Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Best Gameplanner (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=41444)

jshipman2 08-07-2005 06:13 AM

Best Gameplanner
 
Who in your opinions is the best gameplanner in FOF Multiplayer?

Joe 08-08-2005 05:42 PM

how would you quantify this? I can think of several people who may fit, but some are successful because they are good GMs at collecting talent. So are you talking about people who gameplan well and win despite not having much talent, or what?

Kodos 08-08-2005 06:00 PM

Kodos. Hands down.

QuikSand 08-08-2005 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos
Kodos. Hands down.


You know, I had heard that... glad to see it repeated here from an unbiased source.

Kodos 08-08-2005 06:34 PM

Oh sure, people might look at my lack of championships and my pedestrian win percentage and assume that I am not the greatest gameplanner after all, but I have a message for those folks:

Drop dead.

Warhammer 08-08-2005 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George W Bush
how would you quantify this? I can think of several people who may fit, but some are successful because they are good GMs at collecting talent. So are you talking about people who gameplan well and win despite not having much talent, or what?


I think a good gameplanner just gets the most out of the talent available. So if someone has the worst roster, but still wins 8 games, chances are they would fit the bill.

Cringer 08-08-2005 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhammer
I think a good gameplanner just gets the most out of the talent available. So if someone has the worst roster, but still wins 8 games, chances are they would fit the bill.


This comes from a pretty good gameplanner himself.

Many guys would suck with your teams over the last three seasons in the Imperial League.

jbmagic 08-08-2005 07:20 PM

it will be disturbing if you have the worst roster and gameplanning is so powerful that it can get you 12 wins or more still.

i hope talent means more than gameplanning. i hope its like 70 % talent and 30% gameplanning

Vince 08-08-2005 07:26 PM

I think 70/30 might be too great a discrepancy -- maybe 60/40? I mean, even the right people if implemented incorrectly aren't going to be worth crap. Look at the SLO Burn in the first year :)

We had I think the 4th highest Power Rating in our conference before we ever played one game, and then proceeded to lose our first 12 in a row. Yikes.

Cringer 08-08-2005 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbmagic
it will be disturbing if you have the worst roster and gameplanning is so powerful that it can get you 12 wins or more still.

i hope talent means more than gameplanning. i hope its like 70 % talent and 30% gameplanning


Gameplanning definetly does not overcome that much lack of talent over the course of a season. But it can help enough to raise a team up some I think.

The Imperial League's Hartford team, owned by Warhammer, is a good example though. He has a pretty good roster in my book, but nothing spectacular. His big weakness is at QB. He had a rookie QB rated in the 20's (current) last year and was able to take them to the AC Championship game. That QB got injured this year, and in steps another rookie QB. He has bounced back from a bad start and is competetive now. I think some guys would not have been able to do as much with this team as he has.

cthomer5000 08-08-2005 07:29 PM

I would go all-in on albionmoonlight here.

Tigercat 08-08-2005 07:37 PM

I'm the Sid Finch of FOF multiplayer.

Vince 08-08-2005 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cthomer5000
I would go all-in on albionmoonlight here.


Seconded.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.