Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Who is your National Champion? (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=63070)

BishopMVP 01-08-2008 04:49 PM

Who is your National Champion?
 
I'm deliberately leaving the criteria vague. If you want to do it who is most deserving, who you'd vote #1, who you think would win a playoff go for it.

DanGarion 01-08-2008 05:17 PM

Come on, it's USC. Bar None!

Suburban Rhythm 01-08-2008 05:30 PM

Ask us in April, after they do that whole tournament thing.

Eaglesfan27 01-08-2008 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dangarion (Post 1631654)
Come on, it's USC. Bar None!


I want to say USC, but it is impossible for me to argue USC with a straight face due to their loss against Stanford. Now, if we were debating who I think would win a tourney right now, I'd go with USC. However, under the current rule set, I voted for LSU.

MizzouRah 01-08-2008 07:23 PM

To the person that also voted Mizzou (MBBFan?), lets meet for some beers.

sterlingice 01-08-2008 08:58 PM

I think Trout was most deserving this year, for sure

SI

stevew 01-08-2008 09:12 PM

Georgia steamrolled the unbeaten juggernaught that was Hawaii. It's obvious they should be #1.

pennywisesb 01-08-2008 09:13 PM

Its tough, but I really think SC could take LSU down right now. So I voted SC.

astrosfan64 01-08-2008 09:18 PM

I voted WV, because I think they are the best team.

But, LSU is rightfully the national champion.

DeToxRox 01-08-2008 09:20 PM

Has to be LSU. Georgia didn't win their conference, that's not anyones fault but their own.

Lathum 01-08-2008 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astrosfan64 (Post 1631771)
I voted WV, because I think they are the best team.



they lost to Pitt when they had a chance to play for a national title?

Karlifornia 01-08-2008 09:29 PM

Voted LSU...works for me. I can't really say anyone else deserved it more, and they won it within the system that every team was aware of before the season started.

sterlingice 01-08-2008 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1631780)
they lost to Pitt when they had a chance to play for a national title?


This type of argument just doesn't do it for me this year. You can say that about everyone this year. Miles and his "LSU didn't lose in regulation" crap is great spin but, really, the Tigers lost at home to an Arkansas team that was bludgeoned by Missouri. Speaking of the other Tigers, they didn't even win their conference. Kansas didn't even play for their title. Same with Georgia. USC was hurt, but still had no excuse losing to 41 point underdog Stanford. We can play this game with everyone this year. I think if you want to discount someone, you can't just pick one wart- gotta look at the whole body of work.

SI

Lathum 01-08-2008 09:36 PM

I somewhat agree SI but it was the way they lost the game, not so much the fact that they lost it.

sterlingice 01-08-2008 09:39 PM

I did like this season a lot, tho. Only this year could we have KU and Mizzou in such rarified air and then have them play. It was such a great season and I just don't think we'll ever have such a great feeling as we do now as Kansas fans so it's time to just sit back and enjoy it. So unexpected, so fan exceeding expectations, and so fun.

By that same token of this being such a fluke season, I really dislike that LSU got gifted the chance to win a home game for the national title. Not much that could be done about it, but still, that just bugs me.

SI

Pumpy Tudors 01-08-2008 10:08 PM

Seton Hill

Vinatieri for Prez 01-09-2008 02:08 AM

1 loss Kansas.

jbergey22 01-09-2008 02:23 AM

*Well Missouri lost to Oklahoma twice so I dont see how it is possible to give it to them
*Kansas lost to Missouri once and didnt get the chance to play the sooners, they have a case
*LSU lost two games in overtime, won their conference tournament(arguably the strongest conference) and the title game convincingly, easily the best resume
*Ohio State lost to LSU and an overated Illinois team, no case
*Georgia probably the strongest team at the end of the season but the two SEC losses didnt allow them to play in the SEC championship, a case could be made because they were playing the best ball at the end of the season
*USC Its just too hard to explain the Stanford loss, they were likely the 2nd strongest team at the end of the season however
*West Virginia played in an underated conference beating some very quality teams, they choked in the game that would get them into the Nat'l Championship, they have a small case as well because of the convincing Oklahoma win but that Pitt loss was a mystery

Blade6119 01-09-2008 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MizzouRah (Post 1631721)
To the person that also voted Mizzou (MBBFan?), lets meet for some beers.

IT WAS ME!!! And you know im always down for a hangout my old friend :D

Blade6119 01-09-2008 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbergey22 (Post 1631921)
*Well Missouri lost to Oklahoma twice so I dont see how it is possible to give it to them
*Kansas lost to Missouri once and didnt get the chance to play the sooners, they have a case
*LSU lost two games in overtime, won their conference tournament(arguably the strongest conference) and the title game convincingly, easily the best resume
*Ohio State lost to LSU and an overated Illinois team, no case
*Georgia probably the strongest team at the end of the season but the two SEC losses didnt allow them to play in the SEC championship, a case could be made because they were playing the best ball at the end of the season
*USC Its just too hard to explain the Stanford loss, they were likely the 2nd strongest team at the end of the season however
*West Virginia played in an underated conference beating some very quality teams, they choked in the game that would get them into the Nat'l Championship, they have a small case as well because of the convincing Oklahoma win but that Pitt loss was a mystery

My arguement for Mizzou is thus: Of all the teams with 2 losses, they have the 2 best losses. No one, no one, can claim to have lost to better teams(or 1 team twice). Mizzou didnt blow it against Stanford, Kentucky, or any of the other average at best teams the other contenders fell to. On top of that, they beat Kansas, arkansas who beat LSU, Illinois who beat OSU.

They beat two BCS teams in the regular season, could any of the others claim that? If so, im sorry, but i believe Mizzou has the best wins and the best losses during the season. Post-season is hard to factor in, but they beat the crap out of who they were given.

jbergey22 01-09-2008 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119 (Post 1631923)
My arguement for Mizzou is thus: Of all the teams with 2 losses, they have the 2 best losses. No one, no one, can claim to have lost to better teams(or 1 team twice). Mizzou didnt blow it against Stanford, Kentucky, or any of the other average at best teams the other contenders fell to. On top of that, they beat Kansas, arkansas who beat LSU, Illinois who beat OSU.

They beat two BCS teams in the regular season, could any of the others claim that? If so, im sorry, but i believe Mizzou has the best wins and the best losses during the season. Post-season is hard to factor in, but they beat the crap out of who they were given.


I would agree that they had to two best losses out of any of the teams but then we would get into the case that Georgia could also have. How can the Nat'l champion not even win their conference? This would also leave Oklahoma back in the debate along with WVirginia as the Sooners pounded on Mizzou twice and WVir had its way with the Sooners. It was basically just a wierd year all around, no team really deserved it but a lot of teams could be mentioned.

I think what it boils down to is that you could throw 8 teams in a hat and any of the 8 could win a tournament this year as there wasnt that normally dominating team.

MJ4H 01-09-2008 08:24 AM

Man it's a good thing we have a system in place to determine the national champion and don't need to debate about it and then vote anymore!!1

MizzouRah 01-10-2008 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119 (Post 1631922)
IT WAS ME!!! And you know im always down for a hangout my old friend :D


I heart you.

Blade6119 01-18-2008 10:47 AM

Mizzou Named National Champs By One BCS Computer Ranking
Anderson-Hester Computer Rankings Lists Tigers On Top Jan. 17, 2008

Columbia, Mo. - Based on the strength of its 12-2 season, the 2007 Missouri Football team was named national champions according to the Anderson & Hester College Football Computer Rankings. The poll, which is one of six computer rankings to officially be used by the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) rankings, made its updates following bowl season, and when the smoke cleared, Mizzou stood atop the rankings, .005 points ahead of conference rival Kansas.

The deciding factor between the Tigers and Jayhawks likely came down to strength of schedule, as MU's schedule was rated as the nation's 25th-toughest by Anderson & Hester, while KU's rated 61st. Mizzou's schedule strength was highest among the top eight teams in the rankings, as well.

Mizzou finished ranked fourth in the final Associated Press top-25, marking the highest-ever finish for MU in the final AP poll. The Tigers were sixth in the final BCS poll, which were not updated after bowl season.

Head Coach Gary Pinkel's team will begin winter conditioning next week, as school starts back up on Jan. 22nd. Spring practice begins March 11th, and will conclude with the annual Black & Gold Spring Game on April 19th.

Mizzou returns 16 players (including 10 on defense) who started in the Tigers' 38-7 dismantling of 25th-ranked Arkansas on Jan. 1st in the AT&T Cotton Bowl Classic. Many early top-25 polls for the 2008 season have the Tigers ranked among the top-five for next year.

:D :D

Passacaglia 01-18-2008 11:00 AM

If you kids can't play nice, NONE of you get to be the national champion!!!

gstelmack 01-18-2008 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbergey22 (Post 1631921)
*West Virginia played in an underated conference beating some very quality teams, they choked in the game that would get them into the Nat'l Championship, they have a small case as well because of the convincing Oklahoma win but that Pitt loss was a mystery


The Pitt loss was not a mystery. Their head coach was angling for a new job at the time instead of focusing on getting his team ready for the game.

Butter 01-18-2008 11:15 AM

RendeR... you are a true homer.

MizzouRah 01-18-2008 11:29 AM

Mizzou National Champions!!!! :P

Alan T 01-18-2008 11:37 AM

So if 1 of the 6 Computer ratings picked Missouri to end the season, who did the other 5 systems pick? Anyone know?

Butter 01-18-2008 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1638787)
So if 1 of the 6 Computer ratings picked Missouri to end the season, who did the other 5 systems pick? Anyone know?


LSU, West Virginia, Kansas, Bowling Green, and UC-Davis. An interesting season!

st.cronin 01-18-2008 01:18 PM

Brigham Young

gstelmack 01-18-2008 01:52 PM

My fundamental problem with Kansas, Mizzou, and Georgia is that I don't think you should be the national champion if you can't win your conference. That should be rule #1 for entry.

GrantDawg 01-18-2008 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gstelmack (Post 1638951)
My fundamental problem with Kansas, Mizzou, and Georgia is that I don't think you should be the national champion if you can't win your conference. That should be rule #1 for entry.



Agreed. Of course if there was a playoff system, I would not be against including teams that did not win their conference. But on the current "throw a dart at a page and proclaim a team national champs" system, I think that has to be a disqualifier.

Pumpy Tudors 01-18-2008 02:22 PM

hey grantdawg long time no see man how are you doing

GrantDawg 01-18-2008 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pumpy Tudors (Post 1638972)
hey grantdawg long time no see man how are you doing



Working my butt off. Literally. Like 95 pounds worth.

Pumpy Tudors 01-18-2008 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 1638973)
Working my butt off. Literally. Like 95 pounds worth.

That's a lot of butt right there. You could give Shakira a run for her money.

GrantDawg 01-18-2008 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pumpy Tudors (Post 1638982)
That's a lot of butt right there. You could give Shakira a run for her money.



I'd like to give Shakira a....well, let's just leave it at that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.