Front Office Football Central - View Single Post - WW small game: James Bond

path12 · 12-20-2006, 10:27 AM

Fouts, I'm surprised at your vote. I thought you had a better read on the situation than that.

If you are bad, then I have been played and hat's off to you. But I am taking the stand you are good.

I am also taking the stand that Blade is bad. I believe there are massive holes in DT's reveal, but in the absence of a credible 007 coming out I will have to reconsider.

So what I have then is:

Good:
Fouts
path

Bad:
Blade

Lean bad:
DT

That leaves Chief and LSG. One good, one bad -- or in the event that DT really is 007, then we have Goldfinger and Oddjob right there. I agree that Blade is Galore and I place no credence in anything he says right now.

Good tight game, Alan.

12-20-2006, 10:27 AM	#455
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	Fouts, I'm surprised at your vote. I thought you had a better read on the situation than that. If you are bad, then I have been played and hat's off to you. But I am taking the stand you are good. I am also taking the stand that Blade is bad. I believe there are massive holes in DT's reveal, but in the absence of a credible 007 coming out I will have to reconsider. So what I have then is: Good: Fouts path Bad: Blade Lean bad: DT That leaves Chief and LSG. One good, one bad -- or in the event that DT really is 007, then we have Goldfinger and Oddjob right there. I agree that Blade is Galore and I place no credence in anything he says right now. Good tight game, Alan. __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia.