Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Nothing really, just think this is a cool shot (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=27427)

EagleFan 06-30-2004 10:41 PM

Nothing really, just think this is a cool shot
 
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA04361

KWhit 06-30-2004 11:09 PM

I can see my house from here.

Hurst2112 06-30-2004 11:11 PM

I agree...very cool. I downloaded the hi res pic. You can zoom in pretty good.

If I am reading this right, this is an actual picture (or set of photos) of what north america would look if there wasn't cloud cover?

Without me looking it up, what is that island in the atlantic....east of Georgia?

Suicane75 06-30-2004 11:16 PM

Has anyone ever seen that episode of the West Wing when the cartographers try and convince the white house to change the map so that it's more realistic?
Is that just "TV" or is that a real thing IE: the earth doesn't really appear as the standardly used maps show it to appear.

Hurst2112 06-30-2004 11:21 PM

I watched something about this. I think the take of this tv show was that maps (10 years ago, when it was on), particularly older maps always seemed to show things like alaska smaller than texas. It was explained that if you were looking at a globe at the equater, the image that was put in text books was usually still that perspective, (alaska would be further away cause it is on the upper edge of a sphere) even when it was in a book and not on a globe. Kinda hard to explain in writing, but I think it's close to what you are talking about.

Yossarian 07-01-2004 06:11 AM

standard maps shrink things vertically. for example africa is MUCH longer (up and downtheways) than it looks on 'standard' maps

3ric 07-01-2004 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yossarian
standard maps shrink things vertically. for example africa is MUCH longer (up and downtheways) than it looks on 'standard' maps


The "standard" map is usually the Mercator projection, which shows areas close to the poles as much bigger than they really are.


The "modern" way, a.k.a. the Peters projection:



http://geography.about.com/library/weekly/aa030201a.htm

RPI-Fan 07-01-2004 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hurst2112
Without me looking it up, what is that island in the atlantic....east of Georgia?


Bermuda?

Hurst2112 07-01-2004 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3ric
The "standard" map is usually the Mercator projection, which shows areas close to the poles as much bigger than they really are.


The "modern" way, a.k.a. the Peters projection:



http://geography.about.com/library/weekly/aa030201a.htm


That's what I was getting at. I had my info reversed. I knew there was 1 way, and another way. Thanks.

Bermuda...maybe. I am compelled to check now.

RPI-Fan 07-01-2004 09:11 AM

I don't know if there's a second island you're referring to - but the one about 1,000+ miles off the coast is Bermuda.

Hurst2112 07-01-2004 09:13 AM

that's it then. The 1 i was referring to was pretty obvious in the picture (initial post). I always thought Bermuda was futher south.

sterlingice 07-01-2004 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75
Has anyone ever seen that episode of the West Wing when the cartographers try and convince the white house to change the map so that it's more realistic?
Is that just "TV" or is that a real thing IE: the earth doesn't really appear as the standardly used maps show it to appear.


Not only that, but didn't they want to switch the Southern and Nothern Hemispheres because of geographical bias?

SI


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.