Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Werewolf Games (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   WW - The Lost Boys (Game Over; Vampires Win) (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=79783)

Raiders Army 11-17-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 2382039)
It's also the second time you have voted for me without giving a reason. It's hard to defend myself when I have someone who apparently is crusading against me, and I don't even know why.

Heck, you just threw out two great potential targets today in two non-Day One voters in hoops and The Jackal, but you fly right by that to vote for me.

I am fine with getting votes. I just hope you'll back yourself up better than with yesterday's "let's start something" or today's "i'll throw out the first vote..."


Sorry man. I'm not crusading against you whatsoever. I put the second vote on you to see what would happen (since day 1 is a crapshoot, right?). I put a vote on you today because it was down to you and Pass for the lynch and Pass turned out to be a villager.

I sort of give the no-shows a bye since (not sure if this is logical) the vamps were definitely active yesterday with the night kill and neither of them was around...statistically speaking, it is probable that they are both (or at least one) villagers.

RendeR 11-17-2010 06:39 PM

I'll be back in a while, gotta put the monsters to bed.

DaddyTorgo 11-17-2010 06:49 PM

Interesting.

Autumn 11-17-2010 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana (Post 2382383)
Autumns vote for DT bothers me there, and if I didn't thin it would be a throwaway, I would go for him right now

Since I am not going to introduce a new candidate at this point, he can wait for tomorrow

vote raiders army


Why? I did exactly what I said I wanted to do earlier, which was look back at the votes and see which was most suspicious. I've already said I wasn't going to vote Chief, so voting one of the two 1-vote getters with three hours left to go doesn't seem real imperative.

J23 11-17-2010 07:00 PM

Well, Lathum and Render were the two people that swung the vote onto Pass and got him lynched. Lathum obviously was a good guy, but the late vote by Render on the good guy that got lynched obviously puts him on the radar.

I'm hoping that Hoops shows up at some point. I'm also hoping that Danny shows up to put in his thoughts. I'm not used to him being this quiet, so that's making me wonder a bit. Of course, maybe I'm just more suspicious of him simply because he said he was up for voting for me day one :p

Danny 11-17-2010 07:14 PM

I will be voting J23 or Raiders Army. I know people are looking at those late voters, but there is almost always a wolf or two that puts a second vote on someone.

The second votes from yesterday were J23, Raiders Army and myself. I'd bet at least one of J23 and Raiders is a wolf.

Danny 11-17-2010 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J23 (Post 2382415)
Well, Lathum and Render were the two people that swung the vote onto Pass and got him lynched. Lathum obviously was a good guy, but the late vote by Render on the good guy that got lynched obviously puts him on the radar.

I'm hoping that Hoops shows up at some point. I'm also hoping that Danny shows up to put in his thoughts. I'm not used to him being this quiet, so that's making me wonder a bit. Of course, maybe I'm just more suspicious of him simply because he said he was up for voting for me day one :p


I'm not really quiet compared to usual, more absent though. I actually fell asleep yesterday after putting in my vote, but was planning to be around after deadline. I'm more well rested today, so will be around up to deadline.

Danny 11-17-2010 07:24 PM

Vote J23

I realize this a new candidate and it's likely too late to swing the candidates, but there's still time to see. If there is no swing, I will be switching to Raiders Army and not Render.

Autumn 11-17-2010 07:29 PM

I will switch to make my vote relevant later, as need be. But I think DT is a more reasonable vote than many here. He put Pass up front when there was a lot to pick from. That's the time that a wolf wants to vote, precisely because it gets a bit buried by later voters.

Danny 11-17-2010 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 2382429)
I will switch to make my vote relevant later, as need be. But I think DT is a more reasonable vote than many here. He put Pass up front when there was a lot to pick from. That's the time that a wolf wants to vote, precisely because it gets a bit buried by later voters.


I looked back and DT appears to be a solid vote as well. My thinking is along the same line as yours, but I was looking more at 2nd votes because it's a very common spot for a wolf and I happen to have been one.

DaddyTorgo 11-17-2010 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 2382429)
I will switch to make my vote relevant later, as need be. But I think DT is a more reasonable vote than many here. He put Pass up front when there was a lot to pick from. That's the time that a wolf wants to vote, precisely because it gets a bit buried by later voters.


Indeed I did. There was a lot to choose from, but i had no better way of knowing who was or wasn't a villager than anybody else. It wasn't some master plan by me to push Pass into the lead or anything.

Danny 11-17-2010 07:39 PM

Unvote J23
Vote Raiders Army


I already don't see a swing happening, and I feel much better about voting him than Render

Autumn 11-17-2010 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny (Post 2382430)
I looked back and DT appears to be a solid vote as well. My thinking is along the same line as yours, but I was looking more at 2nd votes because it's a very common spot for a wolf and I happen to have been one.


lol, not the best wording there Danny.

Danny 11-17-2010 07:45 PM

I'll assume you're just pointing that out for brevity and not really trying to draw attention to me for what is clearly referring to something else :P

Autumn 11-17-2010 07:47 PM

I had to read that a few times, trying to figure out why you would be revealing yourself at this point ;-)

Danny 11-17-2010 07:50 PM

You mean revealing as a wolf won't add to my trust level? haha

Autumn 11-17-2010 08:02 PM

Anyone have the vote count?

Danny 11-17-2010 08:04 PM

Raiders Army 3
Chief Rum 2
Render 2
DT 1

I believe

Autumn 11-17-2010 08:06 PM

So still three votes missing. I will be here, so I'll wait to move my vote to see if we get those three.

RendeR 11-17-2010 08:13 PM

I'm here and reading, I haven't voted SOLELY for reasons of self preservation. I will vote before deadline.

I'm pondering between DT and Chief Rum right now for reasons I will state later.

Raiders Army 11-17-2010 08:16 PM

UNVOTE CHIEF RUM
VOTE RENDER


Self-preservation and other reasons.

The Jackal 11-17-2010 08:17 PM

Going to be in the subway at deadline. Even though at least one person has said they are avoiding render I see no reason to change at the moment.

J23 11-17-2010 08:24 PM

I'd feel better voting Render than RA, though I don't wish to see a tie vote. I guess we'll see how the pieces fall, and try to stick around to move my vote to avoid a tie if need be.

Vote Render

J23 11-17-2010 08:28 PM

If you're around Danny, I'm wondering what your reasoning is for throwing the vote on me earlier.

Raiders Army 11-17-2010 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny (Post 2382424)
I will be voting J23 or Raiders Army. I know people are looking at those late voters, but there is almost always a wolf or two that puts a second vote on someone.

The second votes from yesterday were J23, Raiders Army and myself. I'd bet at least one of J23 and Raiders is a wolf.


Well, I'd bet that you or J23 is a wolf. :)

That being said, if Render turns up as a wolf, you'd be my first pick tomorrow...knowing I'm a villager.

Autumn 11-17-2010 08:32 PM

Why did you switch your vote, RA?

Danny 11-17-2010 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J23 (Post 2382457)
If you're around Danny, I'm wondering what your reasoning is for throwing the vote on me earlier.


reasoning is above and quoted by RA

J23 11-17-2010 08:34 PM

So it would have been better to bring in a 5th (or was it 6th) candidate with one vote?

I've seen that reasoning thrown around a number of times, but I honestly don't remember the last time that going by that logic caught us a wolf.

Raiders Army 11-17-2010 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 2382460)
Why did you switch your vote, RA?


Self-preservation first and foremost. At the time, I was the led the votes with 3. My switch made it a tie. I know I'm not a villager (then again, that's what a vamp would say!).

J23 11-17-2010 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiders Army (Post 2382463)
I know I'm not a villager (then again, that's what a vamp would say!).



er... :eek:

Danny 11-17-2010 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J23 (Post 2382462)
So it would have been better to bring in a 5th (or was it 6th) candidate with one vote?

I've seen that reasoning thrown around a number of times, but I honestly don't remember the last time that going by that logic caught us a wolf.


The second vote theory? It's help me catch a wolf probably upwards of a dozen times.

RendeR 11-17-2010 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiders Army (Post 2382463)
Self-preservation first and foremost. At the time, I was the led the votes with 3. My switch made it a tie. I know I'm not a villager (then again, that's what a vamp would say!).



Umm.....yeah, really?

Autumn 11-17-2010 08:41 PM

lol, we've had two wolf reveals in one night! wow, lol

J23 11-17-2010 08:41 PM

I'm tempted to go back through games and see how often it's actually true for day 1. I also wonder how much impact the fact that people know a lot of people throw out that theory influences their votes. I know it has affected mine in the past. I guess it's just one of those meta-game kind of things I don't put much faith in.

Autumn 11-17-2010 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RendeR (Post 2382449)
I'm here and reading, I haven't voted SOLELY for reasons of self preservation. I will vote before deadline.

I'm pondering between DT and Chief Rum right now for reasons I will state later.


I'd like to hear your thinking, Render, since I'm having to decide whether to move my vote to you or not.

Raiders Army 11-17-2010 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny (Post 2382466)
The second vote theory? It's help me catch a wolf probably upwards of a dozen times.


You're not making any sense whatsoever. If you're going by a second vote theory and trying to convince others to do so, then they should vote for you since you put a second vote yesterday.

Danny 11-17-2010 08:43 PM

It's not meta game though, it's a strong statistical play for wolves to place second votes on villagers to establish them as candidates for the day and making it less likely a wolf is on the block. It's something I know I've done too often as a wolf, and it's very tempting to do as a wolf in general.

RendeR 11-17-2010 08:44 PM

This is going to sound very cliche, but:


You really don't want to vote for me.

Danny 11-17-2010 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiders Army (Post 2382472)
You're not making any sense whatsoever. If you're going by a second vote theory and trying to convince others to do so, then they should vote for you since you put a second vote yesterday.


I'm one of the three yes, and I never eliminated myself from the list when talking about 2nd votes.

Raiders Army 11-17-2010 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny (Post 2382473)
It's not meta game though, it's a strong statistical play for wolves to place second votes on villagers to establish them as candidates for the day and making it less likely a wolf is on the block. It's something I know I've done too often as a wolf, and it's very tempting to do as a wolf in general.


So, if you know that and you're a villager then why would you put yourself in a position to bring suspicion on you?

Danny 11-17-2010 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiders Army (Post 2382476)
So, if you know that and you're a villager then why would you put yourself in a position to bring suspicion on you?


I'm going to post my thoughts about what I think is the best play regardless if it brings suspicion on me or not.

Raiders Army 11-17-2010 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny (Post 2382475)
I'm one of the three yes, and I never eliminated myself from the list when talking about 2nd votes.

Well, yes you did in a way. I understand you aren't going to vote for yourself, but you also didn't put yourself out there as a candidate based upon the logic you presented.

Danny 11-17-2010 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiders Army (Post 2382478)
Well, yes you did in a way. I understand you aren't going to vote for yourself, but you also didn't put yourself out there as a candidate based upon the logic you presented.


I made sure to include myself on the list. I'm not really sure what else I am supposed to do, should I argue why other people should specifically lynch me? :p

Raiders Army 11-17-2010 08:48 PM

dola, in other words you never presented a good argument why we shouldn't vote for you instead of J23 or me based upon the "2nd Vote" logic.

DaddyTorgo 11-17-2010 08:49 PM

Somebody's got to place the 2nd vote on someone at some point though right?

I mean I get the "2nd vote theory" thing, but you can just as easily turn it around. I know when I'm a wolf I try actively to place votes later, particularly towards the end to break ties so that I can pull out the corollary of that and say "see...i'm not afraid to stand by the logic of my vote."

I dunno...it has value, but I don't think you can look at it in a vacumn

RendeR 11-17-2010 08:49 PM

guys, stop bickering and start fixing the votes. We're getting screwed here. Please don't vote my way tonight.

Danny 11-17-2010 08:50 PM

And I didn't need to, I haven't received any votes. I would be happy to make that argument if it was needed.

RendeR 11-17-2010 08:51 PM

I'm reading it 4-3 me over Raiders. Right now. Am I wrong?

VOTE RAIDERS ARMY


Purely self preservation here.

J23 11-17-2010 08:52 PM

unvote Render
vote RA


Not sure why, but I'm buying it right now.

Danny 11-17-2010 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2382482)
Somebody's got to place the 2nd vote on someone at some point though right?

I mean I get the "2nd vote theory" thing, but you can just as easily turn it around. I know when I'm a wolf I try actively to place votes later, particularly towards the end to break ties so that I can pull out the corollary of that and say "see...i'm not afraid to stand by the logic of my vote."

I dunno...it has value, but I don't think you can look at it in a vacumn


Of course not, but we don't have a ton to go on right now. I think looking at voters that set the candidates is generally a better play than looking at the late voters in this case.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.