Front Office Football Central
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Prom Princess or Porn Queen? (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=35148)

TLK 01-25-2005 02:07 PM
Prom Princess or Porn Queen?
 
hxxp://www.nypost.com/style/39213.htm

Quote:
WOULD YOU LET YOUR DAUGHTER WEAR THIS PROM DRESS?

January 24, 2005 -- PROM princess or porn queen?


This prom dress is so skimpy, even the designer's CEO wouldn't let his teenage daughter wear it. But the dangerously revealing gown, prominently advertised in Seventeen Prom, YM Prom and Teen Prom, and on sale in a Midtown shop, is a top seller for the company this season.

"I was shocked when I first saw it, but now it's one of our top 20 dresses nationwide," says Nick Yeh, the CEO of Xcite, the Stafford, Texas, company that designed the dress and some 200 other styles this season.

"I have a 15-year-old daughter and, no, I would not recommend she wear this dress.

"As a businessman," he adds, "I'm not judging what a teenager should wear or not wear. It's up to the parents to decide for their own children."

In fact, some shops in smaller cities require girls to bring in parental permission slips to buy the dress, Yeh told The Post.

At Elite Designs, a formal shop in Midtown that has the barely-there gown on a mannequin, owner Surinder Nagpal says, "We've gotten a few calls about that dress. Originally, I wasn't going to stock [it], but my sales associate told me that girls would want it, so we're stocking it in black and red."

So far, says Helen Rodriguez, Nagpal's sales associate, no one has bought the $495 gown - but it just arrived.

"Our biggest sellers are still the traditional princess ball gowns, but sometimes a parent will come in with their daughter and will buy her whichever dress she wants," Rodriguez said.

"If my daughter had the body to wear it, I'd let her!"

It's too early to tell how many girls in New York City will buy the dress, but those who do may have a hard time getting through the prom door.

While it's up to individual school administrators to rule on prom fashions, the Board of Education maintains a disciplinary dress code that prohibits "wearing clothing or other items that are unsafe or disruptive to the educational process."

Lisa Maffei-Fuentes, principal of Christopher Columbus High School in The Bronx, bans "anything that resembles the famous [green Versace] J.Lo dress."

"I personally have to check every dress," says Maffei-Fuentes. "Breasts must be entirely covered and there should not be any cutouts in the bodice.

"On the night of the prom, we have chaperones at the entry looking at every dress. We also provide needle, thread and pins to close up holes and fix dresses to the appropriate length," she says.

"This is for their own protection. We're there to help them experience the prom as a wonderful, dignified evening."

Parents who saw pictures of the dress were shocked.

"It's absolutely too much," said Tal Mandler of Woodmere, Long Island, whose daughter, Dana, is 13. "It is very provocative and does not suit the occasion or the age."

"What happened to the rest of it?" wondered Hilda Salazar, whose 17-year-old daughter is a high school senior in Brooklyn.

Asked whether she'd allow her daughter to wear the dress to prom - or if she'd allow her 19-year-old son to date a girl who did - Salazar answered with a resounding no.

Students at Stuyvesant High School were just as appalled.

"Our school doesn't have a dress code, but I don't think any girls would wear that to prom," said senior Mary Zhang.

"How would you wear it, anyway? Double-sided tape doesn't last all night."

Senior Daniel Belu and junior Katie Hammond laughed out loud at the sight of it.

"I wouldn't want my girlfriend to wear this - at least not in public," Belu said.

"I don't think any girl would wear this to a prom. She'd step on her dress on the dance floor and everything would just fall out!"

Most of the students we spoke to were primarily concerned with practicalities. "You couldn't dance in that dress - actually, you couldn't do anything at all," says junior Vivian Healey.

"If you wore that to prom, you'd be falling out of it all night," says senior Angela Cho. "There's also hardly any material. I can't believe it costs $400. You could make it yourself if you really wanted to."

Other students expressed aesthetic concerns. "I don't think anyone would wear this to the prom. The dress looks kind of whore-ish," says junior Emma Herr.

"This dress would look great at a prom if the model in the picture wore it," says senior Vlaz Ermant, "but we don't have any girls like that at our school."

It is now, almost seven years later, that I regret not going to my prom. Having said that, why would anyone wear this?... and why would any parent in their right mind, allow their daughter to wear this?

TLK 01-25-2005 02:08 PM
dola...

there is a pic of the dress at the link....

rkmsuf 01-25-2005 02:08 PM
ohh, I'd hit that, prom style.

Pyser 01-25-2005 02:09 PM
edit. click for prom boobiess.

Ksyrup 01-25-2005 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLionKing
dola...

there is a pic of the dress at the link....

Good, because I was beginning to think this was the "Segway Prom Dress" if there was no pic to go along with the story.

Ksyrup 01-25-2005 02:10 PM
Geez, that's barely appropriate for an awards show.

rkmsuf 01-25-2005 02:11 PM
That picture is making me horny.

Wolfpack 01-25-2005 02:12 PM
Are you (expletive) serious?? There better be a wad of tape under those straps. No, my daughter isn't gonna wear that. Of course, it helps that she's 14 months old rather than 17years old, so it's a nonissue. I shudder to think what creative minds will produce when she IS 17. I think she's not going at this rate. :)

JeeberD 01-25-2005 02:14 PM
No way in hell I would let a daughter of mine wear that thing. Now if I were back in highschool and my girl wanted to wear it...that would be a different story. :D

Ksyrup 01-25-2005 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfpack
Are you (expletive) serious?? There better be a wad of tape under those straps. No, my daughter isn't gonna wear that. Of course, it helps that she's 14 months old rather than 17years old, so it's a nonissue. I shudder to think what creative minds will produce when she IS 17. I think she's not going at this rate. :)

I'm in the same boat, with 5 year old and 8 month old daughters. The downside is that they'll look like tramps. The upside is that by the time they go to their proms, the dresses will likely only consist of duck tape over the nipples and will not cost 1/100th of what my prom date's dress cost.

miked 01-25-2005 02:14 PM
If I were her date, or bigger than her date, it would just take a creative little "bump" to finish the job.

Blackadar 01-25-2005 02:14 PM
Uh...no.

Coffee Warlord 01-25-2005 02:17 PM
To my non-existant daughter, should she dare want that: "That better be just a large bra." Followed shortly by. "You out of your fucking mind?"

sachmo71 01-25-2005 02:18 PM
Her boobs are weird looking.

bbor 01-25-2005 02:19 PM
2 sided tape does wonders....but i'm sure it's a killer on the nipples...i mean,who likes glue in their mouths:)

sovereignstar 01-25-2005 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyser


for the lazy. cant be bad to link to the ny post, can it? if it is, ill take it down.

Thank you. Maybe we should start hxxp'ing links to other threads featured on this board.
:rolleyes:

cuervo72 01-25-2005 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sachmo71
Her boobs are weird looking.

Yeah, they have some sort of cloth over them.

Ksyrup 01-25-2005 02:21 PM
Maybe she's got it on backwards. Those look like the back straps.

bbor 01-25-2005 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuervo72
Yeah, they have some sort of cloth over them.


:D

Suicane75 01-25-2005 02:23 PM
Maybe it's cause shes.......12?

Coffee Warlord 01-25-2005 02:23 PM
Great quote from a friend of mine I showed this to.

"Anyone who wears that, in two hours, will be wearing nothing but the remains of a 40oz and dried sperm."

rkmsuf 01-25-2005 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicane75
Maybe it's cause shes.......12?


Don't ruin this for me. She's at least 17.

TLK 01-25-2005 02:24 PM
I e-mailed the article to my sister, who is 16. I told her to print out the picture, and go tell my mom that she found her prom dress. Good times... :)

rkmsuf 01-25-2005 02:27 PM
Quote:
for the lazy. cant be bad to link to the ny post, can it? if it is, ill take it down

Yo gee
Come and get your New York Post
New York Post right here
Come on y'all
Get the bost stubost stubost
Coasta coasta New York Post
Yo New York Post don't brag or boast
Dissin' flavor when he's butter that you put on your toast
Put my address in the paper cause I smacked that girl
She's the mother of my kid's that I took around the world
Disagreements having scuffles when you share upon
You shouldn't try to drain subjects in a duck pond
If you're gonna tell a story about people's worries
Watch what you tell 'em cause they don't bring you glory
It only brings agony, ask James Cagney
He beat up on a guy when he found he was a fagney
Cagney is a favorite he is my boy
He don't jive around he's a real McCoy
Chuck D yeah, you tellin' Flav we got to let 'em know
Here's a letter to the New York Post
The worst piece of paper on the east coast
Matter of fact the whole state's forty cents
in New York City fifty cents elsewhere
It makes no goddamn sense at all
America's oldest continuously published daily piece of bullshit
Flavor Flav is the one that makes The Post money
Writers making violence in headlines funny
Tryin' to undress my past until it's naked
Post got Flavor from sellin' no records
Europe Asia to the street of New York
Flavor Flav known for his finesse talk
Do it to ya for The Post to employ me
New York Post can't destroy me

chinaski 01-25-2005 02:29 PM
hopefully someday the powers that be will realize any company that gives you shit for 'questionable material' isnt going to allow any non work related web surfing period on company time, making the whole hxxp thing unnecessary.

JeeberD 01-25-2005 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sovereignstar
Thank you. Maybe we should start hxxp'ing links to other threads featured on this board.
:rolleyes:

SD has said before that if it's a racy picture the source doesn't matter. He doesn't want folks at work to get in trouble if their boss comes by and sees a half naked teenager on their computer, even if it's from The Times.

Of course, maybe they should just be working instead...

Suicane75 01-25-2005 02:34 PM
Stop making excellent points.

Klinglerware 01-25-2005 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyser


for the lazy. cant be bad to link to the ny post, can it? if it is, ill take it down.

NY Post = Tabloid

JeeberD 01-25-2005 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicane75
Stop making excellent points.


Sorry...there's a first time for everything.

Pyser 01-25-2005 02:37 PM
ok, i edited it.

my life would cease to exist if i couldnt post here for 72 whole hours.

rkmsuf 01-25-2005 02:38 PM
Sov, you are on the clock.

JeeberD 01-25-2005 02:42 PM
Is sov gonna test The Man?!?!?! :eek:

Chubby 01-25-2005 02:48 PM
LEAVE IT! LEAVE IT!

Suicane75 01-25-2005 02:49 PM
I could make that dress stick to her nipples without any tape.

gottimd 01-25-2005 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicane75
I could make that dress stick to her nipples without any tape.

Gentlemens Glue?

Suicane75 01-25-2005 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gottimd
Gentlemens Glue?

Teeth Whitener.

rkmsuf 01-25-2005 02:53 PM
Very good for the skin.

SunDancer 01-25-2005 02:54 PM
[quote=TheLionKing]Lisa Maffei-Fuentes, principal of Christopher Columbus High School in The Bronx, bans "anything that resembles the famous [green Versace] J.Lo dress."

"I personally have to check every dress," says Maffei-Fuentes. "Breasts must be entirely covered and there should not be any cutouts in the bodice.

"On the night of the prom, we have chaperones at the entry looking at every dress. We also provide needle, thread and pins to close up holes and fix dresses to the appropriate length," she says. [quote]

Too bad its a female principal, a male principal would have a fun job with that.

Loren 01-25-2005 03:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmsuf
Very good for the skin.

but ohh SOOO bad for the hair :(

as far as the dress, $495 wtf..by a set of diamond earrings for 200 bucks pin em on your nipples and drape a curtain as a skirt, just as much coverage and cheaper :rolleyes: and noo, would never in a million years let my kid wear anything that resembled that

gottimd 01-25-2005 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren
but ohh SOOO bad for the hair :(

as far as the dress, $495 wtf..by a set of diamond earrings for 200 bucks pin em on your nipples and drape a curtain as a skirt, just as much coverage and cheaper

Pix pls.....of both.

Klinglerware 01-25-2005 03:19 PM
hxxp://wizbangblog.com/archives/004895.php

Update: It appears that it is possible that the NY Post photographers may have made the model put on the dress backwards on purpose just to generate a story. Not completely conclusive evidence here, but I wouldn't put it past the scumbag Post to pull a stunt like that...

Loren 01-25-2005 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klinglerware
hxxp://wizbangblog.com/archives/004895.php

Update: It appears that it is possible that the NY Post photographers may have made the model put on the dress backwards on purpose just to generate a story. Not completely conclusive evidence here, but I wouldn't put it past the scumbag Post to pull a stunt like that...

k, there's no real difference in the back or front view to me so IF she had it on backwards(which i dont think she did, if anything it looks like maybe the posts model had a size too big on so it didnt hug her in enough) it's null...

scooper 01-25-2005 03:26 PM
As a parent I want to state that in no way whatsoever would I mind my son dating that girl.:D

Ksyrup 01-25-2005 03:27 PM
That's funny. I guessed up above that she might have been wearing it backwards. It certainly looks that way.

Klinglerware 01-25-2005 03:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren
k, there's no real difference in the back or front view to me so IF she had it on backwards(which i dont think she did, if anything it looks like maybe the posts model had a size too big on so it didnt hug her in enough) it's null...

You could be right about the dress not being on backwards. But if you compare the NY Post model (red dress) and the other model (black dress), it still looks like the Post either selected a model and/or altered the dress in such a way that would make the dress look as scandalous as possible.

Yeah, the dress is pretty racy and probably wouldn't pass muster at most proms in either case. But when you see the dress worn correctly, it doesn't seem to be as menacing to society as the Post would have you believe...

JeeberD 01-25-2005 03:42 PM
I think this person had it right (comment from the blog):

Quote:
Actually, if you look at both pictures, it is worn correctly. The Post picture is a little misleading in two ways.

1. Since the picture is taken from straight on, it hides the fact that the dress curves under the girl's arms.

2. The girl in the Post picture has adjusted her dress to show more cleavage. There is another picture on the vendor's website (the small picture with the two girls) that seems to show more cleavage as well. It is shot from the side, so the dress side is more apparent.

Posted by: Steve L. at January 25, 2005 10:45 AM

Bad-example 01-25-2005 03:50 PM
That dress looks like something straight out of the original Star Trek.

JeeberD 01-25-2005 03:51 PM
I like sov's adjustment of the original pic... :D

sterlingice 01-25-2005 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren
but ohh SOOO bad for the hair :(

as far as the dress, $495 wtf..by a set of diamond earrings for 200 bucks pin em on your nipples and drape a curtain as a skirt, just as much coverage and cheaper :rolleyes: and noo, would never in a million years let my kid wear anything that resembled that

Call me crazy, but that's what I noticed: $500 for half a piece of cloth?

SI

CamEdwards 01-25-2005 08:44 PM
yeah, this is freaking unbelievable. Who the hell would buy that for their daughter?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.