*flicks it on you cybernetically*


ooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
oooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

That's a great point, frankly.

Haven't decided. Just hate to vote a guy who said he may forget the game from time to time, especially since his resulting UTR-ness has nothing to do with what role he has (which may be a good one).

But, yeah, we can't leave him hanging out there forever either.

he could be one of those mundane regular mafia or neutral people too.

VOTE INNOCENT

(or not yet guilty)

we vote in thread or PM?

I have a hunch Danny is likely a easy target for the mafia people looking to take out someone who is likely innocent and cannot defend themselves.

vote innocent for now.
not sure if this is how we vote but just in case.

hi brit

Hi, Fox!

At least we garnered some information (or wifom maybe) from lynch talk today. D1 and D2 was worthless.

Let the bloodbath ensue.

Yeah I think putting Danny up and deciding not to lynch him is not a bad thing. It keeps conversation going throughout the day instead of it ending at the first deadline.

I honestly believe Danny is as good as any to be mafia. If he shows back up tonight I don't want him to feel like he is in the clear and has nothing to worry about. I also feel like there could be a connection between CR and Danny where CR really doesn't want Danny lynched which is setting something off inside my head.

Guilty

Forgot the word vote.

Vote Guilty

I stand by my best case/worst case post:

vote GUILTY

My current count:

Innocent (3): Chief Rum [355], Crimsonfox [358], The Jackal [361]
Guilty (2): Dubb93 [364], cheekimonk [366]

Yet to vote: Zinto, timmae, britrock, Ragone, autumn, danny, lighthousekeeper, ziiggy

vote guilty

For science.

My current count:

Guilty (4): Dubb93 [364], cheekimonk [366], lighthousekeepr [368], timmae [369]
Innocent (3): Chief Rum [355], Crimsonfox [358], The Jackal [361]


Yet to vote (6): Zinto, britrock, Ragone, autumn, danny, ziiggy

For now. If Danny doesn't show up before the deadline I will move my vote so we don't spend more days dealing with the Danny no show.

Vote Innocent Innocent until proven guilty.. We really have no proof one way or the other... this seems like a easy ploy by mafia to snag a easy kill..

Or any easy way for the mafia to waste our tomorrow with more Danny nonsense.

definitely staying here now

especially since there may be
a) roles out there that can tell us what danny's role is
and
b) possible replacement of danny

Have a bunch of pm;s to sort through.

Well this is a conundrum. First thought is I don’t much like lynching afks early as it usually turns out to be a villager. But on the other hand, most early lynches do also, and as we sit, it’s not that “early” anymore. Also, in this case there are not as many villagers due to the neutrals so better odds to hit a non-villager. Thing I’m not even close to being sure of is whether or not it’s more likely the mafia would vote innocent or guilty in this situation. I’m slightly leaning to the former though.
Vote Guilty

reminder that it's a fullmoon tonight.

high likelihood of villager dying.

if danny happens to be villager we'll be taking a 2 villager hit.
possibly more.

CR was covering for Danny. I said it yesterday, I say it again right now.

And holy crap, what a blood bath. 5 dead. Wow.

good job ragone

wow, what the heck.

Sorry I disappeared yesterday, got caught up with work and kids again. This is a crazy mess.

good lord

Hmm, looking back over the roles we should keep in mind hte Mafia could have a Disguiser, in which case we might be mistaken about one of the dead so far.

Timmae said he was blocked, which suggests a Mafia Consort, or a random Escort. (Any other possiblities?) The note from the mafia kill suggests that the mafia knew ragone was a werewolf, which suggest they have whatever role it is that scans for roles, right? Is there another way they would know what he was?

There are a limited number of roles left that anyone could be, and half of them are good guys. I'm wondering if it's time for good guys to reveal roles and what we know, and allow us to control the vote going forward. There will be fake reveals of course, but we might have enough info to parse those out.

Only two people were doused by the arsonist, and then last night he ignited. But he should have had one other shot at dousing, is that correct? Does anyone have a note of what nights he doused who?

On rereading I realize I was wrong about the Disguiser, that couldn't be it.

Seems Chief never came out that he had been doused, which is interesting. I odn't see anyone claiming to have been jailed nights 3 and 4 either.