 21 - 23 10
6. Minute Men 10 11 - 25 10
7. Shaolin Landfills 10 10 - 17 9
8. AYSA Express 10 8 - 39 4
Remaining matches:
SHAOLIN: Slashers, @D&D, AYSA, @Indy
Indy: D&D, @AYSA, @KC, Shaolin
MM: @Red Star Belgrade, @KC, Slashers, @D&D
I like my situation, due to MM's schedule. His final 4 matches against the top 4 teams, 3 of them on the road. Frankly, he might not get another point this season.
Meanwhile, I get AYSA at home, which should be winnable. I also get a banged up Slashers team next week (2 guys hurt; one of his starting wings suspended), with really high team spirit for me. Could potentially steal a game there. (Also notable, Slashers should be healthy for his match with MM...)
Another consideration is that Indy has a winnable match vs. AYSA (and possibly at home to D&D too). If Indy goes up more than 3 pts on 7th place, he'd certainly PIC me the final week, to prepare for the qualification match. So I *could* get a break that way, if it came down to the final week (which it very well might...).
I'm in 7th. But the season doesn't end today. And I like my chances of survival...of course, I'd also have to get through a qual. match, which could be very difficult. Will see.
I don't give myself much chance in the Cup Weds. Apoc's strong...but after the insanity of today, who knows?
Havok
06-08-2003, 11:40 PM
will you be playing mostly back-ups vs Apoc??
BillyNYC
06-08-2003, 11:43 PM
Since apoc's an FOFC member, I won't reveal my whole strategy here :)
But, no, can say for sure that I won't do that. Will definitely be starters...as far as what I'll do strategy and match orderwise, I honestly don't know.
It's the quarterfinals of the US Cup; too high stakes to just toss in the towel...
Havok
06-08-2003, 11:58 PM
1 more question.... how much prize money do you win for winning the USA cup??
GoldenEagle
06-09-2003, 12:40 PM
Billy, if you lose in the cup, I am avaliable for friendly at your place :D
Havok
06-09-2003, 02:05 PM
lol!!!!
same here :)
BillyNYC
06-15-2003, 11:11 PM
Week 11 : SHAOLIN 2 Slashers 0 Final.
To the layman, this result was surprising. To the more knowledgable viewer (and to the team owner; that being me :P), it was expected.
Slashers had 2 key players injured (including the magical or mythical mid that's costing him 120k/week, or whatever), and his top winger suspended.
I also was missing 2 players (due to suspension), but neither were absolutely key:
1. Krita Mae Noi, my wingback. My 4th best D ("only" brilliant; horrible I know), but my best offensive wingback (solid wing). Still, in bad form and one of my better D's has passable wing.
2. Lars Tornen, my 2nd striker. His form is up to a season-high of inadequate, so he'd probably get 4* (he's magnif.). My 3rd striker (Gooch, who's formidable) dropped to passable form, so I expected 3*. Not a HUGE difference.
Also, my spirit was delirious, while Slashers was certainly lower.
So I expected a tough match, but thought I'd win by a goal or two. And so it was. Fortunately, I took a nap and missed the first 3/4 of the match, so by the time I woke up, was up 2-0. If I had watched the 0-0 first half, I would've been a bit antsy, especially with 69% possession. Not sure if Slashers PIC'ed me, or if spirit/injuries killed him THAT bad, but his excellent midfield was surprisingly low.
As for me, magical midfield was about what I expected. 53* is a new team high.
Standings
The standings are being screwy, so can't post it. But I moved from 7th to 5th, now 2 points ahead of both IndyRacing and Minute Men. This too was expected, since Indy faced a tough D&D team, and MM an equally tough RSB team. Both D&D and RSB play in the Cup, of course, so I feared either might take it a bit easy against my competitors...but neither did (yay).
In fact, D&D got 2 starters suspended for his Cup match, including his star midfielder Is. So they'll be ready for me on Sunday, unfortunately.
A look at the remaining 3 weeks in the next post.
GoldenEagle
06-15-2003, 11:14 PM
What about your recent youth pull?
BillyNYC
06-15-2003, 11:21 PM
GoldenEagle: yeah, I guess I forgot that. I tend to gloss over most youth pulls. I guess it's something I take for granted. Whether they're fired or earn 100k isn't a HUGE deal to me anymore (so thus I don't get pissed at crap pulls, nor ecstatic at good ones).
But anyways:
Peter Taylor
90 000 US$, 17 years, passable form
Has disastrous experience and weak leadership abilities
Stamina: poor Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: poor Passing: passable
Winger: solid Defending: weak
Scoring: wretched Set Pieces: disastrous
He's got a few bids, and would expect he'll sell for 25k or so.
Attendance
I didn't sell out today, which wasn't a shock; 59,271 out of 60,250, so close enough. Still, I haven't expanded my stadium in 3 seasons or so and despite a growing fanclub (close to 3000), I still can't and won't. Being midtable or lower in ML doesn't draw fans as much as being at the top of III (for example).
That's part of why I wasn't terribly distraught at the potential drop to II. It's lame to say "the first thing I'll do when I'm relegated is to expand my stadium!", but it's absolutely true.
Also, I wish HT was more like CM in this point. The game doesn't care that I've been in ML for 5 seasons and have established myself. It only cares what my fanclub is (size and attitude), what level I'm in, my position, and the weather. So, a team new to ML like Minute Men or D&D draws much more fans than I do, which bothers me a little (also notable, I promoted to ML before the 10% promotion bonuses came about; so my fan club's quite small compared to some of my ML opponents).
The future next...
BillyNYC
06-16-2003, 12:06 AM
As stated, am currently in 5th, 2 ahead of both Minute Men and IndyRacing. With standings down, can't check, but my goal differential is about even with Indy and MUCH (+15 or so) better than Minute Men.
What's left:
SHAOLIN: @D&D, AYSA, @IndyRacing
MM: @KC, Slashers, @D&D
Indy: @AYSA, @KC, Shaolin
If you look at my schedule head-to-head with MM, you have to like my chances of holding a 2 pt lead on him. Of course, anything can happen.
The ideal would be if MM loses the next 2 weeks, and I beat AYSA. Then I can PIC Indy, rest my starters, and prepare for the qual. match. Also, even if MM wins 1 of 2, if I tie D&D and beat AYSA, would be 3 pts up, with a commanding goal diff. advantage (thus, could PIC Indy also).
So essentially, I need 4 points for guaranteed safety, as far as getting a qual. match (Indy likely won't pass me in the next 2 weeks; so if I draw him, I'd finish ahead).
Looking even further ahead, all four II series are close at the top, so no potential opponent will have extremely high team spirit. So, that bodes well for me.
So, what's my strategy?
@D&D: will wait to see what he does in the Cup, and who's suspended. He has several other starters with 2 yellows. A PIC is a possibility. That would get my spirit back to delirious for AYSA, and make sure it's still pretty high for Indy (if needed). Normal's also a possibility. Will see what he does. Also, need to decide who to bench (4 starters with 2 yellows; all KEY starters)
AYSA: again, dependent on what happens. Almost certainly "normal" though.
BillyNYC
06-16-2003, 09:44 PM
1. Kansas City Wizards 11 28 - 13 24
2. Drunk&Disorderly 11 31 - 12 22
3. Red Star Belgrade 11 28 - 11 22
4. Slashers FC 11 34 - 21 19
5. Shaolin Landfills 11 12 - 17 12
6. Indy Racing Athleti 11 21 - 26 10
7. Minute Men 11 11 - 30 10
8. AYSA Express 11 8 - 43 4
So, even with Indy at -5 differential; much better than MM's -19. Therefore, 4 points should be enough...
BillyNYC
06-20-2003, 11:41 AM
Down to the end we come, with a quite interesting match ahead against D&D. D&D's in the Cup of course, and also clinched at least 4th, so nothing to truly lose. Will he PIC me in preparation for the 2nd half of his Cup semifinal? Or will he play all starters? He has no one suspended, but many guys with 2 yellows.
And what will *I* do? It's a road match against a superior team (in current form anyway; i've suspected that D&D trains general for a while now based on high form and lack of really young players, but could be wrong), with AYSA and Indy looming.
As I said in a previous post, I need 4 points to guarantee a qual. match. A win and a draw. So how do I play D&D to try to assure that. PIC, and hope for a draw or that he rests starters and PICs me too? Normal, and hope he rests starters and I get a WIN out of it?
One thing's for certain. I'm going to be rooting for RSB against D&D in the Cup on Weds. D&D faces Minute Men the final week of the season. If they're in the Cup final the Weds. before and after, it's an almost certainty they'd PIC against Minute Men. Of course, this has the potential to hurt me. OK OK, this is NOT for certain. If I get a point this weekend and MM doesn't, I'd feel pretty comfortable and might root for D&D. Not sure :)
One thing is REALLY for certain, I root against Minute Men for the rest of the season.
What I'll do on Sunday is FAR from certain...
-Panther
06-21-2003, 11:31 AM
a win this week would all but guarantee you a qual match. I really
don't think D&D has your team 'outclassed' too much.
MF are about same, D yours is better, O his is slightly better.
I'd play 3-5-2 normal.
You and Indy both have 1 more 'sure' win vs. AYSA (I think so anyway)
MM is likely to loose all 3 (may beat slashers, unlikely)
D&D @ home will give him the advantage, but I think you'll still have a shot. poss. PIC is very risky right now. Even a 1-0 loss will
leave you a very high probability of PICing Indy for your qual.
MM has to win 2 to catch you.
it will end like this:
going in to last week:
Shaolin - 15
Indy - 13
MM - 10
if MM beats slashers:
Shaolin - 15
Indy - 13
MM - 13 (lower GD)
I don't see MM taking D&D on the road.
You could still PIC Indy and lose to make it:
Indy - 16
Shaolin - 15
MM - 13
1 win & 2 losses should keep you above auto-demotion
unless MM pulls 2 upsets ( I don't see it though )
I think you can - norm - norm - pic - qual
D&D's played almost the same lineup in last 2 games (league & cup) so i don't see him playing scrubs against you. not many anyway. If for some reason Indy looses this week, you're pretty secure in qual. & to PIC him in last game.
I'd go normal. if he PICs you should win, if he normals, you should at worst lose by 1 probably draw, maybe win.
BillyNYC
06-23-2003, 11:35 AM
And the verdict was that I decided to.......PIC .
The reasons were multiple. It was obvious that D&D PIC'ed in the Cup on Weds., so I figured his spirit was sky-high. Also, I didn't NEED a win or a draw, since was 2 points up on 6th/7th. I figured Indy would beat AYSA and MM would lose to KC. So if I retained my 2 point lead on MM, and beat AYSA next week, I'd be in good shape.
Similarly, I figured getting high spirit for the next few weeks was a priority.
Another course of reasoning is that PICs don't equal automatic death on upper levels. This is because the midfields are high enough that if you drop it a level or two, it won't KILL you. Say a V team has a weak midfield against a passable one. If they PIC, they'd lose maybe 15% possession more or something like that. If it's divine versus titanic and the latter PICs, it might lead to 5% possession loss. And ESPECIALLY with the better defenses that ML teams have, a PIC against a better team does not equate to total surrender as it does on lower levels.
So with all that, I PIC'ed and played a defensive 3-5-2 (2 wingbacks, both set defensive). Figured my D was much stronger than his attack and hoped for a 0-0 draw.
When I went down 2-0, figured the match was over. In fact, D&D and myself were HT-mailing each other throughout the match (he's a cool guy; out of the current ML guys, I probably get along with him, Indy, and AYSA the best. Not that I DON'T get along with the others, but have had conversations with those 3 on various occasions). When it was 2-0, he asked if I PIC'ed. I confirmed I did and joked "don't beat me up too bad".
I scored one, and then tied it up, leading him to HT-mail me "wow!". Cool guy.
Anyway, scratched out a draw, despite being killed in midfield (divine versus magnificent) and thus possession (63 and 66% for D&D). Still the result wasn't THAT lucky. My defense was much better than his, and my attack very slightly better. So in theory, he got more chances, but I should've been successful on a higher percentage of mine. And so it was.
MM lost to KC and Indy beat AYSA, both as expected. The standings now are:
1. Kansas City Wizards 12 31 - 14 27
2. Red Star Belgrade 12 30 - 12 25
3. Drunk&Disorderly 12 33 - 14 23
4. Slashers FC 12 35 - 23 19
5. Indy Racing Athleti 12 24 - 26 13
6. Shaolin Landfills 12 14 - 19 13
7. Minute Men 12 12 - 33 10
8. AYSA Express 12 8 - 46 4
I feel a little bad about costing D&D a chance at the title (in reality, I've done alot more than yesterday. I lost both matches to KC and drew both matches with D&D...so that's the 4 pt difference up top right there. Strangely, I lost and drew RSB. So if you take out MY matches, all 3 of them have 21 points. So, I might've helped KC win the title.)
Analysis of next few weeks in next post....
DukeRulesMAB
06-23-2003, 12:37 PM
Must be nice to:
a) Be high enough in the Hattrick universe to play teams with divine midfield, and
b) Be good enough to get road points against teams with divine midfields. :)
Congrats, great draw!
Question on what you said about PICing, I was under the impression that the numerical difference between 2 levels on the weak/passable level was the same as the difference between 2 levels on the titanic side. So why would PICing have less effect on the higher levels?
I guess the proportional difference between weak (4) and passable (6) is a lot larger than the proportional difference between (15) and (17), and that might explain it.
BillyNYC
06-23-2003, 12:43 PM
Yes, it's the proportions that explain my statements on such. As far as I know, possession's pretty directly related to that. So 6 vs. 4 would lead to around 60% possession ("around", since 6 could be 5.5 or 6.4, and so forth). 20 versus 14 isn't much different from 20 versus 15; 6 versus 4 compared to 6 versus 3 is quite a difference.
I could be wrong on the specifics. But in general, PIC/MOTS has less of an effect the higher you go.
Oh, on the subject of divine mids, I think I've faced 4-5 this season. Unfortunately, I've yet to have one for myself :(
BillyNYC
06-23-2003, 07:49 PM
Should also note that yesterday's 54* was a new all-time team high (and also the highest in the US; I think the first time that I've had that honor. Misleading, since Slashers had several key guys out, but still I find it cool).
Youth pull this week was an 18 passable scorer. He should sell for 50-75k I'd guess.
I just lost a bidding war with a Finn team for a 17 solid playmaker. The thing about this guy is he also was passable passing, passable defense, and a REALLY high value (400k or so) for a solid. So he was almost certainly near excellent. Still, 1.4M (which is what he went for...) is way too much and I bit my lip and let it go. I do still need a 6th trainee.
Friendly in Egypt this week, early early Weds. So, likely no trainee this week. Ah well.
Will rant about the coming week and future plans sometime in the next 48 hours.
BillyNYC
06-24-2003, 08:52 AM
Logged on to see this:
D.G. Marum Glamourboys raises for Olli Gooch
A bit surprising. Gooch is the formidable Swiss striker (25 years, passable passing) that I overpaid for earlier in the season. When my 2nd striker (Tornen, the magnif. striker) had his form plummet, I needed someone to take his place. Gooch was in solid form and I got caught up in a bid war and paid too much (1.65M or so).
Now that Tornen's form is an inadeq. (and Gooch's has FALLEN to inadeq. as well), I figured I'd try to cut my losses and scrap Gooch. Didn't expect anyone to bid the 1.5, since I thought it was high. If he sells as is, then it's a net 300k loss. Which sucks, of course, but Gooch's use for 3/4 of the season was worth that much to me.
So now I'm going to have only 2 strikers (my 3rd striker is passable...). Hopefully they both last until the end of the year.
But I'm also going to have about $4M to play with. As I said, I need a trainee, but not planning to spend more than $1.5M (if that much!) for one. Never been a big believer in spending 3M to get "the best" trainee. I don't REALLY care whether they're 21 titanic or 22 titanic, nor would it terribly affect their sale value. So why spend 2M extra? The only possible consideration is if they're a definite U-20 player.
So after a home match and buying a 17 year old (let's assume I finally pull the trigger for a moment...), I have 3M to play with.
Am at a bit of a loss as to what to do with it (NO! Charity to one of you guys is not an option! :) ) I definitely want to purchase a super wing (world class+ wing rating), but 3M isn't even close to that. I have nothing to truly sell this instant. I WILL sell one of my 4 defenders:
Wennling: 23 titanic
Petterson: 23 supernatural, passable wing
Nyhling: 25 magnificent, passable wing, SOLID PASSING
Mae Noi: 28 brilliant, SOLID WING, SOLID PM, BRILLIANT EXPERIENCE
The worst two would be the most ideal to sell, since they're also the oldest 2. However, with the mysterious "passing will matter for D's next season" announcement, I won't sell Nyhling until that's announced (his solid passing might command a premium. Not alot of Magnif. D who can pass too)
Similarly, with "experience mattering more next season!", Mae Noi could be crucial, since I have no one else on the team with greater than PASSABLE experience. He's also my top offensive wingback, so even more reason to sell a different D to keep him in the lineup.
So for now, I wait. I might sell Petterson in the offseason instead. Will see.
In meantime, put the "forgotten man" on the list. Kenneth Flodgren, 24 exc. D. He was my 3rd D until I bought Nyhling and Petterson earlier this season. Now he's the 5th D and never plays. His value's REALLY low ($125k now, in weak form), so he's low low excellent. Still, he's excellent. I listed him for 1M, which is probably too much. But figured why not.
Likely will just add 10 economists and sit on the 4M for a few weeks, until I decide who to sell to finance a great wing.
(Although I might sell Tornen, the magnif. striker. Maybe get 4-5M, and have 9M to play with to buy a "2nd striker", with my "top striker" Thorbrant being supernatural. Decisions, decisions.)
BillyNC, excellent defenders sell aroud $400K. Plus your guy is 24, thus not very trainable.
BillyNYC
06-24-2003, 09:16 AM
Alf: yeah, I checked the lists after I listed him.
Really, I might just keep him then. 400k additional in funds is less useful to me than having an exc. D as an "emergency" D.
DataKing
06-24-2003, 10:08 AM
I have a question for you, if you don't mind.
You mentioned that Noi is your best offensive wingback. What kind of difference do you see in your attack and defense ratings for Noi's side when he's played offensively, defensively, and normal. Are we talking about a level or two difference in ratings? Less than that? More?
I ask because I feel that my defense, and my wingbacks in particular, are getting to the point where I can begin to experiment with playing them offensively. I am just curious what sort of results I can expect.
Thanks much.
BillyNYC
06-24-2003, 05:00 PM
DK: I honestly don't track things as much as I should, but would say that Noi (the wingback with solid wing) improves that side's wing attack by about 2 (maybe a little more) when offensive, and 1 when played normal.
Of course, when played O, it hurts that side's D ratings a good amount (probably more than it helps the attack).
To make up for that, I tend to use my best D in the middle on that side. So I'd have:
Offensive wingback--Normal D---Extra inner mid---Normal/D wingback
This tends to give me pretty balanced defense ratings (you can go through my past matches for some examples).
BillyNYC
06-25-2003, 08:33 AM
As an ML team, I usually get flooded with friendly challenges from teams that want a decent crowd. Before the 20 challenges allowed rule, I'd get approx. 75-100 a week.
As I've mentioned before, I usually accept challenges from "obscure" countries (or even issue some of my own...). My last 2 friendlies have been in Chile and Egypt.
Occasionally a team will send a suck-up HT-mail "it would be an honor if you'd play me" yadda yadda yadda.
Today's pair of HT mails from a Slovenian team take the cake:
Subject: Play PLEASE
Would you please play a friendly with me. Tommorow i will chalenge you PLEASEEEEE. We can play in your arena. just play with me. PLEASE.thank you
Subject: (none)
i KNOW that you have much better players BUT lets have some fun PLEASE play WRITE BACK AS SOON AS YOU CAN pleaaase
Normally, I'd ignore it, but this sounds so amusingly desperate, and Slovenia is obscure. Should I have mercy and let him have his "fun"?
My first instinct is to reply a-la Bonds' daughter "Will you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE pitch to my daddy??!?!", since that would be confusing to the guy.
Other instinct is to respond "no." Simple, yet gets the point across.
But maybe I should give the guy a break...
RPI-Fan
06-25-2003, 09:17 AM
Billy: I have a fool-proof solution.
Play my team (Averill Park Mercury, 8489).
Everybody wins!
BillyNYC
06-27-2003, 12:11 AM
Notable training update...my star wing went up to outstanding in PM. He now looks like this:
Bo Hägersjö
1 636 000 US$, 20 years, passable form
Has poor experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous
Playmaking: outstanding Passing: passable
Winger: outstanding Defending: wretched
Scoring: wretched Set Pieces: disastrous
Probably the best young wing in the US. Too bad he's Swedish. And I'm far from done with him; likely will train his PM up to titanic (by age 23-24 or so). FYI, he plays wing on Sundays and IM in cup/friendlies. So, he gets full PM training. Oh, and his form went up to passable too.
In other training form updates:
Riedel (starting keeper): down to passable
Wennling (top D): down to solid
Petterson (2nd D): up to solid
Nyhling (3rd D): up to inadeq.
Thorbrant (top striker): down to solid
Tornen (2nd striker): up to passable
Larsson (2nd IM): up to solid
Havok
06-27-2003, 01:16 AM
holy shit that guy is a beast
BillyNYC
06-30-2003, 01:29 PM
Transfers for Chang Shi-Kai
4 transfers found.
Date From To Price Value then
6/30/2003 Real pellasgårde Shaolin Landfill 3 774 000 US$ (495 000 US$)
6/27/2003 Odds vänner Real pellasgårde 3 200 000 US$ (356 000 US$)
2/10/2003 Barnes United Odds vänner 2 591 000 US$ (166 000 US$)
2/3/2003 AIA Barnes United 1 665 000 US$ (157 000 US$)
That, my friends, is ugly. The guy sold for almost 1M more a week after being sold the first time. And now *I* bought him for nearly 600k more than he went for 3 days earlier.
So, why did I?
I looked at the player himself, thought "if I can get him for under 4M, I'd be happy" and put ONE bid. Checked the transfer history before and knew he was being daytraded. However, the guy's going to help me longterm much more than he'll help the guy who sold me him. So he's worth paying more, to me. Never been one to say "grrrr he's being daytraded! I won't buy him!". More I think "is he worth the price he's being sold for, to me? If so, and he's being daytraded, congrats to the guy selling him". So I placed one bid and went to sleep. No one overbid, and he's mine, which leads me to think I overbid. But I'm content with my purchase.
Why?
Here's him now:
Chang Shi-Kai (7886032)
18 years, weak form, healthy
A pleasant guy who is tranquil and honest.
Has poor experience and weak leadership abilities.
Also part of Team U-20 Hong Kong!
Nationality: Hong Kong
Assessed value: 495 000 US$
Wage: 2 148 US$/week including 20% Bonus
Owner: Shaolin Landfills
Warnings: 0
Stamina: solid Goaltending: disastrous
Playmaking: outstanding Passing: passable
Winger: poor Defending: wretched
Scoring: weak Set Pieces: wretched
Here's what I hope he can be after I'm done with him:
Chang Shi-Kai (7886032)
21 years, passable form, healthy
A pleasant guy who is tranquil and honest.
Has brilliant experience and weak leadership abilities.
Also part of Team Hong Kong!
Stamina: excellent Goaltending: disastrous
Playmaking: titanic Passing: passable
Winger: poor Defending: wretched
Scoring: weak Set Pieces: wretched
And that about sums it up. I've been looking for a passable+ passing mid trainee for weeks. My midfield passing has always sucked, and has hurt my attack. I'm trying to change that. This guy fits that bill.
He's already firmly entrenched in the U-20 team (played 11 matches, even now in weak form) and since I'm training him indefinitely, he'll be a part of the U-20 and Nat. teams indefinitely as well. Thus, his experience should go up nicely.
Plus, he's already at solid stamina. I have 2 other mids with passable and solid stamina. So one stamina training in offseason should take care of all 3.
Plus his side skills suck. This is great, since will help keep wages down some. As I plan to train him past titanic, that is CRUCIAL to me long-term. Plus getting the wage reduction for a nat. team player means I'm OK training him up PAST titanic, which I haven't been doing previously.
So yes, nearly 4M for a trainee is a ton. But considering 17 high solids NOW are going for over 1M, I don't think it's that bad. This guy's a certain nat. teamer, has passable passing, and cheap wages. And he'll be ready to play immediately. So next season when I sell my top midfielder (when he hits titanic), I won't drop too much in midfield.
So arguably, a player like this is MUCH more valuable for an ML/II team than would be for a lower level team. All the side things that keep salary down and help in other ways are worth more on a higher level.
Plus I can sell him in 2 seasons for 7-8M probably (if I wanted to), because of all these things. So 2M profit per season's not too shabby.
My 6 current playmaking trainees:
Lundgren, 22 supernatural (Swede)
Larsson, 20 world class (Swede)
Taylor, 20 magnificent (American)
Methi, 19 brilliant (Norwegian)
Shi-Kai, 18 outstanding (Hong Kong)
Hagersjo, 20 outstanding, outstanding wing (Swede)
By the time I sell LARSSON, Shi-Kai should be magnificent, which is quite playable as a 3rd mid in ML. This is part of my "cycling" of trainees. When I sell the top one, the new 3rd best needs to be able to play on an ML level. I DID want a 17 solid, but Shi-Kai will help me short and long-term MUCH more.
When I sell Lundgren, I plan on getting a 17 passable/solid for much cheaper. Again, passable+ passing. Because I don't need someone to "step right in" as soon. So can go 17 solid versus 18 formidable. Also, I plan to get a star wing, so if I need a midfielder (due to injury cards), I could also use Hagersjo as an inner (he'd be brilliant by then). That's part of why I love Hagersjo. Great wing, but he also gives me so many options.
And having options are a nice thing.
(Week 13 review, Week 14 preview on deck...)
Havok
06-30-2003, 01:36 PM
god i love to hate this dynasty!!!
Since Hong-kong is so small, this guy will play in every U-20 match and every National team match when he is of age.
can i have him??? please?
BillyNYC
07-03-2003, 07:33 PM
Beat AYSA 4-0, as expected. Played normal. What was unexpected was my divine midfield rating...a personal first. Had hit utopian (next level below) twice earlier in the season. But didn't expect divine now, since spirit wasn't POE and I played it normal. Form was high...but not all excellents or anything.
So divine midfield, an all-time team high of 55* and a rating thing of 136 (both of those being US highs as well). Would say stuff's going along well.
Indy PIC'ed and got killed by KC 8-0, as expected. MM beat Slashers 2-0, which wasn't a huge upset.
So standings now:
1. Kansas City Wizards 13 39 - 14 30
2. Drunk&Disorderly 13 36 - 14 26
3. Red Star Belgrade 13 30 - 15 25
4. Slashers FC 13 35 - 25 19
5. Shaolin Landfills 13 18 - 19 16
6. Indy Racing Athleti 13 24 - 34 13
7. Minute Men 13 14 - 33 13
8. AYSA Express 13 8 - 50 4
Being +18 goals on MM essentially locks up a qual. match for me. But being +9 on Indy means that if he beats me by 5+ goals, I'd drop to 6th.
PIC'ing and resting my guys with 2 yellows is obvious. Playing somewhat defensive is also highly likely, since I'd rather hold 5th. It's probable that apoc will lose Sunday and Cyclones will win, so holding 5th would likely give me a qual. match against apoc (who is going all out for the Cup, and who has publicly said he doesn't want to promote. So, essentially would be an easy win).
Even if it's not apoc, PIC'ing will get my spirit back sky high and combined with a MOTS, I should hit divine midfield in my qual. match. Any of my potential opponents from II will have a tough time dealing with that...
BillyNYC
07-03-2003, 09:38 PM
Somewhat eventful.
My 3rd mid (the 20 year old American) up to World Class playmaking. He only has passable stamina though. When I train stamina once in offseason, will help. But this is also why I HATE buying guys with low stamina, and why I so liked the HK trainee buy with solid stamina. Taylor (the guy who just went WC) started with poor stamina. I won't buy anyone with that low stamina again (as far as midfield trainees).
But more bizarrely, my KEEPER went up in PLAYMAKING to wretched. He's never played anything but keeper. Very strange.
Form changes:
3 starters DOWN (2nd D Petterson to inadeq; 3rd D Nyhling to weak; 4th mid Methi to passable.
0 starters UP
other notable: the new HK guy up from weak to inadeq. Hopefully that's enough for him to keep his spot in the U-20 lineup.
My 55* from last week will not be repeated this week (even if I played all my starters)
GoldenEagle
07-04-2003, 12:37 AM
This dynasty is so interesting. I cant even think about what it is like to run a club at the top of it all.
BillyNYC
07-06-2003, 10:44 PM
Lost 4-0 to IndyRacing. Not a surprise, since I PIC'ed and rested about half my starters (any with 2 yellows, a few others). I played a 4-4-2 with both wingbacks defensive, because I wanted to hold onto 5th.
The theory being that I figured apoc would lose (the Cup is all that matters to him) and that Cyclones would win. So holding 5th would give me apoc...who has said he doesn't want to go to ML yet. In other words, a win would be a formality, more or less.
And that's what happened. My 4-0 loss BARELY let me keep 5th (by one goal...). Apoc lost; Cyclones won. I get apoc; Indy gets Cyclones (for the second straight season). My spirit's Paradise on Earth. Had my 3rd D hurt for 2 weeks today, but his form's low and so he likely wouldn't have played next week anyway.
So staying in ML seems pretty safe right now. Yay.
sterlingice
07-07-2003, 03:16 AM
Woo!
SI
BillyNYC
07-08-2003, 05:54 PM
(Team press announcement)
7/9/2003 MidEast peace announced; Landfills soccer responsible
Gaza (AP): In an earth-shattering event, a lasting peace was announced in the Middle East. Officials from both Arab and Israeli authorities cited their mutual love of Shaolin Landfills soccer as the reason.
"They play friendlies here the last 3 weeks. 1 in Egypt, then 2 in Israel. Palestinean and Israeli sit together and cheer this great team!" said LeBron Hussein-Goldstein, 24, of Bethlehem.
Rumors of Landfills GM Billy writing a Nobel Peace Prize speech have been unsubstantiated.
DataKing
07-08-2003, 06:41 PM
*laugh*
Great stuff, Billy.
BillyNYC
07-10-2003, 04:27 AM
As I've said before, I often get spam HT-mails asking for friendly matches.
Two tales of such today....
First wasn't even on HT. An Israeli ICQ'ed me (thought my ICQ info was gone from my info; guess not?) telling me how much he loves America and how he always wants to come here. I'm not stupid and was waiting for the inevitable. So it was...he asked for a friendly. I declined. Then he asked if I could buy some of his players because he's in debt. I asked why I should buy players. He said something like "so I can give the money to poor teams!" A regular Robin Hood (no, I didn't save the convo. Wish I did)
The second is the following HT-mail from a Dutch team:
Subject: I've challenged you
Hope you accept,
Bye.
Suzanne.
Yes, I can't see the message with the red arrow saying "blahblahblahteam has challenged you". It was necessary for her(?) to inform me of such. How nice!
Denied. Am in that US/Canada Cup thing anyway.
In other news, apoc won the Cup and visits me Sunday for the qual. match. He's left open the possibility of playing me tough, but I think I'm ready regardless. Everyone will be healthy, no one suspended, and form's ok. Spirit's delirious. I should get a divine midfield and good stuff everywhere else.
And if he does somehow beat me, I just drop to II and kill everyone. Life could be worse...(yes, I can be an arrogant bastard from time to time :) )
BillyNYC
07-14-2003, 05:59 PM
Beat apoc 2-0, as expected. Based on his formidable mid, I'm fairly sure he didn't make a full effort. That being said, my midfield was divine+, so if he had, I still would've felt confident.
Let me explain "divine+". I hit divine 2 weeks ago in my match versus AYSA. In the qual. match was also divine. When I use supporter at look at my "best match ratings" for midfield, the qual. match divine is 100%. The other divine is only 90%. Since divine is 20, my qual. divine was likely 22-23 (ie. 2-3 levels above divine...if such levels were defined). So...that's a good thing.
My top striker was hurt for 3 weeks. He's 22 and I always have 9 doctors on hand. So am hopeful that he'll be playable for the league opener in 2 weeks.
Other news/preparations/preview in next post...
BillyNYC
07-14-2003, 06:11 PM
Since my fanclub size is closing on 3000 and most of my matches sold out this past year, I decided to expand the stadium. It had been 60,250 for the last 2-3 seasons. I boosted that to 80,008. It'll be ready for the season opener in 2 weeks.
I want an offensive coach, but am going to wait until I see what the new coach process is going to be.
Dobie, the owner of California Sea Lions posted in HT US Conf. about how his fanclub's the 8th largest in the US, and how that shouldn't be right (that the 10% fanclub boost for promotion's a bit extreme).
Funny thing there is that the Sea Lions were in my original III series (III.9). They won the series the season after me, then went back to III, down to IV. However, they promoting to III and now to II, gaining 10% each time. As a result, their fanclub's larger than mine. But no, I'm not bitter...not me.
(FYI, the 2 seasons I promoted were before the 10% rule was implemented. So I didn't get the benefit of it. However if I demoted to II this season, I'd have lost 10%.)
Longterm, it's meaningless. Slashers and KC have both been at the "soft cap" for a while and have 3300-3400 fans. I should be approaching that in 2 seasons or so. So gaining fans won't mean as much.
I start the season home to IndyRacing. If my striker's healthy, I'll feel good about my chances. Will see. Need to work on buying a wing...still.
Havok
07-14-2003, 07:49 PM
good season Billy........... All the FOFC'ers are expecting a first place finish from you this year!!!! no less!!!
:)
DukeRulesMAB
07-14-2003, 07:54 PM
I've always wondered, what happens at the "soft cap"? Do you just stop getting new fan club members?
BillyNYC
07-14-2003, 08:06 PM
DukeRulesMAB: As far as I know, it's just much slower/more difficult. KC and Slashers have both been at 3200-3400 for a little while. It's such that I might get 7-8 supporters in an update now. Once I reach 3100 or so, that might drop to 4-5, and so forth.
And once it gets up to like 3300-3400, might get 1-2 supporters, but would lose 5 for a loss (or similar). So it's exceedingly difficult to get more than that. (Thus, why Swedish teams who have been around 20 seasons don't have more than that. There's no "hard limit", but it's just about impossible to stay above a certain point.)
DukeRulesMAB
07-14-2003, 08:19 PM
Gotcha, that makes sense. Unless there was some sort of cap, stadiums would be of unlimited size.
BillyNYC
07-15-2003, 04:08 PM
Figured I'd give a brief run-through of how the changes affect my team and strategy
Coaches
My coach for the last several seasons:
A solid coach who is defensive minded
A pleasant guy who is balanced and honest.
Has weak experience and solid leadership abilities.
I made no secret of wanting an attacking coach. Also, wanted a popular coach...or a coach with only passable leadership (since I have a clown, wanted to make sure my coach wasn't also the team leader). Based on the pre-announcements, I figured a solid/passable would cost around 500-750k. Was pretty unhappy that it costs sizably more.
Also with the "slight boost" to defensive coaches, and GM-SpidurMan replying in US conf. saying old coaches were "grandfathered" (ie. they shouldn't drop in leadership...no clue whether this is "fact"), I'm thinking I'm going to stay put right now.
Counterattacking
I expected this. The specifics of it were sort of what I had guessed. This makes my decision of "which D to sell" much easier. I'm a midfield-heavy team, so will never counterattack anyway. So selling the magnif D/solid passer is an easy call now. Hopefully I can get a nice sized profit on him due to the rule change. He'd be IDEAL for someone like Cyclones (sub-par midfield, great attack).
Also, my team D's so good that if a team counterattacked me, I don't think I'd be too concerned.
Experience
This does concern me a bit. My team's quite young and lacks nat. team players. I built a team with the idea that I didn't want older guys, since I'd have to replace them every few years.
Well, now this hurts. Fortunately, I kept my Thai nat. teamer D (28, brilliant D, brilliant experience). Otherwise, here's the experience of my 10 other starters (best to worst):
passable, inadequate, inadequate, weak, weak, weak, poor, poor, poor, disastrous
Not so good. One of my trainees is the HK U-20, who's poor. Hopefully he'll go up quickly.
Many other ML teams are much older and have current or former nat. team players. Therefore, I could be hurting.
Also, this will further my search for potential U-20 players as trainees. It wasn't my plan with the HK guy, but now I'm very glad I did buy him.
Tactics
I've already said I wanted to use wings in the future. Now that's even more likely. Also, with wing training being better now, would expect prices on wings to drop some (since will be more).
The "play destruction" thing is worrisome, especially in the Cup. I don't like the chance of increased injuries. At same time, no more really dangerous IV and V teams doing MOTs/fire/PIC/MOTS to play giantkiller, since coach firing doesn't reset spirit anymore.
Recap
Overall, I'm in pretty good shape with the changes. My coach isn't offensive, but he's pretty ideal otherwise. The experience changes might hurt me, but over time I can compensate.
Havok
08-06-2003, 04:32 PM
where's season 2 at Billy!!!
BillyNYC
08-06-2003, 04:35 PM
oK OK, will work on it later :P
sterlingice
08-06-2003, 04:36 PM
Billlll-aaaaaay! Billlll-aaaay! (I probably shouldn't talk so loud since my dynasty is still a week behind)
SI
DataKing
08-06-2003, 04:37 PM
Slackers.
:D
sterlingice
08-06-2003, 04:38 PM
Originally posted by DataKing
-5th Season Head Coach of the Kansas Jayhawks. Check out my TCY Dynasty Report
Pot. Kettle. Black. :D
SI
DataKing
08-06-2003, 04:48 PM
I have no idea what you're talking about. :rolleyes:
sterlingice
08-06-2003, 04:49 PM
Originally posted by DataKing
I have no idea what you're talking about. :rolleyes:
;)
If you're going to update your sig, do it right. Your Seamen dynasty link points to last year or the year before.
SI
DataKing
08-06-2003, 04:55 PM
My, aren't we picky.
OK, enough of this. Sorry for the threadjack, Billy. :)
sterlingice
08-06-2003, 04:58 PM
Each of these is really an attention getting device for information about the Landfills. We need your MLS expertise and this nitpicking and infighting is our cry for help :D
SI
GoldenEagle
08-06-2003, 05:43 PM
I want to hear bitchin about only getting a utopian midfield!!
vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.