What the fu... Was that Miss Jackson's..?
 

What was that set up tit shot of Janet Jackson? Anyone record that and see if it was really what it looked like? What a PR move. I used to like her (like 15 years ago)

I'll be checking the dvd after the game.

Pastie!

LOL:D

YES IT WAS HER NIPPLE....

Actually, her whole boob was showing

How do you know for sure? It looked like it, but do you have proof?

If so, please post it. ;)

Proof is out there. ..

Its clearer, but doesn't show as much as the one i posted.

Remember Skydog's warning about links and such.

True, if you want to see the video, go to fark.com and read the comments section on the Janet article. One of the first few posts lists some links.

True, I will delete my links then.

How in the HECK did you find that so fast? I'm equally impressed that someone has it online already, but I can't imagine that would show up in a search engine.

My friend and I sat there for a moment. Too bad my Tivo isn't hooked up due to new carpet arriving tomorrow. :(


Todd

I found it in four places. I guess when I need naked women fast I know where to look. Its a talent I have I guess. :D

My TiVo is working and my fiance and I are debating on whether that was staged or an accident. We Tivo'd at the end of halftime to see, but the results have been inconclusive.

We are all part of a nipple nation.


I got nothin'

hxxxxxxxp://www.teamrice.com/~d00/superbowl_janet.jpg

someone has a pic from HDTV up here. Best shot i have seen so far

There is an awesome close up shot. It looks like an aluminum paste.


Todd

I'm sure this will be all over the news by tomorrow morning, if not late night news tonight. Parents, Guardians, etc will be appauled that CBS even showed that. CBS more likely will be urged to come out with a statement either:

A) admitting that it was a planned thing, and to apologize
B) Say it was an accident, and apologize

Yeah, the close up looks like a silver star paste thing, but it sure doesn't cover EVERYTHING, just close

The Drudge Report has a pretty funny picture of Janet covering up and staring at Justin. Very high quality pic.

I can't believe CBS would even come close to approving a planned ending. I don't think they would have the 'nads especially after they were ripped for the Reagan movie

Okay, so as I understand it, what we have here is:

-a sizable group of men and boys...
-obsessing over a picture of a semi-exposed breast...
-which is incidentally covered by a pastie of some sort...
-on the fucking internet!

What am I missing here? If you want to see a breast, and you have internet access, I think you ought to be able to work it out. Good luck with that.

Looked staged to me. If it wasn't, what the hell was he doing ripping clothes off anyway?

When they announced a special "mystery guest" performing at halftime, I had no clue it would be a boobie.

We are FOFC?

So true.



Plus, I think its just the startle factor, seeing it on CBS and all.

It was staged, and supposedly approved by CBS, according to Drudge.

Yeah, I keep seeing these links to Drudge. Now I ask, who the hell is this Drudge character, and why is he credible?

Good thing it had some support beneath it, or that thing would have sagged all the way to her navel.

the whole halftime show was shameful. In fact, everything about the superbowl except the actual game was completely lame.

Yeah, but that's true every year!

Was anyone distrub by Kid Rock's American flag?

I was doing other things while the halftime was on - what was the deal? Was it supposed to be some sort of flashback, or something like that? First, I heard Oh Mickey defiled (and that's saying something) with references to P. Diddy, the self-proclaimed "black Sinatra," then I see Kid Rock doing his hit from like 7 years ago, then Janet Jackson doing something that looked like it might be Rhythm Nation (although I wouldn't know what that song sounds like, but I saw the Nation sign). I missed Aerosmith and have no clue who the "mystery guest" was. Then there was the whole tit thing.

Drudge report has a pic that very clearly shows it is indeed her boob. I thought at first it might have been covered, but all she had was some kind of metal-looking tassle-thingy covering her nipple. The linked story indicates that despite what they say, CBS execs knew it was coming. What a smutty show. MTV probably cost itself doing any other Super Bowl events in the next 10 years or so. Kind of reminds me of the staged thing where Mic Jagger ripped off Tina Turners skirt...that one was planned too and I think MTV was involved in that event too.

What was the deal with Kid Rock's cutting open an American flag and draping it over himself? That seemed to be pushing the boundaries of good taste and respect a bit.

No, usualy it's retarded, but this year they had Nelly talking about spilling his seed, girls wearing next to nothing and 90% of what was on them was stuffed up their asses and Janet Jackson taking out her tit on TV. I don't have kids but If I did It would be a fuckin shame if I had to turn them away from the damn SuperBowl halftime show cause I didn't want him seeing a naked chick or hearing Nelly talk about which girl he's gonna dump his junk in next.

For fuck's sake. It's a fucking tit. Over 50% of the population has two of them. I can't believe CBS was "bombarded" by calls because one of Janet Jackson's tits was flashed on screen for a second. I didn't even see it. I am sure children across the nation will be horribly scarred by this horrific event.

I ask again: Who is Drudge?

^^^ Obvious you don't have kids, hockey puck. How many girls do you know who would let you rip her clothes off to expose her booby in public, let alone the millions who watch the Super Bowl. What kind of message does that send?

Society would be much better if MTV would not produce anything more, anywhere, ever. Imo.

Have all the wives of the members of this board suddenly started posting? cause that's what a bunch of you sound like.

It's the super bowl... beer, women, usual crappy music, and a football game.

You just watch it an enjoy the game, not sit around to piss and moan about every little thing like you are the PTA.


Unless your kids are getting online to get the 'high definition blown up enlarged' pictures, I don't think you have to worry about them being bothered... not to mention it wasn't anything in the first place.

Matt Drudge, from www.drudgereport.com

Reports all kinds of news, and usually has things right. Mainly links to news stories, but also commentary and reports of his own.

It probably is, but I don't remember seeing so much in-your-face sexuality. It doesn't offend me personally, but there are a hell of a lot of kids watching the superbowl who don't need to see an "it's getting hot in here, so take off all your clothes" duet, Janet Jackson grinding her ass all over Justin Timberlake, about 250 half-naked people dancing around like cheap strippers, and a sagging old tit with the nipple painted silver. Sure, CBS and MTV want to be "shocking," but they ought to show a little judgment considering the audience.

Are we to expect a bunch of girls going around in public letting boys rip off their tops? If they weren't going to do it before this, they're certainly not any more likely to do so now.

My 12-year old daughter was watching the Super Bowl with me, and she was very embarrassed. She thought it was gross. My wife was in the room and was like, "omigod, did what I think just happened happen?"

Thanks. Shall we consider him a credible source?

Yes. He's right/accurate at least as much as most major news sources, if not moreso.

As a previous poster said, he's usually dead-on, not always, but a lot of the time...and he's usually the first one to break stories like this.