Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   NFL 2021 Regular Season Thread (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=97270)

Edward64 07-30-2021 08:55 PM

Isn't Ryan Leaf at least a top-3?

Quote:

The Chargers won their first two games but Leaf made several mistakes with fumbles and interceptions.

After being hospitalized for a viral infection, Leaf posted one of the worst stat lines in NFL history.

In Week 3 against Kansas City, Leaf went 1-for-15 with two interceptions and four fumbles.

Leaf cursed at a reporter in an altercation after the game.

Things got worse as Leaf tossed four interceptions in Week 4 against the New York Giants.

The losses kept stacking up for Leaf as he lost seven of his final eight starts in 1998, finishing with two touchdowns and 15 interceptions.

A shoulder injury caused Leaf to miss the entire 1999 season.

QuikSand 07-30-2021 08:59 PM

I think there are two different events happening there... Leaf is a classic bust who just never showed much of anything in the NFL, a "fall from grace" implies NFL success followed by decline. Wentz had MVP hype at one point, Goff got his team into the SuperBowl, both rather quickly became GTFO guys (albeit a contract extension too late in both cases).

And RGIII is surely the blazing fall-from-grace candidate from recent memory.

thesloppy 07-30-2021 09:03 PM

I think I've managed to completely forget the period when RGIII was good. Does Vince Young fit in this conversation somewhere?

Atocep 07-30-2021 09:07 PM

Don Majkowski comes to mind. Got the '89 Packers to 10 wins after winning 4 the previous season, finished 2nd in the MVP voting, and then lost his job the following year.

jbergey22 07-30-2021 10:15 PM

Daunte Culpepper

Injuries and the loss of Moss sealed his fate. In the early 2000s he seemed like he was going to be a MVP candidate for years.

jbergey22 07-30-2021 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3341106)
Don Majkowski comes to mind. Got the '89 Packers to 10 wins after winning 4 the previous season, finished 2nd in the MVP voting, and then lost his job the following year.


Great memory and yes. His fall was majestic.

It is funny looking back. Yes, that one season was memorable and he was great at the time. When you look at his number now 27 TDs w 20 Ints and a 59 percent completion percentage. He would be on the verge of being benched in the current NFL.

QuikSand 07-31-2021 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3341106)
Don Majkowski comes to mind. Got the '89 Packers to 10 wins after winning 4 the previous season, finished 2nd in the MVP voting, and then lost his job the following year.


Fun fact, I was running a fantasy football league and had Don Majkowski on my team that year.

QuikSand 07-31-2021 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesloppy (Post 3341105)
I think I've managed to completely forget the period when RGIII was good. Does Vince Young fit in this conversation somewhere?


RGIII had an absolutely brilliant rookie season. The decline was probably multiple things (a serious injury, teams figuring out the gameplan advantages, coaching stubbornness) but it was precipitous - he was never anything like the same player.

Vince Young, I think, was just a slow-developing bust, overall, as an NFL player.

cartman 08-01-2021 04:17 PM

I hadn't heard this one before.

Austin emerges as possible relocation spot for Bills amid new Orchard Park stadium negotiations, per report - CBSSports.com

Arles 08-02-2021 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbergey22 (Post 3341116)
Great memory and yes. His fall was majestic.

It is funny looking back. Yes, that one season was memorable and he was great at the time. When you look at his number now 27 TDs w 20 Ints and a 59 percent completion percentage. He would be on the verge of being benched in the current NFL.

Here are some QB completion & TD-INT numbers in 1989 for the leading yardage QBs:

Majkowski: 59%, 27 TDs and 20 INT
Everett: 59%, 29 TDs and 17 INT
Marino: 56%, 24 TDs and 22 INT
Rypien: 59%, 22 TDs and 13 INT
Moon: 60%, 23 TDs and 14 INT
Kozar: 59%, 18 TDs and 14 INT


If you look at INT % & completion %, Majkowski was 12th and 7th in QBs who qualify. Guys like Sims, Marino, Elway, Krieg, Jim Kelly & Everett were worse. The late 80s were a different ERA for QBs when it comes to those stats.

jbergey22 08-02-2021 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arles (Post 3341281)
Here are some QB completion & TD-INT numbers in 1989 for the leading yardage QBs:

Majkowski: 59%, 27 TDs and 20 INT
Everett: 59%, 29 TDs and 17 INT
Marino: 56%, 24 TDs and 22 INT
Rypien: 59%, 22 TDs and 13 INT
Moon: 60%, 23 TDs and 14 INT
Kozar: 59%, 18 TDs and 14 INT


If you look at INT % & completion %, Majkowski was 12th and 7th in QBs who qualify. Guys like Sims, Marino, Elway, Krieg, Jim Kelly & Everett were worse. The late 80s were a different ERA for QBs when it comes to those stats.


Back in the good ole days where the defense had a fighting chance. I miss these type of stats just like I miss the ole pro set offense.

NobodyHere 08-02-2021 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3341064)
Carson Wentz headed to see foot specialist after missing practice, out indefinitely, per multiple reports - CBSSports.com

Looks like the Eagles won't be getting that 1st round pick from the Colts next year.


So indefinitely means 5-12 weeks as Wentz will be getting foot surgery after previously saying he wasn't getting the surgery.

QuikSand 08-02-2021 01:34 PM

Fascinating how IND basically has no plan at all behind Wentz, whose pre-injury situation seems to be about as precarious as any starting QB in the league, right? He's a guy who might be pretty good if the line plays great and if he overcomes his yips or whatever-the-hell it was last year, and whatever other contingencies there might be.

And this isn't a doldrums team here, it's not the DeShaun-less Texans, the Colts have a serious playoff roster other than at QB. I get they soured on Brissett, fine, so at least you have... I dunno... someone in there, right? You're going with Jacob Eason? Brett Hundley? This guy?

bob 08-02-2021 02:15 PM

So do the Texans and NFL just hope everyone forgot about the Deshaun Watson legal trouble with everything else that's going on? I keep seeing more articles about him maybe getting traded than anything else.

RainMaker 08-02-2021 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 3341137)
Fun fact, I was running a fantasy football league and had Don Majkowski on my team that year.


I don't miss the old days of having to wait for the newspaper to get the box scores.

albionmoonlight 08-02-2021 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 3341298)
Fascinating how IND basically has no plan at all behind Wentz, whose pre-injury situation seems to be about as precarious as any starting QB in the league, right? He's a guy who might be pretty good if the line plays great and if he overcomes his yips or whatever-the-hell it was last year, and whatever other contingencies there might be.

And this isn't a doldrums team here, it's not the DeShaun-less Texans, the Colts have a serious playoff roster other than at QB. I get they soured on Brissett, fine, so at least you have... I dunno... someone in there, right? You're going with Jacob Eason? Brett Hundley? This guy?


100%

I am guessing that Reich's familiarity with Wentz made them too confident.

30 other teams might have taken a chance on him but thought--what if he sucks? Indy is the one team who might have thought that they pulled off the heist of the decade by reuniting Wentz with Reich and figured they didn't need a backup plan. (Or, like, a backup anything really)

albionmoonlight 08-02-2021 02:57 PM

Dola:

As a Saints fan, I would not be opposed to a panic trade in which they way overpay for Jameis and the Saints have a funky and strangely fun 4-13 year with Taysom before drafting a real QB next year.

Better in some ways than the conventional 8-9 season with Jameis that I am expecting.

JonInMiddleGA 08-02-2021 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 3341298)
Fascinating how IND basically has no plan at all behind Wentz, whose pre-injury situation seems to be about as precarious as any starting QB in the league, right? He's a guy who might be pretty good if the line plays great and if he overcomes his yips or whatever-the-hell it was last year, and whatever other contingencies there might be.

And this isn't a doldrums team here, it's not the DeShaun-less Texans, the Colts have a serious playoff roster other than at QB. I get they soured on Brissett, fine, so at least you have... I dunno... someone in there, right? You're going with Jacob Eason? Brett Hundley? This guy?


Insert Nick Foles doing the Cody Rhodes listening meme here

bhlloy 08-05-2021 07:56 PM

It’s shitty football time! Tomlin appears to be trying to kill Najee Harris already.

albionmoonlight 08-06-2021 07:04 AM

I laughed.


QuikSand 08-07-2021 10:23 AM

WTAF Mike?

Jeff Duncan: How unanswered calls contributed to delay in Michael Thomas' surgery | Jeff Duncan | nola.com


albionmoonlight 08-07-2021 10:37 AM

Sigh.

He managed to go two years without contributing AND killed his trade value.

Kodos 08-09-2021 09:41 AM

Peyton Manning is a great ambassador for football.

bhlloy 08-14-2021 02:08 PM

After a shaky start Justin Fields is looking damn good

Atocep 08-14-2021 02:11 PM

I was really high on Fields coming out of OSU, but you never know with QBs. However, watching his first preseason game, he has better control of the offense and throws the ball better than than what I saw from Mitch after 4 years.

That's not to say it's been perfect or anything. He's made some rookie mistakes, but this is actually refreshing to see and after the shitshow at qb the bears have been my entire life it's hard to not get at least a little excited.

bhlloy 08-14-2021 02:15 PM

Yeah. Obviously it’s mostly against backups but I think you can see the level of talent there for sure.

Coffee Warlord 08-14-2021 02:28 PM

Didn't see any of those wildly inaccurate throws that were the hallmark of Trubisky. Numbers woulda been even better were it not for a couple bad drops by some 3rd stringer receivers.

Edward64 08-15-2021 11:10 AM

Welp, unsubscribed to Sling and subscribed to youtube.tv. Looking forward to the NFL and SEC games!

NobodyHere 08-17-2021 07:51 PM

So first Tim Tebow gets cut and now this is a penalty?



The No Fun League returns!

miami_fan 08-17-2021 10:03 PM

John Mara: Taunting is a point of emphasis because we're "sick and tired of the talking" - ProFootballTalk

thesloppy 08-17-2021 11:51 PM

I think I knew there were only 3 preseason games and 17 regular season games in the NFL this year, but I forgot until I actually started looking through a schedule and spent 5 full minutes trying to find that fourth preseason game. Still don't like it.

Ksyrup 08-18-2021 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3342838)
So first Tim Tebow gets cut and now this is a penalty?



The No Fun League returns!


I get it, but if he hadn't turned directly to the last guy and started jawing, that's not a penalty. I'm guessing the line is "non-targeted enthusiasm is fine, but once you appear to be taunting one specific person, that's a penalty." In this case, I don't think he had any particular beef with the last guy, he just happened to be the last guy and dude couldn't hold back his enthusiasm before he could turn to the open field to start yelling about how HE'S THE MAN!

Lathum 08-18-2021 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 3342878)
I get it, but if he hadn't turned directly to the last guy and started jawing, that's not a penalty. I'm guessing the line is "non-targeted enthusiasm is fine, but once you appear to be taunting one specific person, that's a penalty." In this case, I don't think he had any particular beef with the last guy, he just happened to be the last guy and dude couldn't hold back his enthusiasm before he could turn to the open field to start yelling about how HE'S THE MAN!


This will be like all the other rules changes. They will call it a ton in the pre season then back off when games count.

Lathum 08-18-2021 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesloppy (Post 3342868)
I think I knew there were only 3 preseason games and 17 regular season games in the NFL this year, but I forgot until I actually started looking through a schedule and spent 5 full minutes trying to find that fourth preseason game. Still don't like it.


Thats a shame, I usually make a ton of money betting pre season games.

Sweed 08-18-2021 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3342881)
This will be like all the other rules changes. They will call it a ton in the pre season then back off when games count.


Then the problems come when they do decide to call it. There will be no consistency. Some will be get screwed while others get the "no call".

Can a coach challenge and say it should/should not have been called? With the inconsistency this is going to have, and I hate to say this, the coaches should be able to challenge. Yeah, let's go to replay and see if there was eye contact or was the player looking elsewhere?:banghead:

Its a can of worms the NFL should have left alone. Don't like that RB talking after a play like that? Put him on his back next time he gets the ball. It was working fine "as is".


+1 to the NFL (no fun league).

albionmoonlight 08-18-2021 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3342882)
Thats a shame, I usually make a ton of money betting pre season games.


What's your strategy?

Kodos 08-18-2021 08:37 AM

If he loses one bet, he doubles the bet the next game.

Lathum 08-18-2021 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3342888)
What's your strategy?


Hammer the unders and bet the Ravens. Harbaugh is 15-1-1 in the preseaon. Unders went something like 14-2 this week. Plus follow twitter, etc...to see what coaches are saying about playing time for starters, etc...

Lathum 08-18-2021 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos (Post 3342889)
If he loses one bet, he doubles the bet the next game.


Ha!

Can't lose!

albionmoonlight 08-18-2021 08:45 AM

Y'all are awesome.

Didn't realize the bit about the unders. Kind of neat.

Lathum 08-18-2021 08:54 AM

You just have to be careful in week 2 because the books make adjustments and starters play more.

In a normal pre season week 4 is where you can also do well because a lot of coaches run a very vanilla offense. Not sure is week 3 will be that way this year

Ksyrup 08-18-2021 09:53 AM


Ksyrup 08-18-2021 09:54 AM

Technically, Washington Football Team should just be Football Team, otherwise they would be the Washington Washington Football Team.

QuikSand 08-18-2021 10:07 AM

I generally and instinctively dislike collective, non-plural team names... but if I can get past that, both Armada and Brigade are pretty solid I think.

I could see WFT just gaining some sort of iconoclastic momentum and being the choice, which in time would just look/feel stupid, I think. It's kinda novel right now, but I think it would be a poor long term name.

BYU 14 08-18-2021 11:45 AM

Redwolves or Defenders for me, though I still think they missed the boat not jumping on Guardians before Cleveland did

AlexB 08-18-2021 12:20 PM

I quite like the sound of the Washington Spare Presidents!

bhlloy 08-18-2021 12:38 PM

Given recent events can I suggest the Washington Poorly Planned Pullouts? It even feels strangely appropriate for Dan Snyder for other reasons. A double entendre if you will.

QuikSand 08-18-2021 12:54 PM

Washington Gridlock has a fitting ring to it, and on a very superficial level sounds footballish

miami_fan 08-18-2021 01:43 PM

You guys and your PC BS.

They should maintain the current name and not bow to public pressure to change it. To quote a fan of the team, "It's going to mess around with the fan base, and it's not an easy thing for the fan base to do a name change like that,". Another fan said "They changed the name, but that doesn't mean it's going to change me."

WFT to the death.

;)

molson 08-18-2021 02:09 PM

I just hope they drag it out for another 10 years.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.