Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   2020 Democratic Primaries/General Election Thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=95933)

PilotMan 10-23-2020 09:31 AM

I was brainstorming this morning after reading an article on voter registration, and I was wondering, assume that the republican party continues its hapless journey behind trump into the void, and that they sort of adopt this nationalistic you must be with us on x, y, and z or else, that how can the democratic party overcome it?

I don't know about the timing, but at some point, acclimating a portion of your opposition to your own way, correctly timed, can be a death blow. So what if millions of democrats suddenly changed party to republican, and then, at the grass roots level, worked to change the dynamic of the party from within? Sort of subverting part of the party, and breaking the more moderate bank of people away from the more nationalistic part. We already see a large bank of opposition to the current path of leadership. We've seen large facebook groups subverted from within, could the same happen at local levels that could actually amount to a shift? Or is this all sort of too much video game strategy?

Further, what sorts of strategy could be leveraged? Or are national level arguments, that are broad, the most effective?

JediKooter 10-23-2020 09:51 AM

The oil answer is only bad if people didn't listen to him explain it. I'm sure the conservatives and republican party will make it sound like as soon as Biden is sworn in, he will hit a switch that shuts down all the oil companies. When in reality he explained, in the debate last night, that it would be an incremental change from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

In my opinion, oil companies can get on board and prepare for this transition, or they can go kicking and screaming into non existence like Tower Records did.

JPhillips 10-23-2020 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 3307785)
Main thing missing here is that she is articulate, effective, and smart. Couple those with the other demographics and policy matters we associate with her, and she's a major existential threat to the right. Thus, the teardown has to occur as quickly as possible. In much the same way they knew Hillary Clinton was the likely standard bearer for the Democratic party (or "Democrat party" as they'd surely slur) they can see the writing on the wall. AOC has a wide following already, far surpassing her actual station in politics, and she has the cunning to stretch it out far beyond 15 minutes - that is obvious.

So, demonize her as a communist. Slander the "Green New Deal" based on any tiny element it contains. Dig up videos of her having fun as a teenager. Find a tiny thing she said here or there that doesn't hold up out of context. Drum up some innuendo about sexual mores. Find something that felt vaguely "too casual" for the moment. Have at it. Plenty will stick. Not to worry. Your base consists of gullible idiots, and there are plenty more who are persuadable. They'll come around.

This is the gameplan. She's a target.


I'm not convinced she can ever win the WH, but I'm quite certain that she'll be an important political figure for as long as she desires. She's so much better at the politics than Bernie, especially in terms of building relationships with different factions among Dems. Schumer can't have much time left, and AOC has to be one of the frontrunners for that Senate seat if she wants it.

JPhillips 10-23-2020 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3307802)
I was brainstorming this morning after reading an article on voter registration, and I was wondering, assume that the republican party continues its hapless journey behind trump into the void, and that they sort of adopt this nationalistic you must be with us on x, y, and z or else, that how can the democratic party overcome it?


Restore majority rule. The GOP can't exist as is without the help of all of the counter-majoritarian elements of our system. The key to political moderation is requiring parties to garner more support in order to wield power.

Atocep 10-23-2020 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediKooter (Post 3307804)
The oil answer is only bad if people didn't listen to him explain it. I'm sure the conservatives and republican party will make it sound like as soon as Biden is sworn in, he will hit a switch that shuts down all the oil companies. When in reality he explained, in the debate last night, that it would be an incremental change from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

In my opinion, oil companies can get on board and prepare for this transition, or they can go kicking and screaming into non existence like Tower Records did.


It was probably Biden's biggest misstep in the debate and I understood what he was saying, but I don't think he did a great job of explaining it. The fact is we're going to run out of oil from known deposits in about 50 years if we continue use and production at the current pace. As you said, we need to be prepared for the transition that's unavoidable.

CrimsonFox 10-23-2020 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediKooter (Post 3307804)
The oil answer is only bad if people didn't listen to him explain it. I'm sure the conservatives and republican party will make it sound like as soon as Biden is sworn in, he will hit a switch that shuts down all the oil companies. When in reality he explained, in the debate last night, that it would be an incremental change from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

In my opinion, oil companies can get on board and prepare for this transition, or they can go kicking and screaming into non existence like Tower Records did.


Thing is centrists don't shut down oil companies. They don't. I mean it's nice that he is incorporating more progressive ideals but I think he'll more open up alternative sources like wind and solar but nuclear as well and anything else scientists develop.

GrantDawg 10-23-2020 11:26 AM

AOC will be in the Senate in the next ten years or so.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

CrimsonFox 10-23-2020 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3307825)
AOC will be in the Senate in the next ten years or so.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


is the senate considered a promotion?

JPhillips 10-23-2020 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3307825)
AOC will be in the Senate in the next ten years or so.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


I think she can win Schumer's seat when he retires, but if she doesn't she could be locked out of the senate for quite a while. Gillibrand is only 53 and whoever replaces Schumer would probably have three or four terms available. Things happen, people get federal jobs or run for Governor, but Senate seat windows are often pretty small.

If Schumer runs for another term in 2022, which seems likely, I don't think she'll wait in the House for a promotion attempt. I expect her next step up is the NY Gov.

larrymcg421 10-23-2020 11:46 AM

The GOP has made a huge mistake in going after AOC as their #1 villain. If they had picked Omar as the bigger target, it may have worked better, because Omar doesn't have the same political skills and can back her way into the wrong statement more often. They mention Omar every now and then, but something about AOC just draws them in. They can't resist focusing so much of their energy on her. And then what people (even those who don't love her politics) see is someone who is smart, prepared, and engaging.

Ben E Lou 10-23-2020 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 3307789)
...not all that important a skill in actually holding office...

One of the major flaws of our entire system is that the intersection of "skills/talent/personality needed to govern effectively" and "skills/talent/personality needed to run for office and win an election" isn't all that large.

Vegas Vic 10-23-2020 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 3307785)
Main thing missing here is that she is articulate, effective, and smart. Couple those with the other demographics and policy matters we associate with her, and she's a major existential threat to the right.


I strongly disagree with her political philosophy, but AOC is actually doing what she was elected to do, representing the ideology of the constituency that put her in office.

JediKooter 10-23-2020 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3307820)
It was probably Biden's biggest misstep in the debate and I understood what he was saying, but I don't think he did a great job of explaining it. The fact is we're going to run out of oil from known deposits in about 50 years if we continue use and production at the current pace. As you said, we need to be prepared for the transition that's unavoidable.


And to me, as missteps go, it wasn't that bad of one. He has plenty of time to explain it better the next couple of weeks if it comes up again. Yes indeed it will be running out to extremely hard to get to within our lifetime. That's why there's such a freak out when trump accuses Biden of wanting to ban fracking. It's ironic that the oil companies will soon go the way of the dinosaur or at least their main product will.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrimsonFox
Thing is centrists don't shut down oil companies. They don't. I mean it's nice that he is incorporating more progressive ideals but I think he'll more open up alternative sources like wind and solar but nuclear as well and anything else scientists develop.


I agree, Biden more than likely won't shut anything down. The closest he will get to that, is putting the ball in motion for that to eventually happen. He did give a timeline of 2050, but, not having all the details, I don't know if that is supposed to be a drop dead date or meeting certain criteria by then. It does sound like is very open to more solar and wind, which is great and I'm not opposed to more nuclear, but, I won't hold my breath on that happening.

Brian Swartz 10-23-2020 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediKooter
In my opinion, oil companies can get on board and prepare for this transition, or they can go kicking and screaming into non existence like Tower Records did.


Definitely, that's going to happen whether they want it to or not and they know it. They're actually already preparing in some ways. Like most businesses though, what they want is to keep making as much money as possible now until oil is no longer viable.

Brian Swartz 10-23-2020 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan
I don't know about the timing, but at some point, acclimating a portion of your opposition to your own way, correctly timed, can be a death blow. So what if millions of democrats suddenly changed party to republican, and then, at the grass roots level, worked to change the dynamic of the party from within? Sort of subverting part of the party, and breaking the more moderate bank of people away from the more nationalistic part. We already see a large bank of opposition to the current path of leadership. We've seen large facebook groups subverted from within, could the same happen at local levels that could actually amount to a shift? Or is this all sort of too much video game strategy?

Further, what sorts of strategy could be leveraged? Or are national level arguments, that are broad, the most effective?


On the first part, I don't see that working on this scale. When someone disagrees with the party line, they just get jettisoned. See: the views of some conservatives on John Roberts, etc. Some things can be coopted. A major national political party would need to be convinced en masse. The regional differences within such a structure would make any sort of coordinated effort, even if executed perfectly, unsuccessful.

I think you have to basically ignore the intractable parts and just talk to those who are persuadable, combined with motivating those who aren't committed ideologues for the opposition. I think it's also important to be careful what you stand for, but then actually stand for it. The tough question right now for Democrats isn't how to win - they're going to do that for probably the next four years at least. It's how to govern. How hard do you push on key issues without alienating part of your coalition.

JediKooter 10-23-2020 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3307836)
Definitely, that's going to happen whether they want it to or not and they know it. They're actually already preparing in some ways. Like most businesses though, what they want is to keep making as much money as possible now until oil is no longer viable.


100% agree with you on that. The smart ones will realize all the subsidies will go towards solar and wind and they will shift their business models to those, but, will definitely squeeze out every single drop of oil they can on the way there.

CrimsonFox 10-23-2020 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3307825)
AOC will be in the Senate in the next ten years or so.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


hell at this rate she'll become pope

ISiddiqui 10-23-2020 01:03 PM

Speaking of Pennsylvania...

https://twitter.com/aabramson/status...ub-6sA7nv9tCQg

Quote:

Returned ballots in PA so far, per PA SOS Kathy Boockvar:
•Dem = 1,023,402
•Rep = 293,318
•Other = 132,680

albionmoonlight 10-23-2020 01:21 PM

That's scary. It does not look like PA will have enough in person Dem votes to overcome the in person GOP votes. And Trump will sue to stop counting the mail in votes. And the SCOTUS 6 might let him.

PilotMan 10-23-2020 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3307836)
Definitely, that's going to happen whether they want it to or not and they know it. They're actually already preparing in some ways. Like most businesses though, what they want is to keep making as much money as possible now until oil is no longer viable.


They started this back during the Obama administration. The big energy companies delayed the government from getting in bed with upstart alternative energy, while they started pouring money into it to play catch up and grab market share. Right now, the oil/energy companies are on par, and certainly looking to diversify their companies so they don't disappear.

ISiddiqui 10-23-2020 01:27 PM

I don't think there is any way a SCOTUS stops counting of mail in ballots which have been received by election day (and +3 days if postmarked by election day due to previous ruling).

I think folks are a bit too overly frightened about those sort of things...

Because you know if that does happen, the only real remedy is violent rebellion to stop a coup, right?

sterlingice 10-23-2020 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 3307850)
Because you know if that does happen, the only real remedy is violent rebellion to stop a coup, right?


However, how many people think stopping a coup is worth fighting for, maybe losing a job for, or, even, potentially dying for? That number isn't 0. But is it enough?

SI

albionmoonlight 10-23-2020 01:43 PM

I am probably too frightened.

But the GOP has said that this is their plan.

And they only need 5 Justices to make it work.

sterlingice 10-23-2020 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3307853)
I am probably too frightened.

But the GOP has said that this is their plan.

And they only need 5 Justices to make it work.


Trump transparently tells you what Trump is going to do. And he's said that's what he's going to do

SI

RainMaker 10-23-2020 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediKooter (Post 3307804)
The oil answer is only bad if people didn't listen to him explain it. I'm sure the conservatives and republican party will make it sound like as soon as Biden is sworn in, he will hit a switch that shuts down all the oil companies. When in reality he explained, in the debate last night, that it would be an incremental change from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

In my opinion, oil companies can get on board and prepare for this transition, or they can go kicking and screaming into non existence like Tower Records did.


I don't know why this was a big deal. Oil companies poll extremely low and oil subsidies poll even lower.

The oil industry is dying no matter what any President says.

albionmoonlight 10-23-2020 01:53 PM

It also isn't going to be quite as transparent as "don't count these votes because they are from Democrats."

The GOP controlled PA legislature will come up with some flimsy pre-text reason to exclude a bunch of mailed-in ballots that just so happen to be Dem leaning ("There were irregularities in the collection" or some shit). That ends up with a lawsuit by one side or the other which all ends up being resolved by 5 or 6 Justices deciding that "deference to the state legislature" means that it can do whatever it wants and the ballots don't count.

sterlingice 10-23-2020 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3307856)
It also isn't going to be quite as transparent as "don't count these votes because they are from Democrats."

The GOP controlled PA legislature will come up with some flimsy pre-text reason to exclude a bunch of mailed-in ballots that just so happen to be Dem leaning ("There were irregularities in the collection" or some shit). That ends up with a lawsuit by one side or the other which all ends up being resolved by 5 or 6 Justices deciding that "deference to the state legislature" means that it can do whatever it wants and the ballots don't count.


I'm sure they've been dreaming up these scenarios for months. And it'll be some stupid shiny bauble that hangs people up: "the mailman who picked them all up is a Democrat" or "We have some grainy video of something potentially untoward going on". And all the reporting will be about the mailman or the poll worker rather than the substance or the impact. Because who cares that we're about to overturn an election when we can find out that some guy smoked pot 25 years ago.

SI

JediKooter 10-23-2020 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3307855)
I don't know why this was a big deal. Oil companies poll extremely low and oil subsidies poll even lower.

The oil industry is dying no matter what any President says.


I agree, it's really not a big deal. On the scale of 'Bad Looks', this would be like a 1 in my opinion. The spin though will make it seem like it's much worse than it actually is. Is there really that many oil/petroleum jobs in Pennsylvania anymore? Seems like it would be more worrisome for Biden if it was 1902 than 2020.

Warhammer 10-23-2020 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3307855)
I don't know why this was a big deal. Oil companies poll extremely low and oil subsidies poll even lower.

The oil industry is dying no matter what any President says.


Oil is not going to be what it was, I agree with that. However, there are too many uses for oil that as an industry it will not entirely go away. Plastics, lubricants, etc.

Oil is too valuable to burn, but it has been the best fuel for our economy for the past 100 years.

Warhammer 10-23-2020 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediKooter (Post 3307860)
I agree, it's really not a big deal. On the scale of 'Bad Looks', this would be like a 1 in my opinion. The spin though will make it seem like it's much worse than it actually is. Is there really that many oil/petroleum jobs in Pennsylvania anymore? Seems like it would be more worrisome for Biden if it was 1902 than 2020.


PA had a huge boom when they were drilling in the Marcellus Shale 3-4 years ago. Ohio was doing more recently but that was in the Utica Shale.

JPhillips 10-23-2020 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 3307858)
I'm sure they've been dreaming up these scenarios for months. And it'll be some stupid shiny bauble that hangs people up: "the mailman who picked them all up is a Democrat" or "We have some grainy video of something potentially untoward going on". And all the reporting will be about the mailman or the poll worker rather than the substance or the impact. Because who cares that we're about to overturn an election when we can find out that some guy smoked pot 25 years ago.

SI


I'll start by saying I don't think this will happen.

But, what if the plan is to sew as much chaos as possible, including violence from the Proud Boys and similar militia groups. At some point, Barr and state legislatures step in and say the vote counts have to be paused because of the danger to poll workers. At that point court decisions start coming in saying that counts of some votes are invalid. GOP state legislatures in PA, MI, WI vote to follow the Constitution and choose a slate of delegates.

Trump "wins."

RainMaker 10-23-2020 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhammer (Post 3307862)
Oil is not going to be what it was, I agree with that. However, there are too many uses for oil that as an industry it will not entirely go away. Plastics, lubricants, etc.

Oil is too valuable to burn, but it has been the best fuel for our economy for the past 100 years.


It'll be around but it's still a dying industry. Likely hit peak consumption in 2019 and it's downhill from there. Prices are low and their business model now relies on handouts from the government.

GrantDawg 10-23-2020 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3307828)
I think she can win Schumer's seat when he retires, but if she doesn't she could be locked out of the senate for quite a while. Gillibrand is only 53 and whoever replaces Schumer would probably have three or four terms available. Things happen, people get federal jobs or run for Governor, but Senate seat windows are often pretty small.

If Schumer runs for another term in 2022, which seems likely, I don't think she'll wait in the House for a promotion attempt. I expect her next step up is the NY Gov.

I wouldn't be surprised at all if Gillibrand isn't a cabinet secretary in the near future. Governor of New York might be a possibility, or even mayor of New York. I think she is eyeing something more federal, though. She is very young, so who can say? Whatever it is, she is going to be among the youngest people to ever win *insert major office*.

ISiddiqui 10-23-2020 04:15 PM

I don't think Ocasio Cortez has to strike NOW. I mean she's 31. So even if Schumer were to run for only one more term (he'll be 70 in November) in 2022, she'll be 39 when the seat will potentially open. And a decade in the House would really help with Upstate NY.

And yes, Gillibrand may get a Cabinet slot which would accelerate that timeline.

JediKooter 10-23-2020 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhammer (Post 3307863)
PA had a huge boom when they were drilling in the Marcellus Shale 3-4 years ago. Ohio was doing more recently but that was in the Utica Shale.


Ah ok cool. I've mostly heard about what's going in the Dakotas and haven't heard much about Pennsylvania and Ohio. Now I know! :)

JPhillips 10-23-2020 05:21 PM

Quote:

We're not supposed to have a socialist — look we're not going to be a socialist nation. We're not going to have a socialist president, especially a female socialist president, we're not gonna' have it, we're not gonna' put up with it."

Trump working hard to solve his problem with suburban women.

RainMaker 10-23-2020 05:23 PM

Trying to paint the guy who spent like 3 decades fighting for credit card companies and banks as a socialist.

GrantDawg 10-23-2020 06:34 PM

Ok, watched Borat. Rudy definitely wasn't spanking it. It was a set up.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Warhammer 10-23-2020 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3307872)
It'll be around but it's still a dying industry. Likely hit peak consumption in 2019 and it's downhill from there. Prices are low and their business model now relies on handouts from the government.


I highly doubt it, several of the big names have already gotten out. I think you're going to see some smaller not so well known companies move in and take it over. I will not be what it was, but I think it is going to be more stable over the long haul.

Brian Swartz 10-23-2020 06:50 PM

If you're talking worldwide, I don't understand how anyone could think oil is past peak consumption. Developing nations are still going nowhere but up in terms of their use. I don't think we hit peak consumption until the demand can't be met and the price spikes much higher than we've seen it. My best guess is the early 30s for that.

HerRealName 10-23-2020 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3307890)
Ok, watched Borat. Rudy definitely wasn't spanking it. It was a set up.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


We thought he was doing his best to reanimate the dead, so to speak.

tarcone 10-23-2020 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HerRealName (Post 3307893)
We thought he was doing his best to reanimate the dead, so to speak.


I feel his pain. Thank God for boner pills.

albionmoonlight 10-23-2020 08:12 PM

I walk the dog pretty much every night. And every night there are more yard signs popping up. Certainly more than I’ve ever seen. A real diversity, too. Biden. Trump. Black Lives Matter. Back The Blue.

Based on that, I agree with those turn out models that predict a significant increase over 2016.

Danny 10-24-2020 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3307890)
Ok, watched Borat. Rudy definitely wasn't spanking it. It was a set up.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk



Still plenty in there to show he's a creeper

RedKingGold 10-24-2020 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3307848)
That's scary. It does not look like PA will have enough in person Dem votes to overcome the in person GOP votes. And Trump will sue to stop counting the mail in votes. And the SCOTUS 6 might let him.


As a PA resident, I wouldn’t be too concerned because the state has been really behind on getting people their ballots. My wife and I registered for mail-voting several months ago, received an email on 09/22 that we should receive our ballots in 10-14 days but did not actually receive our ballots until three days ago. So, I suspect this count is pretty behind significantly.

Edward64 10-24-2020 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3307890)
Ok, watched Borat. Rudy definitely wasn't spanking it. It was a set up.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


Haven't watched it but why didn't Borat continue until there was "more evidence" to "pop up"?

If true, I'm not going to fault a currently single Guiliani for hitting on an attractive woman. He's got a girlfriend but I'm sure she is well aware of what she was getting into and may have been the other woman at one time, so hard to feel sorry for her.

GrantDawg 10-24-2020 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3307916)
Haven't watched it but why didn't Borat continue until there was "more evidence" to "pop up"?

If true, I'm not going to fault a currently single Guiliani for hitting on an attractive woman. He's got a girlfriend but I'm sure she is well aware of what she was getting into and may have been the other woman at one time, so hard to feel sorry for her.

I am pretty sure that wasn't "popping up" without pharmaceutical help.

GrantDawg 10-24-2020 08:51 AM

This is really good:

CraigSca 10-24-2020 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3307890)
Ok, watched Borat. Rudy definitely wasn't spanking it. It was a set up.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


/agree - he was tucking his shirt back in his pants.

Lathum 10-24-2020 08:57 AM

Shouldn't the presidents personal lawyer be a little more cautious about putting himself in compromising positions? We are all speculating if he was fondling himself but the real story should be why is he in that pot in the first place?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.