Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   FOF2004 Demo: Thoughts (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=16294)

RPI-Fan 11-08-2003 09:27 PM

FOF2004 Demo: Thoughts
 
-One "issue" with locking players is that I think it would be useful to be able to lock starters' playing time also. It appears that when you put a lesser player in as the starter, the playing time will automatically be lowered when you "recommend". While the locking player addition is fabulous, it isn't perhaps quite as efficient as it could be.

I don't mean to be complaining only - I like many, many more things than I don't like (the playing time locking is the only thing I've seen so far, actually). I just waited until the demo came out to throw out suggestions so I'd be basing them off of something concrete.

wbonnell 11-08-2003 09:28 PM

i'll move this here:

Looks like if you don't install it to the default path, it won't find the help file. Just a teeny, tiny bug.

Deattribution 11-08-2003 09:50 PM

Never saw it mentioned before, so thought it was worth mentioning now... but not only can we change the salary cap inflation as mentioned, can also change the injury ratio in the Global Options... even eliminate them all together.

MrBug708 11-08-2003 09:57 PM

RPI, number of first roudners on team was in FOF4, not a new feature

I really REALLY wish we could do the draft

sabotai 11-08-2003 10:00 PM

I like when you search for a player (from the recommend button on the roster type screens), you can search for them and list them in order by a specific attribute.

Need a CB that has good zone defense? Order it by the best at that one attribute.

wbonnell 11-08-2003 10:05 PM

just pointing out oddities as I find them:

the sorting of the simulation window is non-deterministic. Every time I click on the email button, it (seems to) randomly sort:

Arizona
Seattle
San Francisco
St. Louis

->

Arizona
St. Louis
San Francisco
Seattle

->

Arizona
San Francisco
St. Louis
Seattle

->

Arizona
San Francisco
Seattle
St. Louis

FrogMan 11-08-2003 10:06 PM

sab, this little feature will certainly help me when I'm looking for something very specific, like a good kick or punt returner...

FM

FrogMan 11-08-2003 10:07 PM

wbonnell, it does that in FOF4 too, before the beginning of the regular season

Primal 11-08-2003 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBug708
RPI, number of first roudners on team was in FOF4, not a new feature



What screen is this on?

Subby 11-08-2003 10:15 PM

Remind me again how the starter's playing time settings work in the depth charts...

FrogMan 11-08-2003 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Primal
What screen is this on?


On the draft order screen.

FM

RPI-Fan 11-08-2003 10:18 PM

Higher = more playing time for the starter.

Also, another thing I noticed when tinkering with game plans (not sure if this is this way for technical reasons or just sort of an oversight...): When you change the personel information, and save that information, opening it within that same career opens the altered personel information. Opening it in another career indeed has the altered game plan settings (run percentages, etc.), but does NOT have the changed personel information. Seemed pretty interest, especially since the personel information is generic (Split End 1, Flanker 2, etc.)

Subby 11-08-2003 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RPI-Fan
I don't mean to be complaining only - I like many, many more things than I don't like (the playing time locking is the only thing I've seen so far, actually). I just waited until the demo came out to throw out suggestions so I'd be basing them off of something concrete.

Kyle - that is a fair point. Locking should effect the player and the time...

Just as an aside - why set your starters to anything less than 9?

korme 11-08-2003 10:24 PM

Many teams don't play their starters 100% of the game, and even for quarterback it makes sense. If your QB gets hit hard and is suffering a minor injury, depending on a few thing and say he is at 9 PT, he will stay in. However if he is say at 3, he might come out for the backup.

Also, many runningbacks share the load, this is probably the most noticable position that PT effects.

Primal 11-08-2003 10:24 PM

Wierd little bug (maybe).

After I click on "Formation Use - Extreme Passing" then click ok. I can no longer open any of the "Depth Chart & Game Plan" Windows. I also lose the ablility to sim games.

Is this just me or is anyone else getting this?

Daimyo 11-08-2003 10:25 PM

Fatigue... especially on the DL. In real life an example of a coach who uses far less than 9 would be Dungy.

RPI-Fan 11-08-2003 10:26 PM

Yep - I have it too.

cthomer5000 11-08-2003 10:29 PM

perhaps a suggestion for patch/future version:

splitting the talent variables up. Have 1 drop-down for current/future and one for the actual skills. would make it easier to switch back and forth, and would make the individual skills easier to find in the list.

cthomer5000 11-08-2003 10:33 PM

Was the ability to change the injury rate a listed feature? that should really shut up the whiners.

Coop 11-08-2003 10:40 PM

I don't like the idea of opening backfield then closing it to open offensive line,etc. It becomes tedious. I wish Jim would put in a previous and next button.

mckerney 11-08-2003 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Coop
I don't like the idea of opening backfield then closing it to open offensive line,etc. It becomes tedious. I wish Jim would put in a previous and next button.


It was made this way becasue there was a tabs system in TCY very similar to what you're describing that lead to many a crash.

Tasan 11-08-2003 10:57 PM

Did anyone else notice that when negotiating a contract, the player's minimum salary automaticly is the lowest non-zero numer it will set to? Kinda handy. This wasn't in FOF4 was it? I didn't spend much time in it, so maybe I just missed this.

RPI-Fan 11-08-2003 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tasan
Did anyone else notice that when negotiating a contract, the player's minimum salary automaticly is the lowest non-zero numer it will set to? Kinda handy. This wasn't in FOF4 was it? I didn't spend much time in it, so maybe I just missed this.


I don't quite understand what you're saying; could you explain a bit more?

RPI-Fan 11-08-2003 11:08 PM

Got it now - that is indeed a nice little feature.

Tasan 11-08-2003 11:15 PM

Yeah I'm REAL tired right now, so I couldn't really get out what I wanted to say. Maybe this:

We negotiating contracts, zero out a salary for a year. Then bump it up once. Usually, in old FOF, you'd get increments of 10,000 starting right off. Now, it automatically jumps to the minimum salary for the player first, then jumps by 10,000 every increment after that. No more having to guess what the minimum salaries are anymore!

sianews 11-08-2003 11:30 PM

Re: FOF2004 Demo: Thoughts
 
Quote:

Originally posted by RPI-Fan
-One "issue" with locking players is that I think it would be useful to be able to lock starters' playing time also.

Totally agree. If their playing time isn't locked as well then it defeats the purpose of locking a player in as starter.

For example, I locked by 3rd string RB is as starter, and my #1 guy in the 3rd slot. Scout finished out the depth chart giving my RB a "1" for playing time. Result: The player in the third slot gets 16 carries.

Maple Leafs 11-08-2003 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tasan
We negotiating contracts, zero out a salary for a year. Then bump it up once. Usually, in old FOF, you'd get increments of 10,000 starting right off. Now, it automatically jumps to the minimum salary for the player first, then jumps by 10,000 every increment after that. No more having to guess what the minimum salaries are anymore!
That will be a great addition.

The game locks for me on Extreme Passing too, by the way. Actually, if you look in the bottom corner you'll see that you're "retired".

Tasan 11-08-2003 11:44 PM

Yeah, its actually locking me on any one of those that I click on, then click okay to. A tweak or two here and there seems to be needed.

mckerney 11-08-2003 11:49 PM

Any idea what 'Cap Out Offer' does?

RPI-Fan 11-08-2003 11:55 PM

Makes your offer more cap-friendly for the curent year, or even following year also, but is severely backloaded, witht the player getting more money in th elong-run.

QuikSand 11-09-2003 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mckerney
Any idea what 'Cap Out Offer' does?


For a player who is already on a contract with more than one year remaining, it restructures his deal. It takes his current salary down to the minimum for his years of experience, and applies the amount of that reduction as a new signing bonus, which is then (of course) spread out among the remaining years for cap purposes. Future years' base salaries remain unchanged. This becomes much more cap-friendly for the current season, increases the guaranteed money to the player, and pushes the cap hit out into future years.

This type of simple restructuring is becoming pretty common in the NFL.

cthomer5000 11-09-2003 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by wbonnell
just pointing out oddities as I find them:

the sorting of the simulation window is non-deterministic. Every time I click on the email button, it (seems to) randomly sort:




This was the case in FOF4 too. As far as I can tell it really only happens until your teams have records, then it sorts by that. Still, I would say it should be considered a bug.

QuikSand 11-09-2003 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by cthomer5000
This was the case in FOF4 too. As far as I can tell it really only happens until your teams have records, then it sorts by that. Still, I would say it should be considered a bug.


A bug? So, it's a substantive "error" that the game doesn't sort by, say, alpha order when there's no basis for a sort?

Jon 11-09-2003 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Primal
Wierd little bug (maybe).

After I click on "Formation Use - Extreme Passing" then click ok. I can no longer open any of the "Depth Chart & Game Plan" Windows. I also lose the ablility to sim games.

Is this just me or is anyone else getting this?



The same thing just happend to me.

Adamski47 11-09-2003 08:32 AM

I just had a team get a holding call on the opening kickoff and I accepted the penalty. I was given the choice to decline, or place the ball at the 1 yard line.

The CPU returned the ball to the 20 yard line. Shouldn't this be the 10?

Bee 11-09-2003 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Adamski47
I just had a team get a holding call on the opening kickoff and I accepted the penalty. I was given the choice to decline, or place the ball at the 1 yard line.

The CPU returned the ball to the 20 yard line. Shouldn't this be the 10?



The penalty is from the point of the hold, not the point they returned it to.

Edit: I assume the hold happened at the 2 yard line for the spot to be at the 1 yard line (half the distance). That's a little suspect though for a hold to happen at that point unless the returner was bringing it out from deep in the endzone (or he might have muffed it).

wbonnell 11-09-2003 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by QuikSand
A bug? So, it's a substantive "error" that the game doesn't sort by, say, alpha order when there's no basis for a sort?


I wouldn't say it's a substantive defect, but it's still a defect. The sort order should always be determinisitic.

cthomer5000 11-09-2003 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by QuikSand
A bug? So, it's a substantive "error" that the game doesn't sort by, say, alpha order when there's no basis for a sort?


Then shouldn't it be a static list?

Adamski47 11-09-2003 09:15 AM

Yeah, a holding call around the 2 yard line is a bit odd. I know for a fact that the returner "returned the ball 23 yards to the 20" so he wasn't too deep. Perhaps we could have Jim add a line of code that says "Opps! He muffed it!..."

ThomasG 11-09-2003 09:28 AM

Just a quick question regarding players.

Will it be possible to start the game with completely fictional players?

If not, can we somehow get to play with real player names (other than typing in all names ourselves)?

Eaglesfan27 11-09-2003 09:33 AM

It is VERY likely that someone will release a roster file with real names around the time the game comes out.

cody8200 11-09-2003 09:43 AM

Eagles, how can I save player name changes? When I change them does it save them to a file ? Thanks.

Eaglesfan27 11-09-2003 09:58 AM

I'm not sure that you can save them with the demo as I haven't tried the demo yet. I'm hooked with my TCY career again (busy enjoying the game and creating draft files for FOF2004) and I know I will buy the full game when it comes out. However, I'm positive that someone will release a roster file which will have all of the real names very soon after the full game is out (likely the same day.)

3ric 11-09-2003 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThomasG
Just a quick question regarding players.

Will it be possible to start the game with completely fictional players?

If not, can we somehow get to play with real player names (other than typing in all names ourselves)?



A fictional universe will be created if you start a new game with an OPU "alternate player file", which can be created in Excel (or a text editor, if you know how to re-create the csv format).

TroyF 11-09-2003 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 3ric
A fictional universe will be created if you start a new game with an OPU "alternate player file", which can be created in Excel (or a text editor, if you know how to re-create the csv format).


You can also sim through 15 or 20 seasons, save the player file and start with that if memory serves.

TroyF

Noop 11-09-2003 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Coop
I don't like the idea of opening backfield then closing it to open offensive line,etc. It becomes tedious. I wish Jim would put in a previous and next button.


Welcome my brother. You are Coop and I am Noop we're family!!!


:)

noop

Primal 11-09-2003 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Noop
Welcome my brother. You are Coop and I am Noop we're family!!!


Can I be Poop?

mckerney 11-09-2003 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by wbonnell
I wouldn't say it's a substantive defect, but it's still a defect. The sort order should always be determinisitic.


Isn't this normal in FOF? The same thing was done in TCY.

Noop 11-09-2003 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Primal
Can I be Poop?


Sure!! maybe Proop sounds better...

:)

noop

Qwikshot 11-09-2003 01:51 PM

Posted this in the demo sticky, and I'll post here, cannot get the demo to download, was the bandwidth at the site affected?!?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.