04-19-2006, 08:05 PM
|
#891
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade6119
Not in my mind, but if you make your assumptions about your own innocence then sure. I admit whatever you want. What other meaningless points do you want me to concede, becuase im happy to.
|
I'm glad that you finally conceded that you have a bad voting record. In that case, I would refer you to what set you off:
Post #665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiders Army
Okay. I'm gonna have to go with a silent conversion here. Damn.
Based on voting patterns, these are my prime suspects at this point:
1. JeeberD, voted twice for a known scientist (Day 2 both votes)
2a and b. Coffee Warlord and Blade 6119, voted for a known scientist (Day 2 2nd vote)
None of the above voted for saldana on day 2.
Next tier is:
4. tanglewood, voted for a known scientist and not sure if his vote counted towards saldana since it was late (at that point, it didn't matter)
5a,b, & c. mckerney, hoopsguy, and Barkeep49, voted for scientists and for saldana
Unknowns: st. cronin, Swaggs, Anxiety, WVUFan. From their votes, we don't know what they voted for.
Possible good guy: path12, voted for saldana, didn't vote for a known scientist
|
So you flew off the handle on a post that said you had a bad voting record, which you admit. Thanks. I can go to sleep now.
|
|
|