aston217
03-27-2015, 12:39 PM
I've noticed this happening before but didn't get a chance until now to compare before and after files. So here's what happened.
Week 14, I signed a guy. $1.21M salary, $0.26M bonus, $1.47M total cap cost.
Only the top 51 players count against the cap; he's in the top 35, so he does. The guy he pushes down, who is now #52, has $1.10M salary and $0.04M bonus this year, $1.14M total cap cost. I also placed a player on IR ($1.55M salary, $0.01M bonus, $1.22M cap cost with the veteran discount), but my understanding is the IR should not affect the cap in any way.
Before:
$4.96M Room Under Cap
$6.10M Max For New
$12.44M Lost Cap Room
Expenditure = Salary Cap (282.4) - Lost Cap - Room Under Cap = 265.00.
After:
$5.55M Room Under Cap (+0.59)
$6.72M Max For New (+0.62)
$11.52M Last Cap Room (-0.92)
Expenditure = Salary Cap (282.4) - Lost Cap - Room Under Cap = 265.33
By my math, I should have lost 1.47-1.14 = $0.33M in cap room. This is exactly reflected in the expenditure; I'm spending $0.33M more.
However, that's being offset by a $0.92M reduction in this year's cap penalty, so instead of losing $0.33M, I actually gain $0.59M in cap space. Where did that come from? Cap penalty is not something that should ever get lower, right? And a free agent signing, at best, should keep the cap room the same -- not increase it. Right?
Week 14, I signed a guy. $1.21M salary, $0.26M bonus, $1.47M total cap cost.
Only the top 51 players count against the cap; he's in the top 35, so he does. The guy he pushes down, who is now #52, has $1.10M salary and $0.04M bonus this year, $1.14M total cap cost. I also placed a player on IR ($1.55M salary, $0.01M bonus, $1.22M cap cost with the veteran discount), but my understanding is the IR should not affect the cap in any way.
Before:
$4.96M Room Under Cap
$6.10M Max For New
$12.44M Lost Cap Room
Expenditure = Salary Cap (282.4) - Lost Cap - Room Under Cap = 265.00.
After:
$5.55M Room Under Cap (+0.59)
$6.72M Max For New (+0.62)
$11.52M Last Cap Room (-0.92)
Expenditure = Salary Cap (282.4) - Lost Cap - Room Under Cap = 265.33
By my math, I should have lost 1.47-1.14 = $0.33M in cap room. This is exactly reflected in the expenditure; I'm spending $0.33M more.
However, that's being offset by a $0.92M reduction in this year's cap penalty, so instead of losing $0.33M, I actually gain $0.59M in cap space. Where did that come from? Cap penalty is not something that should ever get lower, right? And a free agent signing, at best, should keep the cap room the same -- not increase it. Right?