Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Official 13-14 NHL Regular season thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=87629)

Suburban Rhythm 10-01-2013 11:24 AM

The Official 13-14 NHL Regular season thread
 
Cause it's no longer the offseason

The Jackal 10-01-2013 11:29 AM

Flyers have too many defenseman already and just signed Hal Gill (facepalm) to a 1 year deal .. trade coming?

Suburban Rhythm 10-01-2013 11:32 AM

Leafs extend Phil the Thrill, 8 years/$8m per

The Jackal 10-01-2013 11:35 AM

you should have reposted that GIF in that comment

Suburban Rhythm 10-01-2013 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2860318)
you should have reposted that GIF in that comment


I imagine the Leafs were hovering around $7m, until he pulled this up on his phone


Chief Rum 10-01-2013 11:44 AM

You know, I had frankly forgotten that Patrick Roy was the Avs coach now.

So I have a new reason to hate Colorado again.

Honolulu_Blue 10-01-2013 02:22 PM

I am very excited to have the Wings in the East. It will be great to see so many more games against Boston, Toronto and Montreal. It will also be good to have fewer 10:00/10:30 pm EST starts. Those were brutal.

Things I am interested in seeing:

1. How the Wings handle being in the East

2. How Alfredsson and Weiss perform on the second line.

3. Will the younger players - DeKeyser, Nyquist, Tatar and Andersson - take the next step? (Assuming they're given the opportunity to do so. The Wings have a massive glut of forwards.)

Glad to have hockey back!

DaddyTorgo 10-01-2013 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2860375)
I am very excited to have the Wings in the East. It will be great to see so many more games against Boston, Toronto and Montreal. It will also be good to have fewer 10:00/10:30 pm EST starts. Those were brutal.

Things I am interested in seeing:

1. How the Wings handle being in the East

2. How Alfredsson and Weiss perform on the second line.

3. Will the younger players - DeKeyser, Nyquist, Tatar and Andersson - take the next step? (Assuming they're given the opportunity to do so. The Wings have a massive glut of forwards.)

Glad to have hockey back!


Things I am not looking forward to. Alfredsson on the Wings.
Playing Pavel D. more.
The Wings.

That is all from Boston ;)

The Jackal 10-01-2013 02:38 PM

I'm just glad we got Columbus in the Metropolitan (facepalm) instead of Detroit.

Suburban Rhythm 10-01-2013 02:44 PM

Something on NHL net last night, regarding Columbus (which would hold true for Detroit too).

Last season they played 2% of their road games in the Eastern (ie, their own) time zone. This year that number will be 66%.

Chief Rum 10-01-2013 02:56 PM

I realize I am speaking from a biased perspective, but it is my impression that the "experts" are sleeping on the Ducks, calling last year fluky or just generally not rating them very highly. I beleive that is a mistake.

Hiller and Fasth form one of the best one-two GK combos in the league. Even without Ryan, the Perry-Getzlaf-whoever (probably Penner) line is still one of hockey's best. Cogliano (or a natural RW kiddie forward)-Koivu-Selanne is a strong second line. Tons of developing offensive talent abound on the roster (Etem, Palmieri, Bonino, Holland, Silfverberg). A blueline which will miss Souray's hard shot, but is otherwise very effective with Beauchemin, an improving Fowler, Allen, Lovejoy, well-regarded rookie offensive blueliner Sami Vatanen, and so forth.

There is depth and talent throughout this organization and finishing #2 in the West was no fluke. I'm hoping they prove the experts wrong this season.

The Jackal 10-01-2013 03:03 PM

I think the Ducks have a good shot at finishing in the top 5 out West, a good shot indeed. Probably rate them behind Chicago and St. Louis but after that they're right there with the other solid bunch. Looking at that conference I could definitely see them finishing 3rd.

Honolulu_Blue 10-01-2013 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 2860396)
I realize I am speaking from a biased perspective, but it is my impression that the "experts" are sleeping on the Ducks, calling last year fluky or just generally not rating them very highly. I beleive that is a mistake.

Hiller and Fasth form one of the best one-two GK combos in the league. Even without Ryan, the Perry-Getzlaf-whoever (probably Penner) line is still one of hockey's best. Cogliano (or a natural RW kiddie forward)-Koivu-Selanne is a strong second line. Tons of developing offensive talent abound on the roster (Etem, Palmieri, Bonino, Holland, Silfverberg). A blueline which will miss Souray's hard shot, but is otherwise very effective with Beauchemin, an improving Fowler, Allen, Lovejoy, well-regarded rookie offensive blueliner Sami Vatanen, and so forth.

There is depth and talent throughout this organization and finishing #2 in the West was no fluke. I'm hoping they prove the experts wrong this season.


I think the experts are too focused on the playoffs. I think that they look at Anaheim's first round loss to Detroit and assume there no 2 overall record in the West was a fluke, a product of just being "hot" in a shortened season or something along those lines.

On the other side, I think that a lot of experts think the Wings are better than they are because of what happened in the playoffs. (Though getting knocked out in the second round isn't that impressive.) The Wings were very much a bubble team all year last year. They had to win their last 4 games just to squeak into the playoffs.

Going into the season the top teams in the West seem to be: Chicago, Los Angeles, St. Louis and San Jose. I think Anaheim is right up there with most of those teams.

Suburban Rhythm 10-01-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2860402)
I think the experts are too focused on the playoffs. I think that they look at Anaheim's first round loss to Detroit and assume there no 2 overall record in the West was a fluke, a product of just being "hot" in a shortened season or something along those lines.

On the other side, I think that a lot of experts think the Wings are better than they are because of what happened in the playoffs. (Though getting knocked out in the second round isn't that impressive.) The Wings were very much a bubble team all year last year. They had to win their last 4 games just to squeak into the playoffs.

Going into the season the top teams in the West seem to be: Chicago, Los Angeles, St. Louis and San Jose. I think Anaheim is right up there with most of those teams.


I disagree. Because I see plenty of experts picking the Pens as the winner of the Metro, but barely anyone having them come out of the East in the playoffs. And that's a 100% legit stance.

claphamsa 10-01-2013 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860316)
Leafs extend Phil the Thrill, 8 years/$8m per


thats... obscene.

buck says in 3 years his contract goes for ovechkins contract and both teams hope these guys retire early!

chadritt 10-01-2013 08:36 PM

What is a "protective equipment" penalty? I can't see the game, i can only look at espns box score.

claphamsa 10-01-2013 08:41 PM

when you are wearing a helmet and you fight its an extra 2 min...

The Jackal 10-01-2013 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by claphamsa (Post 2860510)
when you are wearing a helmet and you fight its an extra 2 min...


no i don't think that's in effect, just something being discussed. protective equipment penalty is what they are calling the untucked jersey, i think

Suburban Rhythm 10-01-2013 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by claphamsa (Post 2860510)
when you are wearing a helmet and you fight its an extra 2 min...


I think it's the visor, since you're not allowed to remove your helmet before a fight.

Unless the call is for removing?

The Jackal 10-01-2013 08:47 PM

i was watching that fight and they both took their helmets off, but i didn't have volume on so i didn't hear about the penalty

The Jackal 10-01-2013 08:47 PM

haha, so maybe they both got called for removing their helmets?

The Jackal 10-01-2013 08:48 PM

in sad news, did anyone see what just happened to parros? got pulled down by the jersey as orr was going to the ice after a fight and slammed his face into the ice hard - bloody chin, tried to stand up with the help of three people and couldn't - stretchered off. scary sight.

Suburban Rhythm 10-01-2013 08:48 PM

DOLA

Watching Pirates game, but apparently Parros fell at end of fight with Orr, and head hit the ice. Taken off on stretcher.

bbor 10-01-2013 08:56 PM

Removal of your helmet during a fight is an automatic 2 minutes penalty

JPhillips 10-01-2013 10:01 PM

I sure am glad the Caps gave away their top rated prospect for a guy that's now on the fourth line.

BishopMVP 10-02-2013 01:24 AM

I fully anticipate doing at least 3 double takes in the next month when people tell me they're going to a Bruins game, then start to pay attention in January when the Patriots lose... only to realize the Bruins either have a playoff spot pretty much locked up, or are one of 7 teams within 3 points of the #5 seed due to the shootout/OTL system, and check out again until the trade deadline.

Ryan S 10-02-2013 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860513)
I think it's the visor, since you're not allowed to remove your helmet before a fight.

Unless the call is for removing?


I think that you get 2 minutes for removing your helmet in a fight.

They removed the 2 minutes for fighting with a visor when they made visors mandatory.

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 04:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryan S (Post 2860586)
I think that you get 2 minutes for removing your helmet in a fight.

They removed the 2 minutes for fighting with a visor when they made visors mandatory.


Visors aren't mandatory....yet.

The Jackal 10-02-2013 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860592)
Visors aren't mandatory....yet.


Visors are mandatory for new players, aren't they? Just not grandfathered?

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2860598)
Visors are mandatory for new players, aren't they? Just not grandfathered?


Yeah, bad wording on my part. It will be probably 10 years before they are required for all players at this point.

Fidatelo 10-02-2013 07:42 AM

It's only 1 game, but Trouba looked great last night. I think Chevy found a real gem there. Scheifele also looks like he truly belongs in the NHL this year. I'm sure they will both have their struggles at times this year, but I'm pretty stoked about their futures.

Dr. Sak 10-02-2013 11:45 AM

Vokoun out 3 to 6 months....







:popcorn:

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 11:47 AM

You forget this picture, regularly seen in late April and into May



;)

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 11:48 AM

DOLA

I have zero expectations. Fleury won't be the problem from October-April. He'll be fine. They'll be a playoff team.

After that...again, zero expectations.

Dr. Sak 10-02-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860781)
You forget this picture, regularly seen in late April and into May



;)


Yeah that's the faulty club from a Pittsburgh Manufacturer. But on the bright side, he had as many points as Sid and Malkin did in the ECF last year!

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 11:58 AM

Holmgren knows Hal Gill isn't a goalie, right?

Dr. Sak 10-02-2013 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860793)
Holmgren knows Hal Gill isn't a goalie, right?


Yes but he thinks that since he plays like a big orange cone, he can just park him in front of the net. It's part of his new age thinking.

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2860797)
Yes but he thinks that since he plays like a big orange cone, he can just park him in front of the net. It's part of his new age thinking.


Orange cones will come in handy for rehab skates for Lecavalier and Streit

The Jackal 10-02-2013 12:12 PM

I have no rebuttal, I've been making Hal Gill jokes for years...

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2860802)
I have no rebuttal, I've been making Hal Gill jokes for years...


It just doesn't make sense. He can be slow and get away with holding in the playoffs.

So why sign in Philly?

:p

Dr. Sak 10-02-2013 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860799)
Orange cones will come in handy for rehab skates for Lecavalier and Streit


Or to play the 3rd and 4th line for you guys since you paid your stars so much money. :p

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2860831)
Or to play the 3rd and 4th line for you guys since you paid your stars so much money. :p


Those orange cones will have little trouble getting in Hartnell's way and causing him to fall.

Dr. Sak 10-02-2013 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860842)
Those orange cones will have little trouble getting in Hartnell's way and causing him to fall.


What? He can't hear you...


The Jackal 10-02-2013 01:07 PM

Well done, Dr. Sak

Suburban Rhythm 10-02-2013 01:10 PM

I'm on at work, so can't see....by guessing it him with Cy Clark (Malkamania guy).

Too lazy to look on my phone

The Jackal 10-02-2013 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860855)
I'm on at work, so can't see....by guessing it him with Cy Clark (Malkamania guy).

Too lazy to look on my phone


Correct

Ryan S 10-02-2013 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2860592)
Visors aren't mandatory....yet.


They are mandatory for anyone with less than 25 games experience.

Hybrid icing tops list of NHL rule changes for 2013-14 season - NHL.com - News

Quote:

All players with fewer than 25 games of NHL experience are now required to wear a visor. As a result, the additional unsportsmanlike penalty for instigating a fight while wearing a visor has been deleted from the rule book.

Ajaxab 10-02-2013 11:22 PM

Good to see Patrick Roy bringing his unique brand of lunacy back to the NHL...it's game 1 Patty! Calm down!

Vince, Pt. II 10-03-2013 01:22 AM

And in a 6-1 win for his team, on top of that. Jeez, Roy.

Honolulu_Blue 10-03-2013 08:12 AM

I love it! Go Patty Roy! His presence and some of the talent upfront makes a once very, very dull Colorado team brimming with possible excitement.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.