Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Celebrity Hot or Not 2.0, Vol. 98: Katherine Heigl (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=84709)

DanGarion 08-18-2012 10:56 AM

Celebrity Hot or Not 2.0, Vol. 98: Katherine Heigl
 
Well Olivia Wilde just barely broke the top ten on a wild ride to 87+%. Someone must think she's hot.

Up next is a woman that many of you may recognize, the first time I remember being graced with her hotness was in the TV show Roswell, and she's still just as hot as I remember. Most recently she was on Grey's Anatomy and has been doing film, Katherine Heigl.


DanGarion 08-18-2012 10:56 AM





DanGarion 08-18-2012 11:06 AM

She hasn't aged great, but she still gets me going.

MrBug708 08-18-2012 11:11 AM


bulletsponge 08-18-2012 11:37 AM

id poke it

Lathum 08-18-2012 11:39 AM

she is very attractive but doesn't do it for me.

Buccaneer 08-18-2012 11:44 AM

More pasty-faced blondes with bozo lipstick. The only picture I liked was the brunette one except for its shortness. Hadn't seen her before, so not.

Suicane75 08-18-2012 11:55 AM

I just bought a tin of tiny blueberry muffins and they all smell good and they're tasty enough but there's about 20 of them, and they're all the same.

Also, she played a woman who was supposed to be better than Seth Rogan and she wasn't very good at it. Think about that shit.

Plus I think she's kind of ugly.

Nice body though.

Izulde 08-18-2012 06:52 PM

True she hasn't aged well, and she was pretty terrible in 27 Dresses, but I'll give her a nostalgic Hot anyway, for solid peak value.

Autumn 08-18-2012 08:00 PM

Finally someone I can vote Not for. I was starting to feel like a sham voting Hot every time.

This is one of those people that's an easy Not vote for me. I know she's not ugly, and given the right picture or the right outfit or whatever, she can look good. But most of the time I don't find her attractive. Her features just are off to me for some reason.

bulletsponge 08-18-2012 08:08 PM

she was so smokin hot in Bride of chucky. but chucky was right, she went downhill fast. still shes hot and has a great body so anyone who says they wouldnt hit it is lying. just duck-tape her mouth shut

cuervo72 08-18-2012 09:57 PM

Yeah, for old times' sake (Under Siege 2).

JonInMiddleGA 08-18-2012 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 2702937)
Her features just are off to me for some reason.


Pretty much sums it up for me too.

RainMaker 08-18-2012 10:43 PM

Years ago yes, but she has never really done it for me. Especially of late.

Desnudo 08-19-2012 07:45 AM

Definitely would, definitely not hot

Eaglesfan27 08-19-2012 08:33 AM

I voted hot for her peak (Roswell.)

M GO BLUE!!! 08-19-2012 10:51 AM

Probably a good idea to avoid these threads in the future when working with all women. The nude could have gone badly. LOL

korme 08-19-2012 10:56 AM

Dude, she is 33 not 53. Weirdos in here waxing nostalgia and talking about how she hasn't aged well.

DanGarion 08-19-2012 11:41 AM

Quote:

Probably a good idea to avoid these threads in the future when working with all women. The nude could have gone badly. LOL
It's art.

DanGarion 08-19-2012 11:42 AM

Quote:

Dude, she is 33 not 53. Weirdos in here waxing nostalgia and talking about how she hasn't aged well.
She just doesn't look as good as she used to...

Buccaneer 08-19-2012 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by korme (Post 2703031)
Dude, she is 33 not 53. Weirdos in here waxing nostalgia and talking about how she hasn't aged well.


Even though I wasn't one of those waxing nostalgia, I know plenty of 50-something (celebrity and nons) that are hotter.

stevew 08-19-2012 02:49 PM

I keep waiting for someone to break down the voting data and assign value to members. For example, if you're one of 15 not votes on an 85% hot chick, you're possible a outlier, etc. Once all that data has been formulated we could then isolate who is possibly just a griefer and/or who is just always a not or hot voter, and then reformulate the rankings based on those in the consensus. Or maybe I'm just a giant dork.

DanGarion 08-19-2012 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2703097)
I keep waiting for someone to break down the voting data and assign value to members. For example, if you're one of 15 not votes on an 85% hot chick, you're possible a outlier, etc. Once all that data has been formulated we could then isolate who is possibly just a griefer and/or who is just always a not or hot voter, and then reformulate the rankings based on those in the consensus. Or maybe I'm just a giant dork.


Someone did put a list of voting together...

DanGarion 08-21-2012 01:21 PM

Wow 50/50. Seems to be waning discussion interest in these threads...

JonInMiddleGA 08-21-2012 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanGarion (Post 2704021)
Wow 50/50. Seems to be waning discussion interest in these threads...


From a discussion standpoint I suspect that the majority has grown weary of the same ol' arguments. But 140 votes is still a good indication of interest in the voting concept itself. I wonder how many threads here on any topic ever get 70, much less 140, individual posters?

DaddyTorgo 08-21-2012 01:54 PM

Wow. I voted "Not" but I didn't imagine she'd end up around 50/50. Yowzers.

Suicane75 08-21-2012 02:58 PM

When is Miley gonna go on? I got plenty to say bout that.

bulletsponge 08-21-2012 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75 (Post 2704072)
When is Miley gonna go on? I got plenty to say bout that.


hopefully never. that fugly chick has to be the ugliest "cute chick" ive ever seen

Suicane75 08-21-2012 03:42 PM

See. The debate is already spirited.

Rizon 08-21-2012 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 2702937)
Finally someone I can vote Not for. I was starting to feel like a sham voting Hot every time.


You vote hot 75% of the time.

Rizon 08-21-2012 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2703097)
I keep waiting for someone to break down the voting data and assign value to members. For example, if you're one of 15 not votes on an 85% hot chick, you're possible a outlier, etc. Once all that data has been formulated we could then isolate who is possibly just a griefer and/or who is just always a not or hot voter, and then reformulate the rankings based on those in the consensus. Or maybe I'm just a giant dork.


I actually have it in an Excel file, all the votes on the top 60 women (except the last 3 or 4 votes).

Haven't figured out how to post it here (googledocs didn't work cause it loses too much formatting)

DaddyTorgo 08-21-2012 03:57 PM

What about me? How often do I vote hot?

Rizon 08-21-2012 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2704097)
What about me? How often do I vote hot?


53.6%

Are you gay??

Rizon 08-21-2012 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rizon (Post 2704098)
53.6%

Are you gay??


Though in your defense you voted 4 hot and 2 not out of the top 10, so maybe you have better taste.

DaddyTorgo 08-21-2012 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rizon (Post 2704098)
53.6%

Are you gay??


Nope.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rizon (Post 2704099)
Though in your defense you voted 4 hot and 2 not out of the top 10, so maybe you have better taste.


Yup. I'm discerning.

Rizon 08-21-2012 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2704102)
Nope.



Yup. I'm discerning.


Were you the guy that dated the midget last year?

Rizon 08-21-2012 04:05 PM

Midgets aside, if anyone knows how I can post the stats here I'll do it. I don't want to redo formatting in googledocs.

DaddyTorgo 08-21-2012 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rizon (Post 2704104)
Were you the guy that dated the midget last year?


Touche. It was years ago, and it was a blind-date setup by my sister with my future brother-in-law's cousin. I had almost forgotten about that though.

Of course I'm probably too discerning - none of the women I've messaged on match.com have gotten back to me, and none of the like...2-3 who messaged me on their own were even remotely attractive to me. But I've started to loosen my standards there a little.

Rizon 08-21-2012 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2704111)
But I've started to loosen my standards there a little.


We'll see. I'll sort your votes by date and see if you're voting hot more often now than you did before.

DaddyTorgo 08-21-2012 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rizon (Post 2704113)
We'll see. I'll sort your votes by date and see if you're voting hot more often now than you did before.


LOL - I meant loosen my standards on match.com, but okay.

Rizon 08-21-2012 04:12 PM

Actually, turns out you voted 50% hot in the last year, 57% before that.

DaddyTorgo 08-21-2012 04:13 PM

Rizon = HoN data-king.

Rizon 08-21-2012 04:15 PM

1 Attachment(s)
...

DaddyTorgo 08-21-2012 04:17 PM

38% of voters vote hot for everything?

That's fucking weak guys...be at least a little discriminating.

britrock88 08-21-2012 04:20 PM

What's my percentage, Rizon? (Though I probably have a small sample size.)

Rizon 08-21-2012 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by britrock88 (Post 2704128)
What's my percentage, Rizon? (Though I probably have a small sample size.)


93.8%

britrock88 08-21-2012 05:12 PM

Sheesh! (In my defense, I tend to abstain a bit instead of voting Not.)

Drake 08-21-2012 05:20 PM

I would have never guessed that Eaglesfan27 was the easiest guy on FOFC.

MCK 08-21-2012 05:56 PM

WOW! I always wanted to be first in something. 18 NOT votes. Guess I'm a picky person.

Raiders Army 08-21-2012 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rizon (Post 2704122)
...


First, that's awesome data crunching and I salute you.

Second, that's a little weird that you do that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.