Quote:
Originally Posted by GrantDawg
a. Not angry, only explaining.
b. It is not a matter of "getting the facts." There were a number of kids that started many of the stories that weren't in the room where the supposed story happened. Are you saying they saw through walls?
|
No, no; what I’m saying is that it’s probably not fair to consider it lying. Even if the kid was clearly not where he says he was, or saw what he says he saw. The human brain struggles when it is shown something that has no explanation, it will try to construct a feasible scenario to explain it. It’s probably semantics, but if the kid completely believes that is what they saw, I don’t think you can accuse them of lying.