Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Come on, Skydog (Re: The "Come on, Guys.. Re: The "You Gotta Love Brazil" thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=29290)

SirFozzie 08-18-2004 04:29 PM

Come on, Skydog (Re: The "Come on, Guys.. Re: The "You Gotta Love Brazil" thread
 
We need more spankitude on this board. Not less.

After all, 95% of us are red blooded heterosexual males (and Shorty). We visit FOFC to relax. We watch pr0n to relax. Therefore, for ultimate relaxation, we must have pr0n on FOFC.

I'm sure you can understand this... :D

And now, to prove my point, I will post a site rip.. that's right, all the pictures from "ExtremelyNaughtyNaughtyWomenDoingNaughtyNaughtyThings.com"

You're welcome.

NoMyths 08-18-2004 04:40 PM

skydog ur a dictater sumtimes pix plz thnx

Franklinnoble 08-18-2004 05:27 PM

Bring back the Brazil thread.... and the QOTM while you're at it.

druez 08-18-2004 05:36 PM

Why is the brazil thread gone? I'm confused...

weren't these sports photo's?

Franklinnoble 08-18-2004 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by druez
Why is the brazil thread gone? I'm confused...

weren't these sports photo's?


Too much ass, I suppose.

SlapBone 08-18-2004 05:45 PM

We have a call for a Mr. Richard Tater...

druez 08-18-2004 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlapBone
We have a call for a Mr. Richard Tater...


only somtimes

samifan24 08-18-2004 05:48 PM

Hey I missed all the action. What happened?

Franklinnoble 08-18-2004 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlapBone
We have a call for a Mr. Richard Tater...



Franklinnoble 08-18-2004 05:56 PM

I notice he didn't whack the "what the hell do you look like thread" for this photo...



Cuckoo 08-18-2004 07:00 PM

I need to stop relying on thread titles to decide whether it's worth reading... because apparently I missed a good one.

Franklinnoble 08-18-2004 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cuckoo
I need to stop relying on thread titles to decide whether it's worth reading... because apparently I missed a good one.


If you have the means, I recommend checking out just about every thread for these little hidden gems.

robbgmaier 08-18-2004 07:05 PM

someone email me the site in question I will do some research [email protected]

thanks

Suicane75 08-19-2004 02:52 AM

Were there are pics of female softball catchers? Cause thats what makes me happy. Big boned young women squatting with face masks on, yes indeed.

cuervo72 08-19-2004 07:30 AM

boooooo

(not as if I can't google for beach volleyball pics though)

Draft Dodger 08-19-2004 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by druez
Why is the brazil thread gone? I'm confused...

weren't these sports photo's?


because some people work at places where they aren't supposed to view that stuff, so instead of, say, just suggesting they do work at work and surf at home, we all get to suffer.

GrantDawg 08-19-2004 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
because some people work at places where they aren't supposed to view that stuff, so instead of, say, just suggesting they do work at work and surf at home, we all get to suffer.


Yeah, because unless they are direct-linked on this board then those pictures can't be seen. :rolleyes:

JonInMiddleGA 08-19-2004 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Yeah, because unless they are direct-linked on this board then those pictures can't be seen. :rolleyes:


Thank goodness ... a light in the wilderness. At least I'm not the only person in the thread who kinda "gets it".

Draft Dodger 08-19-2004 08:14 AM

call me Grizzly Adams, I guess, 'cause I don't.

rkmsuf 08-19-2004 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Yeah, because unless they are direct-linked on this board then those pictures can't be seen. :rolleyes:


exactly

Suicane75 08-19-2004 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Yeah, because unless they are direct-linked on this board then those pictures can't be seen. :rolleyes:




They can't. If you arn't on this website while you're at work, which was the point.

GrantDawg 08-19-2004 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
call me Grizzly Adams, I guess, 'cause I don't.


Hello, Grizzly. You really should stop touching that bear that way.

GrantDawg 08-19-2004 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75
They can't. If you arn't on this website while you're at work, which was the point.


?

Bee 08-19-2004 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA
Thank goodness ... a light in the wilderness. At least I'm not the only person in the thread who kinda "gets it".


I agree with Jon again...I hope I don't get conservative cooties! :D

Draft Dodger 08-19-2004 08:30 AM

the point is this:

if someone is not supposed to see pictures that are on all the basic news sites, then they probably shouldn't be viewing this site at work anyway.

I certainly think it's reasonable not to have pornography or nudity linked directly on this board. I think trying to eliminate all the other stuff that "Esteemed Long-Time Poster" isn't allowed to see just for his benefit is silly. "Esteemed Long-Time Poster" needs to get over it.

Bee 08-19-2004 08:33 AM

My company doesn't mind if I surf while working (yes...I can multi-task..amazing for some I guess), but they don't like my surfing places that have questionable content. I'm sure my company isn't the only one like that.

Edit: I don't think I saw the pictures in question, so I have no idea of the details about this specific case but I would prefer to see SkyDog be over-aggressive in this area and as pointed out above... a link to it works just as well.

GrantDawg 08-19-2004 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
the point is this:

if someone is not supposed to see pictures that are on all the basic news sites, then they probably shouldn't be viewing this site at work anyway.

I certainly think it's reasonable not to have pornography or nudity linked directly on this board. I think trying to eliminate all the other stuff that "Esteemed Long-Time Poster" isn't allowed to see just for his benefit is silly. "Esteemed Long-Time Poster" needs to get over it.


And I have no idea why all pictures of a questionable nature couldn't be hxxp linked. I think the point was if someone open that thread at work (or at school, in the public library, etc) that it would look like he was cruising porn. If you don't direct link, then people can still see them, and it would cause no one else trouble.

Draft Dodger 08-19-2004 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
And I have no idea why all pictures of a questionable nature couldn't be hxxp linked. I think the point was if someone open that thread at work (or at school, in the public library, etc) that it would look like he was cruising porn. If you don't direct link, then people can still see them, and it would cause no one else trouble.


I would hope any IT person investigating bad surfing habits might be able to tell the difference between pictures of, say, a Brazilian wax job and a Brazilian Olympic Volleyball player.

GrantDawg 08-19-2004 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
I would hope any IT person investigating bad surfing habits might be able to tell the difference between pictures of, say, a Brazilian wax job and a Brazilian Olympic Volleyball player.


Your missing the point. It is not the IT person, but your boss looking in your office and seeing 50 pics of womens butts that would be the problem.

Bee 08-19-2004 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Your missing the point. It is not the IT person, but your boss looking in your office and seeing 50 pics of womens butts that would be the problem.


Or the secretary bringing you a letter to sign...err...not that I've had that happen.

Suicane75 08-19-2004 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
And I have no idea why all pictures of a questionable nature couldn't be hxxp linked. I think the point was if someone open that thread at work (or at school, in the public library, etc) that it would look like he was cruising porn. If you don't direct link, then people can still see them, and it would cause no one else trouble.



Because it completely ruins the point of the post to link it instead of show the picture, it wasn't porn or anything close to it.

Ben E Lou 08-19-2004 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
And I have no idea why all pictures of a questionable nature couldn't be hxxp linked. I think the point was if someone open that thread at work (or at school, in the public library, etc) that it would look like he was cruising porn. If you don't direct link, then people can still see them, and it would cause no one else trouble.

Bingo. If someone had been sitting at a cubicle and opened that thread (or even a news site with those pics), and someone had walked by, they would have been called into serious scrutiny/question. Whether anyone likes it or not, the fact remains is that the great majority of FOFC's traffic is during the American work-day. My guess is that some people are surfing with permission, and some aren't. Either way, it is my strong opinion that for the good of maintaining our base of those who post, this board need to remain "work-safe." If you want to view questionable pics during the workday, I'm quite sure you can easily find them elsewhere.

Draft Dodger 08-19-2004 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Your missing the point. It is not the IT person, but your boss looking in your office and seeing 50 pics of womens butts that would be the problem.


and, again, if that IS a problem, then you probably shouldn't be surfing this place at work anyway.

Ben E Lou 08-19-2004 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75
Because it completely ruins the point of the post to link it instead of show the picture

If it ruins it so much, then don't post it.

Bee 08-19-2004 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
and, again, if that IS a problem, then you probably shouldn't be surfing this place at work anyway.


I didn't know you were in charge of the site now...

GrantDawg 08-19-2004 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
and, again, if that IS a problem, then you probably shouldn't be surfing this place at work anyway.


And we would lose many, many regular contributers. (Of course, productivity would increase greatly...nah, they'd just waste their time somewhere else)

Draft Dodger 08-19-2004 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
I didn't know you were in charge of the site now...


right, because that's certainly what I was implying, douchebag.

Ben E Lou 08-19-2004 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
right, because that's certainly what I was implying, douchebag.

No need for name-calling, DD.

Bee 08-19-2004 08:59 AM

You've implied what you feel the standards of this site should be should control whether others come here or not. Those types of standards are generally set by the ones in control of the board.

Suicane75 08-19-2004 09:02 AM

I call a 5 minute recess to go and look at some Brazilian asses.

GrantDawg 08-19-2004 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75
I call a 5 minute recess to go and look at some Brazilian asses.


Feel free, but please zip your pants before you get back.

rkmsuf 08-19-2004 09:11 AM

someone's ass is getting ghosted

Draft Dodger 08-19-2004 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
You've implied what you feel the standards of this site should be should control whether others come here or not. Those types of standards are generally set by the ones in control of the board.


actually, I'm expressing the opposite. but no biggie - I've voiced my opinion. no need to continue.

Ben E Lou 08-19-2004 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
actually, I'm expressing the opposite. but no biggie - I've voiced my opinion. no need to continue.

"Your objection has been noted, and has been overruled."--Colonel Julius Alexander
;)

druez 08-19-2004 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
And I have no idea why all pictures of a questionable nature couldn't be hxxp linked. I think the point was if someone open that thread at work (or at school, in the public library, etc) that it would look like he was cruising porn. If you don't direct link, then people can still see them, and it would cause no one else trouble.



The pictures weren't questionable. I don't remember the news source, but those pics could of very easily been on ESPN, CBS Sportsline etc... They were sports photo's and this was a sports message board...

If its a picture on a Sports News site, we should be able to post it on a sports message board.

But, I don't really care about the pics, I just like to argue...

heybrad 08-19-2004 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
"Your objection has been noted, and has been overruled."--Colonel Julius Alexander
;)

But I strenuously object.

;)

GrantDawg 08-19-2004 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by druez

But, I don't really care about the pics, I just like to argue...


Good, then I don't have to respond. :)

Ben E Lou 08-19-2004 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heybrad
But I strenuously object.

;)

Oh, you strenuously object??? OK, then I guess I should reconsider!

SlapBone 08-19-2004 11:00 AM

Hey...I strenuously object also...what are we talking about again?

bbor 08-19-2004 11:56 AM

PEOPLE LOST POSTS!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.