View Single Post
Old 05-18-2010, 10:15 PM   #845
Swaggs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by sooner333 View Post
One thing is that while the Big 10 Network's subscriber base may increase (or, more specifically, the fees per subscriber in the new markets), I can't see ESPN's contract going up proportionally with the new teams. I don't see Nebraska, Missouri, and three Big East teams making the deal worth that much more--even with a championship game. This is why I think it's probably more like the Big Ten expands by one (Notre Dame first, then pick one second) than by five.

Kind of a mixed bag of thoughts. Delaney sort of indicated that a conference championship is not a vital aspect of expansion (although he didn't shoot it down, either), but it is hard to figure out how expansion is a slam dunk for the Big Ten without adding Notre Dame or Texas. I think adding any of the discussed teams and getting to 12 w/ a championship probably pays for itself without diluting things and maybe going to 14, if Nebraska (one of the better national brand name teams), works. Although, I think there is some risk in 14 w/o Notre Dame or Texas.
__________________
DOWN WITH HATTRICK!!!
The RWBL
Are you reading In The Bleachers?
Swaggs is offline   Reply With Quote