Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   2010-11 Hot Stove League Thread - Grienke is a Baller (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=79711)

DeToxRox 11-01-2010 10:48 PM

2010-11 Hot Stove League Thread - Grienke is a Baller
 
'Grats to the Giants.

Too bad my hope for the season goes out the window when the Tigs blow a ton of money on VMart.

MrBug708 11-02-2010 12:13 AM

Dodgers earlier resigned Ted Lilly for three years

stevew 11-02-2010 12:41 AM

I wonder how many years the Giants win will set back hitting sabremetrics.

Chief Rum 11-02-2010 11:49 AM

A couple things baseball did this year, IIRC, that means we all need to start paying attention quick.

1. No more filing for free agency--you're either under contract or you're not, I guess (rights issues, aside).
2. Instead of 13-14 days whatever it was between the end of the World Series and when free agents can sign with other teams, it's now just five. So major free agents could be signing with new teams as soon as next Monday, if I have my math right (and excluding work days).

DeToxRox 11-02-2010 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 2375114)
A couple things baseball did this year, IIRC, that means we all need to start paying attention quick.

1. No more filing for free agency--you're either under contract or you're not, I guess (rights issues, aside).
2. Instead of 13-14 days whatever it was between the end of the World Series and when free agents can sign with other teams, it's now just five. So major free agents could be signing with new teams as soon as next Monday, if I have my math right (and excluding work days).


You are correct. Sunday night is the end of the exclusive rights for clubs so Monday I can be on here bitching about the Tigers giving Victor Martinez a long term deal.

Ksyrup 11-02-2010 12:21 PM

As long as the Tigers don't pay Martinez as a catcher, I like the signing. They can use him at 1B and DH to rotate with Cabrera.

Mustang 11-02-2010 12:22 PM

As soon as the Brewers hire a manager, I can go back to not paying attention because nothing will happen with them during free agency.

DeToxRox 11-02-2010 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2375140)
As long as the Tigers don't pay Martinez as a catcher, I like the signing. They can use him at 1B and DH to rotate with Cabrera.


That's my concern. If we pay him like a Catcher we're going to end up paying him to play 100 game at catcher for two years then DH anyway. Plus they still have hope for Avilia so it'd just fuck up his development.

Ksyrup 11-02-2010 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2374950)
I wonder how many years the Giants win will set back hitting sabremetrics.


Within organizations, none. Within the press and among fans, a bunch, I'm assuming.

Most rational people understand that the playoffs are a crapshoot (pun intended for the Giants win!).

lungs 11-02-2010 02:59 PM

2010-2011 MLB Offseason Thread
 
Figured I'd get this going....

Angels Bench Coach Ron Roenicke hired as Brewers manager.

stevew 11-02-2010 03:07 PM

I don't think the Pirates have a manager yet. I don't think it really matters, however.

Sun Tzu 11-02-2010 03:09 PM

Just a reminder, the Giants are the reigning World Series Champions.

I don't know if I'll ever get to say that again in my life...so I may as well take advantage of it now :)

Butter 11-02-2010 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2375256)
I don't think the Pirates have a manager yet. I don't think it really matters, however.


I hear Lloyd McLendon is available.

Lathum 11-02-2010 03:13 PM

One already started here

2010-11 Hot Stove League Thread - Front Office Football Central

stevew 11-02-2010 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Butter_of_69 (Post 2375259)
I hear Lloyd McLendon is available.


That'd be the day.

Ksyrup 11-02-2010 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Butter_of_69 (Post 2375259)
I hear Lloyd McLendon is available.


That would send shock waves throughout the baseball world.

Logan 11-02-2010 03:26 PM

Adding a post to outduel Detox's thread...



My prediction is that the Mets will make a bad move this offseason.

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-02-2010 03:30 PM

Haven't they already?

lungs 11-02-2010 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 2375260)


Ooops, the title of that thread threw me off.

stevew 11-02-2010 03:46 PM

I'm sticking with this thread. Lungs doesn't edit thread titles.

Ksyrup 11-02-2010 03:47 PM

I went ahead and merged the 2 threads.

stevew 11-02-2010 03:55 PM

abuse of moderational authoritah

Ksyrup 11-02-2010 04:10 PM

You'll just have to trust me on this one.

Swaggs 11-02-2010 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2375256)
I don't think the Pirates have a manager yet. I don't think it really matters, however.


Would anyone even notice if the Pirates didn't have a manager next season?

stevew 11-02-2010 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2375321)
You'll just have to trust me on this one.


The 50th time he changes the thread title....i hope it annoys you.

Crapshoot 11-02-2010 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2375174)
Within organizations, none. Within the press and among fans, a bunch, I'm assuming.

Most rational people understand that the playoffs are a crapshoot (pun intended for the Giants win!).


:D :D :D :D :D

MrBug708 11-02-2010 05:59 PM

Sweet! Dodgers picked up Podsendik's option!

Poli 11-02-2010 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2375355)
The 50th time he changes the thread title....i hope it annoys you.

QFT

kingfc22 11-02-2010 09:02 PM

I hope the defending world champs :D go after Crawford. He would make a very nice addition to the outfield and add much needed speed.

Vince, Pt. II 11-02-2010 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingfc22 (Post 2375524)
I hope the defending world champs :D go after Crawford. He would make a very nice addition to the outfield and add much needed speed.


Assuming they don't get Crawford (I think someone else throws too much money at him, to be perfectly honest), what do you think should be done with the outfield? It seems you're starting Cody Ross, Andres Torres and Pat Burrell (assuming you keep those guys) - is that good enough for you? If you sign Crawford, who do you bump? Burrell?

kingfc22 11-02-2010 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II (Post 2375526)
Assuming they don't get Crawford (I think someone else throws too much money at him, to be perfectly honest), what do you think should be done with the outfield? It seems you're starting Cody Ross, Andres Torres and Pat Burrell (assuming you keep those guys) - is that good enough for you? If you sign Crawford, who do you bump? Burrell?


I'm sure somebody will throw a big chunk of money at him, but he is the #1 target if I'm Sabean. I don't really see it as bumping somebody as Bochy was mixing parts all year and likely will do the same next year. Don't forget Derosa will likely be back in the mix in LF and 3B. Plus they are not going to pick up Renteria's option (he probably retires anyway) for over $10M so that frees up some cash.

Karlifornia 11-03-2010 03:27 AM

The Giants need to stay aggressive, much like the Niners. Signing Carl Crawford would be awesome, but I just don't see that happening.

Ksyrup 11-03-2010 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2375355)
The 50th time he changes the thread title....i hope it annoys you.


I don't get it. I actually don't mind when people update season/off-season thread titles to mention something recent that's happened, if that's what you mean. So I highly doubt it will annoy me. I didn't realize I was supposed to ban certain people from starting threads. I thought you people were against teh bannings.

Poli 11-03-2010 06:54 AM

Just a little annoying no big deal for me.

DeToxRox 11-03-2010 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2375649)
I don't get it. I actually don't mind when people update season/off-season thread titles to mention something recent that's happened, if that's what you mean. So I highly doubt it will annoy me. I didn't realize I was supposed to ban certain people from starting threads. I thought you people were against teh bannings.


Seriously. You'd think I held steve up at gunpoint or something.

lungs 11-03-2010 08:41 AM

It's all my fault!

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-03-2010 08:53 AM

I actually find it useful when the title is changed.

MrBug708 11-03-2010 09:29 AM

I like it too

DeToxRox 11-03-2010 09:43 AM

I am a man of the people, what can I say?

DeToxRox 11-03-2010 09:46 PM

•Here's a haymaker coming your way: TigerBlog reports ESPN Baseball Today podcast host Seth Everett said the Tigers are "pretty interested" in Milwaukee first baseman Prince Fielder. Fielder, 26, hit a career worst .261 with 32 home runs with 83 RBIs, and the Chicago Tribune reports the interest in Fielder -- thus far -- has been relatively quiet.

Would love this if we somehow got Prince without giving up Turner. That said it is unrealistic to think about.

The idea of Miggy/Prince though is simply incredible though.

JPhillips 11-03-2010 10:01 PM

Someone is going to be left holding a terrible contract with Fielder. List height and weight of 5'11" and 270 lbs. doesn't seem like it will age well. It will b a tough short term move, but given the money Boras will want and the high quick bust risk, I think Milwaukee should unload him while they can possibly be over paid for doing so.

DeToxRox 11-03-2010 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 2376132)
Someone is going to be left holding a terrible contract with Fielder. List height and weight of 5'11" and 270 lbs. doesn't seem like it will age well. It will b a tough short term move, but given the money Boras will want and the high quick bust risk, I think Milwaukee should unload him while they can possibly be over paid for doing so.


Fielder has about 4 quality years left in him. He'd be DHing here which may accelerate his fat assness but I think he'd be worth a gamble if we somehow kept Turner.

JPhillips 11-03-2010 10:05 PM

I expect he'll be a 900 OPS guy and then all the sudden drop to 700 one year. The game is trying to guess what year that will be.

A four year deal would be a no-brainer IMO, but I doubt he;ll sign for anything less than six. He might make it through six, but he may give you a couple years as a number 8 or 9 part-time hitter with a 18 mil salary.

Ksyrup 11-04-2010 06:55 AM

I hate the idea of Fielder and Cabrera for more than 1 year. I don't see Cabrera as the long-term 1B (at least not without sacrificing D as he ages), so you'd end up with 2 DHs.

And I'd REALLY hate the idea of my two favorite teams tying themselves down to long-term deals for Ryan Howard and Prince Fielder. UGH. Perhaps one of them could convince Andre Smith to play baseball during the off-season and give him a 10-year contract, too.

stevew 11-04-2010 12:52 PM

Sparky Anderson died today.

BishopMVP 11-04-2010 03:11 PM

Red Sox pick up Ortiz's option for next year. It's a slight overpay, but I think it's worth it to avoid having to sign a long term deal.

Beltre I wouldn't mind re-signing, but I assume he'll be gone for 1.5-2m or 1 year longer than we offer him. V-Mart I don't really want - I think someone will pay him like an elite catcher when really he'll spend half (or more) of the deal as a slightly above-average 1B/DH.

Izulde 11-04-2010 03:56 PM

Not sure if it was reported on the board, so apologies for the repeat. Omar Vizquel got a one year, $1.75 million re-signing with the White Sox. He'll probably fill utility role next year.

Vince, Pt. II 11-04-2010 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingfc22 (Post 2375533)
I'm sure somebody will throw a big chunk of money at him, but he is the #1 target if I'm Sabean. I don't really see it as bumping somebody as Bochy was mixing parts all year and likely will do the same next year. Don't forget Derosa will likely be back in the mix in LF and 3B. Plus they are not going to pick up Renteria's option (he probably retires anyway) for over $10M so that frees up some cash.


So let's say dream becomes reality, and the Giants land Crawford. They re-sign Ross and Huff, but don't re-sign Burrell or Renteria. Your lineup?

CF Crawford
RF Torres
C Posey
1B Huff
LF Ross
3B Derosa
2B Sanchez
SS Uribe

Schierholtz, Ishikawa, Whiteside and Sandoval off the bench. Think that's good enough? Definite upgrade over last year, I believe.

DeToxRox 11-07-2010 01:39 AM

FA has officially begun fyi.

I'll say the first major FA to sign is Crawford with Anaheim Sunday afternoon.

Chief Rum 11-07-2010 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeToxRox (Post 2377346)
FA has officially begun fyi.

I'll say the first major FA to sign is Crawford with Anaheim Sunday afternoon.


I thought it started tomorrow night?

In any case, I wouldn't mind your prediction being true. ;)

stevew 11-07-2010 07:35 AM

My prediction is that Crawford gets a slightly disgusting amount of money. I know he's a WAR champion, I'd just be leary that his speed goes. I guess I could do 4 years, but years 5,6 or 7 would be such a crapshoot. He also doesn't walk as much as I'd like.

JonInMiddleGA 11-08-2010 06:03 PM

Hallelujah !

Jon Miller, Joe Morgan not returning to 'Sunday Night Baseball' TV broadcast - ESPN
Jon Miller and Joe Morgan's 21-year run on ESPN's "Sunday Night Baseball" is over.

Morgan's contract is expiring and he will not be renewed. Miller's contract is also expiring though he may remain at ESPN working the "Sunday Night Baseball" series and postseason baseball for ESPN Radio.

"Jon and Joe have contributed greatly to the success of 'Sunday Night Baseball' for the past 21 seasons," ESPN executive vice president Norby Williams said in a statement Monday. "Over the last two decades, Joe went from Hall of Fame player to one of his sport's top analysts and Jon's Hall of Fame voice and tremendous knowledge of the game have connected with baseball fans everywhere. We owe them our deepest thanks for an outstanding body of work."

Miller, the play-by-play voice, received the Baseball Hall of Fame's 2010 Ford C. Frick Award. Morgan, the color commentator, was a two-time National League MVP with the Cincinnati Reds. The second baseman was elected to the Hall of Fame in 1990.

Crapshoot 11-08-2010 07:31 PM

I'm a huge Jon Miller fan (he sounds like baseball should sound), and if this means he's around for more Giants games, that's great. In Miller, Flemming, Krup and Kuip, we have the best broadcasting team in baseball.

Vince, Pt. II 11-08-2010 07:59 PM

Agreed re: Jon Miller and the SF Broadcasting team. I'm biased, but I really do think they do a great job.

As for Crawford...with all the seriously horrendous contracts out and about these days (Zito, Schmidt, Dreifort, Hampton, Soriano, Byrnes, Chavez, etc) is it realistic to think that guys will continue to get 5+ year contracts? I guess since a bunch of those contracts are quite old now, and they keep happening, that they'll continue.

sterlingice 11-08-2010 09:17 PM

I'd love to see Miller with a new partner for Sunday Night Baseball, personally.

SI

Crapshoot 11-08-2010 09:25 PM

I think Miller's never been a big fan of the travel, so I would be surprised if he is back. Still, if there is a diety, he would replace McCarver and Buck for Fox, so the World Series would have people who actually enjoy baseball.

kingfc22 11-08-2010 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crapshoot (Post 2378270)
I think Miller's never been a big fan of the travel, so I would be surprised if he is back. Still, if there is a diety, he would replace McCarver and Buck for Fox, so the World Series would have people who actually enjoy baseball.


That would be terrific.

JS19 11-08-2010 11:10 PM

Rumors are the Yanks will throw 45-60M over 3 yrs for Jeter. I hate the Yanks simply because I'm a Mets fan, grew up in Queens, and am very bitter watching them win every yr... not because they spend all sorts of money, they play within the rules. However, a deal like this, assuming it goes down, kinda makes me wish they did have some sort of cap in baseball. IMO, they are making a mockery of the system, paying a guy with Marco Scutaro stats, close to 20M a yr.

JonInMiddleGA 11-09-2010 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 2378257)
I'd love to see Miller with a new partner for Sunday Night Baseball, personally.


That's what I expect will happen, although possibly with a part-time schedule.

stevew 11-09-2010 01:32 AM

People come to the ballpark to watch Marco Scutaro. He's the face of whatever team he plays for.

Young Drachma 11-09-2010 01:46 AM

It'd be more fun if he went someplace else, just to see how it'd be, but I imagine after this deal that'll happen anyway as he won't want to retire and they'll have to let him go a la Ruth.

Logan 11-09-2010 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JS19 (Post 2378330)
Rumors are the Yanks will throw 45-60M over 3 yrs for Jeter. I hate the Yanks simply because I'm a Mets fan, grew up in Queens, and am very bitter watching them win every yr... not because they spend all sorts of money, they play within the rules. However, a deal like this, assuming it goes down, kinda makes me wish they did have some sort of cap in baseball. IMO, they are making a mockery of the system, paying a guy with Marco Scutaro stats, close to 20M a yr.


As a Mets fan...1) They're only hurting themselves. They still do operate within a budget, which may not be perfectly clear when they offer Lee a ton of money, they have money coming off the books (like Jeter's already bloated salary) and it will be less they can deploy elsewhere. Plus they'll be hurt by Jeter's subpar defense at SS.

2) I think it's good when players finish their careers with one team. Does anyone really want to see Jeter playing for $5MM a year in Houston?

Young Drachma 11-09-2010 09:38 AM

The big 'What if?' Derek Jeter doesn't sign with the New York Yankees - Daily Pitch: MLB News, Standings, Schedules & More - USATODAY.com

Atocep 11-09-2010 10:31 AM

Sandy Alderson is assembling the old Oakland front office. He's hired both Depodesta and Ricciardi as assistants. Ricciardi was a terrible GM in Toronto, but I like both moves. Loving the move away from the go with your gut approach Minaya had to a more Saber-oriented front office.

MikeVic 11-09-2010 03:03 PM

Derek Jeter, Gold Glove.

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-09-2010 03:17 PM

Baseball-Reference.com - Major League Baseball Statistics and History

Baseball Reference adds a nice touch to their awards listing.

BishopMVP 11-09-2010 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 2378424)
Loving the move away from the go with your gut approach Minaya had to a more Saber-oriented front office.

Reading the back of 1987 Topps cards would be more sabr-oriented than Minaya.

Reportedly the Mets "new front office" told the Wilpons that their job was to set the budget and be consulted if they need to extend that budget, but other than that they have to stay out of the baseball operations and let them do their jobs. If that doesn't happen, they'll leave. No link to an article I've seen.

Ksyrup 11-10-2010 07:52 AM

Joe Poz, brilliant as always:

Quote:

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Farewell Joe Morgan


Joe Morgan from 1972-1976 was the best second baseman in baseball history. That's my honest opinion. There are others who have strong cases. You certainly could argue, most people probably would argue, for Rogers Hornsby from 1921 to 1925 when he hit .402 over FIVE SEASONS. I'm sure that Joe Morgan the announcer would argue that Hornsby was better.

You could argue for Eddie Collins from around 1911 to 1915, when when he hit for a high average (.347), stole a bunch of bases, played superior defense and so on.

You could argue for Jackie Robinson when he got the call to the big leagues ... you could argue for Craig Biggio in the mid-1990s ... you could argue for Chase Utley the last five or six years ... You could argue that Robinson Cano is coming into his own ...

Here's what Joe Morgan did, though: Everything.

You have to remember: Morgan was playing in one of the lower run scoring periods since Deadball. Over those five years, 1972-76, teams averaged just a touch over four runs per game. You have to go back almost 20 years -- to 1992 -- to find even a single season when offenses scored as few runs as teams did in those five years. Put it this way: Lots of people talked about 2010 being the year of the pitcher. Well, every year from 1972-76 was lower scoring than 2010.

And in that low run-scoring environment, Morgan was one of the great offensive players of all time. He hit for average (.303), hit for power (.499 slugging percentage was fifth in baseball over those years), and stole bases (only Lou Brock stole more bases in the era and Morgan stole them at a higher percentage). He walked 111 times or more every season. He led the league in on-base percentage four of the five seasons. He created way more runs than anyone -- 659 in five years. And even that doesn't tell us everything. You have to put that in context.

Considering that teams were averaging about four runs per game, that means Morgan created enough for about 162 games.

To compare, Hornsby, in his great five-year period, created a staggering 855 runs -- almost 200 runs more. But since the average runs scored during Hornsby's period was a much higher 4.81 runs per game, that comes out to creating enough runs for 177 games. So that's more than Morgan, but not so much more.

And Hornsby was, by most accounts, a lousy defensive player and a lousy teammate. You certainly can't BLAME Hornsby for the fact that his Cardinals those five years were mediocre-to-lousy, but it isn't a badge of honor. Joe Morgan, meanwhile, was a very good defender -- Gold Glove winner four of the five years, plus defensive WAR all five years -- and by most accounts a very good teammate. And his Reds averaged a decimal more than 100 wins per season, never won fewer than 95, they took three pennants and two World Series.

Would those Reds with Bench, Rose, Concepcion, Perez and the rest have won with Hornsby at second instead of Morgan? Sure, I suspect so. But the point here is that Morgan was the best player on those great Reds teams; he helped the Reds win every way an everyday player can help a team win. Bill James called Joe the greatest percentage player in the history of the game. More on that in a second.

So yes, I think for those five years, he played better than any second baseman ever.

I bring this up because, as you certainly know, ESPN has decided to part ways with Joe Morgan after 20 years of announcing on Sunday Night Baseball. And ... well, wait, before getting to the point of this, I should definitely go to the source and pull out a classic Joe Morgan quote for the occasion:

"They (Red Sox) cannot beat them (Rays) by outscoring them."

OK. That out of the way ... it's weird to think the Internets won't have Joe Morgan to kick around anymore. I've been trying to think of something to say about Morgan as an announcer, but I suppose most of it has already been said. I remember thinking that Morgan was a fresh voice when he first started out as a national announcer a couple of decades ago, and whether that's just the fog of memory or that he actually was good when he first started and declined, well, I don't know.

It doesn't really matter. I don't think color commentators are built to last. Danger of the job. Sooner or later, we've heard all their stories, we've absorbed all their shtick, we have grown annoyed by their stubborn opinions, we crave surprises that never come. It's funny because when it comes to LOCAL broadcasters, we forgive many of these things -- the repeated stories, the shtick, the sameness becomes cherished after a while. The announcer becomes OURS.

But national announcers don't become OURS, not in the same way. After a while, they're like annoying uncles who know two magic tricks, which they perform at every holiday. Joe Morgan, as he grew older, as he grew more intractable in his views, as he seemed to lose his sense of humor and put less work into his broadcasting, didn't become more cherished. He became a punch line. In some ways, he was a victim of circumstance, I think. I never thought Morgan was worse than some of the other national broadcasters. Let's be honest, Ken Tremendous and the boys could have called their site "Fire Tim McCarver*" and it would have had the same meaning. It could have been called "Fire Food Metaphors" or "Fire Woody Paige," or "FIre David Eckstein" or "Fire Lots of People And Let's Be Honest You Could Be Next." The point was to find idiocy, snark at it, make everybody laugh.

*This, after all, is the description of Tim McCarver in the Fire Joe Morgan glossary: "The Fox Network’s #1 color commentator. And, without question, the worst color commentator in the history of the world, in any sport. By my estimation, Tim McCarver has said 94 of the 100 dumbest things anyone has ever said about baseball."

But they called the site "Fire Joe Morgan," and there's no question that Joe became a symbol of something ... a symbol of the past, I guess. Or, more specifically, he became a symbol of the closed-minded ballplayer-turned-announcer who believed in the power of heart, the magic of grit, and that to win you need winners, and that to become a winner you need to learn how to win, and that to learn how to win you need to win, and that to win you need winners.

Joe would go to bizarre lengths to avoid saying that teams with high on-base percentages often score a lot of runs and that pitchers who command their pitches and don't give up home runs often pitch well. With Joe, after a while, it always came down to intangibles. Which is OK, I guess. But the tangible can matter too. Also, he hated Moneyball and never seemed to figure out that it wasn't Billy Beane who wrote the darned thing.

Anyway, many national announcers -- I'd even say most national announcers -- have these same flaws. But Joe Morgan was out front. I think this is in part because he was the guy on TV every Sunday night. I also think this is in part because there has always been a weird contradiction surrounding Morgan, something that wasn't there for McCarver or the rest. While Joe Morgan the announcer railed against modern baseball statistics, Joe Morgan the ballplayer lit them up like Paul Millsap against the Heat. While Joe Morgan refused to give any credence to the new baseball ideas that were popping up all around him, Joe Morgan the ballplayer had foreshadowed many of them.

Joe Morgan the announcer seemed utterly detached from Joe Morgan the amazing ballplayer. Morgan is a smart man. He lives in the moment. But, strange, it's like he never understood his own genius for playing baseball. I've heard this same thing about a certain brilliantly funny Saturday Night Live actor who was in some of the funniest skits ever -- that he didn't entirely know WHY they were funny. He just did his part. He followed his instincts. And it worked.

Joe Morgan wasn't great because he was a "winner." He was great because he studied pitchers moves so that he could get good jumps (and steal 80% of his bases though he wasn't brilliantly fast). He was great because he made pitchers throw him strikes, he made every at-bat a war of wills, and this often led to pitchers giving in (and walking him) or making a bad pitch (which he often hit with power). He was great because he worked out in the off-season (he liked hitting the speed bag) and built up his strength and so developed good power that belied his 5-foot-7 frame and Little Joe nickname. He was great because he worked hard on his defense and made himself from a below-average, to average to good second baseman. He was great because he challenged teammates to play at their best and he lived up to his own challenges.

He was great because, as Bill James wrote, he was the best percentage player ever, and the irony is that it takes someone like Bill James -- a non-player who loves the game enough to study it intently -- to fully appreciate just how good Joe Morgan really was. I mentioned Hornsby on top. Well, I've written before that Bill ranked Joe Morgan the best second baseman ever and ranked Hornsby No. 3. Bill later told me that he had heard that someone mentioned this to Morgan who immediately said something like: "That's crazy. Rogers Hornsby hit .358. I didn't hit .358."

As if that's what all of baseball comes down to: Batting average.

Other people disliked Joe Morgan the announcer more than I did. I liked listening to his partner Jon Miller so much that Sunday Night Baseball was always fun for me (I will miss Miller, who will also leave the booth). And I kind of got a kick out of the awkward silences and weird vibes that would ring between them. Plus sometimes Joe would say something that I thought was insightful or interesting. And I always knew the silly things he said would make for funny Internet fodder the next day.

In the end, ESPN did the right thing. It was time to move on, get some new voices, trying to bring a little life to the booth. I hope at some point in the near future they find a space for the excellent announcer Jon Sciambi, who I think is terrific. Dan Shulman is very good too. There have to be some terrific young color commentator prospects out there too. Whoever they put in will provide a spark at least for a little while, sort of the way a new coach provides a spark.

And as far as Joe goes ... well, we have a huge bump at the end of our driveway. Every single day, I back out of our driveway and hit that bump. Every single day, I come in our driveway and hit that bump. It's ridiculous, and I know I should get it fixed, and I suspect sometime soon my wife will make me get it fixed. Then it will be smooth going in and going out.

And I KNOW that in a weird way I will miss the bump.

I guess that's how I feel about Joe Morgan leaving the booth.

Logan 11-10-2010 07:53 AM

Well good thing changes are coming. The Mets soon to be former clubhouse manager Charlie Samuels is facing charges of illegal gambling and has already admitted to betting on baseball. He was also taking jerseys, bats, balls etc and selling them to memorabilia companies.

Hope to god no player was stupid enough to make bets through Samuels -- he'll sing like a bird if it happened.

Ksyrup 11-10-2010 10:33 AM

Pablo Sandoval gets to work on his off-season traning regimen:


RomaGoth 11-10-2010 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 2378537)
Derek Jeter, Gold Glove.


When I heard this on the radio I spit out my coffee.....:eek:

Atocep 11-10-2010 11:02 AM

At this point I agree with Rob Neyer's assessment:

Quote:

Of course, it's not just us. Nobody who really follows baseball believes that Jeter is an outstanding defensive player. The Yankees, who see him every day, don't believe that. The writers who cover the Yankees every day don't believe that. Frankly, I'm not sure the managers and the coaches who actually voted for Jeter believe that.

I think they keep giving him the award as a gesture of respect. In a different sort of society, they might simply bow in his presence, then kiss one of his World Series rings. Or cross themselves whenever Game 3 of the Yankees' 2001 Division Series is mentioned. Instead they somewhat mindlessly give him their Gold Glove support every year, even as everyone who's actually paying attention knows the Yankees would prevent more runs if almost anyone else were playing shortstop.

dawgfan 11-10-2010 09:02 PM

Tough news for Mariners fans today as Hall of Fame announcer Dave Niehaus has died of a heart attack at age 75.

Niehaus had been with the M's from the very beginning, and aside from a few days off for his kids graduating and him recovering from bypass surgery a few years back, he'd called nearly every inning of every Mariners game played.

Niehaus was one of the greats (as his Hall of Fame induction indicates). He had a great voice, an easy manner, was a fantastic storyteller who could liven up any dull game with his good humor and great stories, and was reasonably objective about his team (as objective as most team announcers are allowed to be).

While his age was beginning to catch up to him a little over the last decade - misjudging contact off the bat and mistaking easy fly ball outs for homeruns and vice versa, he retained his best qualities.

There's going to be an empty feeling for M's fans now during broadcasts, knowing that we'll never again have Niehaus calling our games.

DeToxRox 11-11-2010 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 2379104)
Tough news for Mariners fans today as Hall of Fame announcer Dave Niehaus has died of a heart attack at age 75.

Niehaus had been with the M's from the very beginning, and aside from a few days off for his kids graduating and him recovering from bypass surgery a few years back, he'd called nearly every inning of every Mariners game played.

Niehaus was one of the greats (as his Hall of Fame induction indicates). He had a great voice, an easy manner, was a fantastic storyteller who could liven up any dull game with his good humor and great stories, and was reasonably objective about his team (as objective as most team announcers are allowed to be).

While his age was beginning to catch up to him a little over the last decade - misjudging contact off the bat and mistaking easy fly ball outs for homeruns and vice versa, he retained his best qualities.

There's going to be an empty feeling for M's fans now during broadcasts, knowing that we'll never again have Niehaus calling our games.


What a tough couple of years for iconic announcers. We're about at that point where the old guard is almost all gone.

Ksyrup 11-11-2010 06:46 AM

As and Royals make a decent swap - Royals get a starting pitcher (Vin Mazzaro) and young pitcher and As get some offense with David DeJesus. I assume Mazzaro will attempt to replace the innings eaten by Bruce Chen, who will likely price himself out of the Royals market. And the As need some offense, DeJesus only has 1 year left on his deal, and he's cheap ($6M). Not an earth-shattering trade, but one that makes some sense for both teams.

Ksyrup 11-11-2010 07:57 AM

Time for the rumors:

Quote:

The Boston Red Sox and Chicago Cubs may be discussing a deal that would send right-hander Daisuke Matsuzaka to the Chicago Cubs for outfielder Kosuke Fukudome, according to a tweet by Phil Rogers of the Chicago Tribune, who states "the Cubs are kicking around (the) idea of a Daisuke/Kosuke Fukudome swap as part of a multi-player package."

Quote:

MLB.com's Peter Gammons said on Red Sox Hot Stove Live Tuesday night that he's heard the Milwaukee Brewers may consider trading left fielder Ryan Braun and that the Boston Red Sox could be an ideal fit.

DeToxRox 11-11-2010 10:05 AM

Gammons is an idiot. Braun has arguably the best contract for a star in baseball and it's a long term deal. Why would Milwaukee trade the face of their franchise? It'd take no less then three young stud pitchers in my estimation.

Toddzilla 11-11-2010 10:08 AM

yeah, Braun isn't a FA until, what, 2014? That shit is just ridiculous.

Ksyrup 11-11-2010 10:10 AM

After 2015, I think.

RomaGoth 11-11-2010 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeToxRox (Post 2379269)
Gammons is an idiot. Braun has arguably the best contract for a star in baseball and it's a long term deal. Why would Milwaukee trade the face of their franchise? It'd take no less then three young stud pitchers in my estimation.


While I agree that Gammons is an idiot, don't put anything past the Brewers. There is a reason they have achieved nothing more than mediocrity.

Ksyrup 11-11-2010 10:14 AM

Only thing I can think is he has no defensive position - his defense is brutal to be in the NL. But yeah, even with that factored in, his contract is reasonable for the next several years.

The fact that Gammons reports that and links him with the Red Sox tells me someone with the Red Sox "leaked" that in hopes of trying to start a fire where they could poach Braun in case they can't get Gonzalez or need to move Youk to 3rd.

samifan24 11-11-2010 11:36 AM

Peter Gammons has been on the Red Sox bandwagon for years. While I think he is well connected throughout the game, I generally roll my eyes at anything that includes the words "Peter Gammons" and "Red Sox" because I assume it to be straight from the Red Sox front office.

Ksyrup 11-11-2010 02:01 PM

Nothing better than a KLAW chat:

Quote:

Mike (San Diego)
Rolen over Zimmerman is pretty bad too, right?


Klaw (1:21 PM)
It's a matter of degree, but I would have taken Zimmerman. How about Dunn throwing Zimm under the bus by talking (to John Fay) about the "bruises" he received from bad throws? Really, Adam? My daughter owns all three Tinker Bell DVDs, and they named the two male tinker fairies after your fielding skills: Clank and Bobble.

sterlingice 11-14-2010 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2379182)
As and Royals make a decent swap - Royals get a starting pitcher (Vin Mazzaro) and young pitcher and As get some offense with David DeJesus. I assume Mazzaro will attempt to replace the innings eaten by Bruce Chen, who will likely price himself out of the Royals market. And the As need some offense, DeJesus only has 1 year left on his deal, and he's cheap ($6M). Not an earth-shattering trade, but one that makes some sense for both teams.


No one in Royalsville is really happy about that since we thought we could get a little more, even for just a (quite cheap) year of DDJ than that rare "innings eater" beast, the guy barely good enough to crack a rotation but not have any future. It's not like there aren't dozens of them out there and they don't exactly have a lot of value for a team not competing next year.

With not much going on next year at the big league level, I wish we could have been in on Maybin (supposedly we were) and Miller- at least they're some high ceiling guys who have lost some luster. Instead, it appears we're headed towards guys with a limited ceiling, the exact opposite of what GMDM did his first couple of years that netted KC the top ranked minor league system.

Also, it seems GMDM thinks that he has to make the first move every offseason. Last year it was Mark Teahen on Nov 6 and two years ago it was Mike Jacobs for Leo Nunez on October 30th.

Oh, and everyone's hoping it's not a prelude to the inevitable Frenchy signing. *sigh*

SI

Crapshoot 11-14-2010 01:26 PM

Yeah, the Royals were apparently talking about Alex Gordon for Maybin (which would be an interesting trade of can't miss prospects that did just that), but it feels like they got 90 cents on the dollar for Dejesus. Maybin was worth a gamble - I like his potential, and think San Diego made a pretty reasonable deal. PETCO makes every arm look like a bullpen gem, and I have more faith in them finding a couple of raw guys with sub 2.0 ERAS (It happens ever year :D) than a CF with plus range and plus power.

Crapshoot 11-14-2010 01:27 PM

Dola,
I would take any bet I could that Frenchy ends up in KC. Dayton's love is too strong.

sterlingice 11-14-2010 01:51 PM

We all know it's coming, we just hate it:

Guess Francoeur's Contract - Royals Review

SI

kingfc22 11-15-2010 07:56 PM

Posey takes home NL ROY! Not a bad start to his career.

Crapshoot 11-15-2010 08:00 PM

Yeah. I'm obviously a Giants fan, but gun to my head I would probably have gone for Heyward as my vote - that being said, two reasonable candidates for the top spot. This isn't Juan Gonzalez winning the MVP over A-Rod or Jimmy Rollins winning in 2007 like situation.

RedKingGold 11-15-2010 09:47 PM

Phillies resign Contreras, or close ot it anyway, to 2 years $5 million. It's risky to sign middle relief for a few years, however, Contreras was quite solid last year.

Also, Ryne Sandberg is now the coach of the AAA affiliate Iron Pigs.

Crapshoot 11-15-2010 10:46 PM

Contreras for 2 years is ... interesting. But in the end, I guess it doesn't make much of a difference for Philly's budget. Surprised they didn't give him 1 / 4 instead.

dawgfan 11-15-2010 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2377364)
My prediction is that Crawford gets a slightly disgusting amount of money. I know he's a WAR champion, I'd just be leary that his speed goes. I guess I could do 4 years, but years 5,6 or 7 would be such a crapshoot. He also doesn't walk as much as I'd like.

My recollection is that studies show "speed" guys hold their value pretty well. Can someone verify or correct me on this?

Crapshoot 11-16-2010 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 2381429)
My recollection is that studies show "speed" guys hold their value pretty well. Can someone verify or correct me on this?


I believe that is the case - old player skills fall off relatively quickly, even thought you would expect the opposite. Carl Crawford is easily the catch of the FA market here - I'd be more comfortable giving him 5/100 than Cliff Lee, given the natural risk with pitchers.

stevew 11-16-2010 12:12 AM

hold the fucking presses......

The Pirates named CLINT HURDLE their manager today!!!!!!!

He brings with him 1 winning season in 8 seasons with the Rockies. And IIRC, the Rockies won about 20 games to end that year, which culminated in a blown save by Trevor Hoffman and a questionable safe call on Matt Holliday. The 2009 rockies were 30 games over .500 after he got fired.

Vince, Pt. II 11-16-2010 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crapshoot (Post 2381213)
Yeah. I'm obviously a Giants fan, but gun to my head I would probably have gone for Heyward as my vote - that being said, two reasonable candidates for the top spot. This isn't Juan Gonzalez winning the MVP over A-Rod or Jimmy Rollins winning in 2007 like situation.


I'm a complete homer and am aware of the fact. That being said, is OBP that important to you? In counting stats, Posey was nearly Heyward's equal in far less time in the league. I don't understand why it seemed that a large quantity of people leaned towards Heyward in this race.

Posey - 443 PA, 23 2B, 18 HR, 67 RBI, 0.55 K/BB ratio, .305/.367/.505, .862 OPS, 129 OPS+
Heyward - 623 PA, 29 2B, 18 HR, 72 RBI, 0.71 K/BB ratio, .277/.393/.456, .849 OPS, 131 OPS+

Heyward also stole 11 bases, but at a 61% clip he was pretty inefficient at it.

EDIT - I don't want to say that I didn't think Heyward was not worthy of it, or that it shouldn't be close - but the results today (20 1st place votes for Posey vs. 7 for Heyward) are what I expected/felt the numbers warranted, while it seems like many people expected a much, much closer vote.

SackAttack 11-16-2010 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II (Post 2381462)
I'm a complete homer and am aware of the fact. That being said, is OBP that important to you? In counting stats, Posey was nearly Heyward's equal in far less time in the league. I don't understand why it seemed that a large quantity of people leaned towards Heyward in this race.

Posey - 443 PA, 23 2B, 18 HR, 67 RBI, 0.55 K/BB ratio, .305/.367/.505, .862 OPS, 129 OPS+
Heyward - 623 PA, 29 2B, 18 HR, 72 RBI, 0.71 K/BB ratio, .277/.393/.456, .849 OPS, 131 OPS+

Heyward also stole 11 bases, but at a 61% clip he was pretty inefficient at it.

EDIT - I don't want to say that I didn't think Heyward was not worthy of it, or that it shouldn't be close - but the results today (20 1st place votes for Posey vs. 7 for Heyward) are what I expected/felt the numbers warranted, while it seems like many people expected a much, much closer vote.


Yeah. Posey was Heyward's productive equal in 2/3 the plate appearances, at a significantly more demanding position.

Much as I hate saying it, the right guy won the award.

JonInMiddleGA 11-16-2010 01:53 AM

I see no reason for anyone to gripe about Posey over Heyward. Hell, I'm surprised it was as close as it was.

Crapshoot 11-16-2010 02:04 AM

This is a weird argument, with the Braves and Dodgers fans arguing for Posey, and me leaning Heyward (albeit not my much). :D That being said, the basic problem with OPS (and by nature, OPS+) is that OBP and SLG work on 2 different scales - ie, a .400 OBP is significantly more valuable than a .400 slg, ceterus paribus. So Heyward's OBP advantage is significant to me, and he played about 40 more games (ie, Posey got called up late).

In the end, I think good arguments exist for both (and I think catching that staff through that September was amazing, and we are not very good at capturing C defensive value) - just throwing my 2 cents out there. Its pretty clear that whichever way it ended up, Heyward/Posey were 1 and 2 for rookies this year. This year's NL Rookie Class could be one for the ages. - just throwing out there:

- Heyward
- Posey
- Jaime Garcia
- Gaby Sanchez
- Aroldis Chapman (cheating a bit, I know)
- Stratsburg (injured, but still)
- Mike Leake (solid before running out of gas)
- Starlin Castro (playing an above average major league SS at 20)
- Neil Walker / Pedro Alvarez / Jose Tabata (decent young Pirates players)

Crapshoot 11-16-2010 02:07 AM

Dola, predictions for Cy Young? NL I expect to be Roy Halladay in a unanimous (or close to it) ballot, with perhaps a vote for Adam Wainwright and/or Josh Johnson from the local guy. AL, it should be Felix, but I wouldn't be surprised if CC or David Price ended up taking it.

Butter 11-16-2010 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2381444)
hold the fucking presses......

The Pirates named CLINT HURDLE their manager today!!!!!!!

He brings with him 1 winning season in 8 seasons with the Rockies. And IIRC, the Rockies won about 20 games to end that year, which culminated in a blown save by Trevor Hoffman and a questionable safe call on Matt Holliday. The 2009 rockies were 30 games over .500 after he got fired.


You guys just can't lay off the marginal ex-Reds from the 80's, can you? :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.