Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan
Agreed. As I said, anything is better than the current setup. The Pac 10 agreement is probably the best way to save the conference.
ISU and KSU makes perfect sense because it's not an in-state rivalry and it's a location between the two schools. Same reason that MU/KU makes perfect sense. Those examples have no relevance to the KU/KSU played at Arrowhead example. It makes absolutely zero sense to take a game between in-state rivals and play it off-campus in a different state.
|
I agree regarding the Pac 10 and Big 12. The nice thing about that agreement is it would decrease some of that power in Texas and spread it along the west coast. Texas is still an important part of the equation, but then they aren't the only part of the equation like they are currently in the Big 12.
I disagree regarding ISU vs KSU. They played in front of 40,000 fans (80,000 capacity). That was an awful idea aside from the guaranteed money. The KU vs KSU game would likely be a sellout at Arrowhead and would command similar money to KU and MU. With Snyder in charge again though I highly doubt you'll see KU play KSU at Arrowhead any time soon.