![]() |
Russ Grimm looking good in prehire.
Quote:
Absolutely horrible decision, and i think the FO will regret this move. What the team needs is not more of the same, but rather a new outlook. Not another coach who was content with watching the team turn into a bunch of spoiled punks last year. Grimm's line got blown the fuck up all season long, and now he's the head coach. I'm pretty pissed, and I hope this is just a bad bad rumor. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: |
Quote:
I do somewhat agree, however, what other options were truly out there that were somewhat enticing? |
Growing up as kid watching the Redskins in the mid-late 80's it's cool to see the first player that I watched getting this far in coaching.
That being said - it does seem to maybe be a bit early for Grimm to be a HC. |
I think it is a very good move and I am pleased with it.
Rivera won't be available for awhile and Tomlin, while promising, needs a little more experience, in my opinion. |
I suppose it could be worse. Supposedly some in the organization were watching to see if MartyBall was going to become available.
|
Quote:
Ridiculous. Who on earth would want MartyBall when you could have ... the ChanPlan. |
I would be pretty happy with that if it were true. I am not sold on how the NFC plays as a whole. They are a lot softer than AFC teams tend to be and I would hate to see that mentality, as well as the Cover 2 defense (that Rivera and Tomlin use), come to Pittsburgh.
|
Russ Grimm was considered a candidate during the Lions' head coaching search last year. If I recall many pundits poo-pooed the idea, saying Grimm wasn't ready.
|
I'm shocked the Steelers aren't making a bigger play for James Lofton.
|
Quote:
Huh? To me the NFC is much more hard-nosed. Maybe because I watch the NFC East and it is the exception? But I associate the AFC much more with the passing game and such. (Although I suppose the West Cost Offense and the Greatest Show on Turf both originated in the NFC) ..Cue me getting ripped for posting a non-informed NFL opinion on a football board. :) |
Quote:
Let's see - AFC West has LT AND Larry Johnson all setting various records this past year. Denver's a pretty tough team too. AFC North has classic pound the ball offenses in Pittsburgh, Cleveland when it has an offense, and Baltimore. AFC South has tough pound the ball offenses in Jacksonville, Tennessee and now Houston. AFC East has Miami, Jets, Patriots all as tough hard-nosed teams. Now, there are patises in the AFC. Indy. Buffalo. Oakland. Cincinnati has turned into one recently. They may be good, but they aren't true hard nosed teams. I'll also veto Cleveland because they want to be tough but haven't reached it yet (Houston has based on this year) Now, NFC? NFC East has Giants and Cowboys as tough teams, with a Redskins team that keeps wanting to change their mind as to their offensive identity and a Phily team that was hard nosed this year for the first time in a while after McNabb went down. NFC North has Chicago and Detroit. The Vikings have historically been a very weak team in terms of their physical nature over the past few years, and Green Bay is a new West Coast offense, although during the Dorsey Levins years they were hard nosed. NFC West? Laughing. Seattle is tougher than most and looks tough by comaparison, but has difficulty standing with a truly tough team. Still, I'll count them. NFC South - Tough division, the only true hard nose, AFC style devision in the NFC. Panthers are great at the tough game, Saints may be doing well this year, Bucs, despite their west coast Gruden ways still have their occasionally tough quality, and the Falcons are a hard nosed team. So, in the NFC I'd veto more teams as not being tough than the AFC by far. The AFC doesn't have one laughable division, the NFC does. |
They'll just let Grimm run the team into the ground then bring in Nick Saban in 2 years to turn them back into an 8-8 club.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Looks like the top 10 RB's are 50/50 between AFC and NFC (with one coming from one of your "patsy" AFC teams)... I'd have to look at % of total yardage, but I think this begins to disprove some of your statements as two of these come from the "laughable" NFC West. |
Quote:
Hard nosed is more than just who runs and what yards they get. It's about establishing a personality and dominance on the field, often through hard running. LT and the Chargers are hard nosed, despite the claim they left Marty ball behind. Even a finesse team can have a hard nosed day, like the Colts had last week when they just took over the game and ground it out - it was very un-Colts like and really, really good. Thats how they'll win the Super Bowl. Its more than mere stats. Is attitude on the field. |
Quote:
I agree. And I think you are mischaracterizing several teams based on what people used to think about them - like the Niners and the Rams. |
I think you're wrong about the offense of Cincy. 1309 yards with a long of 22 for Rudi means a hell of a lot of pounding. The pass gets the headlines, but when they're winning it's because Rudi goes over 20 carries and/or 100 yards.
On defense I won't argue, but they were middle of the league in rush d(Ahead of some of your hard-nosed teams). It was pass d that killed them. |
Quote:
And the Dolphins and Jets. Hard-nosed? I also think (with major bias) that the Redskins are still a hard-nosed team.. they just went through a phase or two. :) and, what I think is a better stat than what Wade used: Attempts per game by Team (Indicative of establishing a style of play) 6 NFC, 4 AFC in the top 10 Yards per game by Team 6 NFC, 4 AFC Average Yards per carry by Team 6 NFC, 4 AFC |
wtf is "hardnosed"?
makes no effing sense to try and categorize a conference |
Playoffs?!?!
|
Tomlin went to the Pens game with Colbert last night. I don't think Clayton's got an inside track on this one. His relationship with the Rooney family isn't all that great and Art II (from everything I've read) likes to play it close to the vest. I think we'll find out what he's thinking when he's ready to announce it. Don't forget that, as of last week, most of the media had pronounced Whis as the new head coach.
If it does turn out to be Grimm, though, I won't mind so much. It's pretty well known that he and Cowher didn't really get along all that well, so I would question his autonomy as the OL coach. I don't think that absolves him of all the line's issues, but I think it would be a mistake to assume that promoting Grimm means that they're essentially extending Cowher. I think he'll want to bring in his own people...although I hope he keeps LeBeau. Well, I hope that whomever is hired keeps LeBeau around in some capacity. |
Quote:
It is a non-scientific anecdotal way of trying to make your team sound cooler than someone else's team. In other words, it's horseshit. |
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07018/754788-66.stm
Quote:
|
yay, it worked!@!#!@!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.