Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   EA and NFL extend exclusive agreement for 3 more years...... (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=63759)

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 09:25 AM

EA and NFL extend exclusive agreement for 3 more years......
 
Seriously, why doesn't EA just go f%$^ itself? I sure hope that there's another company brave enough to come out with a generic pro football game because I now have to wait until at least 2013 before I consider the possibility of purchasing a NFL game.

Flasch186 02-12-2008 09:27 AM

damn

Honolulu_Blue 02-12-2008 09:27 AM

I bowed out of the Madden Franchise two years ago. I don't see going back anytime soon...

rkmsuf 02-12-2008 09:31 AM

suck it, game geeks

Kodos 02-12-2008 09:34 AM

Wow. Today is going to be an unhappy day for a lot of sports gamers. I think I just decided to never buy an EA sports game new again. If I break down, I'll buy games used.

Surtt 02-12-2008 09:43 AM

I've decided to lag a year behind and pick them up for $10.
At this point, that is all they are worth to me.

ColtCrazy 02-12-2008 09:45 AM

I'm still playing 07 on the original Xbox. The lack of innovation is the number one reason I've avoided buying a next gen system and prefer PC games or old Xbox games like KOTOR or older Madden games.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 09:54 AM

I'm not even sure that EA has any clue what the customer is thinking at this point.

1. Last year's incident where an EA rep went on the Operation Sports board to ask what people thought of the NBA Live improvements, only to get blasted by the entire community. He even acted surprised about the backlash.
2. Rather than bringing out a new Fight Night game, they decided to make an arcade version of the game titled 'Facebreaker'. It's little more than a upgraded version of Ready 2 Rumble boxing. That's not going to go over well.
3. All of their games suffer from the 'roster update' mentality, resulting in people paying $60 for a minor upgrade at a full price. Nagging bugs that continue to show up year after year with no apparent work to fix the problems also hinder the games.

I'm not sure how much more evidence they need to understand just how badly EA Sports' image has suffered.

wade moore 02-12-2008 09:57 AM

And even for those "that's just internet geeks" folks - just look at the consistently shrinking sales for Madden. Yeah, they're still high - but they're definitely shrinking.

albionmoonlight 02-12-2008 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1657414)
I'm not even sure that EA has any clue what the customer is thinking at this point.

1. Last year's incident where an EA rep went on the Operation Sports board to ask what people thought of the NBA Live improvements, only to get blasted by the entire community. He even acted surprised about the backlash.
2. Rather than bringing out a new Fight Night game, they decided to make an arcade version of the game titled 'Facebreaker'. It's little more than a upgraded version of Ready 2 Rumble boxing. That's not going to go over well.
3. All of their games suffer from the 'roster update' mentality, resulting in people paying $60 for a minor upgrade at a full price. Nagging bugs that continue to show up year after year with no apparent work to fix the problems also hinder the games.

I'm not sure how much more evidence they need to understand just how badly EA Sports' image has suffered.


I agree with you that the situation sucks. But I think that you are looking at it from the perspective of the mega-informed gamer.

While people here raise legit concerns about the direction of EA sports, guys like Bill Simmons say that Madden Day should be a national holiday. And guys like Bill Simmons (and the vast majority of his readers) buy enough games to keep the game companies happy.

Edit--Just saw Wade's post. I'm not sure how the numbers for Madden are. If they are shrinking, then that does have to be cause for concern. I'm sure that they'll find a way to blame it on piracy and used game stores, though.

Honolulu_Blue 02-12-2008 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1657414)
I'm not even sure that EA has any clue what the customer is thinking at this point.

1. Last year's incident where an EA rep went on the Operation Sports board to ask what people thought of the NBA Live improvements, only to get blasted by the entire community. He even acted surprised about the backlash.
2. Rather than bringing out a new Fight Night game, they decided to make an arcade version of the game titled 'Facebreaker'. It's little more than a upgraded version of Ready 2 Rumble boxing. That's not going to go over well.
3. All of their games suffer from the 'roster update' mentality, resulting in people paying $60 for a minor upgrade at a full price. Nagging bugs that continue to show up year after year with no apparent work to fix the problems also hinder the games.

I'm not sure how much more evidence they need to understand just how badly EA Sports' image has suffered.


I don't know if I want to go here, but... Is EA Sports really suffering because of this? Have sales of Madden and NCAA Football been declining?

I have a sense there is a large group of "Maddenoliday" type folks out there who just go out and buy each version and just sort of play the game for fun, realism be damned, and, therefore, ignore some of the flaws that ruin the game for the hardercore fans. Is that right?

Edit: Damn youse, Albion! Great minds and all...

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore (Post 1657422)
And even for those "that's just internet geeks" folks - just look at the consistently shrinking sales for Madden. Yeah, they're still high - but they're definitely shrinking.


That's the interesting part. I think that EA believes that by securing the license, that they will somehow reverse the 10%+ losses in sales that has occured each of the last two years. They seem totally oblivious to the real reason that sales on Madden are dropping. The game's quality just isn't that good and sticking with the same engine with minimal improvements won't change that.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 1657430)
I don't know if I want to go here, but... Is EA Sports really suffering because of this? Have sales of Madden and NCAA Football been declining?


Yes, Madden has seen 10%+ drops in total sales over each of the past two years. NCAA Football suffered a 17% drop in sales this year over the past year.

wade moore 02-12-2008 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 1657427)

Edit--Just saw Wade's post. I'm not sure how the numbers for Madden are. If they are shrinking, then that does have to be cause for concern. I'm sure that they'll find a way to blame it on piracy and used game stores, though.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1657433)
That's the interesting part. I think that EA believes that by securing the license, that they will somehow reverse the 10%+ losses in sales that has occured each of the last two years. They seem totally oblivious to the real reason that sales on Madden are dropping. The game's quality just isn't that good and sticking with the same engine with minimal improvements won't change that.


I know that MBBF pulled the numbers for me a little while ago, but yeah - I remember about what MBBF says.. 10%+ decreases each year since they secured the license originally, if not before that.

ShaneTheMaster 02-12-2008 11:08 AM

This sucks big time. An equal problem is other companies are not creative or ballsy enough to come out with a realistic football game without an NFL license (except for All-Pro).

rkmsuf 02-12-2008 11:09 AM

I love this deal.

stevew 02-12-2008 11:10 AM

Did EA manage to kill the NBA 2k series yet? There's no chance I'll ever buy a new EA sports game again, so I may be on 2k8 for a long long time. I should clarify that I do buy year old used EA games all the time, this year in a moment of weakness I picked up the garbage that was Wii Madden.

Noop 02-12-2008 11:24 AM

The only game I ever buy from them is the NCAA series and it has went from a must buy to wait and see. I refuse to let game spot trick me into making a pre-order I don't mind waiting a week for the game and if need be two weeks.

Fuck EA, EA Sports, EA Games, EA Fans Boys, fuck them as a staff, record label and as a motherfucking crew and if you want to be down with EA then fuck you too! West Side!(In case of some you missed it I am making reference to something Tupac said about bad boy records)

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShaneTheMaster (Post 1657478)
This sucks big time. An equal problem is other companies are not creative or ballsy enough to come out with a realistic football game without an NFL license (except for All-Pro).


All-Pro Football had good game mechanics, but the decision to pay former players and not have a franchise mode killed the game. Sometimes, these companies outthink themselves and assume they need some sort of pull in the form of name recognition or licenses. Put out a good football game with great gameplay and a good franchise mode and I'd be happy as a clam.

Kodos 02-12-2008 11:29 AM

I think having former stars was a good option, but there should have been an option to play with entirely fake players, along with a franchise mode.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos (Post 1657497)
I think having former stars was a good option, but there should have been an option to play with entirely fake players, along with a franchise mode.


Good point. That would have worked as well. The exclusion of the franchise mode was the key mistake.

Galaxy 02-12-2008 11:31 AM

I'm guessing EA Sports will be paying even more for the extended license?

The NFL is starting to turn me off with it's greed. Talk about a business that is trying to squeeze every penny out of it's customers.

stevew 02-12-2008 11:34 AM

How can you mold a franchise mode when there is a fictitious league with no known rules? I guess they could have thrown something together, but it definitely would have suck potential.

Fighter of Foo 02-12-2008 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy (Post 1657505)
The NFL is starting to turn me off with it's greed. Talk about a business that is trying to squeeze every penny out of it's customers.


Off topic, but just like every other authoritarian enterprise they will end up screwing themselves in the end.

Kodos 02-12-2008 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 1657510)
How can you mold a franchise mode when there is a fictitious league with no known rules? I guess they could have thrown something together, but it definitely would have suck potential.




Make it really customizable. League size, number of games, number of playoff spots. Hell, make playoff series possible. Create cool default fake teams with the option to create your own. Allow users to readily share created teams.

Clearly, Jim should be a consultant! ;)

Galaxy 02-12-2008 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 1657510)
How can you mold a franchise mode when there is a fictitious league with no known rules? I guess they could have thrown something together, but it definitely would have suck potential.


Wouldn't be that hard. As someone mentioned, customize it (a hard cap or no cap, ect.).

MacroGuru 02-12-2008 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos (Post 1657513)
Make it really customizable. League size, number of games, number of playoff spots. Hell, make playoff series possible. Create cool default fake teams with the option to create your own. Allow users to readily share created teams.

Clearly, Jim should be a consultant! ;)


Oh how you forget...There is already one out there! The developer is an amazing man!

http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/...ad.php?t=45810

stevew 02-12-2008 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos (Post 1657513)
Make it really customizable. League size, number of games, number of playoff spots. Hell, make playoff series possible. Create cool default fake teams with the option to create your own. Allow users to readily share created teams.

Clearly, Jim should be a consultant! ;)


The option to turn the beer tent on or off would be awesome as well.

Bee 02-12-2008 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1657433)
That's the interesting part. I think that EA believes that by securing the license, that they will somehow reverse the 10%+ losses in sales that has occured each of the last two years. They seem totally oblivious to the real reason that sales on Madden are dropping. The game's quality just isn't that good and sticking with the same engine with minimal improvements won't change that.


I suspect it's more of a case of them wanting to prevent a drop of 50% in sales as opposed to reversing the 10% drop in sales. If there were a serious competitor to Madden with NFL teams and players the sales of Madden would drop like a rock.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 1657524)
I suspect it's more of a case of them wanting to prevent a drop of 50% in sales as opposed to reversing the 10% drop in sales. If there were a serious competitor to Madden with NFL teams and players the sales of Madden would drop like a rock.


Could be, but that's a lose-lose proposition. When you're a business and your business decisions revolve around ways to minimize sales loss rather than maximize market share, you're not running your business in a profitable manner. This certainly shouldn't come as a surprise to most people regarding EA.

rkmsuf 02-12-2008 11:50 AM

What's EA's bottom line? Are they making money?

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf (Post 1657527)
What's EA's bottom line? Are they making money?


They lost $33 million last quarter. Never a good thing when that quarter is where 40% of your yearly sales occur.

rkmsuf 02-12-2008 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1657534)
They lost $33 million last quarter.


Well that's not good.

Bee 02-12-2008 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1657526)
Could be, but that's a lose-lose proposition. When you're a business and your business decisions revolve around ways to minimize sales loss rather than maximize market share, you're not running your business in a profitable manner. This certainly shouldn't come as a surprise to most people regarding EA.


With the exclusive license they control the market and all that comes with it. They get all the talking heads talking about Madden when it comes out, they get the tv shows like Madden Nation or whatever it's called, they get all the articles written about Madden on release, etc. If they didn't have the exclusive license, I suspect a lot of that stuff would disappear in a year or two.

I think their decision has more to do with controlling the market and all the benefits that come with that. When I said they'd lose 50% instead of 10%, I just pulled the number out of the air but I don't think the decision has so much to do with minimizing that loss in sales as much as maintaining their control of the market. Is it worth it for the cost? I have no idea because there are a lot of factors that you'd have to consider. Do I like it as a consumer? No.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 1657537)
With the exclusive license they control the market and all that comes with it. They get all the talking heads talking about Madden when it comes out, they get the tv shows like Madden Nation or whatever it's called, they get all the articles written about Madden on release, etc. If they didn't have the exclusive license, I suspect a lot of that stuff would disappear in a year or two.

I think their decision has more to do with controlling the market and all the benefits that come with that. When I said they'd lose 50% instead of 10%, I just pulled the number out of the air but I don't think the decision has so much to do with minimizing that loss in sales as much as maintaining their control of the market. Is it worth it for the cost? I have no idea because there are a lot of factors that you'd have to consider. Do I like it as a consumer? No.


Here's the thing. EA would have made a profit last quarter had they removed that exclusive contract from the books and paid a smaller fee for just the license to get the players/teams/etc. If they then take a portion of that savings and actually hire a few good programmers/developers to bring the game up to a new level, they'd definitely see their sales numbers go up instead of down like they have the past two seasons. They are spending literally hundreds of millions of dollars removing their competitors from the market when the competition isn't even the main problem. The quality of the game is the real problem.

Big Fo 02-12-2008 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 1657524)
I suspect it's more of a case of them wanting to prevent a drop of 50% in sales as opposed to reversing the 10% drop in sales. If there were a serious competitor to Madden with NFL teams and players the sales of Madden would drop like a rock.


Madden sold more back in the day when it was going against the NFL2k series, or at least in the year NFL2k5 came out (2004?) and that game was available for $20.

The game's declining quality may be affecting sales but the migration of millions of PS2 owners to current-gen systems can't be helping either, considering you can't play normal Madden on the most successful of these.

EA and the NFL both hate gamers unfortunately, oh well I'll just ignore the game or get it used down the road if it's actually good this year.

Bee 02-12-2008 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1657534)
They lost $33 million last quarter. Never a good thing when that quarter is where 40% of your yearly sales occur.



That was the net income. For example, that included an additional $507 Million in cash they put aside for future use.

rkmsuf 02-12-2008 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 1657544)
That was the net income. For example, that included an additional $507 Million in cash they put aside for future use.


Ah ha!

Always nice to have an extra 507 million.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 1657544)
That was the net income. For example, that included an additional $507 Million in cash they put aside for future use.


I have an accounting degree. We could pick through financial statements all day long and find exceptions like that to make the bottom line look better/worse than it is.

My accounting teacher had a fine statement concerning accounting..........

"When your boss asks you 'what is 2+2', always ask him 'What would you like it to be?'."

Passacaglia 02-12-2008 12:36 PM

I think the problem starts at the top. John Madden never really struck me as someone that good with computers -- he always seemed a little more old-fashioned, not that into technology. How can he really be expected to oversee effectively every aspect of a complicated game like that?

or

Hey, give the guy a break. In case you guys didn't know, he's doing this game in his spare time. He actually has a real job with NBC, and he just does what he can on the side!

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1657561)
I think the problem starts at the top. John Madden never really struck me as someone that good with computers -- he always seemed a little more old-fashioned, not that into technology. How can he really be expected to oversee effectively every aspect of a complicated game like that?

or

Hey, give the guy a break. In case you guys didn't know, he's doing this game in his spare time. He actually has a real job with NBC, and he just does what he can on the side!


I believe John is the lead tester. That may explain a lot of things.

Galaxy 02-12-2008 12:58 PM

Boom!

Ksyrup 02-12-2008 01:04 PM

After seeing the recent No Reservations episode about Vancouver, I'm going to guess EA is doing OK. Either that, or they will go down in the most comfortable flames in the history of mankind.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2008 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1657580)
After seeing the recent No Reservations episode about Vancouver, I'm going to guess EA is doing OK. Either that, or they will go down in the most comfortable flames in the history of mankind.


You make a good point. EA has some monsterous facilities. Often that can lead to the conclusions that you state (Oh, we're fine. Just look at this place! We're EA!). There's been software and hardware companies before them that have fallen from just as lofty a perch as EA currently occupies (Oh, we're fine. Just look at this place! We're Atari!).

Logan 02-12-2008 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 1657488)
Fuck EA, EA Sports, EA Games, EA Fans Boys, fuck them as a staff, record label and as a motherfucking crew and if you want to be down with EA then fuck you too! West Side!(In case of some you missed it I am making reference to something Tupac said about bad boy records)


I think one of them n****s got sickle cell or somethin.

miami_fan 02-12-2008 01:52 PM

Why the anger at EA for extending the agreement? EA has been able to produce crappy games that continue to sell even if they are selling at a lower rate. That tells me that enough people don't give a crap what kind of pro football game they get as long as it has NFL on the box. Also, as MBBF and others have already said, no company has come out with a realistic pro football game. If and when one company does, we will see whether gamers prefer a quality game or a crappy game with NFL on the box.

Butter 02-12-2008 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1657561)
I think the problem starts at the top. John Madden never really struck me as someone that good with computers -- he always seemed a little more old-fashioned, not that into technology. How can he really be expected to oversee effectively every aspect of a complicated game like that?

or

Hey, give the guy a break. In case you guys didn't know, he's doing this game in his spare time. He actually has a real job with NBC, and he just does what he can on the side!


Hey, how hard it is it to put in some new features? I mean you just take this thing there and slide it over here, and then boom, new feature. Brett Favre has always been one of the best new features of all time, but then people say "well, how does Brett Favre always know how to put in new features". And it's just that Brett Favre has that one thing that all new features have, and you can't really teach other new features how to be like Brett Favre...

*gunshot*

Sgran 02-12-2008 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miami_fan (Post 1657627)
Why the anger at EA for extending the agreement? EA has been able to produce crappy games that continue to sell even if they are selling at a lower rate. That tells me that enough people don't give a crap what kind of pro football game they get as long as it has NFL on the box. Also, as MBBF and others have already said, no company has come out with a realistic pro football game. If and when one company does, we will see whether gamers prefer a quality game or a crappy game with NFL on the box.


But who's going to develop a game that is as good as Madden? I think you guys forget how far Madden has come over the years. No, it is not a perfect game (i don't play it anymore), but EA has invested years and years into animations and gameplay variations. Maybe you guys haven't been to the FOF forums for while, but FOF doesn't have a perfect franchise mode either. Clearly something about getting an AI to successfully GM a team over a period of years is challenging.

Neon_Chaos 02-12-2008 02:00 PM

Well, it's better than Matrix Games and the MF team getting the license.

:D

Eaglesfan27 02-12-2008 03:44 PM

Disappointing but not surprising.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.