Quote:
Originally Posted by JPhillips
Buc: I'll admit I'm much more inclined to support Democrats, but at the end of the day I'm much more concerned about policy. The strategies and tactics of campaigns interests me in the same way sporting events do, but just electing any Democrat over any Republican or third party candidate doesn't interest me. My policy preferences will almost always be more likely under a Democratic leadership, but more Democrats won't necessarily lead to what is IMO better policy. Personally, I'd argue I'm much more ideological than partisan, but YMMV.
Your problem is that you can't see anything said by a liberal as honest. From what you typed above we have the exact same view of the WH press operation, yet you're honest and I'm somehow lying. That says more about your biases than mine.
|
But I sense a subtle difference. You tend to sweep stuff like this under a rug (i.e., not being importance) instead of calling Gibbs a douchebag directly, as you did McClellan. I wasn't claiming to be honest, just a generalized cheap shot against all WH PS. But as we have said before, you and I do view this as a sporting event except that I do not want the spoils belong to any victors.