![]() |
Maurice Clarett arrested again
http://www.ksat.com/sports/9651698/detail.html
Quote:
Geez... |
Twice in one night? Wow.
|
dumb ass
|
The Bengals should sign him.
|
he is well on his way to getting a degree in thuganomics
|
Sounds like a hell of a chase. I wonder if there is any video?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He's too slow. |
He's just misunderstood.
|
What was he planning on doing with a bullet proof vest and all that firepower?
|
Maurice Clarett >> Marcus Vick
|
|
poor guy
|
What the hell, he was wearing a bullet proof vest. Weird..
|
Video on CNN. He looks pretty out of it.
|
What a fucking idjit...
|
What a sad, sad story.
|
BALLERZ ALWAYS WEAR A BULLETPROOF VEST, YO!
|
Quick, someone give him a microphone so VH1 can turn his story into a Behind the Music episode.
|
Quote:
Two things... How the hell does he not get charged with resisting arrest? And two, what exactly kind of indication do you need that a guy is intoxicated when he has a small arsenal of weapons, a bullet proof vest and isn't responding to police. |
Can't they just shoot this fucker in the head and remove this problem child before he kills somebody?
|
Quote:
they probably aren't supposed to do that |
Quote:
The lawsuit would get messy too. What a colossal waste of a person. |
Quote:
He just hasn't found his niche yet. Just because he has little aptitude for football or crime doesn't mean he can't find his special talents within. Maybe he could try skateboarding or competitive eating. |
Quote:
I think he's already well on the way to making crazy his new career. |
Quote:
I'm not sure I understand what having weapons and a bullet-proof vest have to do with being drunk. I would guess that most crimes involving weapons and b-p vests are committed by people who are sober. And depending on what kind of demeanor he had in "not responding" to police, you could make a judgment that it had nothing to do with being drunk. He could have just been ignoring them. |
The open bottle of vodka, perhaps, is an indication that he may have been intoxicated?
|
Quote:
First, that wasn't what was being cited to as evidence of his intoxication in the post I responded to. Second, an open bottle of vodka likely means he is guilty of violating the open container law, but without more, doesn't necessarily warrant a DUI charge. Apparently he was driving pretty well. And I've got to think that the cops would be more than happy to throw the book at him if they could. Obviously, they had insufficient evidence that he was drun, aside from the bottle. |
Quote:
Well, I know I can get pulled over, just look at the officer wrong and get asked if I have been drinking... To me, if his behavior is so radical that I am not able to give him a breathalyzer test because he's kicking the shit out of the paddywagon several officers just put him in - and he has a half bottle of vodka, I'm atleast a little curious if he's intoxicated. |
Quote:
I figured highlighting that part of the article was enough to show that I was using it as part of my post, but maybe not.. And if they wanted to throw the book at him, they could have got him for resisting arrest and the open container law. |
Quote:
Yes, I understand that. Quote:
I wasn't suggesting it warranted a DUI charge. But it should absolutely warrant making him take a breathilizer test to see if he was drunk or not! |
Well, he previously robbed someone using a firearm and is awaiting trial. Plus he had priors before that. Why is he even out and about? Now he is travelling in public with a bullet proof vest and loaded rifle and three loaded hand guns. What more do you need to hold him until his several trials are resolved? Does he actually have to kill someone before anything is done? I don't think he was method acting for the Hit Men indoor football team or trying out for The Longest Yard reality show.
Regarding the blood alcohol test, erratic driving (pulling the U turn and refusing to pull over) along with the beligerant behavior toward officers and the bottle of vodka is more than enough probable cause to require a blood alcohol test. Pure speculation but, I'd bet dollars to donuts this nut case was on his way to rob a bank or kill his girlfriend, take your pick. |
Quote:
I don't think there is anything wrong with having that many weapons in a vehicle though. The problem is when only ONE person has trhat kind of firepower because we all are not alowed to have it. If everybody on the highway had at least three uzi's, a flamethrower and an anti-aircraft shoulder missle the roads would be a safe place. :D |
shouldnt we just make a sticky "Maurice Clarett arrested again"?
|
You guys keep referring to an "open container." Nowhere in that article does it say there was an open container found. They only found a half-full bottle of vodka. Just because you are transporting a bottle of alcohol that isn't full doesn't mean you are drinking it while driving.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It doesn't matter. Any alcoholic beverage that is currently open, or had been previously opened, that is located in the passenger cabin is considered an "open container" by the law. An empty beer bottle on the floorboard is still considered an "open container". So a half-full vodka bottle definitely counts. Drinking while driving is a whole seperate deal. You can be cited for an open container even if you blow a 0.00 on the breathalyzer. |
Quote:
Just looked up it. You're half right, I was all wrong. In order for it to be an "open container" violation there must still be alcohol left in the container. So, empty beer cans would not count as open containers. We both stand corrected it seems. |
Quote:
Sorry, I was reading the posted article. |
Maybe the half-full vodka was left over from the last time he lifted weights.
|
Then I assume it was well-aged.
|
I heard this take on ESPN Radio today, and I agree that Maurice is lucky he was arrested. If he wasn't, I think this story would have been much more tragic.
|
Quote:
If a cop turns over an "empty" container and one drop of alcohol comes out, they'll cite you for open container. |
Man, and I was all about going to see him play in some semi-pro league in Youngstown soon. Fucker.
Which former banned troll is nottadrop? |
ESPN has a pretty interesting piece on the Clarett situation, the article was written by a reporter who spoke with Clarett 2 hours before his arrest (supposedly while he was all vested up and driving) - it brings up some interesting and valid points... which make the story even more sad. If it turns out to be the case, as some of it's speculation, I can feel for the guy a little bit.
It's huge so I won't post it here. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?id=2545078 |
Yeah, after reading Tom Friend's piece, its even sadder. Hope that he can get his life straight rather than taking a sad road and being other people like Doc Gooden or Darryl Strawberry that keep coming in and out of jail because of substance abuse and other issues.
Too hard to watch, really. |
sad. but...*cough* shoulda stayed in school
edit: i mean this in the sense of "if he had stayed in school maybe he could have escaped the situation he found himself in by never being in it in the first place" although it seems like a large part of it is that that was just his nature |
Interesting read that ESPN article. Whenever I'd read anything related to his troubles previously I'd always just shrugged it off and considered him a fool, but I think he summed up his own situation nicely -in his own words - in this article. Makes you really feel for the guy.
|
That ESPN article sounded like a lot of bullshit excuse-making to me. The tone presents Clarett as someone who had 4 loaded weapons (one an assault rifle), a bulletproof vest, and a hatchet because he needed protection.
The article states that "someone was coming after his baby girl. And if someone was coming after his baby girl, he was going to do anything he could to stop it." Bullshit. The writer is trying to pull at our heart strings and make us feel for a bad, bad guy. I'm not buying it. |
Quote:
I interpreted it as the author explaining Clerett's state of mind, not the reality of the situation. Clerett is seriously depressed, and probably very scared. He seems to think he's in some sort of danger, and conveyed that to the author. I felt the author was making the point that Clerett was a timebomb waiting to go off, and in jail, he might be able to avert that. For a while, anyway. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.