![]() |
Boston Marathon Changes, Biased?
|
effin elitists.
|
This got me thinking. How do they determine the elite women in this event? I can understand putting the elite men and women at the front of the race, but allowing them to start earlier, makes it unfair to all of the recreational runners that are women. Now, they have practically no chance at even coming close to the elite, where in years past they did have a slim chance.
|
There's two ways to qualifier for the marathon. One is a time trial of a few different runs throught the year. Another is to raise enough money more charity. I would think if you qualified in the time trial you'd qaulify as elite.
This does suck for the commone woman though who will now start about 40 minutes after the elite women |
So does that mean that the difference between an elite runner and a recreational one is only ten minutes? I would have thought it would be much more.... interesting.
|
Elite women are invited, professional runners. For this year's boston marathon, the common woman qualifying time was 3:40. Elite women should all run well under three hours. There may be some common women who can run with the elites for part of the time, but not many. Also, because of the Champion Chip technology, whoever has the fastest time will be declared the winner, not necessarily whoever finishes first (again this doesn't really happen, because of the difference in quality of the elites vs. the field, but it could).
Qualifying for Boston is an incredible achievement, but it is still on a different plane from being an invited, elite runner. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.