Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOF9, FOF8, and TCY Discussion (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   Crazy Draft Player - Need some advice (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=80146)

imdashep 12-20-2010 04:39 PM

Crazy Draft Player - Need some advice
 
So looking at this guy at a position of need, and I'm not sure I have the balls enough to pick him.

6'5, 234 lb ILB, 5.8/5.6 grade, red scores in Solecismic Test (beating #2 guy at position by 9 pts), Broad Jump (by 8 inches), and PSpec (8 pts). Blue dash (also #1 at position), black strength and agility (both closer to blue than black). 57% developed.

However, my 'very good' scout at his position says he is very overrated, but puts his ratings at a gray/orange level somewhere in the vicinity of 15/20. Uber-scrub according to ratings, uber-stud according to combine. Should I pick him?

imdashep 12-20-2010 04:56 PM

Also, his ratings are pretty uniformly low.

BLHF Front Office Football Conscriptor version 1.28.6b in case it works.

DeepPost 12-21-2010 06:13 AM

Gee, this looks familiar, I am anxious to see what everyone thinks. I traded away the pick that could've been used on this guy.

MacroGuru 12-21-2010 09:28 AM

92 Volatility keeps me away from him..

bulletsponge 12-21-2010 10:32 AM

id stay away also unless the draft is weak. if hes there in the 3rd round, go ahead and take a gamble

imdashep 12-21-2010 02:19 PM

The draft is pretty weak. Ended up dealing a future first (~23-28) and 2.23 for him plus a future 3rd (~25-31). We shall see.

Sef0r 12-24-2010 07:00 AM

"pretty weak" is an understatement if the number# 23 ranked player looks like that. What are you going to use him for, because his run stop is non existant for a traditinal MLB, actually for any ILB spot.

wow...who took that Center 1st overall?

RedHawk00 12-24-2010 09:39 AM

mostly i want to know who took the punter at 1.20... very weird indeed

DeepPost 12-24-2010 10:50 AM

AI...

imdashep 12-24-2010 01:02 PM

So wait, I thought everyone was all over combines, saying they are the biggest thing. Now they aren't apparently?

sovereignstar v2 12-24-2010 01:34 PM

Code:

McGrew        Larry        ILB        77        233        1957        Southern California        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        462        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        595        522        492        462        474        577        432        Berkeley, CA        94        6        1        0        0        0        0        0

sovereignstar v2 12-24-2010 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sef0r (Post 2398397)
"pretty weak" is an understatement if the number# 23 ranked player looks like that. What are you going to use him for, because his run stop is non existant for a traditinal MLB, actually for any ILB spot.

wow...who took that Center 1st overall?


His run defense should be fine. :)

Edit: Probably not going enough to stop The Fridge though...

imdashep 12-24-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovereignstar v2 (Post 2398575)
Code:

McGrew        Larry        ILB        77        233        1957        Southern California        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        462        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        375        595        522        492        462        474        577        432        Berkeley, CA        94        6        1        0        0        0        0        0



What is that?

QuikSand 12-24-2010 03:01 PM

I don't have the most experience with "real player" draft files, but I don't think you can take all the research that has been developed to analyze and understand game-generated drafts and just transport it over to apply to hand-made imported files, and expect it all to work perfectly.

What I do know of the "real player" draft files is that they are painfully thin drafts, where the caliber of player you tend to see after the first 50-80 picks is very, very marginal.

Raiders Army 12-25-2010 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 2398609)
I don't have the most experience with "real player" draft files, but I don't think you can take all the research that has been developed to analyze and understand game-generated drafts and just transport it over to apply to hand-made imported files, and expect it all to work perfectly.

What I do know of the "real player" draft files is that they are painfully thin drafts, where the caliber of player you tend to see after the first 50-80 picks is very, very marginal.


Not true at all. I'd have to roll over to my laptop, but there are several hidden gems in the real player drafts as well. Much of it has to do with the AI. A prime example would be QBs. There have been many QBs in my SP career that have been drafted in rounds 5-7 or UFA that have excelled.

QuikSand 12-25-2010 10:24 AM

Certainly agree that the nitwit AI will miss plenty of quality players. Sure.

My point was on this example, clearly a MP league.

Overall if theres any doubt about the notion that these historical draft files are shallower than game generated files, this would be the first I've heard it.

Raiders Army 12-28-2010 08:23 AM

Sorry, mis-read your post. I have little experience with MP and the historical files. I have played many years in SP with the historical files though...probably too many.

imdashep 12-31-2010 12:54 PM

FYI, guy came out 19/23, about where his bars looked, prior to TC.

imdashep 01-03-2011 03:42 PM

19/23 to 21/28. Creeper! :)

DeepPost 01-03-2011 04:53 PM

Yep. My guess: 42/42 when he is unmasked. You need to keep updating this thread as he develops!

imdashep 01-03-2011 06:07 PM

No hope for 70/70 lol?

bighouserulez 01-03-2011 06:45 PM

Yeah i bet you are lucky to get a 40 rated player when all is said and done.

imdashep 02-05-2011 04:05 PM

Just as an update, he finally met his 28/28 potential in week 11, and moved to 29/29 after 12. Stats wise though he has been terrific: 11 games (9 starts), 28 tackles, 11 assists, 5 sacks, 2 interceptions (including one for a TD).

bulletsponge 02-05-2011 06:37 PM

his sacks and picks are nice, but only 28 tackles in 11 games is real low for a ILB

garion333 02-05-2011 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bulletsponge (Post 2420239)
his sacks and picks are nice, but only 28 tackles in 11 games is real low for a ILB


I agree. That many tackles would be more in line with a WLB who blitzes frequently.

MIJB#19 02-06-2011 06:22 AM

All the signs are there that this player has a pretty low run defense bar and the stats so far are supporting that as well.

imdashep 02-06-2011 08:56 AM

Right, I mean, I think the last three posts were fairly obvious. In fairness, most of those 9 starts came in a nickle formation, and he hasn't been playing all that many snaps; gets subbed on a ton of run plays. But still, very happy with his performance so far.

Interesting though that his combines are pretty much irrelevant, and that he is so far meeting his bars.

MIJB#19 02-06-2011 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imdashep (Post 2420376)
Interesting though that his combines are pretty much irrelevant, and that he is so far meeting his bars.

Some of the combine scores still don't match with the bars he's supposed to have, so it's a bit early to draw any decent conclusions. In these circumstances, just go with the stats and then we'll see 5 sacks from a position that usually doesn't produce sacks. This to me says he's got the pass rush stats to do well, or that he's been playing at WLB in a 3-4 quite a lot.

imdashep 02-09-2011 11:03 AM

I run a 4-3, and he's not listed at WLB, so I doubt he plays any 3-4 WLB.

imdashep 04-01-2011 02:14 PM

33 to 34 in second TC. Oh well ;)

imdashep 06-07-2011 03:27 PM

39/39 in FA 1 after his second season

garion333 06-07-2011 07:05 PM

What tackle percentage is he getting?

imdashep 06-08-2011 12:23 PM

1980: 36 tackles, 5 sacks, 3 ints, 7.2%
1981: 74 tackles, 2 sacks, 1 int, 13.5%


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.