|
Always better to get that stuff through subpoena if it's for criminal charges, otherwise, they have to rely on that hacker as a witness for every case. But that info would be great to help know what to request, for national security reasons, and for private use - I hope we get a database where employers and friends and family and neighbors can look up everyone who's affiliated with this movement and what they've said/done/threatened to do. I'm enjoying the stories of people being "revealed", losing their jobs, etc.
|
One thing I have learned with all the discoveries. It is best to have a good to great relationships with your ex spouse after divorce if you are going to get yourself involved in possibly illegal activity
|
"How soon are you government people available for the custody hearing my attorney is scheduling today?"
|
 lol |
Quote:
I love it that these people are surprised about the consequences they face. |
|
Since the enablers won't act on their own, we need more of this.
Dow Chemical won't donate to politicians who opposed election results | TheHill Money talks. The irony of big business who benefitted the most from the GOP tax cuts making this type of move is just a thing of beauty to see. |
The Republicans are so good at this stuff:
|
"Democrats should stop being so divisive"
|
This is another thing that the Republicans do. Once people started comparing the attack on the Capitol with the "Night of Broken Glass", they have to appropriate it with something completely incomparable.
|
Quote:
That's my county. I'll be surprised if it stays up there long. |
Quote:
The fact that it is still up says everything that is needed. |
Right, throw enough smoke bombs in the room and people can't see that the people that are talking to them are wearing white robes (or clothes at all for that matter.)
|
Quote:
|
ugh reading this thread while tupsy is even worse...........stop fingers....stop
|
Quote:
so sivck of every reepublican that uses a word they'd never heard of before hearing it on foxnews. exfirend used to do that constantly |
Quote:
|
dola: that is no slam on Edward. I am sure he moved there well after that scandal was past.
|
Is any GOPer going to acknowledge that Parler would be in very deep legal trouble now without Section 230 protections?
|
Quote:
Nope. They have (smartly) managed to hijack the debate, making it seem like Section 230 hurts conservatives when, of course, it is the only reason Q can exist on social media at all. |
No one (especially the President) on the right has any idea what section 230 does.
|
 |
|
Dang, stuff keeps raining in. DC AG would still be gibing federal charges, right? There is no municipal/state law?
|
Quote:
Yup. D.C. is federal (i.e. would be covered by a pardon and involve Biden/Garland having to follow through with it). There is a D.C. municipal code that sort of works like state law. But it is all federal at the end of the day. |
|
Acting Sec of Homeland Security resigns on the heels of having a boatload of armed protests being planned....awesome.
|
|
i found it funny that he rips on Ford F150s :)
|
Quote:
This guy is a grifter who is wrong about everything. |
Quote:
Dworkin? Trump? GrantDawg? |
Quote:
Dworkin. |
Quote:
And replaced him with the FEMA Administrator. No, really the FEMA Administrator The guy who's role is Quote:
Now that I think about it, they got the right guy. This is a man made disaster. Good call. |
Nobody really knows if Trump can effectively pardon himself, that will the subject of a legal battle after he's out, but it seems like the smart move here would be to resign and have Pence pardon him - if he hadn't already burned that bridge. Pence pardoning him after all this would be the most cowardly act yet, but, I still really wouldn't be surprised if it happened.
I've wondered how much of Trump's insanity was based on fear of criminal prosecution if he leaves the White House, but, he hasn't acted consistently with that goal either, so, I don't know. |
At this point why would Pence pardon him. He literally almost got him killed and has completely turned.
|
Quote:
That was amazing. |
Quote:
Wolf's resignation makes it pretty clear that this is just a move to have a legal DHS Secretary codify all the stuff courts have said are invalid because Wolf was illegally appointed. It's just more rat fucking on the way out of the doors. |
Quote:
I wouldn't be surprised if he was a "point of failure" where he didn't act on someone's request or warning etc. But then again, just as easy to believe he said "f*ck it, I'm done with this circus". |
Well, this should be interesting ...
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/11/polit...yan/index.html Quote:
|
Quote:
He does not want to be around when these terrorists start attacking all 50. Capitals and every government building in DC this weekend and next week. Fucking coward. |
Quote:
Yeah not good. They had former FBI counter terrorism director from Bush admin and also former Obama FBI director on CNN .They reminded CNN talking heads that there is 15000 FBI agency’s national many accountants or lawyers. The FBI and Secret Service are not going to secure 50 capitals, all the top leadership as well as the Capital. From what 3000, 40000 50000 or more angry armed insurrections? Though the country has been built to not ever unleash the army on the citizens we have to have all options on the table. |
Quote:
Saw this earlier today: Police officer says he and others were sent home ahead of Capitol riot - Business Insider |
Quote:
Ah, that makes a lot more sense now SI |
Quote:
|
Rep. Tom Reed is floating the idea of censure with the inability to hold federal office. Is that strong enough?
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
How do you enforce that without impeachment? |
If Trump Loses In November, What Do You Think Happens Next
Amendment 14 is what is being said.
|
I read something that it was not true that a conviction and removal would make him ineligible to run again, that there would need to be a separate vote on that issue. Maybe that's what they are talking about.
|
Quote:
No. |
Quote:
Amendment 14 Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. So they'd have to say he was involved in an insurrection and is therefore disqualified from office. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.