![]() |
Dregs of the Draft
I have completed three drafts now and it seems that at the end the top players left on the board are all Quarterbacks and Running Backs. The best QBs and RBs get taken very early, but once it gets to round 2 and 3, other positions are being picked with much more vigor, leaving the best QBs and RBs remaining to linger around forever. In the later rounds, there seems to be much better value at these position than any other. COnversely, you might have to scroll down 4-5 pages to find the best CB or G available.
Is this just a coincidence or is it something that everybody has noticed? |
My back up running back who is a good looking 47/47 was a 7th round pick and my 65/65 starting QB was undrafted (although he had only 42 potential after his first training camp).
|
Bear in mind what you're sorting by - if it's "adjusted" value, then QBs and RBs get (I think) the highest adjustments, so they'll always be near the top.
|
Quote:
I just use the default view. Is that adjusted value? |
Quote:
The default view is all players, sorted by adjusted value (i.e. guys with highest adjusted value at the top). You can use the menu at the top to look at guys at a particular position only, or click on one of the column headers to get a list sorted by that stat (e.g. 40 time, strength reps, agility drill), which can be handy to find guys who have a particular really good score/rating. Martin |
Cheers.
Is there any way to sort by value not adjusted for position? |
Quote:
There are two columns right next next to each other - for quarterbacks, they'll look something like: 6.2 4.5 6.1 4.4 For kickers, more like 5.1 7.7 5.0 7.6 Click on the header of the other rating to sort. |
Excellent, thanks for your help
|
Quote:
Id like to see this players card if you can post it. Thanks |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.