:Rolleyes:
 

I normally wouldn't do this, but this just utterly disgusted me. I just got the following PM.OK. I wasn't really taken aback by this too much until I did a little research? Anyone want to take ONE guess at who has a perfect IP match for this PM??? :rolleyes:

Uhm...........

Kevin from Dell!

jesus?

By the way Dog, I think you are wanted in the Forum Necromancer thread. :)

oh...ok...i'll stick my nose in there

Matthjis? Darkiller?

ONE guess. ;)

I will pick M (IJ) B since its been awhile since I have seen DK around here.

HM?

me? ;)

nope. :D

I assume that jesus was an incorrect answer?

yes, incorrect.

Jim?

LOL!

Tony?

Mrs. Kippy?

Ryan S? It has got to be Ryan S!

My last guess shouldnt count since SD influenced it with that little winky thing in the post before mine. So...

Was it Bob?

Dang! I was sure it was Jesus...

Elvis?

well, it would explain why he doesn't post here:p

He does have the "Solecismic" account though, right?

I bet you PMed yourself to throw us off.

(is there a moderator-trust anything like the narrative-trust mentioned in that Identity thread?) :)

Calzone?

Shouldn't this and the "cure for stinky farts?" thread be morphed into one thread?

One of the wigs?

Why do people even bother when they know that you can check IP's?

MY WIFE !!:confused:

(imitation of Jim Carey in Liar Liar) It was MEEEEEE!!!!!

:D

It was Erik Flamebeard of the Neither Here Nor There.

Kirby Puckett?

Nice. I still dig that name.

Well, liberals tend to put emotion before logic, and I guess he was SO traumatized by reading that message that his emotions just overcame him.

"Well, liberals tend to put emotion before logic, and I guess he was SO traumatized by reading that message that his emotions just overcame him."

In keeping with the idea behind the title, my only response will be:

:rolleyes:

Nice generalization there SD. Guess that just proves conservatives are all unfeeling, cold bastards right?

"Nice generalization there SD. Guess that just proves conservatives are all unfeeling, cold bastards right?"

No, it just proves that they can't think outside the bounds of overly simplistic generalizations.

Who was it?

I heart Sabotai.

Based on SD's hint, I'll go with Darkiller.

...and kcchief wins the prize.

"think outside the bounds...."

Hmmmm....ironic that he is trying to make the generalization that I can't think outside the bounds of overly simplistic generalizations by using a sample size of one...

See, that's the whole problem with generalizations - they are bound to ruffle the feathers of those unfairly tarred.

For example, I could say that Asians are bad drivers (and I do observe a lot of bad drivers that are Asian), but for the many Asians that aren't bad drivers my statement would be offensive. They would rightfully point out that there are bad drivers in every racial category.

I think you're fairly open-minded SD, but you have to expect that when you make a generalization based on politics that you're going to be called on it by those that don't agree with your statement.

Fritz?

"Hmmmm....ironic that he is trying to make the generalization that I can't think outside the bounds of overly simplistic generalizations by using a sample size of one..."

It's a generalization when I am making a statement about one person? Sounds like I'm making a specificization. :D

:D

SD: You do tend to take jabs at Democrats about as often as I jab at the Cowboys - you seem especially inclined to stab at people who crushed George Bush in Presidential elections... :D

I was going to guess Dave Dial.