(POL) Swift Boat author now says US planning merger with Canada/Mexico..
 

http://www.amazon.com/Late-Great-U-S...4600266&sr=8-1

Um... yeah. Somehow I find it scary that this was #1 in nonfiction on Amazon a bit ago.. and still is top 100.

That would make the Gold Cup even more boring.

ping: Bubba Wheels

It seems like we've got a bit of an economic union going on with the free trade, but I have a hard time seeing a political union ever happening. No way the US ever weakens it current power position...at least intentionally.

I found it interesting that of people who viewed the book and then bought something had this book #1 and the new Harry Potter book #2 (even though it was only 2%). Is there any demographic Harry doesn't appeal to?

+1

This is the first step in the planned global domination of...the NFL!

One thing missing from the book however is that thing called "credibility".

Nicely played, sir.

Aw. I loved your previous sig.

Can we leave Canada out just to be funny?

Wait a second...when did Canada gain it's independence from us?

:D

Its called the 'North American Union" and its in full swing. Trans-corridor highway, illegal immigration, etc., Democrats new push towards socialism, its all coming together as we speak.

Those pushing this are very smart, knowing once its done its over and too late to reverse. It will happen because it makes perfect economic sense to those at the very top who will control it all. Like George (anti-christ) Soros.

We absorb British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and the Maritime Provinces first...

Sweet, the NHL will be back on ESPN in no time.

So the Republicans and Democrats are both pushing this, huh? Thank you Bubba, for showing us the reaction to this from one of his followers.

Bubba: Thanks.

Well, I could give you a list of suggested reading from Pat Buchanan and some other C-Span types who have been talking about this for years. But since you know I'm nuts anyways, just jump ahead to the really good stuff and google Alex Jones.

Jones may not be right, but its alot of fun to look at. http://www.infowars.com

Yes, many Republican 'new world order' types are behind this also, but since the Democrats have apparently gone ahead and made this a plank in their official 'platform' (John Edwards, anyways) I singled them out. ;)

OK, so Who is this Corsi fellow and why haven't I ever heard of him?

The trans-corridor highway is a stepping stone to combining the north american continent into one country? So in about 50 years they should be able to move onto phase two. Hope those who want this weren't planning on things happening too fast. :)

On a more serious note, where do the lizard people fit in all this?

They run the trilateral commission from area 51

Don't you get it? There's going to be a pipeline in the median.

A PIPELINE!

Well, in general I support greater cooperation and transparency amongst those three countries.

Get your paws off Manitoba mister. :mad:

They will arrive some time after the end of the robot wars, and will naturally be the ruling overlords over whichever side ends up victorious. Could be as few as 5 years afterwards that they get here, could be as many as 350. There's still quite a bit of disagreement in the scientific community.

Look - if we are going to kick India's ass down the line, we are going to need reinforcements. A merger totally makes sense to me.

BW

Can you show me where Edwards "Officially" said that or somewhere "official" to his campaign where that is shown as a part of his platform? I question the use of the word "official" in your statement regarding Edwards so Im hoping you dont pull it off of a blog or op-ed.

If he says it himself, I consider it pretty 'official.' Edwards name was brought up in a Neal Cavuto piece today regarding 'transfers of wealth' from the haves to the have-nots, why I mentioned him specifically. It is ALL the Dems, however. Detroit News front page July 13th. http://detnews.com

Use the search on the Detroit News homepage, source expired for the link. Dems spoke it at the annual NAACP meeting in town. Headline is "Dems Vow to Bridge Rich-Poor Divide"

Of course, the word 'socialism' was never itself used. But they be Dems, draw your own conclusions as to the 'methods-to-be-implemented.'

About damn time

SI

BW:

this is the article where in the heck (I only read it once so I may have missed it) did Edwards officially say he wanted to merge with Mexico or Canada? If it isnt found here than would this be considered lying like PSU in the thread regarding PBS and the Islamic movie. BW and PSU, just making crap up and throwing it out there. Let's see if BW can raise the bar above PSU and recant his statement or apologize.

Did Cavuto have video of it? because if this is your evidence it is Pwn3d.

I think BW meant that Edwards made socialism an official plank of his campaign. Still crazy, but not as much so.

Learn to read. It says right there he wants to eliminate the two Americas. Obviously he means America, and North America.

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

so he wasn't talking about the two different socio-economic Americas like the previous sentences would lead an adult reader to believe....

he was talking about North and South America. GOTCHA!!!!

Like when Bush said he'd "take care" of those found guilty of crimes in the admin. I got it...


Im not taking stuff literally enough...thanks Maple Leafs

I don't know about 'planning' anything, but the way the Latino population is growing in the American Southwest (apparently they're going to be ~55% of the California population by 2040), I wouldn't be surprised if there were some kind of political union this century. Maybe not in my lifetime, but this century.

So when do Sasquatch and El Chubacabra do the nasty?

Fascinating, Captain. I put Alex Jones out there for contrast. Since Jones cannot provide credible evidence for many of his assertions, he is easy to deconstruct and dismiss.

However, to not see the daily assault of evidence on the progression towards the NAU is to, quite frankly, be living in complete denial with a mind closed up like Enron while you chug, not sip, the Kool Aide.

Not only is illegal immigration being condoned by political and business forces, together with NAFTA putting middle-class Americans in direct competition with $1 a day (or whatever it is they make) Mexican workers...but movements have begun in states like California to allow illegal immigrants to vote!

Now if your allowing Mexican nationals to vote legally in U.S. elections, you already HAVE one country! Couldn't be more obvious, regardless of what kind of semantics you use.

I agree Bubba! Do the little green men talk to you as well?

You said "Official". If youre going to throw shit out there like PSU you need to make sure you have evidence to support it. However, much like your kind you dont. You'll ignore the fact that you lied and not retract it, and not apologize for it and hope that a few people dont "see" or " hear" the fact that your statement was, in fact, a lie. However, sir, OFFICIALLY your statement above is BS.

I AM NOT EVEN CHALLENGING YOU ON WHETHER OR NOT THE STORY IS TRUE OR THE MOMENTUM IS GOING THAT WAY....Im simply asking for proof of your statement that Edwards has it as official platform and if all you have to back it up is that link you provided than you sir, once again, are a liar.

I think I said it earlier, if the person him/herself says it, I consider that to be pretty 'official.' Re-read the article.

BTW, from the same source find the related article on how Edwards wants to 're-institute' bussing, since it worked so well in the past of course.

Why do you even show up? Dweeb.

Burn.

I agree with BW. Does that make me a kook? Do thy worst, lefties! Do thy worst!

Well, the "movement" was limited to an attempt to put that on the ballot in San Francisco only. When it was made clear just how unconstitutional it was, the initiative was dropped.

It's strange all of the fear about Mexico, when it seems that Canada would be a much larger "threat" to the US job market, considering the percentage of skilled workers in their labor pool compared to Mexico's.

Where in the above article does Edwards say that he would support a Merged Mexico/Canada/US. He is talking about the two socio-economic America's within the U.S......Rich v. Poor.

but maybe I missed it, please just quote it from above when you find it.....or for that matter quote him from any legit site that has him saying that!!!

until then I hope everyone on here sees your true colors as not just misinformed, but a Liar.

You're wasting your time . . . . . . .. . .

i know but for some reason I view it the same as when Rush or another radio or TV personality just throws out a statement that is a lie and then lets it float out to the masses where, for some, it becomes truth. Its that garbage that clouds fact and fiction and if we all just say, "you're wasting your time (which very well maybe true)" then he can get away with it. I honestly think lying is gutter.

I applaud your conviction to truth, then.

Here is an interesting article on the subject. It won't solve the debate raging here, but does at least offer some insight in to what's happening.


Pro-Immigration Forces Back North American Union
John O. Edwards
Monday, July 9, 2007


America is finished.

Mexico and Canada are gone too.

In their place: One massive country, the North American Union (NAU), bordered by the Bering Sea to the north and Guatemala to the south, the Atlantic to the east and the Pacific to the west.

NAU citizens no longer spend dollars or salute Old Glory. They spend "ameros," and the flag that waves over its capitals shows the entire Western Hemisphere.

The national borders of the United States have been forever erased. While that scenario may sound far-fetched, critics of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) warn that future could be here sooner than anyone realizes.

President Bush, Mexican President Vincente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin informally agreed to set up the SPP in 2005.

Not so well known is the fact that supporters of the NAU concept slipped an initiative into the recently defeated immigration reform act. Largely unnoticed amidst the amnesty furor that ultimately sunk the Immigration Bill was the statement, "It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico."

The bill called for measures to boost the economy of Mexico, including:


U.S. support for Mexico, to strengthen its education and training programs.
A call for better health care for "poor and underserved" people in Mexico.
And U.S. assistance to "establish a program with the private sector to cover the health care needs of Mexican nationals temporarily employed in the United States."
The bill also called for U.S. assistance to Mexican businesses and government to eliminate corruption, which it termed, "the single biggest obstacle to development."
"This was the first attempt by the SPP to go public, and it failed," says Dr. Jerome Corsi, author of The Late Great USA. They thought nobody would notice. They were wrong."

Corsi called the sPP "a coup d-etat by bureaucratic means," adding that it works underhandedly like a shadow government.

"It is an attempt to turn North America into something like the European Economic Community," he says, "which began with economic cooperation and expanded eventually to include a common market, and then a full-scale regional government replacing, in many ways, the governing powers of the member nations."

Documents recently obtained by public interest group Judicial Watch reveal that "working groups" of the SPP are developing plans for U.S. taxpayer-funded initiatives to improve Mexico's infrastructure, within just six to 18 months.

SSP plans include:


Creating a North American Pandemic Influenza Plan;
Facilitating cross-border travel;
Establishing Social Security totalization for Mexican aliens working in the United States;
Creating a Trans-Texas Corridor superhighway with truck, car, and train lanes running from Mexico to Canada.
Following the 2005 tri-lateral summit, the three leaders agreed, "We will establish ministerial-led working groups that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working groups will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals."

The working groups include committees on "Manufactured Goods and Sectoral and Regional Competitiveness, Movement of Goods, Energy, Environment, E-Commerce and Information Communications Technologies, Financial Services, Business Facilitation, Food and Agriculture, Transportation and Health," according to the SPP Web, www.spp.gov.

"Basically, the SPP eliminates borders," Dr. Corsi tells NewsMax. "Just as in Europe, once free-flowing cross-border travel and full economic cooperation are established, the next step will be multi-national regulations and multi-national court systems to resolve disputes, with powers that supercede those of U.S. courts in many cases."

Opponents of the NAU slipping its provisions into a bill sold as way to strengthen the integrity of the nation's borders reflects the determination of those pushing a North American union.

The SPP has struck back with a FAQ section on their U.S. website, www.spp.gov, which attempts to counter "myths" of its ultimate aims, stressing that the SPP "does not change our courts or legislative processes and respects the sovereignty of the United States, Mexico, and Canada. The SPP in no way, shape or form considers the creation of a European Union-like structure or a common currency."

As to charges that the SPP is being undertaken without the knowledge of the Congress, the FAQs state, "US agencies involved with SPP regularly update and consult with members of Congress on our efforts and plans." SPP confirms that the SPP is a "White House-driven initiative. In the United States, the Department of Commerce coordinates the ‘Prosperity' component, while the Department of Homeland Security coordinates the ‘Security' component. The Department of State ensures the two components are coordinated and are consistent with U.S. foreign policy."

"They deny it – of course they do, but the ultimate direction of all these actions is driven by a one-world view," Dr. Corsi says. Corsi contends that President Bush has a secret agenda to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union.

"However, as more people in the United States are becoming aware of the goals of the SPP, grassroots opposition to the SPP is growing very fast."

One example: 12 states are currently considering resolutions opposing the establishment of the NAU.

There is a federal effort to block the SPP as well.

It is spearheaded by a resolution, HCR 40, which states, "The United States should not allow the Security and Prosperity Partnership to implement further regulations that would create a North American Union with Mexico and Canada; and the President should indicate strong opposition to these acts or any other proposals that threaten the sovereignty of the United States." The resolution also calls for the U.S. to not "engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement Superhighway System."

The resolution notes that "reports issued by the SPP indicate that it has implemented regulatory changes among the three countries that circumvent U.S. trade, transportation, homeland security and border security functions and that the SPP will continue to do so in the future."

The bill is sponsored by Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., who tells NewsMax, "I hope that more Americans will become aware of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, which will lead to a North American union and the destruction of the sovereignty of the United States."

Cong. Goode, who opposed the Immigration Bill saying it would be "a disaster to our nation if it were to become law," says his resolution has attracted over two dozen co-sponsors so far.

"Defeat of the Immigration Bill was a setback for the supporters of the SPP, but they won't just give up and go away," Corsi warns. "There is a huge amount of international capital driving this. They will not give up easily."