Quote:
b/c they're wolves trying to divert attention from themselves possibly? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
so who were saldana and tanglewood on at that point before piling on CR? we're supposing one of those people might have been a wolf (the one who had the higher vote-count at the time?) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
. |
Quote:
ummmmm, maybe look again...i voted for lathum, and i said it was because he diseased me the in egypt game so i wanted vengeance....sndvls also never voted for chief rum, his vote was on blade....he moved his to noddadrop because there was a tie...you then moved your vote to maintain or recreate the tie, so i moved mine to re break it....i have had this argument a hundred times...ties are stupid, especially on day one when the runoff is pretty much a dead solid lock to be villager vs villager. and when one person in the tie is blade, who has a proven value, and the other is someone that hasnt been on the board for 3 days and has no known value, its a pretty easy choice on who to keep. why specifically are you challenging everyone for day one votes? |
Quote:
|
It's hard to imagine a WW making himself a target like Grammaticus right now. With so many players, you'd think they want to lay low.
|
Quote:
Right Quote:
Right, I got CR and Noddadropp mixed up. Quote:
Then I went to Blade (210) causing a tie Sndvls goes off Blade to Noddadropp (216) breaking the tie (at this point noddadropp is champion). Quote:
No, Sndvls just broke the tie I made. Quote:
You did not break any tie’s. You (saldana) move off lathum and go to Noddadropp (218) – why he is already winning Then Tanglewood moves off Swaggs to Noddadropp (225) completing the pile on. Then AlanT hits me with 4 minutes to go (227) I hit AlanT back (228). |
Quote:
it had to be somebody and I hold grudges ;) anyhow I would have moved off you if the tide had turned towards you. Even if you are bad you are active and could be too valuable for a day one lynch. |
Quote:
I didn't vote chief rum just for clarification |
When are votes due by in the morning?
|
Ok so now what? What are these night moves or night activities st. cronin talked about?
|
Quote:
Er, I know I screwed up and posted a correction in post 254: Quote:
Damn that no edit rule! :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
dola,
Oh and the Count could use a night kill as well. I guess up to three people could get killed throught the night. |
Quote:
Unless he is using reverse psychology. Right now, there are two people that I know for a face are wolves. I just have to drum enough support to get votes. |
Quote:
if you knew they were wolves you'd reveal it GE and then supply proof. |
Quote:
If you know for sure two people are wolves, then say their names now. I'll vote for the first one no problem. If they turn out good, then I'll vote for you. See how easy it works? :) There is no good reason to hold 2 wolves if you know for sure. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
he's a wolf! |
Or I should say how could you possiblyl know the identity of two people who are wolves?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I am just reading inbetween the lines here. Isn't what this game is about? Figuring this stuff out? I also want to avoid becoming a target.
What the hell do I do? |
Quote:
So what two do you suspect then? |
Quote:
Frank? :confused: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What he said. |
I will keep it to myself for now because I guess I really do not know if they are wolves are not. My vote tommorow will reveal one. This really is more interesting that I thought it would be.
|
sorry i havnt been posting, had more work than usual, then i forgot about the game cause i was wraped up in a text simulation game ;). 1 quick question why the sudden rush to vote for nopadope or whatever his name wAS?
|
ps i should be much more active tomorow
|
Quote:
hehe, im not going to vote for you early either cause my last 2 games with you you died early and i havnt seen you play much. |
I'm thinking the WWs are going to knock off someone who's been active in the last few pages - the more information that's thrown around, the better it is for the villagers.
|
By the way, I am re-reading one of the old WW threads st. cronin sent me and it is 31 freakin pages long!
|
gram, as i have already explained, i made sure that we didnt lose blade or have a stupid ass tie...if that doesnt make sense to you, i dont know what to tell you.
|
Quote:
hehe. only 31? wasnt the Necromancer WW then. one day alone was almost 15 pages |
Quote:
Why is it weak? It is nothing personal against him, as he has been one of my good friends from FOFC over the years, but he had time to log in and say he would not be back in time for the vote, yet did not vote? No one ever wants to place a vote for someone they are unsure of and risk upsetting another player or creating some type of voting pattern that could come back to haunt them. In my opinion, if you have time to log in, but purposely pass on voting, you are doing it just to avoid conflict, which is a huge part of this game. |
So you are saying CR is a wolf?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Then again, maybe some wolves did make moves. Not saying it was specifically you, but I do think at least one of the late movers is a wolf. |
Quote:
it was a strategy used effectively for a couple days by Bek several games ago...he said he was too sick to be online with a stomach virus, so we let him skate until about day 3...if Rum read that game, which was two before his first one, so it would make sense that he could have read it as a primer, he could see it as a legitimate strategy... i am not prepared to say CR is a wolf, but it would be convenient for him to use this as a cover |
Quote:
unless the number of wolves is very low to start, like 2, it would be a very risky move for the wolves to push to save one of their own on day one. actually its risky either way...do you let a wolf die and trim down your number or do you save the wolf and expose yourselves? i doubt any of the late moves came from wolves. |
Quote:
The bad thing is that villagers who are not team oriented players will at times take up the strategy of not voting to avoid tabulating a vote record or being noticed. They do this to stay alive longer by avoiding conflict, etc. If as Villagers you consistently lynch non voters, villagers will vote to avoid death and wolves will vote to avoid a quick lynch as well. Then everyone participates and you are not wasting time wondering if so and so was really sick or late for work or whatever. ALWAYS VOTE!!! |
Quote:
With a little time these day one votes will start to add value. |
Voting on the first day is vastly overrated from my POV. only villagers get lynched and nothing is learned from it because its a total shot in the dark as far as voting so "records" of votes are meaningless too. even the wolves dont know who the other bad guys are so they are in the dark also ( cept for other wolves)
|
Quote:
No, I just think it is unfortunate when people fail to vote, unless they are absolutely unable to get online to do so, which is not the case here. To the best of my knowledge, in most games, you are required to vote, so just opting not to because you are not sure is unfair, since someone has to vote and someone has to be voted for on the first day, as random as it usually is. In a few days, voting patterns may become important if we can manage to group some of the wolves together in close votes and when people do not vote, they get a "pass" from that particular form of evidence. |
who else didnt vote besides Rummy? if they dont show up on the second day and participate then we should start "thinning the herd" with them no shows. but the first day is easy to miss. hell i forgot about it during the day and i always read all the post in WW till i die
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.