Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Werewolf Games (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Survivor:Challenge/Common Thread (GAME OVER! FEED BACK WELCOME) (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=56707)

Poli 02-07-2007 09:32 AM

That's what I'm talking about, ITC. :)

Barkeep49 02-07-2007 09:33 AM


Lupus 5
Oz 3
Howard 2
Helsing 2

ImTheCrew 02-07-2007 09:34 AM

nothing cooler than a online forum high five!!

ImTheCrew 02-07-2007 09:34 AM

what 2nd!???

ImTheCrew 02-07-2007 09:35 AM

opps is that total?

Poli 02-07-2007 09:35 AM

True.

ImTheCrew 02-07-2007 09:36 AM

has to be i appoligize

Jonathan Ezarik 02-07-2007 09:37 AM

Question: Do we have to vote every time? Since we aren't getting any points out of this round, do we still need to vote? Will we be penalized for not voting?

Tyrith 02-07-2007 09:40 AM

Is the second post in the thread ever going to be edited to show the current tribes, or is it going to remain static throughout the game?

Barkeep49 02-07-2007 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik (Post 1382979)
Question: Do we have to vote every time? Since we aren't getting any points out of this round, do we still need to vote? Will we be penalized for not voting?

Only requirement is that each player must vote at least once. Now if someone other than you Jonathan were to come around before the next block and vote it would count to the individual vote standings, but have no impact on the overall scoreboard.

Barkeep49 02-07-2007 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith (Post 1382986)
Is the second post in the thread ever going to be edited to show the current tribes, or is it going to remain static throughout the game?

Thanks for the reminder.

Lathum 02-07-2007 10:12 AM

so any speculation why there was no wolf kill last night?

st.cronin 02-07-2007 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1382708)

I gave you a direct reason why I felt this was the case. I guess that wasn't good enough :(


No, not really.

Alan T 02-07-2007 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1383038)
No, not really.



No not really that my thoughts wern't good enough for you, or no not really that you didn't see the post I made?

st.cronin 02-07-2007 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1383039)
No not really that my thoughts wern't good enough for you, or no not really that you didn't see the post I made?


If yours was the post referencing Barkeep's comments about "evil" I don't find that persuasive. That's what I meant.

Alan T 02-07-2007 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1383040)
If yours was the post referencing Barkeep's comments about "evil" I don't find that persuasive. That's what I meant.


in my mind it seems to be alot more evidence than anything you are tossing out though.

ImTheCrew 02-07-2007 10:20 AM

isnt that too obvious????

KWhit 02-07-2007 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1383029)
so any speculation why there was no wolf kill last night?


Not sure. Maybe there are no wolves yet?

Maybe BK's volunteer comment that "they are a little bit more evil" means that they are on the way toward becoming wolves but aren't there yet?

Just guessing.

Lathum 02-07-2007 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1383040)
If yours was the post referencing Barkeep's comments about "evil" I don't find that persuasive. That's what I meant.


any theroies you have would be welcome

Alan T 02-07-2007 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImTheCrew (Post 1383050)
isnt that too obvious????



Not sure how its too obvious since we don't know who volunteered.

ntndeacon 02-07-2007 10:22 AM

Vote AlanT

Abe Sargent 02-07-2007 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1383052)
Not sure. Maybe there are no wolves yet?

Maybe BK's volunteer comment that "they are a little bit more evil" means that they are on the way toward becoming wolves but aren't there yet?

Just guessing.


So you are stressing the "little bit" part, not the evil comment?

st.cronin 02-07-2007 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1383044)
in my mind it seems to be alot more evidence than anything you are tossing out though.


I'm not tossing ANYTHING out. I have been somewhat persuaded that this is a possibility. I just ... need a little bit more.

ntndeacon 02-07-2007 10:23 AM

at least we can give someone else a vote :)

Abe Sargent 02-07-2007 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ntndeacon (Post 1383059)
Vote AlanT


A pile-on vote?

Lathum 02-07-2007 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImTheCrew (Post 1383050)
isnt that too obvious????


sometimes it is best to not overthink things. The thing that led me to believe they are wolves were the comment about to many people volunteering and how those who did volunteer need to keep it to themselves. Seemed obvious to me.

st.cronin 02-07-2007 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1383058)
Not sure how its too obvious since we don't know who volunteered.


Some tribes may know. Also, some tribes may not have ANYBODY who volunteered.

Both of those possibilities are what make that theory a little too unlikely in my opinion.

ntndeacon 02-07-2007 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety (Post 1383066)
A pile-on vote?


more a vote to keep a pile on to happening to one of our guys.

Lathum 02-07-2007 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49 (Post 1380936)




Oh and also before everyone leaves, I need at least one person from each tribe to send me a PM to be a "volunteer". You may not post anywhere that you have volunteered. If a tribe fails to have anyone volunteer there will be consequences. Of course too many people volunteering for this unknown thing could be bad too. So just how adventurous do you feel?


.

Abe Sargent 02-07-2007 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ntndeacon (Post 1383074)
more a vote to keep a pile on to happening to one of our guys.


Well, you know, at first I found this suspicious, because why vote for a guy who isn't here, because you can't do the whole Counterspell thing with it (see: Magic the gathering), but, since you have to vote for someone, I guess this makes sense the more I think about it.

KWhit 02-07-2007 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety (Post 1383061)
So you are stressing the "little bit" part, not the evil comment?


Yes. That's my (lame) theory at this point.

Lathum 02-07-2007 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1383070)
Some tribes may know. Also, some tribes may not have ANYBODY who volunteered.

Both of those possibilities are what make that theory a little too unlikely in my opinion.


read the rules, If a tribe knows who volunteered that is a direct violation of the rules.

ntndeacon 02-07-2007 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1383070)
Some tribes may know. Also, some tribes may not have ANYBODY who volunteered.

Both of those possibilities are what make that theory a little too unlikely in my opinion.



true. But it sounds like those tribes will be punished in other ways as well.

Lathum 02-07-2007 10:27 AM

read the post I quoted above from Barkeep, it seems to me there are alot of clues in there.

KWhit 02-07-2007 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

I want to thank those of you who volunteered. Of course those who were chosen now are a little more evil than before, but let's not let that bother us.


That's the post I was talking about. "A little more evil" seems carefully chosen to me. I don't know what it means, but...

Tyrith 02-07-2007 10:29 AM

Makes sense to just get the vote out there, even if I don't like it too much because it's against one of my guys. But I can't really blame you for it.

Blade6119 02-07-2007 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1383085)
read the rules, If a tribe knows who volunteered that is a direct violation of the rules.

But for the smaller teams of 4 now, we have a general idea. Especially if you know you didnt get whatever the volunteers got. From there, i can make assumptions about which of the 3 others would be likely to volunteer and make my own guesses as to what that means

ImTheCrew 02-07-2007 10:30 AM

the line " too many people could be BAD too" bad as in consequences or in evil?????

st.cronin 02-07-2007 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1383085)
read the rules, If a tribe knows who volunteered that is a direct violation of the rules.


If somebody POSTS that they have volunteered that is a violation of the rules. There are many ways a tribe could know who volunteered without that person posting.

st.cronin 02-07-2007 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1383092)


That's the post I was talking about. "A little more evil" seems carefully chosen to me. I don't know what it means, but...



I agree. I think if volunteers = wolves, Barkeep would have said nothing, for the reasons I outlined.

Tyrith 02-07-2007 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1383103)
If somebody POSTS that they have volunteered that is a violation of the rules. There are many ways a tribe could know who volunteered without that person posting.


I haven't encountered any in this game. I can't really think of anything that would show if someone had VOLUNTEERED or not -- a seer wouldn't tell you if someone had volunteered or not, it would just tell you if someone is bad, which is related but a distinct issue.

Lathum 02-07-2007 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119 (Post 1383099)
But for the smaller teams of 4 now, we have a general idea. Especially if you know you didnt get whatever the volunteers got. From there, i can make assumptions about which of the 3 others would be likely to volunteer and make my own guesses as to what that means


I take this post as nothing but you trying to garnish information from someone.

Blade6119 02-07-2007 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1383135)
I take this post as nothing but you trying to garnish information from someone.


its actually just the opposite...why would i come into the general thread to try and work over team members? if i wanted to do that id do it in our tribal thread. I take your post as nothing but you trying to be mean

Tyrith 02-07-2007 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1383135)
I take this post as nothing but you trying to garnish information from someone.


Let's not lie to ourselves. This is still Werewolf. Most of the posts in this thread are going to be trying to probe for unknown information right now, because I'm pretty certain none of us really know anything. I sure as heck don't. I'm not really going to get on blade for trying to learn something because I think we could all use more knowledge right now.

st.cronin 02-07-2007 10:40 AM

lol @ Lathum and Blade

do it lathum, kill blade! hahahahahaha


st.cronin 02-07-2007 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith (Post 1383149)
Let's not lie to ourselves. This is still Werewolf. Most of the posts in this thread are going to be trying to probe for unknown information right now, because I'm pretty certain none of us really know anything. I sure as heck don't. I'm not really going to get on blade for trying to learn something because I think we could all use more knowledge right now.


Yes, I agree. But I've been very straightforward with my questions and theories today (and last night). I'm not trying to figure out anybody's tribal strategy.

KWhit 02-07-2007 10:46 AM

I think it is still important to share information and wolf theories with each other in this thread. If we only talk overall game strategy in our individual tribal threads, we'll lose a lot. Theories build on themselves, and without talking some of this stuff through as a big group, the wolves will pick us apart.

GoldenEagle 02-07-2007 10:59 AM

Vote AlanT

Blade6119 02-07-2007 11:00 AM

VOTE ST.CRONIN

Tyrith 02-07-2007 11:00 AM

VOTE SWAGGS


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.